The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 30, 2013 3:14 AM

Scott Duncan

THE TENDER FOR LAW PRESENTS: ALL THE SHIT THAT DEAN KORY IS DOING WRONG!

...AND NAZIS!

Ok, that's a bit of an overly dramatic title, in as much as the courts don't actually follow their own rules any more.

Still though... You still get Nazis, so there's that.

Just because they don't feel like following the rules, doesn't mean we have to be “scumbags” like them. I listened to all the audio recordings that Dean Kory made of his hearings (time I'll never get back, so you fucking owe me, dude!), and I feel it's important for me to correct a few key points here.

I know all of you get your information from multiple sources, ranging from the Grand-Poobah of the Free-Dumb Movement, Robert Menard, to Dean Clifford, to Winston Strout; and maybe it's just self-aggrandizement, but I like to think I'm the only source that tells you the truth instead of just orbiting it. As with many things in life there's “more than one way to skin a cat”. However, one of the worst things you can do is “mix methods”.

Dean Clifford and I are at exact opposite ends of the scale. Dean's name is Trust property, thus giving the man that you know as Dean Clifford a great number of options the rest of you don't have. He doesn't use the Trust like a bank machine, he doesn't abuse any of the authority that any Trust title gives him, and he has the personal knowledge that he's not on his own if he has to “get the fuck out of Dodge”. That's where the consensus ends amoung us.

Dean's teachings on Trust Law are accurate, concise and accessible. For some reason it's worth it for him to give everything he teaches those qualities.

I'm not like that.

I'm not a super-genius, and I don't possess any mental powers that you don't. Any discussion and/or engagement with me starts off with the reality that you ALL THINK WRONG, and YOU ALL VALUE THE WRONG THINGS! This does not serve you when you are up against reality.

The sad part is that most of you are too old to change; and as I've demonstrated here in this little forum, none of you can tell the difference between what's true and what feels good. I know what you're experiencing. Whether from Dean, or from myself, the time always comes when you read something that one of us writes and you KNOW that it is true; but you take no further time to understand what is being told to you.

Fortunately Dean Kory has provided us a working/living example of what happens when all of the above factors are in play.

The first obvious mistake that Dean Kory is making is that he is combining what Dean Clifford teaches with what I teach. For the purposes of this article I'm going to dumb the two positions down so you can make the comparison.

Dean Clifford is all about being left alone, and when he's not left alone, he is about calling “them” to account.

I'm not like that.

I am descended from the very people that put all of this in place. Entire stereotypes about Scottish people exist to misdirect. Most will tell you that Scotsmen are “cheap”, when in reality we are conservative about when we engage in commerce. You have but to look at England's and Scotland's history to see why this is true.

The very name of this group, THE TENDER FOR LAW, is all about that mysterious phrase, “THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER”.

I'll be the first to admit there are a great number of benefits to be enjoyed in commerce, when everybody plays by the rules. As I'm sure everyone is sadly aware of, by now; Nobody is playing by the rules anymore.

Trying to “fix the system”, or call them to account in their own system, is simply “appealing to your rapist”. It baffles me that anyone would think this is sound thinking.

...I digress.

As I'm in a unique position to “follow the money”, I can determine who needs to pay the price for the royal screw-over we've been given. As I type this, a team of system's engineers (and trained monkeys) are preparing for you, the reader, a step-by-step guide for cleaning out every financial institution that touches these shores. The only price that I ask for this knowledge is that you pass it on to others. Pay it forward...and get paid at the same time. Who else offers that shit?

I am many things. I am prorogued Nobility. I am a published author. I am a composer. Above all...the thing that forms the core of who and what I am, is that I am a computer scientist. Those who have taken the time to actually listen to me, will recognize many “Scott-isms”; and the phrase “COMPUTER SCIENCE IS THE ANSWER TO EVERYTHING” is repeated almost as often as my Number 1 “Scott-ism”, “THE MAJORITY IS ALWAYS WRONG.” You ignore these two truths at your own peril.

...and reality does not care what you “believe”.

This lengthy preamble is to drive the next point home.

DO NOT TRY TO COMBINE DEAN'S METHODS WITH MINE.

There is no remedy in fraud. There simply isn't.

In many ways I long for the old days where those who breached the PUBLIC TRUST were hauled into the street and thrown into an angry mob. Authors have mistakenly used the term, “Hanging Judge” as a term for a judge imposing strict penalties; but if you look through actual history, and not the crap you were taught in the Public Fool System, “Hanging Judge” refers to a judge who has abused his power and has been hung for the abuse of that trust. He gives sentences he should be hung for; HANGING JUDGE. You never hear the phrase “hanging JUSTICE” ;) This is odd, as there are so many of them. :D ...I know. Digressing. I get it.

We don't have Judges any more, in Canada. A judge traditionally was a trusted individual who could uphold the PUBLIC TRUST. “We the people” no longer get to decide who is worthy of that trust. People confuse the role of “judge” with the current role of “JUSTICE”. It is important to know the distinction.

JUSTICE is actually a “doing-business-as” name for a Crown Corporation. It actually says, in the Dunn and Bradstreet listings “Government of Ontario Operating as JUSTICE”. It has been like that, IN VARIOUS FORMS, since 1982. . ..I'm sorry you missed it.

That is what you're dealing with, and you have ONE unalienable RIGHT; THE RIGHT NOT TO CONTRACT.

My position is a lot closer to that held by Irene Gravenhorst, than it is to Dean Clifford's.

So, let's cover what Dean Kory is doing wrong! :D

I notice a lot of “Clifford-isms” in what Dean Kory is clearly attempting to say; but all of Dean Clifford's methods depend on what I like to refer to as “Clubhouse Rules”, and every time you do this you're pretending to “be in the club”. The natural response to somebody doing this is very similar to the response to somebody saying they know more than I. In case you haven't noticed I smack them down in the most humiliatingly, and public way possible. “Their” reaction is going to be much the same...we're all human after all.

