The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

Jun 05, 2013 8:17 PM

Daslow Aizelasi

So a few years ago I was arrested and Charged with theft of a gas utility and mischief causing damage. At the first hearing I was ordered to go for a psychological evaluation. ( which I never did) the second hearing i presented this document. ALL CHARGES and conditions were dropped. Now I know you will rip apart as you say the imaginary person in the sky part ( so lets not waste time with that.) Why did this work?

Ecclesiastical Notice of Asservation

From: michael ryan of the jean-louis family 2011/07/20 calgary, Alberta, Canada, geographical location no code, non commercial

To Judges Qaarters 601 5 Street SWt6 CALGARY , AB T2P 5P7

NOTICE This is a Private Ecclesiastical, Non Commercial Assumptive contract/agreement/covenant and understanding between michael ryan of the jean-louis family and the judges quarters the private man. Provided under protest and duress

Hello Judges Quarters, I am michael ryan of the family jean-louis, you will address me as minister daslow. I come here as a duty to God not to the courts to minister the office of the estate with the name RYAN JEAN-LOUIS. I am not the legal fiction you are seeking to contract with. "I am here because I have obeyed God rather than man. Your duty is to punish evil doers as God has defined evil. What evil have I done?” (Acts 5:29)

Declaration of private ministry under God and his Perpetual law. I am declaring that I am God created; My Christian given name is Michael ryan Arthur jerry of the jean-louis family and; I am a private ecclesiastical man man under God as my creator and no man or woman has a moral or lawful right to impose anything upon me without my informed consent and; That I do hereby renounce any fraudulent, corporate, assumptive contract and do honor the directive and obligation to respect the equal god given freedoms of other men and women under His law. To all those who set eyes on this Ecclesiastical Determination, I do hereby, officially performing the functions of my calling serve notice to all private men and women who receive this that any offer made herein, prior to, or on my part imply acceptance of intimidation, violence, or threats of violence against me and that no such offer implies that I will submit to any intimidation in the future. I as a bondservant of Christ, do henceforth offer the good faith of proclamation of my freeborn will to live in peace and declare that, by right of God, the de facto authorities edicts, codes, obligations, statutes, taxes, licenses, and prohibitions are not binding upon me, or applicable upon God’s ministers and his children

I am who my Father says I am, not who Caesar says I am. I love my God, I love my neighbor, I even love each and every one of you.

“Capitis Diminutio ( meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization) In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgement of personality, a loss or curtailment of a man’s status or aggregate of legal attribute and qualifications.” Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition. 1968

I am a man, a flesh and blood living being, not an “ARTIFICIAL PERSON” (A legal entity not a human being, recognized as a person in law to whom legal rights and duties may attach)

To create joinder between the man and the PERSON will be considered fraud and is punishable under the Criminal Code of CANADA.

I do not grant the court jurisdiction over the man Michael Ryan Arthur Jerry of the house of Jean-Louis nor will I allow the court to fraudulently create joinder between the man and the PERSON. From this point forward and forever it is my will that the only way to create joinder between me and any legal PERSON is in writing and witnessed by a Notary Public provided with my consent.

that “inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and creature of the mind only , a government can interface only with artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” Penhallow v Doane’s administrators, 3 U.S. 54 (1795) at p

Pope Pius XI wrote Divini redemptoris: "The human being ought to be put in the first rank of earthly realities." Pope Pius XII wrote July 14, 1946: "It is the human being that Yahweh put at the top of the visible universe, making him, in economics and politics as well, the measure of all things." It is not Government who is at the top; it is the human being. The human being therefore does not belong to Government; it is rather Government that must belong to the human being, who must serve him by exercising its function of guardian of human freedoms. Maurice Allard, the MP for Sherbrooke, Que., also said during this debate on the Bill of Rights: "The individual must not become a tool or a victim of the State; it is the State which, while making laws, must favour the numerous freedoms of man." is it the duty of Men, and therefore it our heartfelt desire, to ensure that all men recall their Maxim: “No man shall be ignorant of God”, lest we offend God by stating or acting as if any rule of man’s law is precedental or supercedent to His supreme Law.

