The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

Jun 21, 2013 8:53 PM

Pete Daoust

OK…..

I go to the bank to BORROW money

I say I need 100k

They say, yes no problem.. :D

They CREATE a brand spanking new 100k, and this brand spanking new creation come from MY SIGNATURE.

They send this BRAND SPANKING NEW 100k that was just created by ME to the guy who I buy the thing from.

The bank NEVER had this money BEFORE.

I gave back to the bank this 100k, in form of FIDUCIARY MONEY, that I’ve earned with my TIME.

I also give to the bank INTEREST so they can get paid for this service. I HONOR this contract until it ends.

I go back to the bank to get the 100k (capital) that was created by ME.

The bank have two choices, they give me this 100k, which belongs to me, because I've created it, or, they show me a proof of where this money came from in the first place…..

I’m I not too bad here ? :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 232
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 232 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 129

Chad Brodgesell

Chances are the "" Application "" is not as the GRANTEE but rather the GRANTOR. The approve your Full Faith and Credit and convert it to those Digital or plastic bills then tell you that you have been approved for the loan which is PRINCIPLE and INTEREST plus some timed addition fees. Now you always deal with them as the GRANTEE showing up with the papers of the GRANTEE. But you never show up as the GRANTOR and ORIGINAL documentation to collect YOUR PRINCIPAL that has been converted and given back to the bank to return to the GRANTOR minus the INTEREST and other fees. The bank is there to CONVERT your Full Faith and Credit into some thing that an be used. They keep the PRINCIPAL since the GRANTOR has not claimed it.

Have you EVER noticed that they ALWAYS want the Interest first? It's like they don't even care about the PRINCIPAL.

This is MY understanding of how it works. There are SOME occasions where OTHER peoples real money is used in which case you really ARE borrowing from some one else though. This is just my understanding.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 233
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 233 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

Don't pay the kunts pete. It's your money not theirs. They've already on sold your alleged DEBT to another party for around eighty cents on the dollar. Fraud, Theft, Theft by deception......ASK THEM FOR THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT......OOOPPSS. ...WE HAVE A PROBLEM. CONTRACT IS NULL & VOID.

Chad Brodgesell

Pete Daoust they didn't create anything, they 'Converted' your signature, which represents your full faith and credit . If they could create it they wouldn't need you. I hope I don't start to feel a tingling sensation.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 234
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 234 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

OK...now the CONTRACT is OVER....ended and I HONOURED it to the end....

So I have to go to the bank to get MY 100k I tell them, HI, how are you today ? I'm here to take what's mine The 100k that has been created with MY signature You've got YOUR share, which is the INTEREST So please cut me a certified check for MY share.

Or show me that instrument that says you've got the 100k from another PERSON to land it to me. :D

Thank you and have a great day !!!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 234
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 234 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Johansen

well, the application IS the contract. go get a copy of the application. i tried, they said they do it on the computer, i said it has to be printed and signed right? so let me review a copy of one... the bank denied me that opportunity.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 235
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 235 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Johansen

totally surprised i have an account with that bank out of spain and they didnt try liening it for repayment. yes i screwed them pete. YOU are not qualified to even remotely try to play the part of scott duncan ! ...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 235
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 235 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

If you have a contract with ANOTHER person, and they REFUSE to give a copy of it, you DON'T have a contract....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 236 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 236 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

To Chad Brodgesell, There are SOME occasions where OTHER peoples real money is used in which case you really ARE borrowing from some one else though.: If this is the case, they HAVE a proof of that, and they NEED to show it to you....and if they show it to you, well it's ok......but their DUTY is to show it to you...period.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 236
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 236 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

DISBURSEMENT. Literally, to take money out of a purse. Figuratively, to pay out money; to expend money; and sometimes it signifies to advance money. 2. A master of a ship makes disbursements, whether with his own money or that of the owner, when he defrays expenses for the ship. 3. An executor, guardian, trustee, or other accountant, is said to have made disbursements when he expended money on account of the estate which he holds. These, when properly made, are always allowed in the settlement of the accounts.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 236 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 236 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Pete Daoust

You want to see the ORIGINAL Disbursement....if they can't show it to you, they are cooked :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 237 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 237 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

There is 322 members in this group, if 10% gets it, and share this info with 2 of there friends, and so on, alla the guy with a dick in his mouth style, in three months, these banksters will be RREEAAAAALLYYYY pissed off, they will have to cut their yearly bonuses of at least 50%.... :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 237
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 237 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

And learn to read posts completely as it leads to confusion at a later time. I say this from experience.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 237 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 237 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Chad Brodgesell

Some productive discussion as to the mechanics, language and references as to the learning of the law be it by means of questions as to the content or answers even if cryptic to a common man such as myself so that I may become more knowledgeable in the field of law. Does that answer your question? Sorry for it being a really long ass sentence.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 238
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 238 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

Again......predictable. I never said it wasn't. Please show me where I explicitly said it wasn't. All I have mentioned is the misuse of words. And I would gladly accept being corrected. I am not here to boost my ego but rather to learn These....."conversations"....with you are great! They force me to analyze what people say and make me look at my responses. Since being allowed to join this group I have increased all my abilities in communication. You....have been of great assistance in this. I thank you very much Pete Daoust.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 238
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 238 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Hey Chad Brodgesell, if we would be in the same room, LIVE, I would grab you by the hair, and shake the fuck out of you, just to shake you a bit, and hug you so fucking hard....... HAHAHAHA!!!!..... I know what you mean Chad, I know it so well.....I love you man !!!...you have no idea,,...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 238 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 238 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Stuart Stone

To wander back on topic re the signature: From Bills of Exchange Act (it's a different number in the Act in UK, Australia, Canada & New Zealand), but it's in ALL of them that I have checked:

Presumption of value and good faith: (1) Every party whose signature appears on a bill is prima facie deemed to have become a party thereto for value.

