The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 20, 2013 2:44 AM

Scott Duncan

Your Patrimony

humanrightsdefendersleague.ca

Your patrimony is your birthright. That is, it is your share of the wealth of the land from which you came, yours by virtue of being born there. It should all be viewed as simply a portion of the ...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 183
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 183 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_514897305212873
Unique Facebook User ID:
927379467328526
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
link
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 21

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

From their book "The Solution to Everything": In conclusion, let us quote from a recent e-mail from our lawyer; "I need every single one of you on board to justify my stepping away from my practice and making such a potentially explosive application to the superior courts. And all of you certainly need me (or another competent lawyer willing to sacrifice his "legal" career) to properly handle this action.... We can [and will] win this, but to win a case of this scope and nature will not be easy, fast, or inexpensive. Even as the sizable group we are, this will still be very much a 'David & Goliath' battle."

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 183
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 183 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

I think everyone is missing my point here.

How many things here are TRUE? Remember the rule that everyone from Enron, to the Church, to the Free-Dumb Movement Grand Poobah, Robert Menard know: Cram as much TRUTH into the scam as possible! Leave only LIES OF OMISSION.

So, how much is true there?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 184
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 184 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

How can it be Human Rights Violations when we all AGREED? Nobody rebutted the presumptions... not to mention the Government is not a Person, Liars have limited liability...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 184 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 184 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Anibal Jose BaezMackximus Minimus

It looks like the <<Human Rights" Defenders League in Canada>> has "the SOLUTION to ALL of OUR problems." What a bummer I'm not from "CANADA", I could had just stop looking to the "solution" to ALL of our problems. :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 185
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 185 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top