NOTICE OF MISTAKE (like the cheese) stands alone.

It is the only issue you should be concerned about! NOTHING ELSE!

SERIOUSLY! Accepting discussion about anything else, is a FUCKING NEGOTIATION. All of you are not seeing the forest through the trees. This is why I say Dean Clifford's position is flawed. He believes the tree can be pruned to look pretty again, when in reality it needs it's roots burned out, and it's limbs chopped up for one of Sir-Mica's gassifiers! The fucking tree is dead!

UNDERSTAND?

The tree is dead!

It's filled with parasites and rot, and the parasites are trying to keep the illusion of a tree standing. For the past two years I have been feeding them the rope, at my own expense, and with violence inflicted upon me, so that any argument contrary to my position is immediately nullified. IT IS/WILL BE, CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE that you are NOT getting what you are entitled to, given the burden of surety you have carried!

Unlike THE MAJORITY of your “sources of truth”:

I'm not one of these people that wants to drive without a licence. I'm not one of these people that don't want to pay their mortgage. I'm not one of these people that don't want to pay their taxes. I DO ALL OF THOSE THINGS BECAUSE I FUCKING PROMISED TO! I am, however, someone that possesses knowledge and skills that the government finds/found essential to their expansion. In my youth I gave our erstwhile government a tool, which all of you pay the price for today; and I was rewarded handsomely. I patted myself on the back, and strutted around, knowing that I was smarter than everyone else, and never once paying attention to the harm I had caused.

In compliance with an oath I took a long time ago, I must atone for that; and that's the only reason you, the reader, even know that I exist.

I need to remind you again, that the only reason I'm here, is that I promised to be.

None of you have value to me. You're not qualified to.

I have a lot to teach you, and we are barely getting started; but I am not responsible for the shit that goes wrong when you try to take what I teach you (“REALITY”) and you try to jam it into your idiotic, unqualified, belief structure. As I write that sentence I wonder how many of you have actually pondered that other “Scott-ism” you frequently hear; “ALL BELIEF IS EVIL.” If you believe something, you will stop questioning it; you will stop investigating it, and you will never ponder if, and why, it's true.

Should you believe something, that just happens to be true, you won't look any further — and that's a problem.

So I want everyone to keep the following in mind. All the sources you are investigating tell the truth about the law, but there are pitfalls!

Everything Robert Menard says about the law is true. It's what he doesn't say that's the lie. If you want quick confirmation of this simply ask him what, “This note is legal tender” means. If he tells you the truth (he won't), ask him why he's constantly “begging” for that very same TENDER FOR LAW that contains the ACTS and STATUTES that he claims don't apply to him! THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER is a TENDER FOR LAW. If you BENEFIT, then you have OBLIGATION! Everything Dean Clifford says about the law is true, but how he chooses to apply it, is not; because there's still a lot of “belief” running around in his head. He still believes he can “beat them at their own game.” He will proudly point out their public and blatant violations... His evidence is irrefutable and conclusive. His rights are violated by those TRUSTEES of the PUBLIC, and then he tries to seek remedy from those same trustees! REALLY?

...and then says the remedy, is to go to those very same people and “sue” them..in the very same courts that violated his rights. (What?) ...Oh that's right, those are DIFFERENT courts, with DIFFERENT “Doing business as” JUSTICES. (WHAT?) ...well, I'll just let you work out the flaw from there. If you can't, then you are too stupid to be reading this, and you should kill yourself.

Feel free to try it this way. It's NOT “wrong”, but it ignores the fact that those who hold the PUBLIC TRUST, ARE wrong. Another “Scott-ism” is my position that NONE OF YOU CAN TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT'S TRUE AND WHAT FEELS GOOD! Following Dean Clifford's methods WILL drive this point home, so it's not a COMPLETE waste. ;)

Well then...back to Dean Kory.

Rumour has it, through the grape vine, that the erstwhile Mr. Kory has been and/or will be, a guest on Global C.R.A.P. Radio, hosted by the redoubtable Tony “guy-with-a-dick-in-his-mouth” Butros. This promises to be an exciting show, and I cannot wait to miss it. I eagerly anticipate the thrill of not consuming time I'll never get back.

Instead I'll put something useful here — advice for your next court room appearance, Mr. Kory.

When you're in the court room dealing with these babbling, sacks-of-shit, learn to use the breaks. Repeat after me, “I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS”. If they ignore your question, then your next response should be, “OBJECTION. If the court cannot answer my question, then I do not understand the nature and cause of these proceedings.” Keep repeating that, and repeating that, and repeating that...until they answer your fucking question.

I listen to you in court, Dean Kory, and I picture a girl screaming rape while slipping the condom on the rapist. I notice the distinct lack of that phrase in ANY of your recordings, so repeat it in your head, “Objection. If you cannot answer my question, then I do not understand the nature and cause of these proceedings.”

Apply THE TENDER FOR LAW Rule to this. I choose my words very, very carefully, because I know what they mean. You, the reader, seem to believe there's a library in your ass, because that's demonstrably where you keep pulling your answer out of. If you see me using a phrase that should be used in court, the very first thing you should do is follow my rules. Look up every single word, even, no scratch that, ESPECIALLY, if you THINK you know what the word means. As the regular reader for THE TENDER FOR LAW will tell you, you most certainly don't.

Dean Kory reserves his rights, and then doesn't know what the fuck to do with them; but that's ok, because there are plenty of other people in the court room that know what to do with Dean Kory's rights.

