The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 13, 2013 1:59 PM

Stuart Stone

I think I just found a happy ending for collecting on default judgments/ ex parte orders...on sell it to a bank or other financial institution for a percentage of face value & let them collect as the holder in due course of the note...

First send a bill,

Then a statement,

Then a notice,

Then a fault/default,

Then get an ex parte order,

Then sell the order to a financial institution & use the cash to buy bitcoins...

Useful for all credit agreements/mortgages etc that have been paid back & the note has not been returned...thoughts?

The Holder in Due Course Blues

youtube.com

This is a "Law Lessong" - a law lesson in a song - that I wrote to help students remember the 6 categories of statutes that require a writing in order to be ...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 942
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 942 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 6

Stuart Stone

How is this process different from replevin, or are they one & the same?

Black's: Replevin. An action whereby the owner or person entitled to repossession of goods or chattels may recover those goods or chattels from one who has wrongfully distrained or taken or who wrongfully detains such goods or chattels. Jim's Furniture Mart, Inc. v. Harris, 42 Ill.App.3d 488, 1 Ill.Dec. 175, 176, 356 N.E.2d 175, 176. Also refers to a provisional remedy that is an incident of a replevin action which allows the plaintiff at any time before judgment to take the disputed property from the defendant and hold the property pendente lite. Other names for replevin include Claim and delivery, Detinue, Revendication, and Sequestration (q. v.). Under the following conditions a buyer of goods may have the right of replevin: "The buyer has a right of replevin for goods identified to the contract if after reasonable effort he is unable to effect cover for such goods or the circumstances reasonably indicate that such effort will be unavailing or if the goods have been shipped under reservation and satisfaction of the security interest in them has been made or tendered." See U.C.C. § 2-711(2)(b); — 2-716(3).

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 942
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 942 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Not yet, but another piece of the puzzle...

My quandary in this process is how to enforce a default judgement/ex parte order eg: get the sheriffs involved to seize property at the place of business of the defaulted party or some other method...

Using this process, the lien/judgement can just be on sold to a third party/financial institution (at 30% discount for example or some other agreed upon value), I take the cash & they can enforce it how they see fit as holder in due course.

I want to be sure I have the pieces in place before I jump

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 943
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 943 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Johansen

@stuart, that is precisely what I was saying earlier. why bother the sherrif when i'll gladly take 50% or more from a 3rd party sell off of the debt. let some bank handle it like they do to us.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 943
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 943 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Stuart Stone

Absolutely, if it's a credit card agreement from 5 years ago, or an old mortgage from 10 years ago that I didn't even realise I had rights to, then any return is a bonus...

Throw the banks a bone so they can do the leg work & offer a 30-50% discount off face value...Put in the notice to the defaulting party that every minute overdue from 30 days after the initial bill will accrue a $1/£1 charge for refusing to release my property (negotiable instrument/credit agreement/promissory note), 30 days amounts to an extra $43200.00. That offsets any discount offered to the banks buying the note.

I have worked in relatively poor communities where there are people constantly receiving threats from debt collectors, having their wages garnished, property seized etc...it's about time the tables got turned back in favour of the little guy :-)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 943
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 943 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top