The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

Jun 15, 2013 6:10 PM

Derek Moran

Adam Thomas explains how REAL REMEDY lies with the Bills of Exchange Act and AMENDING the ORDERS of Judges/Justices with it- thread. . . . . :)

Adam Thomas: Fuck the magna carta... June 1 at 10:13am

Adam Thomas: Bills of Exchange is where REal REmedy lays.... ORDERS from JUDGES....AMENDABLE INSTRUMENTS

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 866
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 866 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 673

Adam Thomas

TWO WORDS ; NON-AMENDABLE !! IF IM TALKING SHIT THE CAPTAIN CAN & WILL KICK MY ASS OUT. Fucked if I know how to put anything but dog shit on this thread. I'm computer illiterate. I can download good porn though if that helps ;-)

Derek Moran

Ok, NON-AMENDABLE. So just to clarify Adam, cuz i admit this is an area im unaware about also. So what, you would ask the Judge for this 'ORDER/BoE' he's just issued against you, get the actual ORDER/piece-of-paper in your hands, you whip-out one of these 'stamps' you say you have- lets say the one that says NON-AMENDABLE on it, 'stamp' on the ORDER 'NON-AMENDABLE', then hand it back to the court basically saying- "...how you like them apples?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xcY0-dscn0

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 866
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 866 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Phillip Prater

If that were the case Derek Moran, It would seem as though BEFORE you stamp it, it IS amendable. It would seem that you just amend it add some shit like.. "as payment for said time and effort (name) under full commercial liability will pay me $$ in gold or bitcoins." stamp it non-amendable. is this an option?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 866 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 866 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Derek Moran

Right, thats what im getting at. You get the ORDER, you stamp it NON-AMENDABLE, now what- it would seem like you have hand-cuffed yourself...theres gotta be a step in-between here im missing

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 867
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 867 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Phillip Prater

ok. if you add in " upon presentment of proof that ... sky is not blue, water is not wet, or whatever.... non-amendable. if not.. no meeting of the minds no valuable consideration, no contract?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 867
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 867 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

whoops, on second thought...

NO CONTRACT VOID NON-AMENDABLE NON-NEGOTIABLE

..if i had 6 lines on this stamp, what would be the best two other 'statements' i could make to fill-up the other 2 lines?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 867
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 867 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Phillip Prater

if it is amendable before, put your conditions on it. If you void it does it not put you in dishonor? if you use a condition they can not fill, is this not the honorable thing to do?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 867
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 867 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Here in Canada Phillip, the last line for the definition of a CROWN CHARGE is: "...by virtue of any contract." However, quite often there IS no contract to begin with. So, i ask you...who is in DISHONOUR first? ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 867
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 867 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Phillip Prater

It seems to me that you then, also step into dishonor and two wongs doesn't make a white.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 867 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 867 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Phillip Prater

I would like to say I don't know shit, really, about this and in an effort to close any loop holes and for my better understanding, I ask these questions. Forgive me if I have made a shit stain.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 868
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 868 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

Derek Moran, do not put NON AMENDABLE ON THE ORDER/BoE. Theres no need for it. NON-NEGOTIABLE NON-TEANSFERRABLE WITHOUT RECOURSE. FUCKING FINISHED. INCHOATE INSTRUMENT RETURNED COMPLETE. THE END.THE BUCK STOPS HERE.

Adam Thomas

Non-TRANSFERRABLE meaning they can't go & attach some other piece of shit like a fine or whatever to the instrument, penalties, etc or can they send it to debt collector to transfwr the contract off to a 3rd or 4th party. No Recourse. Tgey can't fucking touch you.period.

Adam Thomas

Its just a fucking OFFER that you've honoured lawfully using their laws/acts. Remember to initial all amendments & give it valuable consideration with the $one dollar stamp & 5cent stamp RUBBER STAMPED ACROSS IT; STAMP DUTY PAID & SIGNATURE IT OUT AS YOU'VE CREATED JOINDER FOR THE CROWN TO NOW ACT UPON THEIR LAWS. CHECKMATE KUNTS.

Adam Thomas

Derek Moran, once I learn how to post the information on my fone I'll be doing it just for you my friend as you actually do give great value to this group & I slso give ye great value too mate. Derek Hill........choke on it ye muppet.

Adam Thomas

Hey Derek Hill. I'm not your crash test dummy kunt. I walk the walk for me kunt. You can't even talk it yet kunt so shut your fucking loud mouth septic tank or I promise you this kunt I fucking WILL COME ALL THE WAY TO GODAMN MERIKA & KICK YOUR LIMP WRISTED YANKEE ASS. THAT I FUCKING PROMISE YOU KUNT. SHUT YOUR FUCKING MOUTH NOW YANKEE BOY OR I WILL SHUT IT FOR YOU. I FUCKING PROMISE KUNT. P.S. EST SHIT YOU BRAIN DEAD TARD.

Adam Thomas

Oh Derek Hill. Here's a simple question for you. Have you actually tried amendind the family law court orders in regards to access to your child?? Look for these two simple words on the order please. NON AMENDABLE. NOW START V WALKING IT KUNT. THERES YOUR FUCKING REMEDY. THANKS. YOU'RE WELCOME MATE. ANY FUCKIN TIME KUNT. CHEERS

Adam Thomas

Even if you have had the order for a year them kunts have to prove that you've had it & guess what I'd be saying to them kunts?? It was sitting unopened in a pile of unopened letters. I opened it a day ago. SETTLE IT. FINISH IT. COMPLETE IT.

Adam Thomas

I hooe that's dumb down enough for the captain chicken heart Derek hill who's a really dumb kunt so if he can read his child custody order & actually LOOK for those two simple words NON AMENDABLE then he might actually learn something. If not then there is no hope for stupid dumb kunts like Derek hill, who justs runs his chicken hearted mouth off but don't actually want to do it himself. What have you got to lose Derek hill?? Them kunts have already taken your child away from you, what else can they possibly do to ye ?? What can "YOU DEREK HILL," now do to them ?? Do it you weak kunt. DO IT FOR YOUR BOY OR FUCK OFF YOU WEAK DOG !!

Adam Thomas

Derek hill, wants REMEDY to see his boy. I've shown him where the REMEDY is. But because he's such a chicken heart he won't do it because he's shit scared & would prefer that I do it for him when he now knows he can do it himself. ...bok-ek...bok-ek....

Adam Thomas

Can I put a loaded gun to your head please Derek Hill?? I'm just thinking of what your beautiful little boy is up against growing up without his father. The chances of him ending up in club buggery with a cell mate called BUBBA who's a mummy &/OR Daddy. Would you Derek hill like to know see how much of an expert criminal he WILL become because "YOU" WEREN'T THERE FOR HIM AS A CHILD !!!