One thing Dean Kory should learn is that he is most certainly not Dean Clifford. Make no mistake, it doesn't matter if I disagree with Dean Clifford's methods. The fact is, I understand them. What Dean Clifford is doing is beyond your current level of comprehension. He is not joking when he says that everything he says and does, is part of a larger plan. I disagree with Dean Clifford's position and methods, because he pays too high a price for the sake of worthless people; but he's doing it for all of you, and not just for himself. I will admit statistically, this does skew the numbers in his favour; because in the end, Dean Clifford is like you. You all think wrong, and value the wrong things.

The only difference between you and Dean Clifford is that some of the things he values ARE the right things.

We are all doing this for different reasons.

Robert Menard will try to scam you out of every cent you have by telling you the truth...because he thinks you deserve it. You're the Mafia wife, the enabler, and he rationalizes that he's not taking anything of any value from you.

Dean Clifford sees that you're all asleep, and he values mankind as a whole; but like Mary Croft before him, he's beginning to realize that everyone prefers “lucid dreaming” to actually being awake. The time he takes pandering to that crowd robs him of time, and returns nothing.

My position is blatantly self-centered. I was born with a title I didn't choose. I was sold to the government, and warehoused for McMaster University because it turned out I was smarter than everybody...and apparently that's a crime. When I began to call all parties to account, they spared themselves by making certain promises and offering certain concessions and entitlements, which they no longer honour.

My aim is to misbehave.

Like Robert Menard, I want you to suffer for your ignorance, especially if you've come to me before. I want to wield what I know against those who would dare seek to harm me and those that I care about; because all of you are walking a path now, and none of you realize it's a one-way trip. You all want your freedom, and my position is, “Be careful what you wish for.”

As you all think wrong, and value the wrong things, so it is unlikely you could possibly know what to do with freedom. If you find yourself making that one-way trip, through that hole in the fence, remember that on the other side, are people just like me.

All of you are welcomed to believe whatever makes you feel good. Martin Sutton's belief, for instance, makes him feel good, and he identifies it as the core of who he is; and all I can think is, “This is what happens when evil has consumed an extraordinary man.”

ALL belief is evil. Martin Sutton is incapable of evil, so the belief sits there like a parasite, taking this man's good qualities and giving them to “Jesus”.

At this point I can classify Martin Sutton as belief's “best-case-scenario”.

Belief is taking not thinking and making a virtue out of it.

All of the people from whom you seek knowledge are extraordinary in their own way. However, reality doesn't care about these things.

I certainly hope this effort gets Mr. Kory focused on what's important, but the reality is, all of this is a symptom of a much larger problem.

We're all running out of time. I don't know if anyone has noticed the professional name-callers have been labeling people who point out the truth as “conspiracy theorists”, while at the same time publishing the inane babbling of actual conspiracy theorists. This method is much like Americans putting people who hire hookers on sex-offender registries, thus removing any distinction between a guy who indulges in a rent-a-fuck-toy experience, and the Scarborough rapist. Because none of you understand the exponential function, you couldn't see the bell-curve of your rights being whittled away.

Before I end this article, let's take a little walk through Canadian legal history.

At this point in legal history, the Criminal Code pretends to be the Common Law remedy, bestowed to an administrative zone of a sole proprietor CORPORATION called Canada...but this wasn't always the case.

I'm going to presume that you don't have knowledge of the Canadian Bill of Rights. I freely admit this is not a reasonable presumption as Dean Clifford never shuts up about it (I swear that guy jerks off reading it).

One of the most protected rights in that bill of rights was Freedom of Speech. Under the Bill of Rights “offences” like hate speech, blasphemous libel (yes, that's a criminal code offence — look it up), and “uttering a death threat”, would not be possible.

The UK Canada Act 1982, better known as “The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms”, includes a “notwithstanding” clause. This gives the elected representatives of an administrative zone's constituency the power and authority to say, “Fuck off, that's just stupid,” to any Federal Statute. The closest a province has ever come to using this was on the “gay marriage” issue. Everyone's entire government had just been privatized, and their biggest concern appeared to be whether two dudes can marry.

I look at events like this and sometimes I can't help but think, “Maybe Menard's right. Maybe you do deserve it.”

Anyway, while you were all in a tizzy about whether a dude can wear a wedding dress and be taken seriously, other more sinister machinations were afoot.

His name is Ernst Zündel of Regina v. Zündel fame, and his story went something like this:

Ernst Zündel is one of those ideological pustules on society that invariably erupt when free speech is so vigorously protected. I've read what Mr. Zündel has to say, and he cites reliable sources to support his position. This ignores the reality, and other evidence, that counters his position.

What's more reasonable to accept?

That the holocaust didn't happen? Or that Roma (gypsies), the mentally ill, the handicapped, the Muslims, the Jews, the homosexuals, and the political dissidents, were all rounded up and exterminated; and the Jews just whined about it the most. People doing stupid things at “crime scenes” don't help, and support idiots like Mr. Zündel. With only a little, tiny bit of probing, you will discover this fun fact regarding the holocaust. Those smoke-stacks on Auschwitz were built in 1947 for “dramatic effect”; and when pressured on it, every holocaust memorial foundation grudgingly admits this is true.

But back to Mr. Zündel....

Ernst Zündel was doing the Streisand effect, before Barbara Streisand made it cool.

After the constitution was ratified, parliament quickly set about whittling away your free speech rights, and Ernst Zündel happened to be in the right place at the right time. No one knew it then.

Now Ernst Zündel is a hateful little man; and he wants the world to know it. So much so, he decided you could avail yourself of his opinion by calling up his £976 Hate Speech Hotline…...for the low, low charge of ten dollars appearing on your phone bill, you could injest all the hate-mongering that would fit on an answering machine tape (Yes, a fucking tape. That's how long ago this shit happened).

