The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 18, 2013 9:21 PM

Scott Duncan

It is a special day here on THE TENDER FOR LAW, as Pierre has made his first post that wasn't completely and utterly content free. In one of our many exciting and engaging threads, Pierre asked the following questions:

1). Do you really think some government agents are following this group?

and

2). If some do, are they NOT just going to quit their stupid jobs and figure out that they are really missing the boat ?

This is a complex issue and deserved an article on its own.

I am currently resurfacing the upper deck of the Tycho-Brahe and you should all feel really guilty that this, writing endeavour, is interrupting my hot, back-breaking manual labour which involves necessary but otherwise pointless suffering...so you'd better appreciate everything this has to offer.

1st question: “Do you really think some government agents are following this group?”

Answering this one is really easy: Yes. In fact they've said so.

To think otherwise would imply a level of self-deception that would probably render you catatonic. In fact, the only reason this group exists is because I KNOW the GOVERNMENT is reading it. Everything I type here I type ON PURPOSE.

As often as they try to insert a voice, their efforts get rendered futile by the rules of my little autocracy here. Jimmy Carter once commented that the reason he was such an effective diplomat was that he always dealt with dictatorships...and shit gets done under dictatorships.

My policy eliminates the flawed notion that your ignorance is equal to my knowledge. There's no “fair and balanced” here, there's right and wrong. The only freedom you have here is to get the fuck out and never come back — you're free to do that at any time. It is MY autocracy. I made it, and I shall rule it as long as I deem necessary.

Why?

Because “FUCK OFF” that's why!

With every word I type (or dictate ;)) my goal for THE TENDER FOR LAW is being fulfilled. As far as you should be concerned it serves no other purpose.

2nd question: “If some do, are they NOT just going to quit their stupid jobs and figure out that they are really missing the boat?” The short answer is, “No”, and the reasons why, are systemic.

Ask yourself, “What is a government worker?”

When you, ACTUALLY LOOK, and realize that they don't actually do anything; they don't make anything, and any benefit they get (including their salaries) was taken from someone else, this becomes PAINFULLY clear, and you wonder how you thought they were anything else.

If you try to get a government job, it's very difficult...unless you are related-to, and/or know someone, who already works for the government.

Every once in a while the issues of nepotism and crony-ism crops up by vocal members of the public, and the expensive, time-consuming and inevitably pointless “public hearing” on the issue will make a £500-page legal ruling” which essentially says “We agree that nepotism and crony-ism is a bad thing”, and the issue is considered closed (..except for the collection of tax dollars that will be needed to fund this "fair and balanced" report, of course!).

Such cancers on the PUBLIC TRUST aren't terminal in a healthy government, especially if policies exist to expel them; and to destroy the problem before it becomes a problem.

Every government in the Commonwealth has such a legal mechanism — referendums being the most familiar. Even with those protections, you will find that everyone, in every Commonwealth county, will feel the same way about government workers!

They have gone from being “holders of the PUBLIC TRUST” to “worthless eaters at the trough”. Though it's hard to imagine; I want you to picture yourself at a point in life (say, in your 40's or 50's) where you know, beyond any reasonable doubt, that you can't actually do anything, don't actually know anything, and can provide nothing that anybody wants. This makes you perfect for government work!

Do you honestly think a government worker doesn't know he/she is a worthless sack of shit?

Do you really think the fat, useless old man who holds the Senior Government position, once bounced on his father's lap and said, “Daddy, can I push paper for the Attorney General when I grow up?”

And do you think his daddy looked at him with hope and pride, exclaiming, “You can be anything you want son”!

What about Children's Aid Society workers (CAS)? Do you really think the fat, ugly, tub-of-shit that no man would fuck on a dare, muchless have a baby with, once crushed her mother's lap, and said, “Mommy, can I steal other people's children when I grow up?”

NO!

That ugly sack of shit, sees herself in the mirror in the morning, and knows, absolutely and categorically, that she's an ugly sack-of-shit, who's bitter, and harms those who have what she wants, and calling it "important work".

That fat, middle-aged man pushing paper for the Attorney General, also knows he's a useless sack-of-shit who couldn't make a living in the real world.

Not only do they read what I'm writing, they know, FOR A FACT, that what I'm saying is true!