Adam Thomas

Derek Hill, you're boy is up against a beating to nothing because of "YOU". KUNT. YOU FUCKIN WEAK KUNT !! B A N G KUNT. I JUST PULLED THE TRIGGER. What's going on?? There's no brains in Derek hills head......WHERE S ALL THE BRAINS....I CAN'T SEE ANY BRAINS..........ZOMBIES?? NEGATIVE ON ZOMBIES..... Even zombies can't eat your brains.....fuck me you're one brain dead muthafucka....

Derek Moran

" Personal message me Derek hill & I WILL TALK YE THROUGH THE PROCESS OF FINALISING THE INCHOATE INSTRUMENT/ORDER." - i see you are BONDING with Derek Hill here, Adam- how bout walking us ALL through it, so we can learn what you're getting at step-by-step...this is your chance to channel your 'INNER-SCOTT' ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 868
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 868 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Lets say you are JUDGE/JUSTICE Adam Thomas. Judge Thomas has just issued an ORDER against Derek Hill. But Judge Thomas is sitting on the bench laughing to himself thinking- "This ORDER i just issued actually is an INCHOATE INSTRUMENT. But none of these dumb-mutherfuckers in this courtroom knows that, let alone probably knows what an Order IS, let alone knows WHY the Order i just issued is INCHOATE..."

SO, Judge Thomas. . . .what is it exactly about the Order that you just issued, that still makes it an INCHOATE INSTRUMENT?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 869
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 869 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

Hahahahahahahaha.....I'm flattered to even be mentioned in the same sentence as the Cap'n. ...blush......but I'm a dumb kunt according to Derek hill. WHERE THE FUCK IS THE KUNT FIRST. GET HIS ARSE HERE. WHERE S MY CABIN BOY??

Derek Moran

Exception, Judge Thomas! At no point did Derek Hill call AND/OR imply you were a dumb kunt. He simply questioned whether or not you were "bullshitting." You have made a FALSE CLAIM Judge Thomas, you are familiar with the RULES of RECUSAL? Derek Hill is entitled to remedy. Perhaps a detailed walk-through for the courtroom on your skill in this area would be enough to discharge/settle this matter? ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 869
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 869 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Ok, Judge Thomas has bad-eyesight - gotcha. So lets say I AM Derek Hill. Judge Thomas has handed to me his ORDER issued to me. The first thing i will do- is to whip-out my 'stamp,' stamp it NON-NEGOTIABLE. Then, i INdorse the BACK of the INSTRUMENT. Hand it back to Judge Thomas, and then go home and drop some acid? Thats it?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 869 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 869 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Pete Daoust

OK... I signed the Front: RECEIVED BY:___________________ Stamp the front with a : NON-NEGOTIABLE rubber stamp I put a $1 postal stamp on the front

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 870 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 870 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Derek Moran

on the front, stamp that reads:

BILLS OF EXCHANGE ACT NON-NEGOTIABLE NON-TRANSFERRABLE WITHOUT RECOURSE

stamp #2: RECEIVED BY:____(signature)____

stamp #3: DATE:___________

..and NO signature INdorsing anything on the back

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 871
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 871 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Phillip Prater

Phillip Prater If that were the case Derek Moran, It would seem as though BEFORE you stamp it, it IS amendable. It would seem that you just amend it add some shit like.. "as payment for said time and effort (name) under full commercial liability will pay me $$ in gold or bitcoins." stamp it non-amendable. is this an option?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 872
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 872 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Phillip Prater

finish it with the rest....BILLS OF EXCHANGE ACT NON-NEGOTIABLE NON-TRANSFERRABLE WITHOUT RECOURSE

stamp #2: RECEIVED BY:____(signature)____

stamp #3: DATE:___________ (indorsed on the back as acceptance of the contract that you are entering) if this is wrong, forgive me.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 872
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 872 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Blake Gardner

Jeeeez Louise guys...there are many ways, the simplest is to just sign it back to the drawer for settlement and closure of the account...that is as simple as signing the back of the negotiable instrument and returning it to their CFO with a notice, stating its been indorsed / accepted as value and returned for settlement and closure creating a zero balance. Then request a statement if account showing the current zero balance.

Adam Thomas

It will save me the hassles of doing it ok? Please ?? Either way your child is NOW FUCKED. YOU'RE NOT THERE FOR HIM SO GO KILL YOURSELF. YOU'VE CONDEMNED YOUR CHILD TO DEATH OR IMPRISONMENT IN THEIR SYSTEM.....

Adam Thomas

Drop sheets & a hooker with really BAD TASTE is required next...& a small see through coffee table....now feed YOUR HOOKER LOTS & LOTS OF LICORICE & STEAK & BEER....LOTS & LOTS OF BEER IS ALSO REQUIRED.....

Phillip Prater

the UPU being a party to it then gives you ability to have them investigate if this document doesn't make it where it is supposed to go under mail fraud.Seems like i read that somewhere.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 873
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 873 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

Apart from my off topic rants & spiels etcetera... HAS EVERYONE GOT THEIR ZOMBIE PROOFED BRAINS AROUND THE VERY BASICS OF BILLS OF EXCHANGE ?? I WONT CONTINUE UNTIL SOMEONE REPLIES. THERES A COUPLE OF PARTICULAR DETAILS MISSING STILL FROM THE INCHOATE INSTRUMENT THUS STILL MAKING IT INCOMPLETE OR UNFINISHED BEFORE ITS ACCEPTED. IF IT EVEN IS ACCEPTED. Believe it or not theres some judges here in Australia, that actually will give you brownie points for your knowledge of Bills of Exchange. They usually have a big fat gold ring from their JESUIT OVERLORDS OR HANDLERS.....They're all good mates of the JESUIT KUNTS. They've got to be otherwise they KILL THEM. Yes because that's what jesuit s actually are the best at. KILLING EVERYONE & EVERYTHING. They run & control the whole shop of what's called the holy Roman See of COMMERCE. THEY ARE THE CREATORS.

Adam Thomas

Derek Hill. Without seeing the ORDER that's for child custody arrangements I know what word you have to AMEND. It's the word "NOT". CROSS OUT LIKE A CROSS THROUGH EVERY WORD THAT SAYS " N O T". So your left with the words can see or can be or can do or can attend.....then INITIAL your amendments...

Adam Thomas

Where it says that the child reside with the mother YOU AMEND IT BY PUTTING IN THE WORDS "SHARED EQUALLY" Then initial the amendment. Or words to suit...hey its your show you fucking write it ok ?? NOT THEM KUNTS. TAKE YOUR POWER BACK.

