The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

Jun 09, 2013 12:49 PM

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

Scott

my question is. if I want to sail my own boat at sea but don't want to use say the red white and blue flag how do I go about the use of my own flag. how do I establish it and am I not a nation unto my self ? I know your the only source on how to do this.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 438
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 438 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 57

Scott Duncan

This one's a cool question :D

You know that UCC shit all the free-dumb movement thinks is their "remedy"? That is what you use. That will require a LOT of typing. Next time I'm on a train I'll type it out.

Step By Step Guide, coming up! ...ok not immediately. I do have a life, and THETENDERFORLAW.COM is a big project. The very subject you speak of will be in there, but it will take some time.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 438 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 438 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

Bildo Schmildo - RE: "We use what we have available"

No, you don't. If you DID, you'd never be mislead, or waste time (Your only TRUE asset).Your brain was available and IS available, even now. The problem is that you think wrong, and value the wrong things. You manufactured your own ignorance, and have given away the best parts of who you are, for "belief".

When you try to engage your brain, when it's needed, the reality that you cannot tell the difference between what's true, and what feels good sinks in. Your brain doesn't work because you think "We use what we have available" is a valid position.

...I am therefore calling you dumb. (Which happens to disprove the whole "No body calls me dumb for doing the best I can with what I have at hand" position)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 439
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 439 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Michael WebbWeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers

Not to mention this demonstration that you care about a stranger's opinion about what you are. :P

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 439 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 439 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

I'll say it again. You are dumb.

It's something you inflict on yourself because you can't tell the difference between what's true, and what feels good.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 440 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 440 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

Then you will be stuck here forever. 1: It's not an insult. It's a fact. 2: Agree to Disagree is the most base-line idiotic bullshit-injection method ever devised. Reality does not care if you agree or not.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 440
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 440 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

You believe most of the bullshit that you do, because you think idiocy like "agree to disagree" are valid concepts. You INVITE delusion, and I see you have over-indulged on it. Ordering a "Diet Coke" with your 3 Big Mac's, won't stop you from being a big fat fuck, just as the tiny bit of critical thought that lead you to this forum, won't stop you from being stupid.

You will simply acquire data here and selectively choose the bits you like. You really are all the same. Seriously.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 440
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 440 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Carl Dunne

You can't be considered dumb for being misled but you can for trying to choose only the parts that suit you and your feelings however. I have always hated the agree to disagree stance as if you know your right why give any consesion to those who are trying to make you accept their belief.

Scott Duncan

The WRONG answer consumes your ONLY valuable resource; YOUR TIME. The expectation that I must abide people who are DEMONSTRABLY WRONG is a THEFT of my only valuable resource.

I myself am here for EXACTLY THE WRONG REASONS, and for most of you reading, this will only ever be "pearls before swine". I don't really care. I'm keeping a promise to those worthy of MY time. That's it. I keep my promises. I write here for NO OTHER REASON.

I am about to take something from all of you that you don't even know exists yet, muchless understand its VALUE, but I have to make you mentally capable of grasping it before I lay my claim.

...after I lay my claim, I want you to come back here, and you can suck on "agree to disagree", because there won't be a thing you can do to get it back, once I have control of it. ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 440
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 440 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Tara Duncan

Let's guess. Is it a nautical theme? "Iiiiiiiiiii"... sort of like "Aaaarrrrrgggggggggghhhhhhhh!"

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 441 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 441 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Scott Duncan

Don't thank me! When I make use of it, I do NOT care who it harms. It will be MINE and people can suffer for their ignorance. I've suffered from/for being "too smart", and it's my turn now.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 442
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 442 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Anibal Jose Baez

Has anyone noticed nowadays the only "pirates" that appear to exist (shown by the media) are "Somali" "pirates"? Almost starving black folks in some raggedy little boat that looks like it/they don't stand a chance. Now, that's some social engineering right there!

Back to top