Unfortunately for all of US; for them to acknowledge that, would be to cut off the revenue stream, that feeds their families, at other people's expense.

So yes, Pierre, they do watch, and they do know what I'm saying is true.

It just doesn't matter to them; because the only way they can have the illusion of self-actualization and worth, and to feed their families, is to be worthless, useless, child-stealing sacks-of-shit. Would you let your family starve?

If the only way you could feed your family would be to assume the role of paper-pushing/child-stealing/citizen-beating/home-invading, worthless sack-of-shit...wouldn't you do it?

The infrastructure of the government consists of middle-aged, stupid/incapable people, who where brought into the position, by a previous generation of middle-aged/stupid people, who were brought in by a previous generation of people who fought in a bloody, pointless war and chose to avail themselves of the benefits of “Civil Service”.

There was a time, right here in Canada, that you weren't paid to work for the government. You did it as “service”, and you were rightfully revered for the position, for it was a position of TRUST. Only after 1933, was government ever a way to “make a living”. Here in reality, government workers make YOUR LIVING. They take from you, to breed another generation of stupid/incapable people that the real world doesn't want.

The “real world” doesn't want me either, but I am not responsible for the wants and desires of others (although Tara will tell you I am in fact responsible for every want and desire she has...and I'd best make sure she has them if I know what's good for me...I digress).

So...just remember that Pierre, every worthless, sack-of-shit in government already knows they're a worthless, sack-of-shit.

One of my larger goals in my public initiatives (THE TENDER FOR LAW being but one of them), is to eventually provide absolute, conclusive, irrefutable proof, so when you try to wake up your friends and neighbours, you won't have to say, “I know a guy who knows a guy”...you will be able to point to it and to say, “Here's the proof.”

Remember I'm the guy who pays all his taxes, who PAID OFF his mortgage, and had guns pointed at him and his home stolen, because he would not cede jurisdiction, and would not have his UNALIENABLE RIGHT not to contract ignored.

Everything has been meticulously documented, and the corruption of the system will become self-evident. When they question the “authorities” about what I say, the response will only reinforce my position.

I want the government the way it SHOULD be; TERRIFIED of its citizens. Those with authority in the PUBLIC TRUST should have sleepless nights worrying about what the citizenry might do to them if they step out of line.

PUBLIC TRUST and PRIVATE TRUST is no different. You will have no problem seeing the nature and depth of the offence, when somebody betrays your trust, and I'm sure you have no problem expressing it when it happens. Yet people in the PUBLIC TRUST, when they do the same, get away with saying, “Ya, well...that's just the way it is. C'est la vie.”

Why is that?

Why is one breach of trust unforgivable, but the other is “just the way it is”?

EVERYTHING IN GOVERNMENT IS ENGINEERED TO MAINTAIN THAT “JUST THE WAY IT IS” MENTALITY IN THE PUBLIC. IT SERVES NO OTHER PURPOSE.

...and to counter the inevitable, “we need government for hospitals, roads and schools”, as if these things don't occur as a matter of course: Even the most backward, primitive villages in Tzshitholeistan, will have a road coming into the village, and executive to administer policy, and minimal “public services” to accommodate the village.

All we have left now is worthless people who contribute nothing, implementing “Might makes right” policies, if you dare say ANYTHING against the cry “Respect MA ATHORITAH”!

You have but to look over at Dean Clifford to see this mentality in play. Those very same government workers who know that they're worthless sacks-of-shit living off your labour to feed their worthless sack-of-shit families [hereafter: Worthless breeder], look at people like me publishing what I do, and people like Dean, publishing what he does, and even the Grand Poobah of the FREE-DUMB Movement, Robert Menard, and you can imagine the pressure they are feeling. For anyone examining the issue, at bare minimum will conclude, that ONE of us is right; and that what exists right now, is NOT EVEN CLOSE to "RIGHT".

Like a cornered animal, I feel these worthless breeders will actually harm Dean Clifford, and that's a bell that can't be un-rung. Too many people will see this happen. I'll make sure of that.

So to conclude,

1: Thank you Pierre, for finally asking something relevant; and I no longer think you're a waste of oxygen that should be ground up for filler, in pet food.