Adam Thomas

I've seen my mates reaction to his beautiful little girl being ABDUCTED BY DEPARTMENT of HUMAN SERVICES goat fucking lesbian man hating strap on wielding feral pig dog fucking SCUM TERRIFY HIS DARLING GIRL FOR 12 HOURS. WHY?? HOWCOME?? THEY AMENDED THE ORDER THEMSELVES & EVEN LEFT IT OPEN FOR FURTHER ABDUCTIONS & ABUSES BY THEM STATIST KUNTS. CHILD RAPISTS. Heres another MAXIM OF LAW. AS IT IS WRITTEN SO SHALL IT BE. The WRITTEN WORD IS WAAAAYY MORE POWERFUL THAN THE SPOKEN WORD. I'm well & truly aware of their shenanigans as they are constantly AMENDING their own ORDERS ALL THE FUCKING TIME.

Adam Thomas

They just wrote into their own order these very words. That the father & mother not be in the same buikding as the child. WRITTEN IN. THE OTHERS WERE ALL TYPED. Judgecwas surprised but he said "but never the less it is written thus"...wank wank wank..toss fapfapfap...spunk explosion..

Blake Gardner

For example. Most corporations are fairly uninterested with most of our procedures until it reaches court and even then they feel they are superior and to a degree untouchable...you can lien once you have first perfected a claim via the administrative process, but the real impact if that lien may not be so much the pay out if you can wrangle the monetization if your security but the reporting of it to Dunn and Bradstreet...that can stuff a corporations credit rating up and their insurance premiums making them a willing candidate for negotiating a compensatory settlement:-)

Adam Thomas

N.B. CLASS....The customary of the "period of grace" has evolved from seventy two hours to " Three working days commencing after sunset" on the day of RECEIVING the communication/ presentment by some say; Talmudic Law principles.

Blake Gardner

The Shetar/property for debt

Most important, the encumbrance of real property permitted by the Jewish Law of shetar had been adopted by English law. Bonds contained the traditional Hebrew formula pledging "all my goods, movable and immovable." Creditors had the statutory right to execute against the debtor's land. No longer were personal obligations and rights in land rigidly separate. Even while Edward was divesting himself of his Jewish moneylenders, he made their legacy permanent. A small but significant principle of Jewish Law, wherein personal debt superseded rights in real property had become the law of the land.

Blake Gardner

It's becoming a virtual smorgasbord of possibilities...the more one continues his due diligence the more options crystallize with the ratio of demystifying/deprogramming/discovery...that's something you simply just can't do for others as much as you would like too, (stuff their heads in books and mentors for at least 14-24hrs per week so they can get the necessary paradigm shift that opens the door to ongoing knowledge) which funny enough is today more valuable than so called money:-)

Blake Gardner

In relation to the facade that surrounds us...

Black’s Law Dictionary, 4t Edition:

“BRUTUM FULMEN”:

“An empty noise; an empty threat. A judgment void upon its face which is in legal effect no judgment at all, and bywhich no rights are divested, and from which none can be obtained; and neither binds nor bars anyone.

Adam Thomas

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS. A general name for bills, notes, checks, transferrable bonds or coupons, letters of credit, and other negotiable written securities. Any written securities which may be transferred by indorsement and delivery or by delivery merely, so as to vest in the indorsee the legal title, and thus enable him to sue thereon in his own name. Or, more technically, those instruments which not only carry the legal title with them by indorsement or delivery, but carry as well, when transferred before maturity, the right of the transferee to demand the full amounts which their faces call for. Daniel, Neg. Inst. — 1a. A negotiable instrument is a written promise or request for the payment of a certain sum of money to order or bearer. Civil Code Cal.” 3087.

Adam Thomas

I'm no where near finished with this thread. I'm going to drum the fuckery out o it until everyfuckingone breathes, eats, shits, fucks, walks & talks Bills of Exchange. Till their very fucking ears bleed BoE. Till all they THINK is BoE.

Adam Thomas

Therefor, if the liability instrument presented is not a " non negotiable instrument. ...then could this not then simply still be a "negotiable instrument" awaiting negotiation/completion to be concluded by transfer of delivery? ? It could be "YES".

Adam Thomas

INDORSEMENT IN BLANK ; Where a person to whom a bill or note is payable simply writes his or her name on the back. The effect of such an indorsement is that the right to sue uoon the bill will be transferred to any person to whom it is delivered. Butterworths New Zealand Law Dictionary sixth edition spiller pg 144

Adam Thomas

S.84 cheque duty payable otherwise than under a license. Duly stamped means stamped by 2 (a) afgixing a postage stamp or stamps on the face of the bill of exchange for the amount of the cheque duty payable on the bill; and 2 (b) effectively cancelling each postage stamp so as to render it incapable of being used again; and 2 (c) Stating on the bill the true date of cancellation: S.84 of the Public Act 1971 no 87: Stamp and Cheque Duties Act, date of assent: 19 november 1971

Adam Thomas

Sleepy times now.... chat in morn & I Will be keeping on this thread as theres only one bloke on here apart from me who gets this shit. A few more stamos have to be affixed in correct order & place...wank..wank..fapfapfap Tomorrow's a new day. Well its now today from yesterday & tomorrow is a two dollar long time. Let's see if I'm going to be called out as a bullshitter again shall we ?? I'm 100% certain I do know the captains rules of this group & guess what Derek Hill, I'm STILL FUCKING HERE KUNT !! Where are you again because your voice has gone real quiet like a church mouse...almost stupifyingly quiet. Time for me to jump back into the TARDIS !!

Pete Daoust

LETTRE DE CHANGE.

Effet de commerce par lequel une personne appelée tireur (le créancier) donne l'ordre à l'un de ses débiteurs appelé tiré de payer une certaine somme à une date déterminée à une troisième personne appelée bénéficiaire ou porteur.

:D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 873
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 873 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

Ell heres that "another day" I was talking about last night.....IM STILL FUCKING HERE DEREK HILL.....Haven't hears squat from your mouth so far...apart from you telling everyone that will read this thread that You actually choke on dick...

Adam Thomas

Woo Hoo. Atta boy Derek Hill. FRIEND ME PLEASE KUNT BEFORE I KICK YE IN THE BALLS....I'm actually trying to be nice Derek, as I actually do want to HELP YOU WITH YOUR CHILD & ACCESS/ CUSTODY/RESIDENCY RIGHTS. YOU CAN FUCKING DO THIS DEREK HILL. IF TGE DUMBEST KUNT IN THE UNIVERSE CAN DO THIS YOU CAN TOO. Q; WHOS THE DUMBEST KUNT IN THE UNIVERSE? ? A; "ME".

