The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 24, 2013 12:24 PM

First look at the date of the custody and access order,July16 2007...(reasonable access with reasonable notification to the mother! Now look at the date of the private contract made between the mother and I...Sept 6 2008...and the police still remover her from my care baced on a false accusation from the mother! Keep in mind the mother has refused to allow me access for over 2 years now without any action taken by the family court despite all my efforts trying to bring this info to the police and courts!

Unique ID: 462493170453287_516404751728795
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 17

Philip Laforet

Dean I sympathize with you. I haven't seen my son for 5 years. His Mother has influenced his decision not to see me. It is called parental alienation syndrome. Keep the faith brother and keep up the battle, you will overcome, good ALWAYS wins over evil!!

Dean Kory

I was seperated for 11 years with my oldest daughter...we reunited not long ago,she was only 5 when we were divided,she has a clear memory of our past and the bond we shared...was the most beautiful moment of my life...brought from such a painful beginning!

Mark Russell

Keep looking, get to the bottom of the problem.. the child is not yours, you signed them over to the state and they are owners. Now to top it if you got a marriage license than you also entered a contract with the government to have them put you in family court.

James Allan

My deepest sympathies Dean. There are no things that impact upon ones right to family, life, liberty and not to be subject to cruel treatment more than keeping a child from a loving and caring human parent. You speak of the terms "custody" and "access". Are those not terms decriptive of statutorily granted privileges conferred upon classes of persons by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second? You mention "Family Court". Is the jurisdiction of Family Court not almost entirely statutory? In your other post you state you are "man with inherent rights and jurisdiction (common law)". Why then, are you in a statutory court seeking priviliges conferred upon statutory persons?

James Allan

Neither of those courts can hear common law matters or grant remedy respecting same. It is beyond their jurisdiction. That is, they have not been granted authority to hear common law. They can't hear you.

James Allan

Look, here is an analogy to consider. You pull your car into Mr. Lube where they do oil changes. You hop out and demand the guy in greasy coverall gives you a haircut. You tell him that you have every right to receive a haircut (and lets assume you do). For some reason you are of the belief that Mr. Lube should recognize and honour your right to recieve a haircut. The guy looks at you like you're nuts. No matter how loud you yell and scream or try to claim Mr. Lube is a barber shop, you WILL NOT get a haircut there. They proceed to change the oil in your car though - THAT IS what they do there. You remain dumb founded as to why they would not give you a hair cut but proceeded to change your oil. YOU ARE AT THE WRONG PLACE TO GET A HAIRCUT.

Back to top