2: It is unlikely that anyone observing these pages for, or on behalf of, any government entity will assimilate the message, change their opinions, or become a force for public good. Those who live fantasy existences, whether inspired by religion, wealth, or a job in the public sector, cannot afford to let even the smallest amount of doubt seep into their “realities”. They can't, without questioning every facet of who, and what, they are.

In seeking to maintain their view of the status quo, they will fight, by whatever means necessary, to maintain their rose-coloured illusions that everything is fine and nothing is broken.

Ultimately if they cannot stem the tide of public opinion by sticking their fingers in their ears, they will even seek to silence those with dissenting opinions. To do otherwise would force them to acknowledge themselves as dysfunctional and an integral part of a broken system.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 650
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 650 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_514467128589224
Unique Facebook User ID:
927379467328526
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
status
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 126

Pete Daoust

and I no longer think you're a waste of oxygen that should be ground up for filler, in pet food: I remember a few humans I had the same thoughts about them, :/ I'm reaaly happy it disapeared your thoughts, and recognize very much your patience, because I was not that patient with them :/ (I've tried very hard to phrase this correctly, sorry for the fucking phrasing)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 652
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 652 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

in the same Spirit.....some kids can be very ANOYING :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=D-eVF_G_p-Y

Thanks to Stuart Stone !!! (deep stuff Stuart and very appreciated)

Play video
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 653
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 653 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Priests "inspire" too. I'm not trying to inspire. I don't care if you all fall flat on your faces...

...I'm just trying to make sure you know it's your fault if you do. Don't pay attention to "feelings" and "belief". LEARN. Don't "be inspired"

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 654
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 654 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Joseph Davia

I AGREE WITH MOST OF WHAT YOU SAY..... not many round who have the balls to say what they think, maybe inspirational was the wrong word..... (gotta be careful with words) - lets just say - hope you both find a girl who likes to succeed ......lol - Rewards are for those who deserve them, not for the ignorant who are too fucken stupid to see whats in front of them, for whatever reason....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 654
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 654 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Gerry Cardinalli

Well, I'm not inspired. Words people utter do not persuade me to go out and wave some flag on their behalf in response. And I am not emotionally aroused either. Those that orate from emotion are usually as deep as a fucking car park puddle after a light shower. Neither am I impressed. To be impressed by the words or deeds of another is to fall into the category of follower or another bloody sheep. I stand alone. Why?... Because it is my fucking inalienable right. Let some bastard try and take that from me. What I can say about what you wrote here Scott, quite simply is - that I agree with what you state above. Whole-heartedly. What I choose to do with what you have said, is my business. But I do believe that it is a statement of fact that needs to be sent to every Commonwealth Politician and government agent. Thank you for sharing your honesty.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 654 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 654 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

I did answer that. These are people who would starve in the real world. They make NOTHING. They HAVE nothing the world needs. These really are "worthless eaters" who are attracted to the Government.It doesn't matter what motivates strangers who mean you harm.

I don't care what motivates some worthless sack of shit to take a stranger's child, or hurt someone because they don't "respect their authority". Why would anyone care what motivates them? Are you planning to stalk and kill them? no? Then "examining their motivations" is a waste.

Women in Oslo don't care about the motivations of the muslim man who thinks "allah" gives him the "right" to rape them.

There comes a time when your love of "belief" becomes irrelevant and you just become a sack of shit.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 655
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 655 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Daniel Predie, would it be nice to explaine to us WHERE Scott Duncan is wrong in this Allah Muslim stuff....I check EVERYTHING Scott is writing, and my DREAM would be to catch him in default one day :D No luck for me so far, but fuck do I try hard :D, Of course, I would not say he is wrong without explaining it in here, after all, it's HIS group, not mine :/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 656
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 656 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

I have no idea, that is why I'm asking :/ , but as I said, this freaking Scott seems to have the knowledge to back everything he says, so far anyway, so again, WHY do you say he is wrong ?, or maybe you should have said: Hey Scott, can you give me the source of your affirmation....something like that anyway :/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 656
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 656 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

We are the product of an agrarian society. This allows us to SPECIALIZE and do cooperative tasks. No ONE human being can build a computer from scratch. It takes hundreds of specialty fields. Skills in these fields which provide real world items that real people in the REAL world want/need.

The worthless breeders have none of these skills. They would starve in the real world...

...just like you got banned, in the real world.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 657
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 657 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Oh...are you really asking for evidence that Islam endorses rape?