Adam Thomas

If people go back to the very start of this THREAD they will see for themselves that "YOU DEREK HILL" Have made a poopoos....you've done poopsie outta your ASS AGAIN......DIAPER ARE NOW REQUIRED FOR "YOU". Can we get a nappy roadie in here please??..or someone to take all this shit out.....

Adam Thomas

Your REMEDY TO ME DEREK HILL, IS TO FOLLOW THIS THREAD VERY CAREFULLY & SEND THEIR PILE OF " PULLED STRAIGHT FROM THEIR ASS...SHIT....ORDER...BoE" straight back to them "KUNTS" COMPLETED.....COMPLETELY. ..IN ITS ENTIRETY. ...100% LAWFULLY & 100% HONORABLY. .....TO GET ACCESS TO YOUR CHILD/BOY FULL FUCKING STOP KUNT. And this order from me to "YOU DEREK HILL," IS.... NON- NEGOTIABLE. NON-TRANSFERRABLE WITH RECOURSE TO "ME".OK KUNT??

Adam Thomas

I wont be ACCEPTING an APOLOGY from "YOU" DEREK HILL. I WANT TO SEE YOUR BOY WITH HIS RIGHTFUL FATHER.....NOT SOME FLY BY NIGHTER CRACK DADDY PIMP THAT DON'T WANT THE " RESPONSIBILITY" FOR YOUR BOY...... R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y... H O N O U R........ TRUST........

Derek Hill

my point isnt proven, i see alot of people who can still use laws and it would APPEAR to be logical but always miss some critical step.

Do you have evidence to show that this process would work.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 874
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 874 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

I can't go posting this because I don't know fucking "HOW TO" on my fucking fonee... Yes I've done this shit & I've seen this shit....there's more steps that need to be finalized like if they dishonour your agreement to the 100% LAWFUL BoE... NOTICE OF DISHONOUR. NOTICE OF HONOUR. C H E C K M A T E... Even if they DO DRAG THE CUSTODY/CHILD/ ORDER BACK TO COURT ITS WHERE THIS is T E N T H O U S A N D T I M E S M O R E D E A D L Y...... F O O L P R O O F. YES, THAT MEANS "YOU" DEREK HILL. FeWl pRoOf...

Adam Thomas

Its THEIR LAWS..... REMEMBER THAT. ARE YE ALL " FREETARDS"...WANKER SLAVES STILL? IF SO PLEASE LEAVE THIS GROUP BECAUSE I AM A MAN & REFUSE TO BE A SLAVE & TRADE OR EXCHANGE LABOUR IN THEIR FICTICIOUS SLAVE TRADE & I REFUSE TO TRADE IN THE "SOULS OF MEN" :-9

Adam Thomas

The tables have turned as "YOU"....Ahhhh yep you again Derek Hill.....because you've been a good boy & ACTED 100% HONORABLY & LAWFULLY....YOU ARE NOT THE CREDITOR ANYMORE......YOU'VE GOT YOUR BoE that says whatever ye fucking like it to say COMPLETED....& THEM KUNTS HAVE WHAT AGAIN???

Adam Thomas

My great friend just successfully kicked the shit out of some banks over here on farmers foreclosure & he beat them kunts by getting 2 of his friends 3 farming properties back.... He's my obi-wan kenobi here in melbourne. The 3rd property is ongoing but they're in checkmate the banks because of obi-wan. ALL BY USING BILLS OF EXCHANGE. ... ????????????

Adam Thomas

Which section of the BoE Act are they trying to NEGOTIATE A "RUBBER STAMPED NON-NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT AGAIN"???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Adam Thomas

Remember how we condemn ourselves by our own mouth & WORDS... AS IT IS WRITTEN SO SHALL IT BE....That's your baby Derek Moran......PROVE OTHERWISE KUNTS!! NO...NON...NEGATIVE...ESTOPPEL. ....CHEQUEMATE M U T H A F U C K A S !!!!

Adam Thomas

Ok I think I made that last word up...FRENETICALLY....FAST..FASTER THAN FAST...BLURRED VISION....COLD SWEAT.....SPINNING HEAD....LOOP DE LOOP......BRAIN FADE......ZOMBIES.....STARVATION.....DEATH...NOM NOMS....BURP...FART...GLASS COFFEE TABLE...DROPSHEETS....LICORICE. ...STEAK....BEER...HOOKER.....NORWEGIAN......HOOKERS.....BRUNETTES.......LESBIANS....NAKED....H O NEY.....ME.........BLISS TIME.... R E M E D Y !!!!

Adam Thomas

TENOR 1 Law the actual wording of a document. 2 finance the time that must elapse before a bill of exchange or promissory note becomes due for payment. Origin: Middle English: from old french tenour, from Latin tenor ' course, substance, import of a law', from tenere 'to hold' , Oxford Dictionary.

Adam Thomas

I t s all a LEGAL FICTION. MAKE BELIEVE. ..PRIVATE.....SHHHHHHH. .....People will go to their universities of their choice to learn to be a THIEF/ LAWYER.....& PAY MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF FAT STACKS OF FIATS TO LEARN THIS BUT THEY WILL NEVER GET IT &/OR GOT IT.....GOT IT???

Sirwade Firsbey

Adam Thomas What you're saying is to pay your child support with those exchange Correct

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 875 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 875 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Adam Thomas

Well of course paying of an instrument is one way of using their instruments but also receiving a child from an unfair outcome for the chikd is another way as is actually getting people out of prison as is keeping people out of prison as is paying for a LAMBORGHINI that was priced at $250000000 for o buck o five... FREEDOM COSTS A BUCK O FIVE. !!!!!!!!! LITERALLY ONE DOLLAR AND FIVE CENTS. P R O V E M E W R O N G

Adam Thomas

If it's hard you're doing it wrong Pete Daoust. Go back to start & start your read again of this thread. Crown instrument with the 5c stamp = joinder/ stamp duty paid with your signature through the kunt. Read again pete.

Adam Thomas

You all have to LEAR FIRST BECAUSE IF YE DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING THEN THEY WILL FUCK YE UP HARD WHEN THEY TAKE YE TO TASK ON YOUR COMPLETED LAWFUL CURRENCY THAT YE CREATED.... G O T I T ??? Start with a phone bill or utilities bill....baby steps first.... Trial & Error.... REMEDY IS AT HAND & HERE... I'm here being RESPONSIBLE sharing Powerful information that is 100% TRUE & CORRECT. . IF ANYTHING I HAVE CLAIMED IS NOT THE TRUTH THEN THE CAPTAIN WILL KICK MY ASS OUT OF THIS GROUP... FULL FUCKING STOP.... NO RECOURSE

Adam Thomas

What section of the Commonwealth of Australia Bills of Exchange Act 1908/09 are ye trying to NEGOTIATE a NON-NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT? ? WTF??....HUH....SCRATCH HEAD.....SCRATCH BALLS...PLAY WITH BALLS....PPFFFFTTTT......BUGLE TIME.........HARD ON ALERT.......ROCK HARD.... Harder than Chinese arithmetic. ...

