Shaun Hamer
I don't know, perhaps you could run some tests. :) The contaminants are present, especially in corporate products. But again, the issue of rights is somewhat seperate, Is the life we take, ours to take, It seems obvious the animal has primary right of use to its body. For nature's purposes anyway. Perhaps vivisection would provide a better morcel to chew this over than meat eating. Survival is survival after all. But when it comes to suffering for vanity or to test weapons etc, do we have the right,? of course we have the choice and the ability, but is it right.?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 363