Ok, you asked for it:

http://www.wikiislam.net/wiki/Rape_in_Islam#Conclusion http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/002-rape_adultery.htm

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 657
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 657 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

And remember al-taqiyya! They will always lie when they can, about their intent. They have canned responses in the Sira.

This is a serious issue in Europe. They can't even speak about the problem. Sweden (Yes Sweden) has cities with "no-go" zones. They are taught from childhood that it is their right to make non-muslims submit. They see Sweden's enlightened society as "weakness", and they truly believe the policies are an acknowledgement of their ":divine superiority".

Oh, and since 85% of of the Swedish population is non-theist, there is a fatwah declaring that it's ok to kill swedes.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 658
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 658 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

HOW may Muslims are there? Over A BILLION?

Find ONE who thinks this guy is nuts. I dare you :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 659 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 659 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Joseph Davia

there lies the problem - finding the sheeple is easy - we're fucking surrounded by them, finding one that has a brain to think with and question whats "right" .....aah now there's the problem, whats right for me ain't necessarily right for you......so whats right or whats wrong......maybe thats why the sheeple behave the way they do....because they don't know anymore, the line dividing the two are now so blurred its hard to know ......just a thought !

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 659
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 659 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Shawn FolkesShawn Ofthefamily Folkes

whoa... heavy mother fucking thread. And here I come to piss everyone off.

Ok, Scott, you first. You are not completely right. But damn close. You said ONE thing wrong: If you try to get a government job, it's very difficult...unless you are related-to, and/or know someone, who already works for the government. Not true. A generalization from a wold fast fadng.

You also said: The infrastructure of the government consists of middle-aged, stupid/incapable people, who where brought into the position, by a previous generation of middle-aged/stupid people, who were brought in by a previous generation of people who fought in a bloody, pointless war and chose to avail themselves of the benefits of “Civil Service”.

Wrong again dude. Youll note I said ONE thing I disagree with but actually lsted TWO? They are the same thing. And youre incorrect. An example to prove youre wrong: My sister You really dont know WHO is in here...or WHO their family might be.

FYI? Shit...one of the biggest conspiracy theorists I know of...is so high up in a particular area of the government that ould leave you ALL in serious disbelif. So, not only are some YOUNG High ups reading, tey already are on point with what really "going down". Theres more to this and certain theories in effect I wont tal about, but...nah, youre wrong. Not all in "higher" positions (and I mean positions that have to yell down a long way for Harper to hear them) are of the old school or the old school mentality. YOU..have NO IDEA. And I cant say more ok? Just trust me on that.

As for all this muslim talk? Youre all fucking nuts. Listen, I just so happened to get a real refresh on Islam...from someone who ALWAYS warns me to NEVER bash them in public. They are THAT fucking dangerous to him. NONE of you, Scott, included, are as "smart" as him, ok? Ive read a few things here and he shredded it all so fucking fast I couldnt even begin to answer him or defend shit said here. I will keep trying to get him to post here thru my fb. Anyhow...HE...broke down the whole muslim thing. And Scott and company are DEAD BANG ON regarding that topic. I got the whole break down of everything...keeping in mid that he has of course read four different translation of the Quran, and knows it inside out and upside down. You have to understand the history behind it, not just the book itself and understand Mohammeds background...his influential Christian wife, his father, and the disrespect his people got for being an illiterate nation and godless pagans. A truly fucked up religion and that Im sorry is no joke. It simply is what it is. Seriously fucked p man made shit. And boy would my big brain hat me for saying all this to you. But shit when it comes up like this I GOTTA say something, after learnin what Ive learned, and ho I learned it from.

That tingling had better be my fucking Selsun Blue!

Scott...youre a crack dealer. You get people in here, wake them the fuck up, and get them junked out. I endorse that shit!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 659
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 659 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

So... your SISTER became a "worthless eater". You must be so proud.

...who'd she know to get in? I GUARANTEE it's a useless, unskilled middle-aged "worthless eater". Disagree all you like, but there is nobody at the helm in government. Commercial interests nudge it in their favour, but no thinking man or woman works for the government, no matter how much you "disagree".

