The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 11, 2013 2:54 PM

Rainhard PitschkeRain Odp

So, I made a 'special appearance' at a court in Newmarket yesterday. Trial for suspended driving and running red light. (I didn't see the blushing red light in the room so I would have gotten off by 'pleading' not guilty anyway.) I slapped down the two packets of 'disclosure' in front of the persecutor. I said I looked at all this and don't wish to contract with you. I also gave a copy of Scott Duncan's (thank you for posting it here!!!) Notice of Mistake. And my unique Birth Cetificate...more about that another time.

The calling of the name of course happened after all other entities had been dealt with. Funny enough...the two ladies called my given name. To which I replied hesitantly...yes....? Then they repeated with the surname to which I quickly replied no....but I'm here for that matter. Then I was invited to 'come aboard'...(matey). I declined respectfully....and was invited again. The Goddess...the judge must have been a goddess since all were calling her 'your worship'...said I was disrespecting her and the court. I had of course already informed her that I was claiming commonlaw jurisdiction, all rights reserved, waive all benefits and privileges....so it was my court, yes? In any case she then asked if I was a 'freeman on the land'. Sheesh! What's that I asked?...yuk, yuk. Then she insisted again to entice me onto her ship...Oh...let me add...what is the union jack...the British flag doing in the corner?!...Is this an embassy or ship in dry dock...I wanted to ask but we couldn't get past the railing issue. She warned me she would have me removed.....she did...had me escorted from the room...she said my 'papers' are on the last row of seats by the door...lol. I removed my bc and Notice of Mistake...and left their 'defendant' solicitations...and walked out.

But...I had a spy who remained. He heard them talk in secret like cowardly conspirator in dishonour. They sent one of the armed thugs to retrieve the 'papers'. She asked him if there was anything 'interesting' among them. No....yuk, yuk...their own stuff is of course not interesting. Then they decided to arrange for 'ex parte' hearing for next year in or for my name. Are they obligated to tell me this?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 949
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 949 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 19

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

I guess that means you are not invited... :D I wouldn't worry about it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 950 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 950 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Shawn FolkesShawn Ofthefamily Folkes

Can you really be held accountable to anything they say/do then? If they are going to deliberately act behind your back ...how can they claim you have any responsibility to things you have no knowledge or understanding of? How can one be surety to that? Too bad she didnt call you beligerant!

Id like to hear about your bc...because I don't have one and never have. And im also curious because none of the government shit I have been given to identify me to their accountant fucks....has my correct name on them. Not a single one....only my birth registration has my full name.

Im following your story as I am about ti launch into a big fight over driving and my license thats been suspended for unpaid fines for 13 years and interest (interest....they charge you interest on a fine. If that doesnt say it all...) has amassed to over 35k. But now I graduated in a trade and need to operate a vehicle to make a living. And if they ultimately cock block me from earning an honest living, I can officially say that I have to live by my own devices, and do whatever I have to....including Life, to assert my right to earn a fucking living. Cuz really, if Im driving my work van and a cop goes to take it....I will resist that shit with wxtreme prejudice. And im fine with saying that publicly....cantbsay I didnt warn any ine, and it doesnt change the reality that I WILL be extreme if my livlihood is tampered with. So it doesnt matter.....anything after the fact Is after the fact. So they better not tread on me.

So keep us posted!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 951
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 951 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Awesome thread, and even better story, i love the 'experiences-in-court' threads. Ive got not one but TWO emails from my MPPs office saying the Attorney Generals office told them Ontario is a common law jurisdiction. a fortiori, if thats the case, then HOW, the FUCK, can we be in any other court THAN a common law- ADMIRALTY? "Well where's the fucking-WATER your Justice, where's my life-jacket, am i in danger of anybody throwing me overboard today and DROWNING??"

