Now Scott can tell us or.......not tell us resulting in us thinking about it and by doing so it opens our minds to further learning and inquiry.
Now back to the OP, We where asked what "WE" think Scott means. If you read the OP it is not being asked what "Scott actually means".
To be very blunt and in your face, We are being asked for our opinion to something that can never be verified without Scott speaking up.
But Scott was never asked in the OP as to what he means by what he says.
Nuff said.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 321Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 321 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.