May 23, 2013 5:56 PM

http://godisimaginary.com/

That's actually a friend of Dan's. :D

Why WOn'T God heal amputees? He'll cure cancer, but if you lose a limb, you are not worthy of healing?

Because an amputee needs to "learn" something from it?

If you are trying to detach from a fraudulent, corrupt legal system, you don't get to keep some of the lies, because they feel good.

GOD IS PRETEND! DEAL WITH IT!

That was sarcasm...

What if it isnt the system that is corrupt but the people who misuse it...after all the system does provide remedy despite it being hidden by said people....

My version of God is that must be me! I am the one who creates everything in my world, gains and losses. If we wish, we can put our lives into the hands of some entity to take care of things... that said, let's just believe in our defacto gov't AUTHORITAH cause they're doing such a good job! We're all safe now :/

If you like, you can convert to Scott Duncanism! If you pray to me, I promise that I will answer an equal or greater number of prayers than your current "god".

...or no money back ;)

Blake Gardner: if the system is corrupt because of the people, what do you replace them with?

One of the things nobody seems to connect, is that the population has been dumbed down to a frighteningly low level. MOST of you can't even knowledgeably question the issues, muchless design/execute POLICY.

So we purge the corrupt... then what? Iran did it... it didn't work out.

I like the no money back part! wouldn't want to deviate to something totally different than what i have now.

Scott, I will need to see the disclaimer on that...

The God of Scott Duncanism is merciful and wise. :D

What part of "no money back" don't you get?

*sigh*

Ok, here's the accounting in a nutshell:

If any money comes into my possession through Scott Duncanism, you get NONE of it. See how that works? :D

Will thetenderforlaw.com come complete with its own PUBLIC NOTICE section? Then...i can simply just alert the City of Toronto of the posting i put up so nobody can say i at least didnt act in good faith. A wise-man recently said this is an excellent way of ENFORCING things ourselves ;)

Yes and no. It will be there to DIRECT people to the actual LEGAL NOTICES in the newspaper.

Scott Duncan - maybe it doesn't need changing at all. Maybe it's perfect the way it is - the public providing a democracy (socialism) for all who will trade rights for benefits and the private for those that wish to handle their own affairs.

Except it's not really your right to impose that on strangers. That would be my whole point here :D

The system is THE NOBLE LIE. You cannot expect to "fix" something that's fraud by its very nature.

At least the "options" could be taught in school so there would be a choice.

NO! That's like saying "teach the evolution controversy". It's more back-dooring bullshit.

TEACH MONETARY THEORY! THAT'S IT.

TEACH what the words THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER means.

No "choosing. You are right or you are wrong. Period. You dont teach Pregnancy and the STORK THEORY in sex ed and "let them choose" :P

I see your perspective Scott - is it not true though that its nevertheless by consent...you did just mention people's intellect being a little low these days...and there is a maxim that mentions, it is everyone's duty to know the law...

Therefore could it not be possible that we are at fault?

...which none of you do! You can't have informed consent, if everyone is clueless.

Not informed consent - implied consent.

Are not our actions taken objectively as implied consent...and would it not be fair to say that even if you informed the population of the law the majority would still choose benefits?

OF COURSE you are at fault! Ignorance is the greatest weapon of tyranny. Mau took over china by slaughtering all teachers and intellectuals.

IMPLIED CONSENT sounds a lot like "she was dressed that way because she wanted it". You cannot IMPLY consent and have a valid contract.

...and all of this is based on the VERY flawed notion that it's your right to impose this stuff on people.

I have friends that have seen what we are learning here and tell me "I'm too lazy to learn all that." Hence, they CHOOSE benefits.

Those were the millions on Nazi "Death Marches"... all going, "Is this legal? This can't be legal" while they are marched to their deaths.

Too lazy to learn will be a VERY expensive luxury, over the next ten years.

Is it not true that contract law teaches 1) all contracts to be voluntary 2)reasonable expectations...Now if people choose to contract voluntarily with the government is it not reasonable that the the terms and conditions be imposed or compensation is sought for breach? Has there not been provision made for an alternative in the private to operate in commerce under private international law/contract...again I see your perspective but maybe we should be seeing a bigger picture for a clearer remedy. Maybe some portion of the system know very well how democracies end and are rooting for competent beings to graciously stand up and handle their own affairs and possible others as well by setingoff debts so the public doesn't have too. I mention this only due to a couple of encounters with judges who insinuated such.

It's just the us v's them dialectic seems like a disadvantaged starting point...maybe it's more of a choice between public and private and how to balance the two via contract and trust...

The super wealthy do exactly that quite well

We can too...

Yes, Blake, but here in reality, none of these things exist. None of you even know what money is, muchless how to fix it. Who are these imaginary people who will fill the roles to "fix the system"?

I've been teaching the Noble Lie for DECADES, and I am here to say that NONE of thse imaginary "qualified ethical" people exist.

Think I would participate? Not a chance! I'd wipe the lot of you out for being so stupid. I'm a bad choice. I will spend 2013 trying to wake up who I can, then I vanish and exploit the incumbent idiots.

Let me be clear here. I'm handing out lifeboats, and when I'm done, I'm sinking the ship.

I hear you Scott - but maybe the system is perfect the way it is - public - private - combination, take your pick...my signature is money so I'm fine but am thankfully for your proverbial life boat and the many others out there...nice chatting.

It was productive... but it's never "nice" :D

:-)

...back to Bible-bashing!

A little essay for all you "God fearing Christians". This says why I hate your pathetic "ideology".

http://i.imgur.com/Vkus6ky.png

Martin Sutton says i will burn in hell. His answer is that he "has to believe" it.

And this is a man who walks the talk! he's as Christ-like" as they come... Yet he'll say I am "hellbound" because Zombie Jesus says so.

This is why BELIEF IS EVIL. ALL belief. It is the END of inquiry. It's making a virtue out of NOT THINKING.

That's why you can't see the lies in front of you.

Swearing an oath on the bible is handy in Court. When they ask if you 'understand' anything from whatever got you in court in the first place, you can say that "I don't need to know about that. I can only be questioned on the bible. Its only that which I have sworn on."

11 shit-stains in a row. I thought nobody could beat Pierre on that. Way to go, "Outcast"! I am about to think you are a cop. You are either very stupid, or a cop. How can you learn anything, if you just wont stop writing, and posting VALUELESS CRAP? If you are busy writing, then that means you are not studying/reading, because you are WAY to busy writing. I bet you didn't even read everything you just posted about the "noble lie".

There are some of us that are busy getting the lifeboats being thrown at us, before the ship sinks. People like you in this group are just making the ship sink FASTER.

So, I have a suggestion. Repeat after me:

SHUT THE FUCK-UP! Then say it some more, SHUT THE FUCK-UP! SHUT THE FUCK-UP!

Then you repeat that over, and over. Make that your mantra, UNTIL you have respect enough for everybody here, and have made some due diligence. Copy and paste from wikipedia shit here, you believe is enlightening, or anything of VALUE?

Very nicely, your SHUT THE FUCK-UP facebook friend,

Max!

PS: Don't forget to SHUT THE FUCK UP!

I read each ten times but your right why try to help others

PS: Don't forget to SHUT THE FUCK UP!

thank you for correcting me

The "Stone of Destiny" used for the Queen's inauguration was a fake. The original required, was removed. It is an integral part of the coronation. Sooo, she is not the Queen. Also, she violated her oath "not to legislate", per God's order, so, again, she is not the Queen. I figure that would make all BAR members, under her, powerless and acting in their capacity is fraud.

corruption

I am getting me one of those lifeboat's shuts the fuck up now