The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 23, 2013 7:16 PM

Luis Ewing

FW: PRO-SE WINNERS is a NEW BLOG TALK RADIO SHOW AT 1 - (347) 215-9477 or http://www.blogtalkradio.com/pro-se-winners - EVERY FRIDAY & SATURDAY EVENING at 6:00 PM on PACIFIC STANDARD TIME or 9:00 PM EASTERN STANDARD TIME! - LEARN ABOUT YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO TRAVEL!!!! -- WE ARE REAL PATRIOTS & CONSTITUTIONALIST’S WHO ALL DRIVE WITHOUT DRIVERS LICENSES AND BEAT ALL OF OUR TICKETS!!!!

PRO-SE WINNERS Online Radio by Luis Ewing

blogtalkradio.com

Pro-se Winners is a group of experienced "pro-se litigants" lloyd smith, Kurt Riggin, Michael James Anthony, Matt from Michigan and Luis Ewing.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 438
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 438 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 247

Luis Ewing

Dude, you don't know what you are talking about, we chose the name "Pro-se Winners" because most people only know "pro-se" to mean someone that goes to court and handles their own court cases without an attorney. We explain the true meaning of pro-se on our show and how to overcome it. It's only the amateurs and beginners in law like most of the patriot movement, constitutionalists and sovereign citizen type who get all caught up in little trivial shit arguing over the meaning of 1 stupid word, when there are many far more important things to learn like WINNING COURT CASES. THERE WERE NO WINS AT THE WHIM OF A SUPERNUMERARY TRUSTEE LIKE YOU SAID! YOU DON'T KNOW US! -- THERE ARE NO INDIVIDUALS IN THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES WHO HAS WON CASES IN MANY DIFFERENT AREAS OF CRIMINAL LAW THAN THE GUYS IN MY GROUP!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 439
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 439 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

The courts don't care why you "chose the name". Pro Se is JOINDER. If you say otherwise, you are misleading the readers.

Do you REALLY want to stick to your position that I don't know what I'm talking about?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 439
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 439 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

These people need the same public smack-down that the Free-Dumb movement does. They are the "appeal to your rapist" crowd, and I am really going to enjoy putting this little lying fucktard in his place.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 440
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 440 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Luis Ewing

It is when you HIRE AN ATTORNEY to REPRESENT YOU or when you allow a PUBLIC DEFENDER to REPRESENT YOU that the court obtains jurisdiction over you with the MARTIAL LAW JURISDICTION! If you send me an e-mail to <rcwcodebuster@aol.com> or <rcwcodebuster@yahoo.com> or <rcwcodebuster@gmail.com> I will send you an e-mail that completely explains that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED IN THE SIXTH AMENDMENT and that the so called RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED only exists in a GENERAL COURTS MARTIAL and/or a SPECIAL COURT'S MARTIAL or in a INVESTIGATION inside a MILITARY COURT ROOM and prove to everyone that REPRESENTATION ONLY EXISTS IN THE MILITARY STATUTES IN BOTH FEDERAL STATUTES 10 U.S.C. 838 and under STATE STATUTES RCW 38.38.376, etc., the so called RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED ONLY EXISTS INSIDE A MILITARY COURT ROOM, I am the one who has REVEALED THE GREATEST LEGAL SECRETS IN THE LAST 200 YEARS IN LAW, AND PROVE THAT EVERYONE VOLUNTEERS TO GO TO PRISON WHEN THEY ALLOW THEMSELVES TO BE REPRESENTED BY AN ATTORNEY AT TRIAL.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 440
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 440 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Luis Ewing

YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT TO THIS THE MILITARY NATURE OF THIS COURT ROOM, BY WHAT STATUTORY AUTHORITY DOES THIS COURT PURPORT TO HAVE AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT A GENERAL OR SPECIAL COURTS MARTIAL OVER ME, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED EXCEPT IN A GENERAL OR SPECIAL COURTS MARTIAL OR AT AN INVESTIGATION WHICH CAN ONLY HAPPEN IN A MILITARY COURT OR MILITARY TRIBUNAL

Note: “RCW 1.16.090 Legislative declaration for civil liberties day of remembrance. The legislature recognizes that on February 19, 1942, the President of the United States issued Executive Order 9066 which authorized military rule over civilian law and lives . . .”

I object your honor, . . . “THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED” . . . only exist’s in a . . . MILITARY COURT ROOM. See RCW 38.38.376 (1) and (2) which reads: “RCW 38.38.376 [Art. 38] Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel. (1) The trial counsel of a general or special court-martial shall prosecute in the name of the state, and shall, under the direction of the court, prepare the record of the proceedings. (2) THE ACCUSED HAS THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED in his or her defense before A GENERAL OR SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL or at an investigation under RCW 38.38.316 as provided in this subsection.”

