The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

Jun 08, 2013 8:09 PM

Derek Moran

The 'Your BIRTH CERTIFICATE is PROOF to your CLAIM that YOU are there in the role of BENEFICIARY in a courtroom'- thread. . . . .originally posted by Eamonn O Brien

Eamonn O Brien: So is the BC proof of one's claim to the role of BENEFICIARY in a courtroom scenario?

If we appoint the JP ADMINISTRATOR can't he re-assign the role of beneficiary to the state?

I may as well throw some questions out there that come to mind. The more I ask the clearer it will become, hopefully...

Scott Duncan: YES

Eamonn O Brien: So if there's a hearing set for a particular date and it's being held for the PERSON I'm authorised to represent, notification of the capacity/ies should be sent asap...? (Scott clicked Like on this)

Scott Duncan: Yes, and notify them that you are there as a "Friend of the Court". Not as Plaintiff or Defendant"

Eamonn O Brien: So we possess the PERSON (control it) and they own it (legal title).

When they conjure up offenses they try to place liability on us as surety/ ies.

Where does the SOLB come into play or is it necessary at all?

Scott Duncan: RE: "If we appoint the JP ADMINISTRATOR can't he re-assign the role of beneficiary to the state?" - No, because the STATE gave it no VALUE. YOU did. YOU get the benefit, not a state trust.

Eamonn O Brien: I give it value by acting as the living representative?

Scott Duncan: Ok, "statement of live birth"...is a statement.

"Fiona Munro want's to make porn with me" ...is a statement.

Scott Duncan was born on February 31st 1966 ...is a STATEMENT.

All have equal value.

...and have NOTHING to do with law.

Eamonn O Brien: Ok... Got ya. The BC is the only important document...

So registration of birth notifies the GOVERNMENT of another man/woman in the country. They then create the PERSON for us to use as beneficiary, they are surety and administrator is us also unless we wish to appoint someone else... Like when we write up our last will and testament, we appoint an executor....

Pete Daoust: They then create the PERSON for us to use as beneficiary: No, they want us to give it VALUE

Scott Duncan: THERE you go!

Scott Duncan: NAME attached to VESSEL. That's all it is.

YOUR "WILL" is something to research for clarity. Remember, there are NO HOMONYMS IN LAW.

Scott Duncan: The record is EXPUNGED when the bankruptcy occurred. That is the "protection" the law offers.

They can just run this cycle forever.

Scott Duncan: A bankruptcy trustee must accept it. They have no obligation to.

Scott Duncan: You are also in the U.S. You have a slightly different status than the commonwealth.

Derek Moran: bankruptcy trustee = Receiver General Rona Ambrose?

Scott Duncan: That's the one!

Tell her I said hi.

Scott Duncan: BIRTH CERTIFICATES are NOT FEDERAL

Scott Duncan: In either country.

Scott Duncan: CITIZENSHIP is FEDERAL

Derek Moran: So who would've been 'THE COURT' that appointed Rona Ambrose as the Bankruptcy Trustee?

Scott Duncan: Derek, the government is who "The Court" appointed. The rest is just busy work..

Derek Moran: 'The Court' = IMF ? (Scott clicked Like on this)

Scott Duncan: Fun Fact. Those born in Washington are NOT considered valid certificates. The Birth CERTIFICATE for The DISTRICT of COLUMBIA is actually considered a "Coupon" like a Chuck-e-Cheese ticket.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 464
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 464 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 335

Cory Black

The JP is already the administrator for the NAME that was created in the public interest. Accept their oath of office (the public not the private) and tell them they are in fact the public trustee for the name. I have never had a justice rebut that claim. answer for them when they remain silent.

Cory Black

The BC is the receit for your security, which is the registration of a live birth. The gov is the trustee of that doc. The BC is not only a receit of the security but an assigned name that allows the human to function as a corporation in this commercial system. You only have the right of use for the name! It was "given" to you! The fraud is to shift liability from the legal title owner to the beneficiary and equitable title owner of the name. Know who you Are!

