Jun 04, 2013 11:03 PM

Ok, let's examine this.

If I were to exercise my authority over you, in the context of you being a member of my crew, and you NOTIFY me that I am MISTAKEN, and that you are NOT, in fact a member of my crew, do you have to appear at my flagship?

And anytime you are in a courtroom you are only there by special appearance as a courtesy to them because you're not the one getting fucked today.

As i posted that your point of order wasn't showing up wtf get a grip mate . By what authority do you demand anything of me ?

It was posed to you all wise one i do my own homework :P

mine and his are one and the same.

Whaddup? ? I get it. Ye don't show up.....

No, you don't have to appear at that flagship. What if you don't show up and they send you a default judgment?

Bildo stay on the subject and answer the question please

Fuuucckk. ..why so many stupid fuckin questions to the one fuckin question ??

What if there really is a santa clause ??

There is really only one question adam

What if they take away all the red smarties....

please not now adam let this sink in the others okay :)

I know that John. But some members here don't get it.

I answered the question asked at the top of this posting from Scott Duncan. I only added what comes next. Sorry I answered the question.

Forget it ---continue

oh sorry did not see your post Bildo Schmildo

What comes next is not for this thread okay

Hey DILDO, you did NOT answer the fuckin question. If the Captain seen that ye lied he will ban your ass fir good. NO FUCKIN LIES OR LIARS. GOT IT KUNT?

adam he did it is up top lol

you should deleat that adam okay thank you

Oh...fuck...so it is. My apologies bildo...

Hahahaha...im off to a flyer tiday....pain be fucked...

Sorry bildo schmildo

I can't delete. Only CYBERMEN can delete, delete, delete.

Courtesans get fucked its the other way around, some people are so twisted in all this I get fuckkn sick.

Jc please answer the above question thank you

Outcast Frisbey for what? It's already answered. It's called comprehensive reading.

okay then pleas deleat your comment then thanks

ask yourtself how your comments are relevent to the thread?

J.c. Gods grace you are extending them the courtesy making them the courtesan you don't except courtesy

The Answer is Emphatically No, a women made a mistake in the thread also which has to be Corrected. How about paying attention before speaking on things?

Oops it's Carl not Carol well so I apologize I also made a mistake Carl is most likely a man not a woman.

So I should be courteous to the prostitutes? It doesn't make sense for me at this moment.

To me it seems common sensical that he who does the deed wears the title however Carl Dunne is saying that by doing the deed the receiver of the deed done becomes the courtesan.

here Philip Laforet

Maybe you two JC and carl should make your own thread ? about that subject. just a thought :)

I have to re read, it's getting late, my eyes are burning

It's all relevant Outcast Frisbey in relation to appearing after depositing Notice of Mistake and then either extend or not extend them a courtesy.

By the very nature of you appearing you are giving concent. :)

I originally said anytime you appear in court you are there by special appearance extending them a courtesy. Correct me where i am wrong as accepting a courtesy is also accepting surety is it not ?

Sieg fail....CONSENT.

Accepting. ..sieg fail....

You are not giving consent you are there to settle the matter of the mistake and nothing else.

I asked Scott let us see what he says :)

and in accepting surety you are consenting to a befit.

yet you dont comprehend my question is the same as Scott's

a king does not accept a befit it is owed to them by right

Ponder whether i give your question enough value to let it steal time i could be learning something new you will soon see comprehension of your question is irrelevant to me.

I state as fact I am right.

A right is not a right if it can be taken from you.

I ponder.....P A I N.....

Yep. Youre right there john.

Ye have no rights. THE ONLY RIGHTS "YOU" HAVE IS TO BE A GOOD LIL BITCH & BEND OVER & CLUTCH YOUR ANKLES & ACCEPT THEIR STATIST KUNT PENIS UP YOUR ARSE WITH NO SPIT OR LUBE. DONE DRY. USING A SANDPAPER CONDOM.

Piss & fuckin moan as much as ye like kunts.

Possibilities, possibilities, possibilities....

1.you can send your notice, stay at home and get a default judgment, and quite possibly also go through the rigmarole of being arrested and forced to appear and/or other assorted commercial penalties.

2.you can send A notice of special appearance merely for the purpose of having the moving party to show cause why, blah blah...rock up and contract the moving party and judge into a dismissal of sorts:-)

3.you could be inspired by such a summons to pack your bag and go bush, build a tree house and live wild somewhere completely isolated off the grid.

Ect...ect...

Win/win - matter of personal preference and perspective:-)

Depends where your security interests lay...

OR.....GET A BIG FUCK OFF GUN N GIT SUM.....HEHEHEHEHEHE.... Gunna have me sum fun.....

Point is - many options...

The security interest lies in the court doesn't it Blake Gardner?

BC !!

Your S.I lies where ever you want it too

BOND #

We are the author of our contracts (or can be if awake))

I'm not getting that Blake,. Please ecplain what ye mean by SECURITY INTEREST & WHERE IT LIES.

Adz - your preferred remedy method of choice will be (or at least hopefully) relevant to your present security interest nessesity.

Sieg fail....NECESSITY

K - I sent the NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING AND INTENT PLUS DENIAL OF CONSENT - Notarized by a JP, to the man acting as prime minister of nz, solicitor general of nz, attorney general of nz, head of nz police, head of Auckland police, filed it at the district court where they were inviting me too attend and made sure the judge got to read it before I decided to appear. Then in court I sat at back of court, when judge entered refused to stand and when name called yelled out "that sounds like my name" ........when asked to stand replied from back of court...I will stand your honour on condition I do not waive my commonlaw rights nor do I consent to In-persona jurisdiction, the judge said "oh stand up then" then I walked to front of the public gallery not entering the bridge of the ship and told them the name on the summons was not my name - it was the identity of a legal fiction created by government - my name was as on my birth cert in upper lower case, as I held it up for them to see, he replied "are you sure you aren't that person - no! your honour I am not, I replied, he then issued an arrest warrant for the all caps name for failing to appear in court .......then cancelled it after I turned around and walked out.

there was a bit more to it than that above but dems da bones ...so to speak.

Options - possibilities - consequences:-)

It's a great life...

yes it is

up until I found these pages and all you guys all Gerry and I had was information from the freedom movement - so we tended to follow thier ways - times change and thanks to SCOTT, BEVERLY,PETE,ADAM etc etc there are many who post whom we thank very much ... our journey has become far more enlightened and purposeful.....

no offence intended, u just recently on here, this shit with our courts and IRD (Tax dept) was 2yrs ago and I found these pages 3mths ago much before u appeared here ......

Hahahaha...good point John. We're ALL contributing here & its AWESOME. I LOVE THIS GROUP. I HAVE NEVER LEARNED SO MUCH IN MY LIFE. Public & private skewl are fucked.

I give the HIGHEST VALUE to Scott D, our Captain & EVERYONE that contributes the TRUTH inside &/or OUTSIDE this group.

Scott Duncan: Ok, let's examine this.

If I were to exercise my authority over you, in the context of you being a member of my crew, and you NOTIFY me that I am MISTAKEN, and that you are NOT, in fact a member of my crew, do you have to appear at my flagship?