I object your honor, . . . “THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED” . . . only exist’s in a . . . MILITARY COURT ROOM. See 10 U.S.C. 838 (a)(1): “TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART II > CHAPTER 47 > SUBCHAPTER VII > — 838 — 838. Art. 38. Duties of trial counsel and defense counsel (a)The trial counsel of a general or special court-martial shall prosecute in the name of the United States, and shall, under the direction of the court, prepare the record of the proceedings. (b) (1)THE ACCUSED HAS THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED in his defense before A GENERAL OR SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL or at an investigation under section 832 of this title (article 32) as provided in this subsection. —

I object your honor, I am NOT in . . . “THE REGULATED MILITIA” . . . I am not in the army, navy, marines, air force or the national guard! I object your honor, I am NOT in . . . “THE UN-REGULATED MILITIA” . . . either, the constitution clearly says that all males between the ages of 18 and 45 are presumed to be in the “REGULATED” or the “UN-REGULATED MILITIA” and I am in neither!!!! I OBJECT TO THIS MILITARY COURT CONDUCTING A GENERAL OR SPECIAL COURTS MARTIAL OR AN INVESTIGATION BECAUSE AM NOT IN THE MILITIA!!!! The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states:

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the assistance of Counsel for his defense.”

Article 1, section 22 of the Washington State Constitution reads in part:

“SECTION 22 RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. In criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right to appear and defend in person, or by counsel, to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him, . . .” YOUR HONOR, CAN THIS COURT COMPEL ME TO WAIVE ONE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT IN ORDER TO EXERT ANOTHER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT???? — See Simmons et al. v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 (1968). YOUR HONOR, DO I HAVE THE SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL? — See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). YOUR HONOR, DO I HAVE THE ARTICLE 1, SECTION 22 WASHINGTON STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DEFEND MYSELF IN PERSON? YOUR HONOR, I AM INVOKING MY ARTICLE 1, SECTION 22 RIGHT TO DEFEND MYSELF UNDER OUR STATE CONSTITUTION & THE SIXTH AMENDMENT COUNSEL OF MY CHOICE WHICH IS ME AND I AM NOT WAIVING EITHER RIGHT! For help with your case, contact Tribal Court Lawyer Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or <rcwcodebuster@gmail.com> or <www.prosewinners.net> or <www.luisewing.com> or <www.ultimateusers.com> or <www.beatphototickets.com> or <www.stoptolltickets.com>

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 440
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 440 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Ok, so... Lying sack of shit "controlled opposition". Check!

None of that counters the REALITY that PRO SE is REPRESENTATION, and by ACTING in PRO SE CAPACITY you are, in fact A WARD OF THE COURT.

See "whim of a supernumerary trustee".

Posting their clubhouse rules won't change that.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 442
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 442 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

This would be an example of truth with a layer of bullshit as seasoning.

The thing that guys of this ilk, who always cite the clubhouse rules; they ignore the ugly reality that THEY AREN'T IN THE FUCKING CLUB!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 442
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 442 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

The definition would lead me to believe that by appearing PRO SE one is doing what the lawyer would do anyway...?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 443 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 443 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Scott Duncan

Yes ID was required. At the time, government computers said what i told them to say. I created 12 IDs in my stint with the government. They still work. They have a good credit rating too!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 444 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 444 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

Aye, John Frisbey! `tis a never-ending "perfect storm" of idiotic vacuous, crap, who's stench never really leaves, even when it loses strength.

...Like Jesus. :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 446 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 446 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

Though my bones be weak, and I weary of fighting the shitstorm, I shall gain strength by grabbing a Tender-for-law groupie and slap her face with my dick while Tara records it...

...don't ask me why that seems to work, but it helps me carry on the fight.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 447
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 447 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

I was in court recently with a girl off of Dean Clifford's page, who got hung-up on how to answer when the Justice asked her point blank: "Are you here today as Agent, or Representative for (THE NAME) ?" She didnt expect that she would actually get him to bite and go along with her NOT being THE NAME... how should she have answered that, Scott?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 447
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 447 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

With a question!

Why are you questioning me? By what authority do you restrict my capacity to those things for which i clearly don't consent?

If those are my ONLY options, than I do not understand the nature and cause of these proceedings.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 447
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 447 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

If you answered yes to either terms then I'd imagine it would be a form of accepting a courtesy from the court to be recognised as such...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 448 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 448 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Eamonn O Brien

representative, n, (17c) 1. One who stands for or acts on behalf of another...