"Is it not written in your law that the law does not compel a man to do the impossible (maxim), and, also, any law contrary to the law of God is no law at all (maxim)? I was exercising my duty of movement upon the common ways. My warrant for doing that is written in the Word of God, "Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature" (Mark 16:15), also, "To visit orphans and widows" (James 1:27). And it is also written, "I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me" (Philippians 4:13). , "Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law" "It is also written in your law that an act does not make a man guilty unless the intention be guilty. Since my intention is to do God's Will, and God's Will is not evil, I could not possibly be guilty in this thing I am accused of." "I cannot accept any benefits offered by the court. And as a bondman of Christ Jesus, I cannot represent "myself," for that denotes self-will. I don't have any self-will. Jesus the Christ is my Advocate and Wonderful Counselor" (1 John 2:1, Isaiah 9:6). It is written in your law that "No man is ignorant of God’s Law" (Maxim). The Scripture saith, "There is one lawgiver (James 4:12). The Lord is our lawgiver (Isaiah 33:22)." It is also written in your law, "We are all bound to our lawgiver, regardless of our personal interpretation of reality (Maxim). Legality is not reality" (Maxim). The reality is what God says it is, not what your perception of it is. It is also written in your law, "There is no fiction without law. Fictions arise from the law, and not law from fictions" (Maxim).

to remove any items from my possession will be immediately considered theft and is punishable under the Criminal Code of CANADA

I am protected from criminal responsibility for defending my possessions even against a person entitled by law to possession of it. Criminal Code of CANADA pt. 1 section 39. (1)

ATCO first broke the law acoording to article 51 Notwithstanding the terms of any contract, a person or company furnishing or supplying gas by retail or wholesale either directly or indirectly to or for the public or any member of the public shall not discontinue the furnishing or supplying of the gas by reason of or pursuant to any other contractual obligations in respect of the furnishing or supplying of gas. RSA 1980 cG-4 s42

Article 52 of the gas utlities act of Alberta states 52(1) A person who fails to comply with this Act or the regulations is guilty of an offence. (2) A person who advises, solicits, persuades, instructs, directs or orders a person (a) to do an act or thing prohibited by this Act or the regulations, or (b) to omit to do an act or thing required to be done by this Act or the regulations is guilty of an offence. (3) A person who is guilty of an offence under this section is liable to a fine not exceeding $3,000,000 for each day or part of a day on which the offence occurs or continues.

422. (1) Every one who wilfully breaks a contract, knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that the probable consequences of doing so, whether alone or in combination with others, will be (a) to endanger human life, (b) to cause serious bodily injury, (c) to expose valuable property, real or personal, to destruction or serious injury, (d) to deprive the inhabitants of a city or place, or part thereof, wholly or to a great extent, of their supply of light, power, gas or water, or (e) to delay or prevent the running of any locomotive engine, tender, freight or passenger train or car, on a railway that is a common carrier, is guilty of (f) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, or (g) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

No police officer would respond to these complaints when brought forward to them including CST J.H HAMEL We wish for the case to be dismissed or to be given a void judgment based on

Charges were laid based on assumption the arresting officer CST. J.H HAMEL nor any other officer or an employee of ATCO GAS never entered the residence to verify the appliances were turned on and consuming gas.

There is no injured party to come forward . It is written in your law that corporations, such as ATCO GAS have no souls—they are dead, and the dead cannot be sued, and the dead cannot receive an injury. Can you show me any law that says the living must be joined to the dead? God's Law says that we are not to be unequally yoked with unbelievers (2 Corinthians 6:14), and it is also written in your law that “unequal things ought not to be joined” (maxim). Therefore, it is God's Will that I not be joined to the dead, for scripture says, "God is not the God of the dead, but of the living (Matthew 22:32) ."

All witness statements are hearsay

It is stated that the ACCUSED tampered with the meter, How is this possible if the meter was removed by ATCO GAS when DAVID SINCLAIR attested that the meter was removed 2010/06/29

The Chief Financial Officer JAMES SPENCE of DIRECT ENERGY and myself had a tacit agreement. That if he did not accept my payment I had sent in and if my meter was not returned within 10 days upon receiving the letter by registered mail. Or if I did not receive a response from him in writing I would reconnect the line myself. He did not respond or return my meter I remained in honor by following through with our agreement

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 470
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 470 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 15

Derek Moran

"Hello Judges Quarters": i love that. Basically you didnt know WHICH Judge/Justice you were going to get, but, you did know that you would eventually get ONE of them, so this NOTICE would ultimately get to the 'right one?' :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 470
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 470 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

so ... the first paragraph was his notice to clarify that he is not subject to control by government and no commerce expected or implied, he is not a legal fiction. Is there any significance to using Canon law?