So, if there's only one signature, then there's only one party there to for value.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 239
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 239 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

I don't have my original application, that got spirited away, but I wrote a letter like this, attached to my bill:

On or about 7 May 2004, I signed a valuable security, with face value “XXXXXX.00 and deposited same to you, creating a trust and or credit relationship, in which you impliedly or explicitly agreed to act as trustee and or deposit my creditor’s deposit/valuable security accordingly. At or around the time of me entrusting this valuable security to you, you opened a customer account, Account number YYYYYYYYYY. The security offered by the customer as collateral in relation to this account was the property known as (address of property).

It is my understanding that, as of 1 September 2010, this customer account has since been settled and or discharged and or closed, thus ending any business relationship between you and the customer. However, at the end of this business relationship between you and the customer, the original valuable security has not been returned to me. Consequently, please find attached an invoice for “XXXXXX0.00, being the face value of the valuable security deposited to you on or about 7 May 2004. As per the instructions in the invoice, please deposit said amount into the nominated account by cheque or electronic funds transfer, within 30 days of the date of the invoice...

As the saying goes: Send them a bill Send them a statement Send them a fault & default notice Get an ex parte order against them

And the missing bit....Kaching!!

I've sent the bill....and will let you know how the rest of the process goes :-)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 239
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 239 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

Stuart Stone a question. If you are the only signatory to a document, can you revoke it at any time in the future? Since I figure that your signature is the only element giving the document force and effect.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 240
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 240 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

I'm currently looking into that Chad Brodgesell, because with my application/credit agreement/Bill of Exchange, (and as far as I can tell, this holds true for most/all credit agreements) I signed a power of attorney for the lending institution, which is what enables them to create a promissory note using my signature & filling in the details (Bills of Exchange Act Inchoate instrument).

This is the step in the process that enables the institution to act as a trustee on behalf of the credit provider (you act in this capacity when you sign the original application) & lend to you in the role as customer when you sign the loan agreement.

Searching through my own mortgage agreements, every term such as grantor, lender, customer, trustee etc are all defined, but the one term mentioned but not defined, is the credit provider....and they sidestep answering that question.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 240
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 240 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

Pete Daoust, let me make this perfectly clear to you...or any one else for that matter. I DO NOT GET most of what you post. I am still trying to decipher posts you and others have made MONTHS ago, Call me stupid, call me a grandmother, call me dumb or ignorant. Have at it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 241 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 241 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Chad Brodgesell

See, this is what I mean. JOKING? About what? How can I look you in the eye when your telling me to look at a picture? Do you ever say the entirety of what you are trying to say in one or two posts? This is what I think happens when you go to court. After the judge asks some questions and you ask some questions and he tells you things and you tell him things the judge turns to you and the crown counsel and dismisses the case as he doesn't't want to have to deal with it anymore.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 242
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 242 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Agreed Pierre.....If we have agreed to the terms of the contract, then if we breach it, we deserve the consequences....however if the credit provider forgives the debt, then the customer only needs to pay the administration fees etc to the trustee for them providing their services of converting the signature into money of account

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 242
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 242 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

DISBURSEMENT. Literally, to take money out of a purse. Figuratively, to pay out money; to expend money; and sometimes it signifies to advance money. 2. A master of a ship makes disbursements, whether with his own money or that of the owner, when he defrays expenses for the ship. 3. An executor, guardian, trustee, or other accountant, is said to have made disbursements when he expended money on account of the estate which he holds. These, when properly made, are always allowed in the settlement of the accounts.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 242
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 242 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

I'm not sure if there are meant to be some cryptic references re the bass players here Pete Daoust, but the last two clips especially are just 2 examples of awesome tunes... Blake Gardner may be a better person to talk musical references with cos if I'm not mistaken, this is him on guitar :D http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcJAPnCCnKo

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 244
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 244 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

Blake Gardner, you sneaky kunt.....I never knew...jaw drop....fiona Horne always gave me a HORN....DEF-FX...I NEVER....FUCK....I LOVED THEM DUDES....I SEEN THEM LIVE WHEN THEY FIRST STARTED OUT DOWN IN BRUNSWICK STREET MELBOURNE....& here we are........WOOHOO...

Tara Duncan

" Tara Duncan, would you please leave him 5 minutes ???" Leave him in 5 minutes, or for 5 minutes? If you're renovating, repairing property, creating and maintaining networks...5 minutes is a luxury. It's funny how we only miss things when they're not there. Hang in there Pierre...he can't be occupied forever.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 246
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 246 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top