People called up and he actually profited from being a hateful little man...and if the story ended there, you could reasonably think, “Fuck this is Canada. You can do anything”, and we'd all live happily ever after.

After a couple of months of profiting from people with more money than brains, rumour of this great scam eventually fell on the ears of a Jew. See? Mel Gibson was right. Jews are always causing trouble. Well it came to pass, that this great scam did fall on the ear of a Jew, and attached to that ear of a Jew, was a Jew with a finger, which could dial a telephone; and for the bargain price of ten bucks...he could make history!

I freely admit that I wouldn't pass that shit up, so there's no way a Jew's going to. Remember the stereotypes kids, and be advised that Jews come to Scottish people to learn humility.

Do you guys see how many stereotypes I've managed to jam into here so far?

As the result of this hilarious chain of events, Mr. Zündel became the dubious winner of the “First Man to be Charged with Hate Speech” prize. Under this “code” Mr. Zündel's position was indefensible, but he had an “ace up his sleeve”. He had studied the constitution and believed he had the right to do what he did. His lawyer, probably another Jew, saw dollar signs rocketing all the way to the Supreme Court, so he grabbed onto the Law Society's tit and sucked as hard as he could. This case plodded through the courts relentlessly, and ended up at the Supreme Court where they freely admitted that all hate speech laws are, by their very nature, unconstitutional. However, Nazis are “bad” so they decided to remove that right and blatantly ignore anything the constitution has to say, with an addendum pointing out that each administrative zone (province) has the right to exercise that “notwithstanding” clause nobody's ever dared use.

They'll save it for something important...like dudes getting married to each other. I say dudes because I refuse to accept the proposition that hot girl-on-girl action is NOT a human right.

These events marked the beginning of the slippery slope of rights removal all of you are just discovering now. It has been happening for a very long time.

Much has happened since the Zündel case. The public is slowly spoon-fed ridiculous concepts. The United States slipped even faster using our “enlightened” hate-speech laws as an example. Now there is a perfectly “legal” “War on Terror”. Americans are so stupid that they don't even realise they're making war on something that's not even an noun. “War on Drugs” at least meets the “noun” criterion. If you had to defend the “War on Drugs”, it's only defense would be, “At least we're making war on a noun.”

I'll let that sink in.

How many stupid “Patriotic Americans” don't realize there's a war on something that's not even a fucking noun. If I think you don't deserve to live for not realizing that, imagine how low you rank in the eyes of those who created this policy — all "perfectly legal".

We need a Monarch dictator for a generation, to bitch-slap you back to reality. For, one of the other things that I don't hide, is the fact that I, and other privateers, commissioned the AQUILAE TRUST with the primary mandate: To assist in the restoration of executive power of the Monarchy, under the terms of the AQUILAE COVENANT.

Three generations ago, Princess Elizabeth called to the then recently-released slaves, to help her stop the Empire from being wiped-out by the Germans. And she is of German descent. That war left a legacy that is priceless. It formed the corner stone of civilization and brought us into a new Golden Age.

The laws of commerce work when everybody plays by the rules, and when everybody's rights are respected. For three decades I have screamed that this is not happening.

So I have set out to prove it to you. My goal is to show you all that there is no deception. They're just not playing by the rules any more. The people responsible for your chronic ignorance, jumped ship long ago. Now we're stuck with parrots and chimps, running a mighty, but decaying, infrastructure.

Just remember this is on an exponential curve too.

I am doing my utmost to construct a lifeboat, and to detach you from all this. What I am constructing (to paraphrase Q from Star Trek) has wonders to satiate all desires, both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid.

Here is my court room position in a nutshell.

You do not accept surety — EVER.

Step 1: Reserve all rights. (get Derek Moran to parrot how to do that...he loves that shit)

Step 2: Direct your case and do not let them proceed. Present NOTICE OF MISTAKE, and REMEMBER THE FUCKING QUESTIONS IT CONTAINS. If they do not answer these questions you object, and declare that unless the questions in your NOTICE OF MISTAKE are answered, you CAN NOT UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS.

Anything outside of this supports their position that you are “playing” their game, and thus it is presumed that you understand the rules. The only way to counter this is to declare that you CANNOT UNDERSTAND the rules without these questions being answered.

Think very carefully about this. If you are a novice at chess, and did not know about castling and its rules, you might raise the obvious question, “Why do you get to move two pieces?” If I refuse to explain that rule to you, and even deny you the chance to present your understanding of the rules, would you continue playing chess with me?

If you attempt to stop the game for this reason, that's when you're going to “understand” that this was a chess game for money; and that I have big, burly thugs to enforce this game. You claimed to know the rules for the engagement, even if you later disclaimed being an expert.

Novice drivers and expert drivers all have to follow the same rules. You don't get to ignore rules because you suck at them. Just as my chess board is not a chess school, the court will not allow the presumption that you being a novice is a lawful excuse. The only method to extract yourself “with honour” is to accept responsibility for the mistake in presumption. They are presuming something wrong...and you are acknowledging it's your fault. The court must accept this MISTAKE, and your entreaty for forgiveness for the unintended debt created. The court MUST do this.

Your name should never come into it. Your name is but a piece of evidence in a much larger presumption that the court has the right to attach a name derived from a public document, to a living man. This, of course, is untrue. The court knows it's not their right. That's why in the Mary Croft days, the quote “living man” argument worked. But these are trimming at the branches of the poisonous tree in an attempt to make it look pretty. The only solution is to target the root. The root is accounting and surety; there's no farther to dig down.

