The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 28, 2013 9:23 PM

Derek Moran

The ADMIRALTY LAW- annotated thread.....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1035
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1035 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 54

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: Who's admiralty was that again? The propaganda, posing as "history" that you pasted, doesn't really answer the question. CITIZENS are commercial titles, under an admiralty. WHO'S ADMIRALTY?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1035
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1035 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: Yes, which is the "Law of the land". Law=ACCOUNTING. Accounting only exists on land.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1035 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1035 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Derek Moran

Pete Daoust: writ of prohibition n. pl. writs of prohibition An order issued by a higher court commanding a lower court to cease from proceeding in some matter not within its jurisdiction

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1036
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1036 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

-Russ Rawlingson: Maybe a single skinned oil tanker. They are banned from carrying oil now and most have been beached and chopped up in india but you may be able to find one. I thought about using one to grow weed on the deck. 13 miles out and I don't think they could do anything about it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1036
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1036 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Ok, the maritime question is 'Permission to come aboard?', if the vessel is docked/moored...the captain has the right to grant or refuse this request.

So, in court, when the vessel is docked, does the NOTICE OF MISTAKE & the resulting deflection of surety serve the same purpose to refuse the request to come aboard?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1038
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1038 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

The law of the land is admiralty/maritime. it is all done by accounting. :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1038 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1038 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Derek Moran

If as long as we are in THEIR jurisdiction by using THEIR 'This Note Is Legal Tender,' then i think at minute 1:35 of this clip speaks i think to what we all have to do in returning THEIR currency first, in order to be free...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbfkAqd6MAk

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1039
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1039 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

OK...so I will sell my house to whoever wants to buy it with BITCOINS, for one condition, this guy needs to sell it back to me within 48 hours and need to accept BITCOINS as payment ... does this make sense ? :/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1039
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1039 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Gold Derek Moran...from the article re pirates of the Caribbean:

'So if, for instance, this pirate buys some land and registers it in “his” name, it becomes property of the estate of the same name, being a subset of the national bankruptcy estate, and will therefore never actually be owned by the man at all.'

Maybe we should ALL buy land with bitcoins & using the name Fucks the Puppy :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1039
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1039 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Stuart, funny you mention that- Unlike Black's Law 9th, there is no definition in The Dictionary of Canadian Law 4th-edition for RECEIVER GENERAL..but there is for RECEIVERSHIP ;)

RECEIVER[SHIP]: a legal or equitable proceeding in which a receiver is appointed(by the IMF) to take over the PROPERTY(i wonder what/who that could be) of an insolvent company or INDIVIDUAL. The receivership operates with respect to ALL(wonder if that includes US) of the assets of the insolvent party.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1040
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1040 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

I'm just working my way through this interview right now:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5-4BwT5ZpE

It talks about (with the relevant references for New Zealand) how the child is considered dead at birth (birth includes still birth) and consequently intestate, how a marriage includes void marriage (making the child a bastard, incapable of inheriting an estate)...and I'm just finding the equivalent passages in Aust Acts...

So far, the receivership angle makes perfect sense...

I'm just waiting for the remedy part ;-)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1040
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1040 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Just for a bit of light fun (or more education on Admiralty Maritime law)...Here's Pirates of the Caribbean 1: Wills, Estates, Bills of Exchange & Tender For Law...

http://metaphilm.com/index.php/detail/pirates-of-the-caribbean/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1040
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1040 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Harold Austerman www.assistingvesel.com

Harold Austerman http://assistingvessels.wordpress.com/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1040 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1040 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: Who's admiralty was that again? The propaganda, posing as "history" that you pasted, doesn't really answer the question. CITIZENS are commercial titles, under an admiralty. WHO'S ADMIRALTY?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 5, page 1041
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 5, page 1041 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top