Adam Thomas

What am I doing in your courts for kunts ?? BUT THE INSTRUMENT SAYS : WITH OUT RECOURSE... You've ACCEPTED THE INSTRUMENT BY DISHONOURING IT BY "NON ACCEPTANCE"....72hrs.. I BELIEVE I'VE ACTED 100% HONORABLY & LAWFULLY your assholiness...oops. ..im sorry for calling ye an asshole ye KUNT...PLEASE FORGIVE ME AS THAT WAS NOT MY INTENT & I M SORRY FOR CALLING YE AN ASSHOLE BECAUSE THAT IS NOT THE CORRECT TITLE FOR YE...YOURE A KUNT AN NOT AN ASSHOLE......YOU HOLY KUNT YOU....

Adam Thomas

Are ye trying to make me a slave you kunt?? Can ye explain to me then WHY ARE YE TRYING TO FORCE ME INTO INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE/ S L A V E R Y BY PAYING/DISCHARGING/SETTLING OF ACCOUNT WITH " LEGAL TENDER"?..

Adam Thomas

Thats very simole & I won't even entertain the equity thing. If ye dont get that then shoot yourself in the head because that means you're a REALLY DUMB KUNT because I know it & im a dumb kunt so if ye don't know thus your BELOW ME ON THE DUMB KUNT-O-METER.....YOU DUMB KUNT!! :-)"

Adam Thomas

The GOLD STANDARD, a MONETAry system where the medium of exchange are paper NOTES that are convertible into pre-set, fixed quantities of GOLD, replaced the use of gold coins as currency in the 17-19 century in Europe.

Adam Thomas

After WW TWO at the Bretton woods conference, most countries adopted fiat currencies that were fixed to the SEPTIC TANK/YANK/ US DOLLAR. The US dollar was in turn fixed to gold....or so them kunts said.... In 1971 the US government SUSPENDED....THE CONVERTIBILITY OF THE US DOLLAR TO GOLD.... Countries de-pegged their currencies from the US dollar after this fun spoiler from the yanks.....

Adam Thomas

In-Corpse-orated..orator...author..... A dead kunt said it & fucking wrote it.....& he was a god called RA...Who was an Egyptian kunt that they worshipped in the sky that most dumb kunts today worship except his name changed to Julius Caesar. .. oooppss...I mean Jesus Christ & they all go to church/Court/Bank on SUNday to give thanks for being a top bloke & sacrifice him for being a top bloke/great guy/good sport/good kunt....& drink his blood & give him money for being a dead kunt.....

Adam Thomas

Oh yeh Jesus chRIst was a Jew kunt.....let's not start me on the jew kunts....jesuits & certain jews kunts are best of mates. ...clubs....that makes them deadly dangerous kunts & should/must/be removed from certain positions of POWER......IMMEDIATELY EXECUTED WITH EXTREME PREDJUDICE. ...

Adam Thomas

AU-THOR...AUTHOR AU=GOLD THOR=YOU'RE A DUMB KUNT IF YE BELIEVE THERE'S A MASSIVELY HUGE FUCK OFF LOOKIN KUNT IN THE SKY WITH THE BIGGEST TOOL BELT IN THE UNIVERSE WITH A HAMMER THE SIZE OF FUCKOFFSVILLE & BACK & LUNCH BOX TO MATCH & HE'S GOING TO PUNCH UP ALL THE BAD GUYS FOR YE............. R E A L L Y N O W ?? THORS DAY IS THURSDAY.

Adam Thomas

Perfect English language is perfect, unadulterated LEGALESE LEGALESE=EXECUTE WITH EXTREME PREDJUDICE ALL LAWYERS ON EARTH FUCKIN NOW KUNTS.... CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. ..... RAPE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES......... EXECUTE THEM NOW.... KNOW THY ENEMY.

Adam Thomas

I must strongly affirm, protest & object. Your Honour ( kunt). The prosecution has just labelled me a TAXPAYER.Whether or not that I AM a taxpayer is the very root issue in this case & has not yet been proven by the prosecution. I respectfully request that the W O R D 'TAXPAYER' be stricken from the record & that the prosecution be instructed to not use that word again until it has proven that I am indeed a taxpayer....fuck you very much your fuckheadedness...

Adam Thomas

a.Date drawn, an impress stamp duty paid etc. b. A sum certain c. If any value has been given or d. that any value has been given therefor e. all material particulars otherwise missing such as; I. without substance title, ii. an unnatural writing style; &/or iii. all capitalised wording for natural elements, etc. f. any or the whole part of the name g. any or the whole part of an address h. the post code or any other artificial construct I. all parties to the instrument I.e. I. payer, payee, ii. signer, Signee, iii.drawer drawee, etc. j. the place where it is/ was drawn: k. the place it is payable l. the amount payable in words; &/or m. any other detail or material particular Would any of the above missing particulars, not create an incomplete presentment & CONTROVERSEY????

James Allan

Who is the Drawer? And who is the Drawee? Who becomes liable if the party being presented with the Bill, by the Drawer or his agent, expressly refuses acceptance of the Bill of Exchange for fraud under to the BoE Act based upon the SOMETIMES baseless presumption by the Drawer that the man represents the fictitious Drawee?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 875 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 875 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

James Allan

Yes, so what the the BoE Act say as to who become liable if acceptance of the Bill is refused?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 876 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 876 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

James Allan

Or have you already presented a license to the cop or responded as the Respondent in the divorce action thereby, through your conduct, making it known to the outside world that it is your intention to operate under the designation of a class of person having it rights and duties conferred upon it by Her Majesty?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 876
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 876 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

If theu don't accept it back completed honourably & accepted honourably they're in DISHONOUR & NOW BECOME THE CREDITOR THUS LIABLE FOR THE VALUABLE FROM THEIR ASS THEY PULLED INSTRUMENT. P R O V E ME W R O N G....

