The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 27, 2013 5:27 PM

William Goldwin Carrington Howland (March 17, 1915 — May 13, 1994) was a lawyer, judge and former Chief Justice of Ontario, Canada. Howland was born in Toronto and educated at Upper Canada College. He graduated from the University of Toronto in 1936, and afterwards enrolled at Osgoode Hall Law School. He was called to the Bar of Ontario in 1939. In 1975, Howland was appointed a Judge to the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Ontario. Two years later, he was appointed Chief Justice of Ontario, and remained in this position until his retirement in 1992. Protecting the rights of individuals in Ontario [edit]

On April 10, 1989, Chief Justice Howland issued a historic Practice Directive to the Ontario Courts which reaffirmed the right of the citizens of Ontario to audio record their own court hearing under Section 136(2)(b) of Ontario's Courts of Justice Act. In his Practice Directive, Justice Howland stated that the rights of the citizens under section 136(2)(b) of the Act were to be respected by the courts without citizens having to make oral or written arguments. Many consider Justice Howland's directive to the courts as one of his most notable contributions to protecting the rights of self represented individuals before the courts. Even today, Justice Howland's practice directive continues to be used as a reference when audio recording equipment is used by self represented persons in their court hearings. Practice Directive (April 10, 1989) [edit] “Subject to any order made by the presiding judge as to non-publication of court proceedings, and to the right of the presiding judge to give such directions from time to time as he or she may see fit as to the manner in which an audio recording may be made at a court hearing pursuant to s. 146 [now s. 136] of the Courts of Justice Act, the unobtrusive use of a recording device from the body of the courtroom by a solicitor, a party acting in person, or a journalist for the sole purpose of supplementing or replacing handwritten notes may be considered as being approved without an oral or written application to the presiding judge.” Chief Justice of Ontario W.G.C Howland

Read Comments 4

Philip Laforet

Dean, those bastards will try ANYTHING to get people to conform!! Fuck them, put liens on any crown attorney law license, who try to prosecute you! It only costs 28 bucks!! Once a few of them start losing their jobs, they'll conform, but fucking quick!! Using laws and acts and stuff like that is useless, they seem to do as they please, LIEN THE FUCK OUT OF THEM!!! END OF PROBLEM!! As Donald Trump would say.... YOU'RE FIRED!!!!

Eamonn O Brien

Dean, the main post describes a provision in an act made by Government, and we know who/what acts apply to... If you are claiming that you are not the PERSON but then make a claim to benefit from a provision in a particular act I'm not sure how that would be viewed...?

Back to top