The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

May 09, 2013 8:22 PM

Derek Moran

Scott on setting-up a CORPORATION/TRUST-thread.....

Scott Duncan It's REALLY not as as hard as you make out.

1: Establish a trust 2: Establish a corporation - In the Charter, assign the role of the corporation to HOLD the trust, and establish the "Law" guidelines (You get to make your own up) as regards keeping the trust. 3: Get ANY accountant to manage the books of the corporation. You direct the corporation as FIRST DIRECTOR, and establish roles (President/CEO Vice President, etc) which is how the UNITED STATES was formed.

Side Note: EVER NOTICE that when the US "Liberates" a country, they NEVER install their form of government? It's always a PARLIAMENT they install. Figure out why that is, and things will be clearer. USE THE U.S. AS A MODEL FOR YOUR CORPORATION.

The accountant EXECUTES YOUR TASKS within the framework. To establish a trust, write it down, and have it witnessed and notarized. The end. Only shareholders of your corporation are recognized by the trust.

These are just pretend names. Officially Mine is AQUILAE trust.

Stop letting OTHERS define YOUR trust/claim. Call it Le Trust Du Pierre, for all I care. IT'S YOURS and your CORPORATION'S.

Using GOVERNMENT terms is an INVITATION FOR STANDING.

Well, if you really NEED me to draw up a Trust declaration I could be hired to do it.

I don't accept MONEY as payment for my skill. It's illegal, and unlawful (I receive benefit while ignoring the legal framework it offers), but I do have many other payment options!

You can pay money to Roguesupport Inc (in trust). You can pay me directly!

I accept: 1: Severed body parts from Cops/lawyers/judges. 2: The bound and gagged (But Not raped! I don't do sloppy seconds) wife/daughter/mother, of a SENIOR Judge/Lawyer/Cop delivered to a venue of my choosing (PREMIUM service for this payment) 3: Various technologies (Changes constantly. CONFIRM hardware before attempting to retain me) 4: The corpse of any Judge/Lawyer/Cop who has harmed me previously

I also require payment up front.

Or you may present your draft 22 years hence

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 416
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 416 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 194

Derek Moran

Not bound to execute trusts

59. Her Majesty and a fiscal agent or registrar acting as such are not bound to see to the execution of any express or implied trust to which any securities are subject.

http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/f-11/FullText.html

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 418
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 418 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: Charles Moreland, you have NO idea how much I wish we had your law up here!

The US has the ONLY charter that SEPARATES CHURCH AND STATE. You have no idea what that does for the PERSON. It's HUGE from an autonomy standpoint.

DELAWARE has the BEST laws on the PLANET!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 419
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 419 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: A fellow Noble established his trust when he landed there in the first 20 minutes. They had the papers ready an hour later.

The place rocks if you want to use law to line your pockets.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 419 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 419 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Derek Moran

Jason F. LeBlanc PUBLIC NOTICE

TAKE NOTICE that the VESSEL known as JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC is now the LAWFUL PROPERTY of a PRIVATE TRUST per the wishes of Jason Fredrick Le Blanc CREATOR and GRANTOR.

Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING FEBRUARY 27, 2013, THE VESSEL KNOWN AS JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC MUST BE CONSIDERED A PRIVATE VESSEL WITH NO COMMERCE EXPECTED AND/OR IMPLIED.

PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO USE JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES MAY BE FINED AT THE RATE OF SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS PER DAY ($6,000 PER DAY) OR ANY PART THEREOF, FOR UNAUTHORIZED USE.

Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to the DULY AUTHORIZED TRUSTEE CORPORATION, [ 1732964 ALBERTA LTD.] at (587) 719-2112.

Jason Fredrick Le Blanc President/ Sole Beneficiary

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 420 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 420 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Derek Moran

Jason F. LeBlanc: How can I prevent that? Change VESSEL to VESSEL/LEGAL PERSON...

What am I missing? I need to be able to re-butt. defend. counter, obviously. I want to hit the bull's eye not be "close".

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 420
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 420 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Jason F. LeBlanc: Fuck... I am still missing something, How do I insure that the Party does not mistake Vessel For Person? I know it is simple but I am not picking up what your laying down.

The Name Is not a legal Person, or should I say Natural Person

The Vessel Is not a Person it is attached to the surety of the birth certificate, The Name Is the Vessel In commerce.

I want to start my bank now...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 420 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 420 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Derek Moran

Stuart Stone: Top of my head here, or out of my ass...the Vessel has a soul and/or a Captain, the person is a fiction, which is referred to in a specific manner (capitus diminutia maximus?)...delineate the two in the following manner?!?

