The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 24, 2013 8:52 AM

Ingunn Sigurdsdatter

Where do you lien the Bill of Laden (BC)? It cannot be done within our national registries,-according to what i have found so far.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 460
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 460 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 72

Ingunn Sigurdsdatter

Didn't find it there. Norway is a version of the Soviet Union,-cannot use national registers or file a public claim. And I got the impression you don't file it with UCC? I understood that I should create a common law trust (is that right),- but also that I should lien the birth certificate. Would be happy for answer,-I sorry if I am a slow learner.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 460
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 460 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Ingunn Sigurdsdatter

Did you make it in Denmark? It doesn't seem to be possible here, - "jTinglysing" is the same as entering judicial information into a registry or public record, and the information then acquires "legal" value within the system. That should be the obvious way of reversing the trust/trustee/beneficiary situation as well as liening the BC, BUT this process has been bound by legislation which prohibits entering anything into the public record except if it is in accordance with very specific terms. Spent all day calling of all the national registries. A lawful way of doing it would be to proclaim it yourself, in writing or in local newspapers, but not so sure about the real-life effect of it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 460
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 460 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

You can create a maritime lien, which does not need to be publicly registered.

It is liened into a private trust (which also does not need to be publicly registered because it is private).

You then issue a public notice (newspaper notice, notice to government etc) that the above processes have taken place ie: The BC with details ??? has been liened into a private trust.

Any further details are private, which is the beauty of the process...only parties to the BC and or trust have any standing...anyone else, it's none of their business because it's private...

To paraphrase from a previous thread:

1: Establish a trust

2: Establish a corporation - In the Charter, assign the role of the corporation to HOLD the trust, and establish the "Law" guidelines (You get to make your own up) as regards keeping the trust.

3: Get ANY accountant to manage the books of the corporation. You direct the corporation as FIRST DIRECTOR, and establish roles (President/CEO Vice President, etc) which is how the UNITED STATES was formed.

The accountant EXECUTES YOUR TASKS within the framework. To establish a trust, write it down, and have it witnessed and notarized. The end. Only shareholders of your corporation are recognized by the trust.

run this by Scott Duncan for confirmation/ to clarify details.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 461
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 461 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Start with a google search on maritime liens...then start a thread to get the details sorted...or, as you are liening it into a private trust & you are the party that gives the BC value, ie: a party, and the government is not a person, thereby not able to act as a party and or rebut your claim/lien, then as I understand it, dotting the 'i's & crossing the 't's becomes less important...after all, who is going to challenge you on it?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 462
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 462 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

So Scott, you know how the gov't always seems to access your bank account when they figure you owe them and they just take what they want? Does this lien remove that possibility?Therefore, if you had a functioning business would you also lien that with said Holding Company for the same reasons?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 462
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 462 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Stuart, I think the holding company liens the BC, the Trust would then claim OWNERSHIP of the name... Jinny started a thread on claiming ownership of the name (for yourself) but I think the idea is the TRUST owns it? Scott?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 462
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 462 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Blake Gardner

A trust is not a person, thus the oppt scam / ucc claim...re; strawman, it's a benefit unless you reverse your capacity status to trustee and start settling its accounts/public debts with your indorsement...or the less ambiguous method previously mentioned above, of creating a new vessel to operate in commerce with...express trust/private investment fund - corp.

Eamonn O Brien

You CREATE a corporation, then grant ONE SHARE. You are now the SOLE SHAREHOLDER (not an "owner"). You then ORDER (from the corporation, for which you are the CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDER to LIEN your BIRTH CERTIFICATE. The corporation can then hold that asset IN TRUST - Scott

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 463
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 463 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Blake Gardner

So many ways...it is interesting how many are focused on the BC as if it is wealth in and of itself or a definitive answer...it's just a certificate...learning to use what it symbolizes is substance...

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Blake, my friend just got back from Portland for the last Creditors In Commerce gig... he hasn't explained much to me but Gordon Hall learned everything from Brandon (and is in jail right now with his son for being the PERSON)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 463
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 463 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDER means a shareholder who owns more than half of the shares or majority of the outstanding shares in a company. A controlling shareholder generally controls the composition of the board of directors and influences the corporation’s activities...

Pete

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 463
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 463 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Actionnaires MAJORITAIRE in French, = Majority Shareholder in English ?

I'm just saying that Controlling Shareholders makes no sense to me, but you may be right and I may be wrong....you know, like the song :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 463
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 463 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

Majority shareholder yes... They most likely started the business and have control over who the directors are and how they want the business to run...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 463 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 463 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

The way I get it, ADMINISTRATORS control a corporation, as I AM the administrator of SFC Inc, and the CEO of SFC Inc, and I'm NOT the Majority shareholder, come and try to move me from my spot :D, you better have your check book ready :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 464
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 464 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Blake Gardner

Eamonn O Brien - we are the lawful holder...it's just that most let the public play trustee with account.

Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma - not quite, he and his son got involved with a scetchy client as trustees for his assets and became implied in the customers prior dealings, plus the Feds were already gunning for an opportunity:-) He's been in this sitch before...should be alright...definitely a prolonged test though...

Stuart Stone

'Stuart, I think the holding company liens the BC, the Trust would then claim OWNERSHIP of the name...'...you're right Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma, my mistake...apologies if I misled anyone.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 464
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 464 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Blake Gardner

The central trust holds all assets and is generally inactive not ever operating in public. The corp or outer trusts that do operate in public assign/convey their interests to the holding trust creating a buffer.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

I am like the bum on the side of the road and I ask for it all Scott I want it all don't hold any thing back tell me all you know. so that I can become free a grow up man please.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 465
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 465 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Hi Chris Evan, I am still acting as Administrator for the name & finalising a Bill of Exchange (meaning that the other party has been invited to attend to receive payment this Friday, then the matter will be resolved and/or a certificate of protest will be issued).

Then I will complete the process (register the lien/caveat & resign).

Here (Australia), the caveat/lien is registered via the Personal Property Securities Register, the relevant legislation being the Personal Property Securities Act (I think the name is the same for Canada).

Back to top