You have all heard the quote, “I am not a number. I am a free man.” This came from the profoundly subversive British television series, The Prisoner, which exposes the Noble Lie in the most blunt and obvious way possible, without using the actual words. If you take the time and watch this series, you can see very clearly, knowing what you know so far, exactly how everything is. The protagonist, played by Patrick McGoohan, who truly supports the concept that acting is an art form, is only ever identified as “Number 6”. The highest ranking officer in the prison is only “Number 2”, whose character keeps changing; none of them ever answering the constantly-posed question, “Who is 'Number ONE'?”

And...because I fucking-love giving away the ending...

“Number ONE” turns out to be a delusion of the protagonist's own making, whom others around him exploited; all to answer the question, “Why did you resign?” I want you to think about that as you go down this path.

You will be pursued by the people you once served, and you will be asked, “Why did you resign?” To answer is to become “salvage”. You never learned why “Number 6” “resigned”, because his position is what your position should be as regards government.

NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS!

If you want to be even more hostile reach for a “Scott-ism”, FOR WHATEVER REASON OFFENDS YOU THE MOST!

So there's your homework. Read this article over, and over, and over again. Just so there's no confusion, I am communicating on several levels here. Whoever is reading this, pay close attention to what I say.

That's it. Scroll to the top, and read again.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1184
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1184 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_518715888164348
Unique Facebook User ID:
927379467328526
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 266

Jessica Bender

It would appear to be a some form of a non statutory abatement process in which one separates the nom de guerre from being applied to the man. May I ask if this is applies to the statement above ?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1186 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1186 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

ONLY TWO FUCKING "LIKES" in an hour? That's the most important status bullshit on facebook! You people value that shit, yet there are ONLY 2 LIKES?

You people suck so much there's an event horizon! :P

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1186
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1186 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Ok...how in the world did I end-up in this group ? :-\ you have to admit that it's fucking strange !

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1186 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1186 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Jessica Bender

For the "THE TENDER FOR THE LAW" record, it is a great post Scott Duncan you do not need my respect, but I freely give it. ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1187 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1187 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Thomas Aguon

simply know who You are and usufruct; or else, you's a fucked. the DEAD (corps=corpse) have absolutely NO control over the living (unless you contract it to be so). however, strive to maintain peace; not only with your brothers and sisters in the world, but also those within the courts, police, government, etc. government is ONLY about protecting the people's resources in trust, and maintaining peace and public safety and order while doing so.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1187
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1187 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Thomas Aguon

lol, there was a time when people thought the sun being the center of the solar system was bullshit, same with the earth being round, robots, space travel, even quantum physics. we live in an ever changing reality, no-thing is ever the same thing it was a split second ago, even ideas; and what i have come to learn over my years of research and life experience may or may NOT be bullshit, but that is ultimately up to those who do their due diligence and research things before making up their mind about information =)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1188
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1188 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Thomas Aguon

he who makes the claim must prove it! lol, i never claimed to want to be a part of their club, nor did i say love the government or police, just those men and women who participate in them. forgive them for they not know what they do and learn how to work in harmony with them, but most importantly, learn their functions so that you can know how to use them for what they were created for.

being that you did some time, i could understand your position with them. i as well did time in tent city, and 6 months in sheriff joes jail being held without bail (not that i wouldve taken it) because i was testing all those theories i learned about before going in and fighting my " misdemeanor charges" from 3 different cities (about 10 charges total, 1 felony for resisting arrest). i was thrown in the mental health unit for my views on their fake authority (in which youre naked on the concrete floor with not even a toilet to keep you warm), spent a month as a rule 11 which means not competent to understand proceedings, and even more shit they tried to scare me with. the thing was, the more i fought, the more they fought back, until finally at the end of it all, i said i was done fighting (although still not consenting to contracting with them) and i was released with only stupid fines (which i have not, and do not intend to pay), but only after they fucked with me more by taking me to prison for over a week (i wasnt supposed to go to prison) and put in maximum security which is 22.5 hours in the cell, 1 hour recreation, and 30 minutes for dinner. trust me, i know how you feel about them even though it wasnt years in prison and whatnot.

you must understand that those corporations posing as your government are overseen by the united nations. the purpose of them is to maintain peace between nations, and believe it or not, you are a nation. so when you fight with your government, courts, police, etc, youre entering international WARFARE under the laws of nations and acting as a belligerent under those laws and the lieber code (if youre in the US at least; not sure if other countries adopted it?) on your own FREE WILL. that grants your government permission to do what they do because ultimately, theyre trying to PEACEFULLY collect taxes from those they presume to be SURETY for a debt.

so when you deliver your NOTICE OF MISTAKE, youre essentially asking for forgiveness and THEY MUST GRANT YOU IT. the rabbit hole goes MUCH deeper than you think my friend. hope this helps!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1188
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1188 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Daslow Aizelasi

Is there anything written in any legislature about the Notice of Mistake for reading and better understanding purposes? Or is from handed down knowledge and experience?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1189 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1189 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

Why would there be?

Here's a plan, READ THE FUCKING NOTICE!

SERIOUSLY! YOU ARE NOT IN THE FUCKING CLUB!

STOP LOOKING FOR CLUBHOUSE FUCKING RULES!

ALL YOUR ANSWERS ARE HERE, NOT IN THE FUCKING CLUBHOUSE!

Seriously, if you want clubhouse rules, go suck a Justice's cock in exchange for the information!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1190 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1190 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Daslow Aizelasi

ok John what have you done what have you challenged and won oh wise ass?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1191 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1191 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

The same way I "COME ACROSS THE FUCKING MUSIC I COMPOSE, and the same way I COME ACROSS the programs I write! I FUCKING MADE IT BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL.

IT IS DUMBED DOWN AS FAR AS I CAN YET YOU ARE ALL TOO STUPID ANYWAY.

WHERE DID I COME ACROSS IT? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?