PUBLIC NOTICE

TAKE NOTICE that the VESSEL known as JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC is now the LAWFUL PROPERTY of a PRIVATE TRUST per the wishes of the CREATOR and GRANTOR.

Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING FEBRUARY 27, 2013, THE VESSEL KNOWN AS JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC MUST BE CONSIDERED A PRIVATE VESSEL WITH NO COMMERCE EXPECTED AND/OR IMPLIED.

PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO USE JASON FREDRICK LE BLANC FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES MAY BE FINED AT THE RATE OF SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS PER DAY ($6,000 PER DAY) OR ANY PART THEREOF, FOR UNAUTHORIZED USE.

Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to the DULY AUTHORIZED TRUSTEE CORPORATION, [ 1732964 ALBERTA LTD.] at (587) 719-2112.

By: Jason Fredrick Le Blanc President/ Creator/ Grantor/ Sole Beneficiary.

Feedback? (Scott clicked LIKE)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 421
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 421 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Pete Daoust: would that be ok..??? (brouillon) PUBLIC NOTICE

TAKE NOTICE that the PERSON known as PIERRE DAOUST, inscription No. 119XXXXXXXXXX, is now the LAWFUL PROPERTY of a PRIVATE TRUST per the wishes of Joseph Pierre Gilles life birth registration no. 11XXXX CREATOR and GRANTOR.

Therefore: LET IT BE KNOWN THAT AS OF THIS DATE, BEING FEBRUARY 27, 2013, THE PERSON KNOWN AS PIERRE DAOUST, inscription No. 119XXXXXXXXXX, MUST BE CONSIDERED A PRIVATE PERSON WITH NO COMMERCE EXPECTED AND/OR IMPLIED.

PARTIES ATTEMPTING TO USE PIERRE DAOUST, inscription No. 119XXXXXXXXXX, FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES MAY BE FINED AT THE RATE OF SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS PER DAY ($6,000 PER DAY) OR ANY PART THEREOF, FOR UNAUTHORIZED USE.

Questions regarding this NOTICE may be addressed to the DULY AUTHORIZED TRUSTEE CORPORATION, [ 9175-XXXX Quebec Inc.] at (514) 222-2222.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 421
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 421 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Stuart Stone: You're on track Ethan & there is no time wasting because everyone is here to learn...there's plenty of banter but definitely no bullshit. One of Scott Duncan's rules of law is that if it is difficult, then you're doing it wrong...As I understand it, Trust law is the highest form of law.

Your private trust agreement has equal standing in law with any other trust. You can lien the NAME into the private trust, making it trust property. The government has no right to challenge that action because the government is not a 'person' and cannot be a party to the action.

The private trust can not be challenged by anyone unless they are a settlor, trustee or beneficiary...for anyone else, they are not a party & therefore it is none of their business.

Place the trust inside a corporation (separate person in law), and make sure you are the controlling shareholder in the corporation and the Director. The corporation can then extract value from or on behalf of the person, under the direction of the Director (You), for the benefit of the shareholder (You), and the name is now out of commerce because it is the property of a private trust.

Also, like you said, your corporate charter creates your private law/jurisdiction.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 422
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 422 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Ethan John Muellers: Stuart, when you say Place the trust inside a corporation (separate person in law). do you mean another human being? or a corporate entity? if so would it have to be someone else's "person" or could I use my own? who would I send my private trust agreement to? my guess would be the attorney general and maybe the head of calgarys local police force off the top of my head.

I just recently sent a registered letter to the attorney general stating that I am the sole administrator/beneficiary of ETHAN JOHN MUELLERS and I also had a fee schedule attached. Would this be considered a CORPORATE CHARTER? if not what would?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 423
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 423 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Stuart Stone: Yeah it was late & I had a wee bout of talking out my ass backwards, thanks Joseph Pierre Gilles Hope I didn't lead anyone too far astray...corporate entity is seen as a different 'person' in law...your private trust agreement is exactly that, private. The only public notice you need to make is one that states that the name has been liened into a private trust...(I'm not sure exactly what the notice needs to say because I'm still researching that part...ie: Do I need to name the private trust and or corporation etc?)

Maybe the oracle Scott Duncan would be so kind as to fill in a few of the gaps.

