The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

Jun 05, 2013 3:13 AM

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

If someone does appear in court after they have filled the "NOTICE OF MISTAKE" or they not giving consent and thous under the courts jurisdiction again?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 448
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 448 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 38

Bill WiethaupBildo Schmildo

Answer to question of this thread--Yes. Now, can you point me to the thread that mentions the effect of this cause. ie, they come and get you and drag you kicking and screaming to jail and more court. Presume Notice of Mistake was ignored.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 449
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 449 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

It depends in what capacity you attend the court eg: amicus curiae or sui juris etc...

If you stand your ground & continually make it very clear that you are unable to understand the nature & cause of proceedings until the questions in the notice of mistake are answered, then how can you be dragged away if you are merely seeking answers and asking questions ie: remaining honourable?...

If, by your assertion you are still ignored & dragged away, then you have probably been kidnapped, so a writ of habeus corpus probably needs to be filed on your behalf...

Dean Kory's final court appearance audio discusses the notice of mistake & the thread re Dean Clifford's arrest & detainment discusses the notice of mistake & habeus corpus in the body of the comments in that thread (I think)...happy reading

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 449 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 449 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

David Johansen

that's the trick. basically your telling them unless they read the notice, to answer it's questions, which is a deception to get them to read it proving they got the notice, now its part of the record! brillient!

they will do anything to keep from doing that once they realize how it catches them at their own game. which wont take long, they'll be sure and distribute a pamphlet warning all justices.

i get a cookie now?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 450 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 450 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Bill Wiethaup

As far as I know, you can go if you have a "security interest" in the estate/trust/legal person/entity that they are "charging". Just gotta make sure that they know that that entity is NOT you, the man/woman. You the man/woman are not the surety.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 450 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 450 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Bill WiethaupBildo Schmildo

To "discharge", settle and close the accounting on the event. You don't HAVE to go. It depends on if you have control over, or an interest in, the legal person. If you remain outside the legal realm, and do not claim any control over your transmitting utility, fine. Let them do their thing.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 451
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 451 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top