So if you're a re-presentative then you are standing for the PERSON. So are you accepting surety by stating that you are a representative?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 448
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 448 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

YOU're? YOU're is the SURETY in this matter, your Justice Duncan. As I AM the Grantor AND the sole-living-Beneficiary in this matter, i WISH to discuss the matter of SURETY. Would the court at this time point out to me, who exactly is the SURETY in this matter? :)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 449
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 449 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Lets say for a sec Scott, that Dean Kory actually says that next time he's in court- "So FUCK YOU. YOU'RE a YOU. I'M a ME!".....now, YOU KNOW, before the words finish coming out of his mouth, the Justice will hit him with a 'Contempt-of-Court!" HOW then, would one counter that?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 449
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 449 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

THE, BIGGEST, fucking KISS-ASS, that has EVER, graced this page...not only that, BUT...whats most embarassing, is how you've done it in such record-trailblazing-fashion...FUCKS THE PUPPY?...i think not

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 451
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 451 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

You deleted the thread, Pierre! You have defiled the sacred name of "Fucks the Puppy".

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 452 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 452 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Derek Moran

I WOULD forgive you, IF this were my page. But its not. Therefore i dont HAVE the authority to forgive you. If this WERE my page, i would've banned you already just for being rude to people as ive already observed you being in, oh by the way- just SIX DAYS?!? WTF But ENOUGH ALREADY, forget about it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 454
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 454 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

Scott and my rank. I know it will be low. I just want to know where I am to know where I have to get to.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 456 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 456 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

You have to know who YOU are first. You haven't even STARTED yet on that task. You've just realized something is very wrong, and you are getting answers...

...but that won't show you who YOU are.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 457 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 457 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

No. When you feel your worst. When you cannot take it anymore, and find yourelf wanting to go back to being asleep, you can gain inspiration with these simple words:

"At least I'm not Pierre"

All will seem a little brighter then. :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 457
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 457 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

insanity

n. mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior. Insanity is distinguished from low intelligence or mental deficiency due to age or injury

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 458 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 458 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Pete Daoust

ENTERTAINMENT: "Imperial overstretch"

"Too many commitments" "Too many enemies" "Too much blowback"

Over 40% of the Pentagon budget is secret. 100% of the intelligence budge is secret.

No one had a better grasp on what all this means and where it's all heading...Chalmers Johnson.

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/1064.html

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 458
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 458 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

HEY, my "other" inbox reveals...

Luis Ewing That's fucking . . . "LAME." Do you normally block people who have far more knowledge about the law than you do? LAME! Today

20:55 Scott Duncan No. Few people do have more knowledge than than I do. How many law degrees do you have? I have TWO. One from your nation of idiots, and one from Osgoode. I only block those who THINK they know more than me. You'd be one of them Would you like a tissue? Perhaps you can shake your fist at the monitor! To review: Your "guesses" and "belief", does not equal my knowledge.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 458
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 458 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

"One from your nation of idiots...Perhaps you can shake your fist at the monitor!"...L, M, F, A, O - tell him his consolation-prize is that he can go listen to Karl Lentz's talkshoe-shows, and to always remember that you were the one who gave him that tip

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 459
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 459 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Sirwade FirsbeyWho-are You Frisbey

Luck or chance is an event which occurs beyond one's control, without regard to one's will, intention, or desired result. There are at least two senses people usually mean when they use the term, the prescriptive sense and the descriptive sense. In the prescriptive sense, luck is a supernatural and deterministic concept that there are forces (e.g. gods or spirits) which prescribe that certain events occur very much the way laws of physics will prescribe that certain events occur. It is the prescriptive sense that people mean when they say they "do not believe in luck". In the descriptive sense, luck is a word people give after the occurrence of events which they find to be fortuitous or unfortuitous, and maybe improbable. Cultural views of luck vary from perceiving luck as a matter of random chance to attributing to such explanations of faith or superstition. For example, the Romans believed in the embodiment of luck as the goddess Fortuna,[1] while the philosopher Daniel Dennett believes that "luck is mere luck" rather than a property of a person or thing.[2] Carl Jung viewed luck as synchronicity, which he described as "a meaningful coincidence".

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 460
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 460 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

I can sign a document that says that I am the WORLD'S GREATEST BAGPIPE PLAYER!

Since it's nearly impossible to provide evidence to the contrary, the document in question, is DEFACTO PROOF.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 461
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 461 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

How can you do that? It's BAGPIPES! If there's a BETTER bagpipe player, how will you tell? :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 461 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 461 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.
Back to top