SERIOUSLY! ARE ALL OF YOU THIS STUPID? AM I WASTING MY TIME HERE?!?!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1191
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1191 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Daslow Aizelasi, your asinine and offensive question proved beyond any doubt, that Pierre is your intellectual superior. This makes you unqualified to have ANY opinion on such matters.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1192 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1192 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

I AM THE FUCKING SOURCE. Nowhere else. That is ALL you need to be concerned about! You are too stupid to grasp anything more! You KEEP PROVING THAT WITH THE QUESTIONS YOU ASK, and you DON'T EVEN SEE IT!

$20 worth of free advice: If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1192
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1192 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Daslow Aizelasi

didn't you say to question everything because if you think you know something it stops you from moving forward?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1192 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1192 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Daniel J Wentz

I just figured out why Hitler was rejected from that Vienna Art School! He wouldn't reveal where he "came across" his paitings, and no Art theory and/or history could confirm Hitler's paintings were "valid art". :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1193
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1193 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Daniel J Wentz

Daslow Aizelasi said: " didn't you say to question everything because if you think you know something it stops you from moving forward"?

WOW. You just said what Scott Duncan wrote, is based on BELIEF. I have read this article. I have read NOTICE OF MISTAKE. They are SELF EVIDENT!

What is wrong with you people? Every time I come here, I am amazed that you all come up with new ways to disgust me.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1194
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1194 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Daniel J Wentz

AQUILAE: Latin for "OF THE EAGLE". It's the name of the privateer's trust which Scott currently holds. He is the KEEPER of the Trust, and is addressed as"Keeper" when Trust business and/or administration is needed.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1194 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1194 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Daniel J Wentz

Well this thread has shown that if Scott Duncan ever decided to watch the world burn, there's nothing you people could do to stop him. :(

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1195 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1195 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Scott Duncan

...I'm tempted every day. They all think wrong, and value the wrong things. This makes them predictable and programmable. That's just reality.

...I just understand it better than everyone else.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1196
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1196 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Daniel J Wentz

No, I was warehoused with him, but I was there for asking the wrong questions at too early an age. I have known Scott Duncan since childhood. It took me years to even realize I was so far behind him, that I thought I was in "first place".

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1197
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1197 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Daniel J Wentz

You are not me, John. I also had Scott as a resource at a very young age. How long it took me is largely irrelevant, because it will have nothing to do with how long it will take for YOU.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1198
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1198 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

You have no concept of the scale you are dealing with. :D

This forum is just a wake up call. I'm not stating anything new.

Your new knowledge is just a tiny awareness that you might be thinking wrong. That's all. Nothing more.

Dumb it down, for him Dan! :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1198
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1198 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Daniel J Wentz

You haven't learned anything on any meaningful scale. Go to the top floor of a tall building and look down. Do short people look ANY different than tall people?

You are only seeing things from a few inches higher than everyone else.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1198
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1198 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Most of what you think you understand is shit you are making up. Stop guessing/presuming and just plain making shit up! You will only think is circles and really piss me off by having to clean up all the shit-stains you will invariably leave here, as a result.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1200
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1200 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

The Queen did not choose her puppet/rubber-stamp role. She's a part of a greed infrastructure. Nothing more.

She has a shit life, because she knows what I do, and can NEVER leave her role. Imagine that for a second. KNOWING all you need to be free, and never being able to do it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1200
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1200 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

In my dream, I was alone with John, both of us handcuffed, and suddenly this guy opened his mouth, to make a long story short, when I was done this small room was filled with all kinds of thinny pieces of him, and I could not see my handcuffs anymore because of his long hair....what a freaking dream o_O

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1200 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1200 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

Currently the NX2000 research coalition has 380 Scientists, engineers, mechanics and doctors. I can commission them at ANY time and they will do my bidding. They can all claim expertise in their fields, and I don't have to teach them anything.

Why do you think you are on that level? Those are the ONLY useful people in my life.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1201
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1201 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

so Scott what protection do you have. My point is don't you want to protect your self and those with knowledge. for the sake of saving that said knowledge.? :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1201
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1201 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

No. I don't care. I have no stake in the outcome. My life's work has nothing to do with any of this. I don't care if you all die, praying to Jesus, and clutching your magic crystals wondering what's happening.

Why can't people grasp that? I DON'T CARE if you wake up. I just don't! I stopped caring a decade ago.

You ask these questions that reveal what I already know, and have told you; YOU THINK WRONG, AND VALUE THE WRONG THINGS.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1201
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1201 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Thanks Scott Duncan, deep, heavy, elegant & simple, on so many levels...kudos to you. Now to read it through for a 4th time & let it all percolate some more. You have your reasons for doing what you do, and regardless of the reasons, your efforts are appreciated, Thank you :-)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1202
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1202 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

There needs to be a "LIKE ANY POST BY SCOTT DUNCAN" link....

I can truthfully say, I "got" alot of what the big man says here.

UNDERSTANDING THE CONCEPTS

Everything after that is NEGOTIATION

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1202
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1202 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Carl Dunne

This one goes past the gold notes straight to platinum (y) .. You have addressed quite a few thing's i have been thinking lately and i seem to be finally turning a corner with all this. I see law as the second lesson here after learning to think for yourself and both lesson's escape most people for the most part. I see it as the first rule of learning is to admit to yourself you don't know jack shit and move on because what you think you know undoes what you learn.

Chad Brodgesell

Okay, outside into the fire pit with no ladder out.

I have not the comprehension of 99% of the OP. After reading many times and attempting to grasp the entirety or at least the gist of the OP the following has surfaced;

1) The only time Freedom will actually be attained is when everyone on the planet dies and I'm the only one left. Then I have to be everything to myself in order to survive. So in the end Freedom is just a rosy belief that makes me feel all warm and cuddly in my insane mind. True Freedom doesn't exist. Something/Someone will always be fighting for my time/ resources whatever.