Claiming there is anything else besides "worthless eaters/breeders" in government, is a claim I put on the same shelf as Unicorns and Faeries.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 660
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 660 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

If your sister is being paid by the government, that money was TAKEN from someone the world actually VALUES. So claiming your sister "proves me wrong" is simple bullshit. Anyone who thinks "working" (It's not actual work) for the Government is OK, is not CAPABLE of any more rational thought than is required to convince themselves they aren't doing anything wrong by claiming "Authority" over strangers.

You are leaving out information; I will generalize even further, by saying she got the job, because she meets a quota. She's not male (quota of females still not met), so that helps. Is she a "visible minority", because they have quotas for that too!

Can you feel my respect dropping? You need to provide a bit more than "My sister met a quota, so you're wrong"... followed by "I know a guy who knows a guy...no names".

These quotas for women and "visible minorities" are there to leave this "repressed demograph" in charge when the world reserve currency crumbles. The "visible minorities" will be blamed, and after much bloodshed, everything is reset.

A quick reminder of who I am: I AM PROROGUED NOBILITY. I AM DESCENDED FROM THE PEOPLE WHO BUILT ALL OF THIS. What you are discovering, I ALWAYS knew.

You are simply not qualified to even CLAIM that I'm wrong. Not about anything.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 660
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 660 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Did it prove that you're sister is a worthless eater? I really thought that was obvious. Glad i could help!

Did it prove that your so-called "higher-ups" in government that you claim to be so chummy with, are figments of your imagination? Again... that was obvious and I don't deserve the credit.

YOU just proved with your idiotic response, that your worthless eater sister is a Quota Filler. That's what she gets paid for... to be left holding the bag when things go to shit.

Since you seem to know everything, have lots of friends "higher up", and I've just "proved" some irrelevant thing to you... you'll have no more use for this group.

Stand still...

...no, you don't even deserve more than "fuck off".

Fuck off.

BANNED!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 661
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 661 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Hill

i have to agree with scott.

government workers are by far the useless. They don't do anything other than take maybe a 6 hour course on how to handle people and then get some stupid certification and can work for the government(my friend did this so i know).

they dont know anything outside of their job. The only reason they are there is because they couldnt find a job somewhere else meaningful so they go to government to feed themselves and family.

I refer to the general workforce, there is always few exceptions.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 662
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 662 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Hill

Scott, for the few exception i refer to people who were caught in the middle of hardship for whatever reasons. few Exceptions can be as little as 100 people in the entire workforce.

I personally could not see myself working for government. Its boring unrewarding and mundane.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 662
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 662 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

--sigh-- My Father, Mother, Oldest brother and Older brother were/are all Government workers. I have never worked for the (been employed) by the Government myself. Have almost my entire working life been Self-Employed. Sadly to say I can speak for a fact that at least the Government Employees that I have/do know (my family also) meet the above criteria 100%

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 662
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 662 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Hill

Scott, its mainly to account for all the things that i cant think of. It is impossible to know every single situation.

Perhaps its for people who work only for a few months to get by to a better field of work they enjoy. Scott i don't know there is too many possibilities to know to include the entire group as a whole.

Anyways, i wont comment further as there is nothing more to say.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 663
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 663 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Hill

A Man lost his job with a family of 2 and his wife on disability. In order to maintain his household his must seek a job in order to help with bills in the meantime. The only job at the time was a government administrative desk job with the government.

A young man got into a car accident and needed extra cash to do his nightly job. He seeks a job with the government for 3 months in order to help pay for a new car or to repair the current one.

A single woman with 3 children had a night job as a waitress, she gets reduced shifts because of layoffs and poor business. She seeks another job during the day in order to help with the loss of money to help feed her family. She seeks a government job because of the reliability and the steady shifts.

Just on the top of my head. Scott not everyone spent time into law, they have different paths. Not everyone has the same amount of knowledge as you.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 663
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 663 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Hill

1.jeff gough 2.dan mcgregor 3.liz mckennen.

i really dont even know why you need the names.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 663 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 663 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

Nobody "innocently" applies for government work. Only people who think it's their right to have authority over and live off of others.

If you are thinking one can "innocently" work for the government, then you are just dumb enough for low-level government work.

You don't need to be "as smart as I am" to know if you're a parasite.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 664
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 664 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

I need the names because I don't think they are real people. If they ARE real, you will believe any bullshit story the government sells you...