James Allan

What if you draw a Bill of Exchange which is to be drawn upon Pete as the Drawee (means he is the one to pay the party to whom payment is order) and present it to me insisting that I AM Pete absent any evidence for such a claim. In fact, I expressly advise you that I AM not Pete. But you continue and present the Bill to me then run away. Is that not fraudulent conduct by you as the drawer of the Bill? What does the BoE Act say about who is liable when acceptance of the Bill is refused? What does it say about fraud?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 876
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 876 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Allan

If you have not established facts to the contrary, would the Drawer who has proceeded to force you into association with a class of person you do not wish to enter in association with not be violating your right to freedom of association? Would he also perhaps be violating your right to freedom of conscience, belief and possibly religion if he was forcing you into association with say.... satan ;) ?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 877
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 877 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

Your ....sigh....you like to argue James & this is a deadly dangerous thing that you do because it's akin to what Lawyers do to get their clients gaoled over pathetic shit & they rape vhildren & families & lie & defraud everyone so please go & shoot yourself now in the head, between your fucking eyeballs....you know just in case ye ever want to become a lawyer & it sounds like ye do so you know what to. .....bye bye...make sure ye put drop sheets down. ..

Adam Thomas

Why ASK those questions for ?? If ye go to the very start of this thread you'll get the lot of what it is. It's 100% AWESOME that ye ask but I hate questions from people that just aren't qualified to ask them. Yep now ye can start hating me. Thanks. Cheers. You're welcome. Any time. Have a good day. ............kunt..

Adam Thomas

How about "YOU" Jamea Allan, throw that in this thread.....there's a VALUABLE job for ye james Allan. ...atta boy...go on.... git em....git in around...whistle......atta boy. ..good boy...pats..pats..pats...

Adam Thomas

Hey Pete Daoust, do ye know WHY our CAPPY or Cap'n, has allowed us here in this group?? YOU & I ARE THE CLASSROOM BULLIES..... WE FUCKIN RULE THE ROOST....Of course the Capn will slap us silly when we pull "SHIT STRAIGHT OUT OF OUR ASSES" but we don't. ... I'm hoping to be Sargeant at ARMS now.... Do ye know what I think is absolutely HILARIOUS pete Daoust??

Adam Thomas

Pete Daoust=SLAVE NO MORE = UP YOURS YOU PACK OF EVIL KUNTS COS IM DEADLIER THAN DEADLY NOW.......& I DON'T PACK A PIECE OR NEED NO WEAPONS COS MY BRAIN IS NOW SUPER DEADLY....SO BACK THE FUCK UP KUNTS & FUCK OFF IS THE FIRST STREET ON THE LEFT....SEE YOU KUNTS THERE SOIN.....OVER & FUCKIN OUT....CHECK...

Adam Thomas

RE, RO, RI, RA = GOD/CREATOR EL & AL = GOD/FATHER/FROM GOD/CREATOR. ELectricity. ELephant. ChRIstians. RAw, RApid, RAdio, ROute...REAL... R E A L.... REAL=TWO IMAGINARY KUNTS CALLED GOD FATHER OR TWO KUNTS BUT ONE OF THEM KUNTS IS CALLED GOD & THE OTHER KUNT IS CALLED FATHER....GO FIGUre....

Adam Thomas

I'm about 12 hours ahead of the rest of you kunts....so I'll be back online tomorrow to add more VALUE to this thread. TRUST me this will be a neverending thread. Oh....heres a good one to ask the kunt in court. Just tell him that ye have NO LEGAL TENDER & could he OFFER an alternate form of payment ?? Coffee beans have been requested here before & only just recent too in the land of Oz.....ok...so keep thinking OUTSIDE O their make believe box. Night all...

Adam Thomas

But how do I pay your holy kunt you?? The only thing I've of value is my ex & her pussy is well & truly clapped out because she loves being double fisted dvda....also het WHOLE HOLE is now the size off

Adam Thomas

I just did this for a 'MATE' WHO JUST RECEIVED DELIVERED VIA PO (st) LICE Y- POLICE enFORCErs an INTERVENTION ORDER..F R E S H K I L L...... NOT EVEN 8 HOURS OF ACCEPTANCE.. I showed him & taught him & he was tripping balls.... He AMENDED every line out of the order with a BLACK INK PEN....... His ex kunts name what's her guts ??? We'll just call her KUNT & HER KIDS TIMES TWO.... HER NAME WAS COMPLETELY CROSSED OUT AS WAS EVERY SENTENCE ON THE "ORDER"....... NOTHING BUT MY MATES NAME & CASE FILE/ACCOUNT NUMBER..... He initialed at the end of 'EVERY' sentence........ Exactly the same as when ye order A BIG MAC....NEGATIVE ON THE CHEESE !!

Adam Thomas

There's only one person i will bow down to & only one MAN.....Scott Duncan. ... It certainly is weird lookin down from up here Cap'n. ..now I know exactly what ye mean......there really is lots of dumb muthafuckas down there.....but great view though hey !!

Adam Thomas

They had their very faint blue stamped logo/signature/corporate crown emblem/valuable consideration on the last page of the ORDER....COULD HARDLY EVEN SEE TGE KUNT OF A THING...... My mate RUBBER STAMPED IN RED INK; SEE OVER FOR INDORSEMENTS

Adam Thomas

Then he turned the INCHOATE INSTRUMENT OVER ONTO THE PRIVATE SIDE BLANK/BACK/SIDE/CHEQUE & RUBBER STAMPED IT; INDORSED BY ................IN A BIG RED SQUARE BOX...... THEN HE SIGNATURED THE INSIDE OF THE BOX IN BLACK INK PEN & RUBBER STAMPED TODAYS DATE....

Adam Thomas

He then licked his five cent stamp & pressed it onto the front of the not quite valuable instrument..... He RUBBER STAMPED DIAGONALLY ACROSS THE 5c Stamp in red ink these words; STAMP DUTY PAID. HE SIGNATURED THROUGH THE STAMP....

Adam Thomas

He then took out his one Australian dollar stamp & licked it & pressed it onto the front page.....somewhere near the top of instrument where theres room for another rubber stamp. He put his SIGNATURE THROUGH THAT STAMP.

Adam Thomas

Sorry kunts I've already received that offer/vontract/BoE & its been returned complete for A-BUCK - O - FIVE KUNTS...Here's a copy that the registrar should have on his PUBLIC RECORD......GO & CHAT WITH HIM OK KUNTS...BYE BYE...FUCK OFF IS FIRST ON LEFT....CSNT MISS IT KUNTS....

Adam Thomas

They cops will ALWAYS have an INCHOATE ORDER......... MY MATE WILL ALWAYS HAVE A COMPLETED COPY ORDER....OR.....A RECEIPTED/COPY ORDER.... CHECKMATE K U N T S... WHO'S IS 100% MORE LAWFUL ?? THEIR VERSION?? OR YOURS ??