Chris Evan

That makes absolutely zero sense to me. I am aware that it is, in fact, a Security Instrument. Where you lose me (and where everyone has lost me) is why does the gov go through all the trouble to do this? And if I decide to use the NAME, aren't there strings attached? Isn't it much simpler to not get involved with the whole FRAUD going on here?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 465
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 465 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

The reason is who controls the assets of the surety and who assumes liability for the person. I have a person. I am not the person. The presumptions of that we by consent or is where they conjoin us to the person. The bc is a valuable instrument and placed into a trust. the corporation you own stock in covers you from liability.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 466
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 466 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

yes Derek, I read that and understand it. But I do not have a BC. Maybe it is somewhere else where there is a BC, but I dont have it

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 466 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 466 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Chris Evan

Frisbey, I am not playing word games....This makes zero sense to me. So someone created a document that gives me a person...for what reason? And this document was mailed to me by mistake and it is like a nuke?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 467
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 467 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Dude....it sounds like complete fraud to me. Why would I participate in it? The legal/equity capacity, or in other words, the creation of a trust was not done with my consent. I want full lawful control of everything that has to do with me. They can control whatever they want, but no piece of paper that I have nothing to with implies they can control me.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 467
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 467 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

All right...here is my issue with this. I have in the past contracted with these criminals and had DL's and SSN etc. I NO LONGER USE it...or I should say that there are still a couple ties to me, but not many and way less than there used to be. But why am I subject to PRESUMPTIONS? How about this....FUCK OFF! What am I supposed to do, guess what they think? No, this is dumb and I don't want to play!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 468 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 468 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Chris Evan

So, for some reason, I am bound to a contract because someone I have never met, thinks I am a person that is surety for a Security Instrument that I have never seen, thereby making me property? I am not really following this

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 470 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 470 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Chris Evan

Exactly, so debt was obtained through the use of my alleged BC. I still have no evidence this effects me!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 471 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 471 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

Lets figure this out:

You enter there place...

YOU: Hi sir/madam, apparently there is a piece of paper here that concerns ME. YOU: Some folks call this a birth certificate. YOU: Please, Madame/Sir, could you EXPLAIN me in DETAILS what's this all about? YOU: Thanks

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 472
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 472 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Chris Schulte, forget about that....you don't WANT one, you want to know 1). Whos created it 2). Its purpose 3). Does it have ANYTHING to do with YOU 4). Is it a SECURITY 5). If yes, WHY 6). Do you have any OBLIGATIONS over it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 474
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 474 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

With my surety in a corp is my access to my credit. To discharge my debt.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 476 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 476 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

I have mine and it shows my foot print my mom had a copy made I want to photo copy it and post it here.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 477 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 477 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Pete Daoust

You stay away from doing business with them, and when they show up to offer you a TENDER FOR LAW, you say, NO THANKS. You have the right to CONTRACT, and/or NOT to CONTRACT. No one can force you to contract.....they can try, but if you STAND your ground, they will eventually to go away.....This BC is NOT dangerous, it can even be helpful in some circumstance.....it has been created to SERVE ME, the MASTER.....unless they DARE to say something else :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 478 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 478 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

OK, let say MY BC is liened, and I get ARRESTED, who are they arresting ?, the PERSON of course, and who is suppose to pay for this arrestation ?, the freaking PERSON I guess, through the BC, which is a fucking check....so now, what the heck they will do if this BC is liened ?....it surely will get messy :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 479
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 479 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Frisbey, I watched that video. You are having some tunnel vision. Think outside the box. FRN;s are accepted everywhere and lawful money is not. One would HAVE to use FRN's out of necessity to EAT! There is no additional jurisdiction out of necessity. Plus, one would have to be a citizen of the United States to even be subject anyhow. Do you have evidence that I am a US Citizen?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 479
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 479 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Just call all these places, and say: Hey, I've heard that there is a birth certificate somewhere concerning ME, I need a meeting with you guys.....<

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 480 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 480 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Pete Daoust

I asked one question to one of those idiots, she gave me an answer, I asked, are you sure at 100% of this answer ?, she said no, at about 70% :/, I said, can you transfer me to someone that might have a 100% answer?, she said no. :/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 481
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 481 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Mathew Morrill

Chris were you born in Boston? I was not so I don't think me going to the town hall in Boston would help me, that's where my confusion is. You guys got me wanting to go down there to.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 481
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 481 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

The question was: Dear Madame, can you explaine me what is the SURETY/SECURITY of MY person ?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 482 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 482 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Mathew Morrill

Yeah then you will probably have luck going to the Boston town hall. I went right to the Mass.gov website and searched "Birth Certificate". It then sent me to The Registry of Vital Records. But maybe the town hall in my town has something also?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 482
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 482 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

And to come back to earth, watch this after :/

Money makes the world go around and the Fed is playing a dangerous game with it.