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 951
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 951 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Rainhard Pitschke

Thanks Derek. I think they literally have redefined the roads as 'rivers of commerce'. The courts are definately maritime jurisdictions for the traffic offenses. 'Mister' is actually 'master' which is a nautical title too. In any case it's a fucking church inquisition tribunal too. You're guitly or guilty with some excuse. You are in dishonour for arguing with a superior officer....and since you were charged by one it's insubordination to even show up. You should have paid the fine upon arraignment and disclosure.....or as soon as the cop made out the ticket.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 951 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 951 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Rainhard PitschkeRain Odp

@shawn.....I had quite a shock when I got my bc from Germany. It showed a different man as my father. I'm 63 so this is a shock to 4 children of mine and grandchildren now too. The entire thing now in my opinion is fraudulent. I got validation from my mother (it was a real relief for her) and I did research to find that my birth father died but I now have two sisters I didn't know about. One is visiting me next month! But...about the licence. I have the same outstanding fines shawn. Only they are from 2003 and I have totally ignored them. They farmed them out to various collection agencies. When they tried to collect on behalf of 'CITY OF TORONTO'....I asked them if they had proof of my contract with that corporation. Then I served them notice in writing for documentation. They sold the 'debt' very quickly. If you acknowledge the debt or pay even a tiny bit then you have given it life. Your only option is like mine to deny you require a licence.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 952
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 952 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Shawn FolkesShawn Ofthefamily Folkes

In my case I was pulled over a few days after the existing insurance papers had expired. Since there was a vehicle switch on the Ulrike vehicle insurance package there was a delay in getting my new pink slip...from NY PARENTS....who the car was registered to as well as the insurance. I showed the cop a stack of chronologically ordered pink slips, with the last one expiring about ....6 days before the pull over, from which I drove away at the time. Same cop charged me again a few days later...so I bit two driving without insurance, even though I didn't own the vehicle. They mailed my court date to an address I moved from, and I divided I'd pay the fine for failure to PRODUCE...but they convicted me of failure to HAVE and gave me the max x2. When I got my old mail I found the verdict that was rendered in NY absence and when I Went to court the court birch said I had to pay the whole fine -10 I, before I could bring it up to contest it. I said bullshit....and left. I got driving while under suspension (cuz I couldn't re.edu, of course) twice and received a few fines....biggest one being MY last at 700, which I ain't paid. Some collections agency has been calling me and putting me immediately on hold....costing ME if I answer them. So I don't answer them, and I ain't contracting with any third parties...ESP. when a driving while under suspension is the fine they are seeking to extract and extort from me.

Interesting to note that Maritime or Admiralty courts can not be held in the same court as common or civil law, or be presided upon by a civil or common law judge. So the judge could only have any type of authority to speak to your "entity" if he/she is a Maritime judge. And then they become open to recognizing your sovereignty and opening the question of valid juris diction.

Regarding my BC... I never got one. So it's never either been mine (it never could be anyways, as it's property of the Government corp., not MINE) And the existing SIN they have doesn't even state my proper name.... I have four full names and it only says there. And I duck with them by giving cops my two middle names...they can't refute it, cuz they are my names...not theirs.

Gonna be interesting to hear a judge tell me why I cannot execute my right to earn a livelihood, ESP when I can prove it's vital that I be able to navigate the roads in a vehicle to earn my living.

They attempted to offer me a "payment plan" which I have declined...you can't get fucking blood from stone..and ESP when the interest (what IS that supposed to be....incentive to pay? Did I "borrow" that fine? ) is almost triple the principle. I just don't get their logic on the interest.

So I will do whatever I can now....latest thing they said was to make a motion to set aside and go from there. Motion? Petition? Notice? Affidavit? IM assessing NOW what to serve.... I clearly need to read more of Scots posts. What disgruntled and worries NE....is that IM pretty ducking good in courts...but much of this is new to ME...yet I see others going into court I'll equipped with nothing more that a few lines with no real MEAT behind it...or sufficient knowledge, balls and ammo to really stymie the court. We need some GOOD court footage! I for one will be answering everything they say irrespective of what it is with at least TWO questions.....every time. And I won't let the court dismiss me.... I will be the one dismissing them....once I get all the right ammo in my head, and clear out the old trash

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 952
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 952 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Shawn FolkesShawn Ofthefamily Folkes

I read this entire thread to my dad...and he tore it to shreds. I need to learn slot more before I tackle him. He even destroyed the adage of "unlearn what you think you know so you can learn anew". Personally I think he's typical...really smart but brainwashed and too smart,to consider that all he was taught (which he will claim came from himself) was wrong to begin with...but he just cuts everything down in some logic that....just sad ducks any argument anyone here has made. And if I can't take him I won't date take on a judge.

Dean he heard your Lindsay court vids....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 954
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 954 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top