2) The "" SYSTEM "" as it stands now is the Titanic already breached and starting its decent into the cold killing waters. The people who started it, no not the Captain and Crew, The Owners/Shareholders of WhiteStar NEVER GOT ON THE BLOODY SHIP. The rats are left struggling to gain the upper hand over the one beside it thinking "Hey, I'm in a better position then that guy" Each will spend the rest of their life attempting to keep what they got at all costs even though the water is at ankle level. Sadly believing they alone will be safe.

3) This one is simple, at least to my 2 brain cells running at full steam. --Never engage in ANY FORM of DISCUSSION (coming to terms of false comprehension as to the new terms of the Agreement that they will LEAD YOU INTO ACCEPTING) of coarse to their benefit and your loss. (Think about it, they just change the rules. YOU ARE IN THEIR COURT and they make the rules) -A good question to ask might be, as Scott says is "What business is it of your's?" Just rambling because I'm at a real keyboard and it's so nice to type with more then my thumbs. Have at it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1202 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1202 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

Lucky you with your 2 cell brain, me, I'm still at : the courts don't actually follow their own rules any more.: I'm still trying to grasp that part :( and it comes to me like if the Hockey League would not follow the rules anymore.....I'm I still jumping on the ice ? .....I'm I going to get kill if I jump on the ice ?, ahhh fuck it, I will go play Hockey with friends and will NOT accept to be part of that corrupt league....I just don't want to go there, how in the world they can FORCE me to be there anyway ?....anyway, I'll jump on the second paragraph very soon......

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1203
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1203 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

2 brain cells, 1 for the first letter of the OP the second for the second. Your still ahead of me by a long shot. :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1203 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1203 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Chad Brodgesell

It's all just a shell game and we don't control the shells OR the pea. Just need to stop being mesmerized by the movements of the shells and hands as they fly about , trying to follow the pea thinking that we could actually keep it in our eyesight. The smart ones just walk on by going about their business.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1204 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1204 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

Well, maybe I'll start by reserving ALL rights, just in case I still have one, and hopefully, the one that would still left to me would be the right to NOT contract. and then I will tell them that IF someone led them to believe that I am surety in this game, well it's a complete mistake, and I ask forgiveness about it. :/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1204
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1204 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

I would happy with being able to 'really' get 10%. Thousands of years of history in one post. The electrified wall that my wiskers touch are trying to keep me on this stupid path :(

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1205
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1205 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

What is this gazunshit thing ? Gazuntight which is also spelt as gesundheitm, means bless you. This is an interjection used when someone sneezes. It's used to wish the person good health.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1205
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1205 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Over think ?....I'm TRANSLATING for christ sakes.... and I bet you some will tell you that Overthinking and ME, dosen't fit :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1205 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1205 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

How long shall I suffer.? I say no more will I consent to my slave masters. I will not waste any more of my time in fear. I will look at my self and know this day I am a man. I will make plans to protect what I value to the best of my ability. I realize my suffering is caused by my attachment too things I once valued wrongly. and it was my wrong thinking that lead me down this path. I take this oath to myself and only to myself. Too never value the wrong things again and to not have false pride in thinking I know it all. I also will give freely of this knowledge to any that seek it in truth. Sincerely your's John wade Frisbey.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1206 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1206 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Derek Moran

..im still waiting on pins-and-needles for Sir-Mika's rebuttal to Scott's article ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1207 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1207 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Robert Cormier

Scott Duncan Re: Zundel and hate speech Was this the gateway to thought crimes?. I recall Zundel (and others) commenting that the government's position was that it could read minds. Although Zundel claimed/swore he had no hatred in his heart/mind, he merely wanted to inform people about the "truth", the government's position essentially was that they were able to know his thoughts and determined that his thoughts were filled with hatred.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1207
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1207 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

Scott, why is answering the question "Why did you resign" becoming salvage? Being rescued is the brief definition of salvage I'm using... (Watching The Prisoner for the most part of today)... By his resignation has he chosen to leave the system? Or is the village supposed to be a form of the system as he received medical cards, bank cards, is referred to as a number etc...? Or am I way off?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1207
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1207 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Robert Cormier

Scott Duncan: "Above all...the thing that forms the core of who and what I am, is that I am a computer scientist."

If the above = “Nudge nudge wink wink, hint hint” does that = it’s truly as simple dimple as each of us creating our own LEGAL “operating system” (TRUST) which we display PUBLICLY through REGISTERED POST through PROPER NOTICE that INFORMS THE PUBLIC that our TRUST is claimed and IT serves us. By the way, it is INDEMNIFIED because it is managed by a CORPORATION.

I might pee myself laughing. I’m pacing again.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1207 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1207 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

David Johansen

thanks for bumping this back up so i could READ IT AGAIN. QUESTION; what does one do when they try putting one away in a cell for not accepting what happens next after "I do not understand the N&C o t P"? plead for forgiveness of the mistake? your leaving out somthing? do we go on to the next question? do we try going round the questions to them till THEY get tired?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1208 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1208 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

Do you have any evidence or proof that I am one of your employee ?

I don't work for you and/or your organization.

Leave "ME" alone, if you want to keep the person I had in my pocket, keep it, and do whatever you want with it, I can even give you the complete address where the SURETY is, have fun and leave me alone....

And keep in mind that I, yes "ME" I have the RIGHTS to this person's life, liberty and security.....so watch your behaviour, because I, yes "ME", I will make sure that everything you do with this person is COMPLETELY legal.