Adam Thomas

So who's got the BALLS to come & kick me off this ship ?? Derek Hill. ...nuh I didn't think so...negative on the fairy bread with Derek. ... C'mon kunts......please....someone try & kick me off this ship....NO ONE BUT THE CAPTAINS CAN........BUT THEYRE NOT INVITED THEY ARE EXCLUDED BECAUSE THE INCLUSION OF ONE IS THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHERS.......

Adam Thomas

The QUEEN IS NOW BEING A COURTESIAN OR BENDING OVER & CLUTCHING HER "HOOVES"...."FUCKIN HOOVES"......"C L I P C L O P CLIP CLOP "...AS ONLY CHUNKY MARK, does best....& YOU ARE REAMING HER ASS ROYALLY.........SHE IS YOUR BITCH.......SOVEREIGN WARRIOR YOU....

Adam Thomas

My friend can now CLAIM that BANK ACCOUNT/CASE ACCOUNT NUMBER WITH ANY FUCKING INVOICE THEY SEND HIM & USE IT TO OFFEST ANY FINES &/OR PENALTIES &/OR INFRINGEMENT NOTICES &/OR ORDERS &/OR. ...S I G H .....

Adam Thomas

That is why all LAWYERS/JESUITS/POPES WHITE & BLACK ET FUCKING CETERA.... SHOULD/MUST BE REMOVED FROM ALL POSITIONS OF POWER EXECUTED WITH EXTREME PREDJUDICE. .... NON-NEGOTIABLE NON - TRANSFERRABLE WITHOUT RECOURSE. OK KUNTS GOT IT??

Adam Thomas

SECTION.68 Of the Stamp & Cheques Duties Act 1971; & a. By also placing an "unfranked/unindorsed" yet 'issued postage stamp' to the value of your tenor providing the necessary added value to the previously INCHOATE bill of exchange.......

Ceit Butler

Now what if you don't receive the AMENDABLE INSTRUMENT by mail, what if, oh, hypothetically speaking, you have an assault trial in, say, 3 days, and this small-town, joke of a courthouse tends to just hand you their ORDER on the spot, shortly after making their "judgement". Once it has been HANDED to me to sign...would that also qualify as DELIVERY and I am then free to complete it and hand it back?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 878
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 878 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ceit Butler

Let's just say that "hypothetical question" may be a little LESS hypothetical than originally implied...lol...I'm thinking this is my back-up plan, in case they ignore everything we've done already.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 879
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 879 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Adam Thomas

Pfffttt. ..farkn sooo farkn hilarious...dude.....hahaha...ukranian model....pfffttt...good luck with tbat model kate. Do they even have parts for them anymore in the Ukraine? ? Hahahahahahahahahaha. :-D

Ceit Butler

Okay...so taking this AMENDABLE INSTRUMENT thing one step further, what would happen if I also happened to have a printed sheet, outlining a fee schedule for the recouping all expenses that I have racked up while dealing with this mess, and stapled it to the ORDER?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 879
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 879 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Blake Gardner

It would be a dishonor as its a separate issue/claim...you wanna amend or discharge (deal with) the order if it comes to that and/or if they can't bring forth the original charging or accusatory instrument during the trial/hearing, for your inspection and execution. Many outs, however what's your current A game?

Ceit Butler

I'm not a fan of rap, but the movie and the message make this one great.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_zgl8ZB_84&list=PL7F1D8D7AC384E2A9&index=11

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 879 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 879 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Adam Thomas

Juliar Gillard, the ceo of the Corp. Of Australia is now having her blood letting on the floor of the parliament fir their Corp. She's gine..kaput. Bill shorten has INDORSED kevin Rudd, our Rightful Prime Minister... the Australian Labor Party are still a pack of kunts no matter who's runnig their show...

Ceit Butler

So to recap; Seven stamps: 1. SEE OVER FOR INDORSEMENTS 2. ACCEPTED AS INDORSED BY:________ 3. Date stamp 4.NON-NEGOTIABLE NON-TRANSFERABLE WITHOUT RECOURSE 5.STAMP DUTY PAID 6.INCHOATE INSTRUMENT ACCEPTED FOR VALUE RETURNED COMPLETE SUPRA PROTEST Pay the sum certain of ONE CANADIAN DOLLAR EXACTLY. 7.RECEIVED BY:______________

Exactly like that?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 880
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 880 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Blake Gardner

The "how" is the easy part Pete Daoust as Adz so concisely depicts...it's the true understanding of "why" that wins or loses the game.

There are many ways...I prefer the simplicity of the signature (obligation/value) on the back if the instrument. I add my account number, i mean social as a courtesy, because my signature is cryptic looking. But as I said that's the easy part of the game.

Pete Daoust

OK—so lets focus on WHY Why is it they NOTIFY me that a payment has been made ? Why is it they are PRESUMING that I need to back it up ? Why is it they are COMMENCING that BoE, and they are NOT giving me the instructions on how to COMPLETE it ? Why is it, this is kept SECRET ? Why is it, we don’t learn this in school Why is it, this has ALREADY been paid ?

The way I see it, ALL of these BoE are already paid for, and I am tricked into paying them again—WHY ???????????????

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 880
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 880 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Blake Gardner

"Why" is a one man winding road less travelled...

Study is essential to elucidation Pete - someone can tell you black and white to your face what the truth is and your intellect may even be able to follow the logic but there nevertheless remains a gross deficiency until elucidation dawns upon the inward man...this only comes by due diligence and patient persistence.

I will say though the simple answer to "why" is that law merchant/admiralty is an adversarial game, like chess, it's competitive based therefore the non-disclosure et al.

Ceit Butler

28 minutes, and counting. If by some fluke, I happen to not be around for the next 21 to 30 days, weed and scintillating reading material can be sent care of: Vanier Centre for Women 655 Martin St., Box 1040, Milton, ON L9T 5E6

:D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 881
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 881 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ceit Butler

They didn't even ask me for my name! The Crown asked if they could address Kathryn Butler's matter next as she saw I was there. I walked up and started to prepare everything and the Clerk paged my ex husband. The Crown stated that he had declined to attend, meaning there was no valid claim from a living man, no signed complaint and no charging instrument. We sent several documents which let them know that I was aware of these egregious errors. They paged him once, probably hoping he would show, and then asked for immediate dismissal.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 881 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 881 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

Kate Butler was asked if "a dismissal would be agreeable to her", today.

She had her S/O and Myself on the case. A Paper-Pusher's worst nightmare. :D

Chalk one up for the good guys. :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 882 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 882 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Ceit Butler

I had previously submitted an AFFIDAVIT OF STATUS, and NOTICE OF QUESTIONS FOR THE COURT which I required answers to in order to proceed, and gave them ten days to respond. When they didn't, I served a NOTICE OF FAULT AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE, with an additional five days to respond. When that time elapsed, I served a NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND CERTIFICATE OF NON-RESPONSE (attaching ALL previous submissions to each new document as EXHIBITS).

