May 26, 2013 2:25 AM

Ok here is my rewrite, and my thinking behind it...

A notice of mistake to start to clarify that they are mistaken in thinking you are responsible for paying their fine.and because it commands discharge and closure. Then I think you should give public notice of who you are and claiming your property, so there will no longer be a question about surety. Also I removed the choices you gave to them because through the notice of mistake you are commanding discharge and closure.

WITH ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, AT ALL TIMES, for the man, Kelleran Holman, referred below as "I", "me", myself", and "man"

Re:"ORDER TO REMEDY NON-CONFORMITY WITH STANDARDS FOR MAINTENANCE AND OCCUPANCY" Reference Number 5-14-2013 DATED:inspection MAY 14,2013

To, PROPERTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE, xxx xxxx: Property Standards Officer, and all agents of THE CORPORATION OF ESSEX

NOTICE OF MISTAKE

In the matter of SURETY for the LEGAL NAME, I believe that there has been a MISTAKE as the SOLE BENEFICIARY has been INCORRECTLY IDENTIFIED as the accused. If I, AND/OR PERSONS AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE COURT AND/OR SUCH OTHER PARTIES ACTING IN MY INTERESTS, have led the COURT to believe by responding to “You” and or “KELLERAN HOLMAN” and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION YOU HAVE ADDRESSED ME AS, that I am the PARTY WITH SURETY in this matter, then that would be a MISTAKE and please forgive me.

As I have no knowledge of who “You” and or “KELLERAN HOLMAN” and/or SUCH OTHER IDENTIFICATION the PROPERTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE, xxx xxxx: Property Standards Officer HAS ADDRESSED ME AS, I RESPECTFULLY ASK; by WHAT AUTHORITY ARE YOU ADDRESSING me as such? As the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) has been deposited into the COURT, WHAT EVIDENCE does the COURT have that I, as the SOLE BENEFICIARY of the TRUST have any SURETY in this matter?

As the GOVERNMENT is the SOLE SIGNATORY PARTY on the SURETY BOND (BIRTH CERTIFICATE), with SOLE AND FULL SURETY as TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME, WHAT EVIDENCE does the PROPERTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE, xxx xxxx: Property Standards Officer have that I am a TRUSTEE for the LEGAL NAME. WHAT EVIDENCE does the PROPERTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE, xxx xxxx: Property Standards Officer have that I am a TRUSTEE and have ANY SURETY with respect to the LEGAL NAME?

WHAT EVIDENCE does the PROPERTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE, xxx xxxx: Property Standards Officer have that I am an OFFICER, an AGENT, a TRUSTEE or an EMPLOYEE of the CROWN?

WHAT EVIDENCE does the PROPERTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE, xxx xxxx: Property Standards Officer have of any WARRANT OF AGENCY for the principal?

WHAT EVIDENCE does the PROPERTY STANDARDS COMMITTEE, xxx xxxx: Property Standards Officer have that there has been any meeting of the minds, any PROPER NOTICE given, any considerable CONSIDERATION offered, or that I have ANY INTENT to CONTRACT in this matter?

As such, I am returning your OFFER, DECLINED, for immediate DISCHARGE and CLOSURE.

AUTHORISED By:____________NON ASSUMPSIT, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ALL RIGHTS RESRVED Maximus Legis, Grantor, sole-living-Beneficiary, Lawful-Holder-In-Due-Course, de jure pro domino

______________________________________________________________________

PUBLIC NOTICE

TAKE NOTICE that the VESSEL known as KELLERAN HOLMAN is now the LAWFUL PROPERTY of A PRIVATE TRUST per the wishes of ***redacted shit here***'S CREATOR and GRANTOR.

Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING May 25, 2013, THE VESSEL KNOWN AS KELLERAN HOLMAN MUST BE CONSIDERED A PRIVATE VESSEL WITH NO COMMERCE EXPECTED AND/OR IMPLIED.

TAKE NOTICE THAT, ALL PROPERTY at the location known as 9577 Walker Road, Mcgregor, in accordance with the Canadian Criminal Code sec 39. is held under A COMMON LAW CLAIM OF RIGHT.

PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO USE KELLERAN HOLMAN FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES MAY BE FINED AT THE RATE OF TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS PER DAY ($25,000 PER DAY) OR ANY PART THEREOF, FOR UNAUTHORIZED USE.

Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to the DULY AUTHORIZED TRUSTEE CORPORATION at xxx-xxx-xxxx.