You won't learn about it from the blow dried air heads on MSNBC or Fox Business.

Understand the strange things the Fed is doing behind the scenes.

Video:

http://www.realecontv.com/page/1503.html

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 484
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 484 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Kirsten Carlstrom

Thanks Derek Moran, I'm a little lost with this....I'll keep reading it over until something clicks. Can anyone suggest a video or some more reading that may assist me in getting a better handle on this information?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 484
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 484 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Kirsten Carlstrom

I have a question first, how is it that I or the legal person became surety?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 485 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 485 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Kirsten Carlstrom

What agencies in the US must I notify that I'm beneficiary? Along with removing any contracts I may have entered into without knowing the implications of those contracts, like the drivers license?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 485
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 485 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Now, I don't have to notify no one, If a PERSON contact "ME", I have to make a decision if I use "ME" to respond, or the PERSON I have in my pocket....if NO PERSON is contacting "ME", and/or the PERSON NAMED PIERRE DAOUST, than WHY should I contact anyone ???

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 486
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 486 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Fuck them, you don't have to contact them.....if they contact you, than you respond.....fuck it, ....that's how I see this, and don't sign ANYTHING without fully UNDERSTANDING what the fuck you are doing....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 486
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 486 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Technically, Pete is correct...but in the US, you should let them know that you will no longer be voting. And if you have any oaths on file, you will want to rescind them. You may want to lien the NAME too....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 486
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 486 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Kirsten Carlstrom

Jason, I have a warrant out for my arrest for an expired drivers license. I was forced under duress to sign a citation, two days after I signed I certified mailed and had delivered an affidavit of non corporate status and rescind my signature on the citation/contract but a warrant was issued anyways. 3 deputies came to my home to arrest me, damaged my door and scared the hell out of everyone in my home. I didn't admit to being the "PERSON" and after several hours the deputies finally left. They've parked outside of my home for months and spoken to several of my neighbors asking them to call them when I leave my home so they can arrest me.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 487
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 487 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

WOW!!! Notice of Mistake! They want to arrest KIRSTEN CARLSTROM, not you. Let them know!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 488 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 488 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Kirsten Carlstrom

Is it true that the bc has a bond attached to it? If that is so and a bond is a certificate or evidence of a debt, than what exactly is the debt and what is securing that bond and why is it attached to the bc?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 488
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 488 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Kirsten, the BC (Legal Person) that says KIRSTEN CARLSTROM on it IS Surety for the debt. It is also a registered voter! It is a costume. If you put it on, you are subject to the rules. If you don't wear it, (or place a lien on it and wear it (as you are the only one who has given it value)), there is no jurisdiction! So yes, If you wear the costume and accept the SURETY, your labor is security for the debt.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 489
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 489 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

So essentially, to CLAIM your beneficial interest with this SECURITY CERTIFICATE, you must put forth a trust indenture directed at (now) Diane Finley as fiduciary trustee for that ACCOUNT?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 490 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 490 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Derek Moran

Kirsten Carlstrom- here's a question you should ask Scott, because, well, he does like boobies and you DO have them: "Who's the equivalent of your RECEIVER GENERAL in Canada, here in the united states of America?"

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 490
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 490 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Neil RowePaul Rowe

The Birth certificate is confirmed evidence of slave trade, in a pirate commercial court. It naturally makes judges uncomfortable. When I deal with the courts, I come off from the jump with an oppt curtesy notice, which specifically incorporates a statement of reliance on unrebuted UCC facts in commerce that all public offices are vacant, and that this is exactly what they, as private contractors are engaged in, human trafficking of people, presumed to have no rights, right from the jump, knowingly and intentionally with culpability deprived of rights treated as fictions devoid of rights, and notice that I dont consent to being induced into counterfeiting or forgery, or contributing to their criminal corporate schemes and bankrupt social insurance programs in their lawless monopoly money pyramid scheme.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 490
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 490 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Neil Rowe

ONE PEOPLES PUBLIC TRUST, Swiss Lawyers who put together a forclosure notice on private corperate governments masqurading as public institutions.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 491 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 491 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Neil RowePaul Rowe