Asservation — confirmation

Private Ecclesiastical, Non Commercial Assumptive contract/agreement/covenant

Private - Acts by individuals or corporations not subject to the direct control of government.

Ecclesiastical - intended to include all those rules which govern ecclesiastical tribunals. Vide Law Canon.

non commercial - refers to an activity or entity that does not in some sense involve commerce,

Assumptive - Characterized by assumption; Taken for granted; assumed; Presumptuous; assuming.

Contract - An agreement between two or more parties, especially one that is written and enforceable by law

Agreement - properly executed and legally binding contract; The writing or document embodying this contract.

Covenant - formal sealed agreement or contract; A suit to recover damages for violation of such a contract.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 471 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 471 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Gail Marie

I'm not understanding what you are saying...I looked up the definitions to see why that was enough to get his charges dropped...I dont see any of it as trying to be in the club..what am I missing?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 471
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 471 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gail Marie

the fact that I understand something doesn't mean clubhouse rules, it means that I can agree with or I'm clear on and accepting of what is being said....when I'm not understanding, then I am not in agreement or clear or accepting of what is being said..which is the case above :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 471
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 471 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

"Step 2: Direct your case and do not let them proceed. Present NOTICE OF MISTAKE, and REMEMBER THE FUCKING QUESTIONS IT CONTAINS. If they do not answer these questions you object, and declare that unless the questions in your NOTICE OF MISTAKE are answered, you CAN NOT UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.

Anything outside of this supports their position that you are “playing” their game, and thus it is presumed that you understand the rules. The only way to counter this is to declare that you CANNOT UNDERSTAND the rules without these questions being answered."

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 472
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 472 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Daslow Aizelasi

MORE MEAT LESS FILLER

My intention by corresponding through this document is to clarify what is occurring in my situation regarding having any relationship with the court and any concerns therewith. I come under peaceful means and therefore do not wish to or have any want or need to battle or war with the court whatsoever. If it is directly required by the court, I can produce a Peace Bond to that effect in order to demonstrate my good faith and merit in whatever matter exist. I'm simply asking for an explanation to which person of title you the court is summoning to speak to? Since it is impossible for myself to be a person of title and I have never created such a person then how can I be linked to such a person? It is my understanding that a person can only appear on a document and therefore I would be committing a fraudulent act by attempting to represent such a person that I had no involvement in creating in the first place or have no permission to do so on behalf of. If there is any confusion regarding this topic, then I apologize for any misunderstanding on my part. That being said, I hope and pray that the court's purpose and intentions in these types of matters is to appropriately and truthfully guide people to make the proper decisions especially concerning the fact of trapping or entrapping themselves into unknowingly and falsely representing a person that they have no association with. I would think that nobody should be forced or threatened into an act that they have not committed or the intent to commit. Also I am not aware of the particular jurisdiction and/or law that the court conducts itself under, but for myself I can only recognize the law that was created and establish by God the Creator, which we as people are to follow by. It is my understanding that there is no law superior in standing then that of the Divine. If I am incorrect or uninformed in my analogy, then I would ask anyone to come forward and present and provide the truth to the contrary. The court in my estimations has taken the liberty of demanding from me that I provide my fingers for printing, which I feel is being conveyed to me under threat of reprisal where could lead to forcible confinement or worse if I choose not to follow the court's instructions. In good conscience it is very apparent that I cannot subdue any physical attributes that I possess in and on my body. By doing so I would be forfeiting that which I truly possess and that I must guard over for the sake of my health and welfare. So regrettably I obviously cannot submit to the court's demand. Where I may have stated before and wish to remind the court, I do not wish to have any sort of relationship with the court in any manner or shape whatsoever. I feel by doing so I would always be in fear that it would always fall one sided toward the court and I would be open to ridicule and eventually compromised in the end. I only believe in surrounding myself with those people who are truly righteous in faith and kindness. The court has not demonstrated to me that it is capable of conducting itself in such a manner at this time.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 472
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 472 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top