Yes, he has. But only in trying to explain why it is that WE have the ability to reserve all rights in court. 'Friend of the court' = they can only offer their BELIEF, and OPINION, nothing more. Therefore they are NOT a party, and therefore have NO STANDING in the case.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 718Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 718 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.