I'm just working my way through this interview right now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5-4BwT5ZpE
It talks about (with the relevant references for New Zealand) how the child is considered dead at birth (birth includes still birth) and consequently intestate, how a marriage includes void marriage (making the child a bastard, incapable of inheriting an estate)...and I'm just finding the equivalent passages in Aust Acts...
So far, the receivership angle makes perfect sense...
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1040Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1040 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.