CAUSE NUMBER 13-DCV-205913

IN THE INTEREST OF — IN THE ALLEGED 328th

Jaydin Joseph Louis Reddo — DISTRICT COURT

A Child of JOSEPH LOUIS REDDO, Estate — OF FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS

I COURTESY NOTICE BY PAUL NEIL ROWE TO ALLEGED JUDICIAL OFFICER OF ALLEGED COURT

II TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. Parties B. Applicability C. Respondent’s Responsibilities D. Sufficient Verified Response E. Method of Rejection F. Method of Acceptance G. Terms of Acceptance

III FEE SCHEDUAL A Changes to Terms and Conditions

IV BACKGROUND AND FULL DISCLOSURE

V CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

VI ATTESTED VERIFICATION

I Courtesy Notice To Alleged Judicial Officer Of Alleged Court Respondent (private details): Walter B Williams c/o alleged 328th District Court Office: Fort Bend County Justice Center 1422 Eugene Heimann Circle Richmond, Texas State [77469]

Proponent (private details): Paul Neil Rowe c/o Mailing Address 6714 Springcrest Drive Richmond, Texas State [77479] Date: Thursday the first of August, Two Thousand Thirteen Re: Unlimited personal liability arising from foreclosure of all banks, all corporate governments and all other corporations by UCC filings of the One People’s Public Trust. (OPPT); *One People defined in UCC# 2012079290 Service: Registered Mail Number ______________________ DULY VERIFIED DECLARATION OF FACTS: With regard to operating or perpetuating any and all private money systems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems and any and all SLAVERY AND CHILD TRAFFICKING SYSTEMS of and against the One People* by Walter B Williams, with address of 1422 Eugene Heimann Circle, Richmond, Texas State [77469], hereafter “Respondent”. I am the sole lawful and legal REGISTERED owner, custodian, and trustee of my BE'ing, any and all creations therefrom, and property thereof, UCC Doc. File No.'s 2012127810, 2012127854, 2012127907, 2012127914, restated and incorporated here by reference as if set forth in full, original notice of DECLARATION OF FACTS by public registration made and given by the One People's Public Trust, hereafter “OPPT”. I have and do knowingly, willingly, and intentionally adopt, reconfirm, and ratify said DECLARATION OF FACTS as my own duly verified due DECLARATION OF FACTS, nunc pro tunc praeterea preterea, unrebutted as a matter of law, as matter of fact, and as a matter of public policy, hereafter “Proponent”. DULY VERIFIED NOTICE: Proponent duly gives and makes notice to Respondent that Proponent DOES NOT CONSENT to any unlawful and illegal devaluing, diminishing, abrogating, subjugating, subordinating, usurping, invading, violating or theft of Proponent's duly secured BE'ing, any and all creations therefrom, and property thereof. Respondent is duly ordered to CEASE AND DESIST any and all said unlawful and illegal actions against Proponent effective immediately. Proponent duly makes and gives you due notice that Respondent is lawfully and legally responsible and liable, in principal and triple damages under common law, for any and all unlawful and illegal actions against Proponent by Respondent causing and resulting in any and all damage to Proponent, inclusive of physical harm, physical detention, property seizure, property damage, financial damage, or any other damage of Proponent's measurable energy. Respondent’s attention is directed to the DECLARATION OF FACTS, specifically the foreclosure in late 2012, of the world’s corporations operating under the guise of the people's governments, banks and all other corporations for cause of treason against and the damage of the one people of this planet without their knowing, willing and intentional consent, specifically: Government Charters Cancelled: (Refer: DECLARATION OF FACTS: UCC Doc # 2012127914 Nov 28 2012) —...That any and all CHARTERS, inclusive of The United States Federal Government, UNITED STATES, “STATE of ...", Inclusive of any and all abbreviations, idem sonans, or other legal, financial or managerial forms, any and all international equivalents, inclusive of any and all OFFICES, inclusive of any and all OFFICERS, PUBLIC SERVANTS, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, TREATIES, CONSTITUTIONS, MEMBERSHIP, ACTS, and any and all other contracts and agreements made thereunder and thereby, are now, void, worthless, or otherwise canceled, unrebutted; ...” Bank Charters Canceled: (Refer: TRUE BILL: WA DC UCC Doc# 2012114776 Oct 24 2012) “Declared and ordered irrevocably cancelled; any and all charters for Bank of International Settlements (BIS) members thereto and thereof including all beneficiaries, including all certain states of body owning, operating, aiding and abetting private money systems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems, operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS — commandeering lawful value by unlawful representation...” Said DECLARATION OF FACTS, identified herein, restated here, remains unrebutted and stands as Absolute Truth in law, commerce and BE'ing, registered in public record, universal law ordinance, for all of the world to rely upon. See https://gov.propertyinfo.com/DC-Washington/ or www.peoplestrust1776.org.

