The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 12, 2013 7:25 PM

Jinny Freeman

ideo on the Fictitious Name, and claiming it.. best described in the audio I did with Juan today.. found on Talkshoe.. Call ID: 122402 May 9th call

Video shows similarities between the Original Registration of your ownership” compared to what the completed instrument for claiming the name will look like as far as witnesses, and seals..

Also where it says in the Act for Fictitious Names.. that .. if you are doing business with an assumed name (ALL CAPS)” and have not registered it” you are guilty of a misdemeanor….. right now.. today” as you sit reading this’ you are a criminal” because you have not registered your ownership in your “corporation”

This is why “unknown owners” is used” The Estate exist.. you at one time were the registered owner.. but did not renew the registration.. and the Estate is considered abandoned”

Further.. you cannot bring a suit of any kind in the state court unless you have registered your ownership” and you can listen to me read it .. right out of their law”.

So claim the NAME” before they do”

Its truly profound.. if you just think about it for a minute” by doing this.. you have separated the man from the NAME.. and the STATE is going to Certify it.. you now have a registered corporation.. doing business as ALL CAPS”

And in Commerce.. there is only one type of contract.. BILATERAL.. officers of both corporations sign the contract” We did our part.. signed the contract and put up collateral” but the other party has refused to sign the contract” now its just contract law” UCC” Court of Equity (in the Manner of DELEWARE).. lets call it Corporate Equity” no matter”

What matters.. is THEY now have a BIG.. BIG .. PROBLEM…..

Video: Claim the NAME... Before they do..

robcourtofrecord.wordpress.com

RobbRyder here” again.. Video on the Fictitious Name, and claiming it.. best described in the audio I did with Juan today.. found on Talkshoe.. Call ID: 122402 May 9th call Video shows similarities...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 494
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 494 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Unique ID: 462493170453287_512381652131105
Unique Facebook User ID:
1.02053255051966E+016
Last Updated:
Type of Post:
link
Place of Post:
None

Read Comments 21

Derek Moran

Check the back of your SIN-card, those tiny letters-and-numbers have some sort of relevance..i think its your 'Exemption-number' for the 'private-side' of the card

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 496 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 496 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Jinny Freeman

Writing to let you know of our two victories- among others. These are two cases won in AZ courts. Maricopa County Superior Courts Superior Court - Maricopa County

www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/

View shared post 1. Harold Bruce Hyden CR2008-158369-001 2. Peter M. Pilat, Sheilla Pilat CV2010-016616 The first case was a felony case. It was bonded using GSA forms based on the SSN as a FEDERAL CONTRACTOR and the oaths of the judge, DA, public defender were accepted. All PUBLIC OFFICERS were appointed Fiduciary Trustee to settle the matter to -0- and erase all records. Dismissed without prejudice. The second case was a foreclosure case. The Pilats had lost the case after fighting and hiring lawyers for almost three years. The judge had ordered the writ to the sherriff to foreclosure. The case was closed and ended, The Pilats had nothing to lose. They filed the appointments the judge, lawyers in the case-the case that was closed and over with. They did not bond the case. The judge gave the lawyers, bank fifteen days to answer. After 15 days the bank did not answer. The lawyers did not answer. The judge reversed her order and found for the Pilats and dismissed without prejudice. We have th evidence and the who, what,where and why's for both cases. You can enter the identifiers in the case history on the courts web site to verify our victories. It was short and sweet. In other cases we had a IRS judge abandon the court. This is powerfull and it works. We do not argue we act in peace Would be great to share all the info. Mike Mason Rialto,CA

http://robcourtofrecord.wordpress.com/2013/05/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 497 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 497 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Phillip PraterPhillip Prater Theprisonersix

If you own the name, you become surety but if you put it away and no longer use it, you may/might own it and be surety but, since you don't use it, where are the draw backs?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 498
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 498 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top