...oh wait. I just saw who I was talking to.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 664
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 664 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Hill

Scott you can voice whatever opinion, but those 3 peopls dont work for government anymore they do what they love again. So i dont think they really care about your opinions that much. First 2 will probably tell you to go suck dick for all they care. 3r5d will probably say "Thats nice" and hang up if on the phone.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 664
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 664 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Oh I see.. they were young, and "just experimenting" with the whole "parasite lifestyle"?

They were thrown out...

...and if they are no longer with the government, then the numbers remain the same NO EXCEPTIONS.

Parasites are parasites, no matter what perfume of bullshit you wish to try to cover it with.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 664 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 664 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Pete Daoust

Like selling junk on ebay fo 1 full year....lots of fun and 13 years ago everyone was paying with money order and the USD vs CDN was awesome

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 665 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 665 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Derek Hill

jeff and liz are in their 50ies. They were not experimenting.

They were not thrown out. The exceptions was to be used during their employment.

Jeff and dan leads productive lives. Jeff works on backyard work with weed and his food garden and experimenting with different ways to use materials. I see jeff almost bi daily.

Dan, he has a job for junior programming.

Liz, she does what she loves, work at a cafe.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 665
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 665 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

In case you haven't figured out: I don't tolerate ANY support of government, in any form. Take it elsewhere. Trying to say that Government is ANYTHING but parasitic, just won't be accepted here.

...and before you bitch about "free speech"; You are free to speak it elsewhere.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 665
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 665 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Hill

i wouldnt, i dont care much about government, im broke and i still wouldnt work for government, id go insane after a day of being bored.

I have no problem telling cops to fuck off. I smoke weed in front of them and they cant arrest me because of the past.

But i dont speak for others.

I hate government i cant stand it. Government is in the way of true progress. I also know government is useless and dont do anything on its own without labour force. Anyways im done with this topic.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 665
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 665 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Hey, what do you do for living, I work for the Canadian government, and what is it do you do for them?...ho euh..we are re-evaluati.g reports that has been evaluated some years ago, ho fuck...that must be fucking boring ?......yes, but they pay good.....ho, who pays you ?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 665 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 665 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

How YOU feel is so profoundly irrelevant, I can't think in scales that small.

Here in reality you are saying "they stopped raping the public so they're fine now". I'm sure they gave back all the money they were paid, just as soon as they realized it was taken from somebody else!

Paul Bernardo isn't kidnapping and raping teenage girls anymore either, so I guess he's a "good guy" because he stopped.

I really hope you teach your child to think like you, so I can watch the formation of stupidity that will result, grow so massive, that it collapses into a fatal black hole of stupid.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 666
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 666 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

I called a few of these government workers to ask questions....oh man :-\ if I would do what they did to me, I would be out of business as we speak......just check where they work, no private business can afford what they use as space building and decorum....they are spending outrageous amount of $$ for absolutly NOTHING...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 666
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 666 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Is it true that with satellite technology they can spot anything that happened at a specific place at a specific time ?....why not use a few thousand of these government workers to resolve children kidnappimg ?.....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 666
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 666 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Is it possible to know what happened at a specific lattitude / longitude at a specific passed ti.e ?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 667 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 667 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Chad Brodgesell

Pete Daoust , A friend of mine who worked on some of the classified sats with NASA on the machining end did tell me they have made them that 24/7 record at such high resolution to follow where a person went days prior.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 667
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 667 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Chad, you don't need actual people to search visual data. OpenCV can do it. It's not that hard to go through a terabyte of data if you can identify your target.

Here is something FAR harder for visual input to do...identify targets in real-time. Recorded stuff isn't even real-time! OpenCV just searched for pictures of Tara Duncan in m 3 TB archive. Found, 11000 and put the faces it detected in a single contact sheet.

It took about 1 minute. That's it being lazy, with a crappy bash script calling OpenCV with switches.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 667
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 667 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

Yes I've seen that one awhile back, I'm sure they have a better algorithm and equipment today that could wipe that one up with a mop. 7 years ago though the memory/speed was the hinderance, not anymore. I would really like to know what they can do nowadays with todays technolagies

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 668
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 668 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Dino Disenfranchised

Dick takes a job at government because he says he needs money. He helps create a condition where others, like Jane, find it difficult to live. Once he has made enough money, he says he will find a job he prefers.

Jane takes a job at the government...

Back to top