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 882
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 882 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

can we get a look at what these documents look like, Scott/Kate? > AFFIDAVIT OF STATUS...NOTICE OF QUESTIONS FOR THE COURT...NOTICE OF FAULT AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE...NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND CERTIFICATE OF NON-RESPONSE (attaching ALL previous submissions to each new document as EXHIBITS)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 882
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 882 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

I know this is going to sound like I'm crazy but how about a picture of me in a Catholic schoolgirl girl uniform posted on Facebook? would that be enough Scott?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 883
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 883 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ceit Butler

The court reporter for the local paper was in the courtroom, so I'm sure that helped play a role in this as well. Wouldn't want the good people of Norfolk County gettin' any ideas now, would we?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 883
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 883 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Well- ChiefRock did say at the seminar last Sunday, that when he was in court once, he told the Justice- "Public jurisdiction doesnt have any authority over private agreements" and the reply from the Justice was- "You're right." So i guess what happened in court with Kate today is an example of that?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 883 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 883 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

Watch Derek Moran. He shows you what you will ALL eventually do... Get really close, and then make up some dumb bullshit and shoot yourselves in the foot.

None of you are qualified to handle power. You are just like the government in that respect.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 884
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 884 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Tara Duncan

Sorry...WELL DONE KATE! At this point you probably have some extra adrenaline left-over so you could save a few people from a burning car, probably. Now let's get started on some of our cooler initiatives.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 884
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 884 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ceit Butler

I stated that I: -would attend court on this date under a SPECIAL APPEARANCE with restricted capacity of SUI JURIS, -DO NOT consent to be recognized as a LEGAL PERSON (of ANY class) and/or PRO SE LITIGANT and/or ANY other LEGAL FICTION, -have NO INTENT to CONTRACT Witt the COURT, not have any knowledge of any existence of a VALID CONTRACT with the COURT, -that I DO NOT consent to be addressed as a "YOU", being a party of SURETY. -that my name is PRIVATE and NOT derived from ANY information from ANY PUBLIC document, therefore I waive SECTION 2.1 of the CHANGE OF NAME ACT OF ONTARIO, -if you proceed against the LEGAL PERTAIN, and it is convicted, then you must soak to the holder of the title document, the STATEMENT OF BIRTH, for satisfaction of any financial and/or legal obligations, which holder, I understand is THE GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 884
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 884 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

Copyhold ~ a former tenure of land in England and Ireland by right of being recorded in the court of the manor...

So by their having copyhold they are recorded as being the holder/possessor thus have surety?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 885
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 885 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Blake Gardner

Gotta love the old sweep you under the rug, on the fly, makeshift remedy, courtesy of the, "there's nothing to see here folks, move along, these are not the droids your looking for - system".) You can next too count on it as a reward for livening up their fiction filled day with a tantalizing dash of cognitive stimuli.

Blake Gardner

Usually the old boy behind the bench regardless of knife vs chainsaw would certainly have a go and explore the the deep dark cavities of the being standing before him making use of such ancient and sacred words... but I dare say having a reporter in the room made not only a difference but was to Kate's obvious advantage...never a dull moment on the TFL.

Ceit Butler

That, and the fact that my ex husband declined the invitation to participate. The questions mentioned the lack of a signed complaint, lack of impartial third-party witness and the fact that there was no charging instrument. It would be one thing if I was not aware of these facts, but the fact that I obviously was...I think they tried one last attempt at getting him in there and when that failed, they folded.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 885 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 885 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Derek Moran

"... no charging instrument..." - is this referring to the 'Constructive Bond/Trust' they set-up in advance for these types of cases?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 886 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 886 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Ceit Butler

No, they HAVE to have a signed charging sheet. A citation, something that states WHAT you have been charged with, and containing an official signature. It should have been Page 1 of the disclosure. The closest thing it contained was an "information" page stating the charge, the cop's name, the date was just "This____day, Dec. 2012" and there was NO signature from a Justice at the bottom,

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 886
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 886 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Yes, last summer i opted for an 'Early Dispute Resolution' regarding a speeding-ticket my mom got in St. Thomas that she wanted to contest. I was told i would get this DISCLOSURE. The 'disclosure' turned-out to be chicken-scratch-writing from the police-officers-notes and his business-card. Of course this happened last fall, and before this page was started. Since learned to not even ask for/keep any of their shit, and commence with private-administrative-process IMMEDIATELY

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 886
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 886 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ceit Butler

They gave me the Disclosure at the bail heating. The top page listed a bunch of conditions on it and stated that "by accepting this disclosure, you agree to the following...". At the bottom, it CLEARLY states that "if you do NOT accept these conditions, you should immediately return atoll these materials to the Crown and arrange for disclosure in another manner or seek an order of a Court of Competent Jurisdiction." And the Office of the Crown's address below, so we mailed the fucker back with a Notice of Mistake stapled to the front. Next appearance, the Crown tried to hand it to me WITH my Notice of Mistake still attached :D

Stapling it on makes it PART of the document now.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 886
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 886 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ceit Butler

Is there any sort of time limit for amending these Negotiable Instruments? I didn't get a chance to use the "Bag-O-Stamps" in this instance, BUT, I just happen to have this envelope FULL of ORDERS received in the past, say about 5 years ago. A WEAPONS PROHIBITION ORDER (They just LOVE to slap you with that one whenever they can sneak it in), a CONDITIONAL SENTENCE ORDER, an ORDER AUTHORIZING THE TAKING OF BODILY SUBSTANCES FOR FORENSIC DNA ANALYSIS (Seriously, NOT happy about that one), and not one, but two PROBATION ORDERS.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 886 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 886 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Derek Moran

Pierre- like ChiefRock said at the seminar, its not our job to explain to them the law, and/or as Scott Duncan would say- "If i have to explain this to you, then you are committing FRAUD by doing this JOB- EVERYBODY, OBEYS, the LAW, do you UNDERSTAND Quebec Hydro!?"

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 887
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 887 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

That was NOT for Hydro-Quebec Derek Moran, What I am doing with Hydro is a bit different, The way I understand the BoE act, the Beneficiary ;) has the responsibility of explaining to me HOW to remit this thing, and I've sent 2 letters to Hydro-Quebec ASKING them WHAT method should I use, other than fiduciary MONEY, to clear that matter......Hydro is NOT answering my request, I haven't paid Hydro for 1 year now, and I'm NOT in colletion, they just keep sending me BoE.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 888 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 888 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.
Back to top