Can I leave now without receiving a bullet beetween the eyes ? :D

I ask this because you seems to be some serious ANGRY folks :D

HAHAHAHA!!!!!!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1208
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1208 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Johansen

the cause would (can only) be a contract obligation, the nature would be [because how else can a company fuck (an) individual(s) on a grand scale (brainwashing through television)]. hence the need for you to accept SURETY for the PERSON. the fact of the matter is that both scott and dean individually are right, like so many others, however the systems are incompatable. you have to choose, or learn when to use which. education is not without its cost/value tradeoff.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1209
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1209 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Johansen

"In my youth I gave our erstwhile government a tool" ? At that time maybe you didn't know any better. "the only reason I'm here, is that I promised to be." who? "i am an author" of? "Accepting discussion, is a FUCKING NEGOTIATION" Maybe offer them the courtesy! (notice of mistake).

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1209
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1209 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Johansen

ah ha! so its my fault they presume somthing is wrong, i'm merely offering them a way to honorably correct that mistake.

"The only method to extract yourself “with honour” is to accept responsibility for the mistake in presumption. They are presuming something wrong...and you are acknowledging it's your fault. The court must accept this MISTAKE, and your entreaty for forgiveness for the unintended debt created. The court MUST do this. "

must? why? because they can not otherwise except attempt some other alternative trick?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 3, page 1209
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 3, page 1209 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Ah yes, I recall.

I must apologize, but these things aren't data I absorb. I ALWAYS forget what this group means to some of you. I barely recall mentioning it, and you guys think it's the most important thing in the world.

Let me clear things up in my usual "aggressive diplomacy" I am so famous for:

1) You will always be "product" to me. Always. You barely grasp the simplest things. You think WRONG. You value the WRONG THINGS. You are doomed to be beasts of burden. You woke up too late. Your CHILDREN, however, have a fighting chance. TELL THEM WHAT YOU HAVE LEARNED.

2) This group is here as a venue where you may hear the TRUTH from one of the people who participated in this world's "Legal" framework, in a maintenance, and expansion capacity. I am not your friend. I have an agenda. That agenda requires me to tell the truth AT ALL COSTS. That agenda requires that I draw attention to myself, because of the position my colleagues have thrust me into. If they watch ME, they AREN'T watching my Captains!

3) I spend most of my time collapsing the banking system and starting a war... LEGALLY AND LAWFULLY. You only see a TINY part of all the things I do to to make this happen.

THAT is reality. Remember it from my perspective, because that is what you are ALWAYS dealing with here.

You, knowing what is true, SERVES MY AGENDA. That's the ONLY reason you even know my name.

I GET that what I say profoundly affects you. I GET that. What all of you don't get is that you are going through shit I went through at 9 years old! Nobody in AQUILAE gives a hot shit how profoundly their Admiral's words have changed YOUR life. You seek truth. Big fucking deal. Do you know how many AQUILAE trustees seek truth AND do something else incredible? You JUST seek truth!

...you're fucking fired :P

http://youtu.be/8Ur9Ps5lqmc

Play video

Anibal Jose Baez

How is that for "whole/full disclosure"? :D Better than the government, if you ask me.

"You are a sack of shit serving my agenda, and since I am giving FREE stuff/information, that means YOU are the PRODUCT. You "seek the truth" (whatever that means), and then sit on it. You are lucky you are getting this much! By the way, I would kill you all, no problem"

That's how my Puerto Rican translator is reading this.

John Greco

. . .. "THE TENDER FOR LAW, is all about that mysterious phrase, “THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER”. . . . TENDER FOR LAW that contains the ACTS and STATUTES! THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER is a TENDER FOR LAW. If you BENEFIT, then you have OBLIGATION! . . . . you have ONE unalienable RIGHT; THE RIGHT NOT TO CONTRACT. . . . . . . . . “I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS”. If they ignore your question, then your next response should be, “OBJECTION. If the court cannot answer my question, then I do not understand the nature and cause of these proceedings.” Keep repeating that, and repeating that, and repeating that...until they answer your fucking question.. . . . . . Here is my court room position in a nutshell. You do not accept surety — EVER. Step 1: Reserve all rights. (get Derek Moran to parrot how to do that...he loves that shit) Step 2: Direct your case and do not let them proceed. Present NOTICE OF MISTAKE, and REMEMBER THE FUCKING QUESTIONS IT CONTAINS. If they do not answer these questions you object, and declare that unless the questions in your NOTICE OF MISTAKE are answered, you CAN NOT UNDERSTAND THE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS. . . . . the court will not allow the presumption that you being a novice is a lawful excuse. The only method to extract yourself “with honour” is to accept responsibility for the mistake in presumption. They are presuming something wrong...and you are acknowledging it's your fault. The court must accept this MISTAKE, and your entreaty for forgiveness for the unintended debt created. The court MUST do this. Your name should never come into it. Your name is but a piece of evidence in a much larger presumption that the court has the right to attach a name derived from a public document, to a living man." - Scott Duncan - December 3, 2014

Anibal Jose Baez

I really enjoyed re-reading this. I've been in this group for 2 years. Every time I go back, and read something the Admiral wrote months, or even 2 years ago, I get to understand things that I simply could not see the last time I read it. The words where there, but I could not see/understand. Which scares the shit out of me, because that's when I remember what is the "Dunning-Kruger Effect."

I cannot imagine being new to this group, and grasping most of these stuff. Reading the Admiral's works it's something I have taken extreme pleasure in doing. Enjoy the "one-way trip"!

Scott Duncan

...no really.

"Ok, that's a bit of an overly dramatic title, in as much as the courts don't actually follow their own rules any more. Still though... You still get Nazis, so there's that." <--Totally delivered!

Chris Evan

Really? I missed this point earler?

Salvage: To establish a valid salvage claim under maritime law, the claimant must prove the following: the salvage was needed because of a marine peril; the claimant's service was rendered voluntarily and not because of an existing duty or contract; and the claimant's service contributed to the success of the salvage in whole or in part.

Back to top