Accordingly, Respondent is advised that they now act in the capacity of an individual entity, without a corporate safety net and with full personal liability for EVERY ACTION THEY TAKE under common law protected and preserved by public policy UCC 1-103, and Universal law, the governing law laid out in the OPPT UCC filings. (Refer: WA DC UCC Ref Doc # 2012113593) Should Respondent choose to act on behalf of a foreclosed entity, causing Proponent any damage as herein stated, Respondent, in their individual and unlimited capacity will be held absolutely liable. Such actions may result in lawful remedy being brought against Respondent, pursuant to public policy UCC 1-305, including but not limited to UCC Commercial Bill (Lien), against Respondent’s assets. Further, Respondent’s attention is drawn to DECLARATION AND ORDER: UCC Doc # 2012096074, Sept. 09 2012, duly reconfirmed and ratified by COMMERCIAL BILL UCC Doc. No. 2012114586 and TRUE BILL UCC Doc. No.2012 114776 which

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 491
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 491 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

This logo is supposed to be of significance, because of the KEY featured in it, has something to do with the definition of STARR in Black's 9th...

http://www.economiapersonal.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/us-treasury-logo.jpg

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 494
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 494 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

starr (stahr), n. [fr. Latin starrum fr. Hebrew sh'tar "a writing"] Hist. A Jewish contract (esp. for release of an obligation) that Richard I declared to be invalid unless it was placed in a lawful repository, the largest being in the king's Exchequer at Westminster. Also termed starra. "It is well known that, before the banishment of the Jews under Edward I, their contracts and obligations were denominated in our ancient records starra or starrs, from a corruption of the Hebrew word, sheeay, a covenant .... These starrs, by an ordinance of Richard the first ... were commanded to be enrolled and deposited in chests under three keys in certain places; one, and the most considerable, of which was in the king's exchequer at Westminster .... [T]he room at the exchequer, where the chests containing these starrs were kept, was probably called the starr-chamber, and, when the Jews were expelled from the kingdom, was applied to the use of the king's council, when sitting in their judicial capacity." 4 William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 263 n.a (1769)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 495
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 495 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Treasuries. (1922) Debt obligations of the federal government backed by the full faith and credit of the government. See TREASURY BILL; TREASURY BOND; TREASURY CERTIFICATE; TREASURY NOTE. Black's 9th

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 495
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 495 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

BIRTH CERTIFICATES > FOR TREASURY USE ONLY

BIRTH CERTIFICATES > TREASURY USE ONLY

BIRTH CERTIFICATES > TREASURY USE

BIRTH CERTIFICATES > TREASURY ONLY

BIRTH CERTIFICATES > TREASURY

"...(especially for RELEASE OF AN OBLIGATION) that Richard I declared to be invalid unless it was placed in a LAWFUL REPOSITORY..."

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 496
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 496 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Kirsten Carlstrom

I'm in Florida and yes, new here. My eyes started opening to what is really going on with our government two years ago. Unfortunately, I've been lead down several disinformation paths and have studied a lot of nonsense. Truly happy to have found this group.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 496
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 496 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Kirsten Carlstrom

That everyone's legal person is actually an account worth millions and that account may be cashed in for FRN's, strawman stuff. Also, I spent a couple of months with the Tim Turner Group in AL. I liked what the Restore America principles were, however the main group of people were so far out when it came to religion - it kind of freaked me out. Total zealots!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 496
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 496 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Kirsten Carlstrom

Christianity, Jesus, they took the bible literally word for word. I'm not a Christian, I felt uncomfortable at every meeting and seminar. That's all I'm gonna say about religion, I don't want the wrath of Scott coming down on me if I cross a line, and it's off topic.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 497
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 497 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top