A good place to learn from (if you're in Canada) is http://www.ppsa.ca/ppsaca/ re lien registration etc...there are posts on different threads on TENDER FOR LAW that go into the Canadian system & ppsa in more detail, you just need to take the time to go through them. I'm currently trying to decipher & find the equivalent for Australia...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 423
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 423 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Pete Daoust: I guess you do everything that need to be done, then you notarize everything, and then you put a NOTICE on the news paper....that sounds about right to me...Scott could correct this..??...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 424
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 424 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Ethan John Muellers: Wow, I have been looking up how to make a corporation on the industry Canada web sight and it is way easier than I thought it would be. Seeing as the corporation would be placed in the trust, the corporation would not have to follow any of Industry Canada's regulations as it would be private trust property. Am I correct in my thinking?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 424
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 424 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: Not even close.

You don't OWN a corporation. A corporation is a PERSON.

That PERSON liens YOUR NAME. The corporation is owned by the SHAREHOLDERS. Those shareholders just happen to be YOU.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 424
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 424 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Pete Daoust: ok...so the ACTUAL number corporation I happen to be the SOLE share holder can lien the NAME that I happen to be the LAWFUL holder in due course..???...I could do it RIGHT ON THE SPOT ????....I use this corporation sice 5 years to dividende, when dividende there is (there is none) and that numbered company is 50% shareholder of ANOTHER corporation...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 424
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 424 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Ethan John Muellers: Okay, I would like to lay down the process as I understand it to be so I can be told I am a idiot if I am incorrect about anything.

First off I will need to register a CORPORATION that I am the SOLE SHAREHOLDER and DIRECTOR of. I then will have make the CORPORATION a ASSET of a PRIVATE TRUST that I just happen to be the ADMINISTRATOR , INHERITOR and BENEFICIARY of. Then as the DIRECTOR and SOLE SHAREHOLDER of the CORPORATION I will direct the CORPORATION to lien the NAME that I am the LAWFUL holder of in due course. From that point the name that I am the LAWFUL holder of in due course will be deemed property of the CORPORATION and therefore property of the TRUST.

Am I mixing any of this up, or missing anything crucial?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 424
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 424 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Pete Daoust: I'm not sure of this : PRIVATE TRUST that I just happen to be the ADMINISTRATOR , INHERITOR and BENEFICIARY....I see to many FUNCTIONS for you there....you need a TRUSTEE....some you TRUST a lot....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 425
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 425 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: People need to know what a CORPORATION is.

A CORPORATION MUST HAVE:

A FIRST DIRECTOR SHAREHOLDERS GOVERNMENT ENDORSEMENT And a RECEIVING TRUSTEE (Bank)

You AND your Birth Certificate are NOT THESE THINGS.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 425
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 425 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: It's closer to a $20.00 Bill than it is to a "Corporation".

EVERYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE IS LYING TO YOU.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 425 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 425 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Derek Moran

Monique Moon: that all caps name is you as a corporation....you gotta be this in order for them to even deal with you based on a voluntary agreement and an understanding of the contract..if neither exists no contract based on their own commerce laws....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 426
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 426 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: OMG SHUT UP! Now I have to debunk all your AMATEUR BULLSHIT because you pull your concepts out of your ASS.

Seriously. The douche in the video with blacks, says SUCH AS A CORPORATION.

Roguesupport inc. and ROGUESUPPORT INC are the SAME.

THE CAPS MEAN NOTHING UNLESS IT IN A COURT FILE, and ONLY IN THE CONTEXT OF PARTY.

ScOtt DuNcaN Scott Duncan SCOTT DUNCAN

ALL THE SAME.

And you wrote like an autistic 12 year old. THAT ALONE is enough reason to muzzle you.

BE SILENT.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 426
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 426 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

parliament. (l2c) The supreme legislative body of some nations; esp. (cap.), in the United Kingdom, the national legislature consisting of the monarch, the House of Lords, and the House of Commons.

this would equal a TRUST?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 426
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 426 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

The IMF’s quota system was created to raise funds for loans.[55] Each IMF member country is assigned a quota, or contribution, that reflects the country’s relative size in the global economy. Each member’s quota also determines its relative voting power. Thus, financial contributions from member governments are linked to voting power in the organization.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 427
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 427 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

ZJ Free

Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma, the 'monetary value' is a beginning point for which a Security in the name of your LEGAL PERSON, may be sold to a private investor. Each time an amount is 'borrowed' from the account into which was deposited the proceeds from the sale of the aforementioned Security, the 'monetary value' of the account is increased 'dollar for dollar'.

As the 'borrowed' amount will never be repaid, a Note is deposited into the account, in the 'borrowed' amount, and becomes an asset to the account. Each time an amount is 'borrowed' by any agency or faction of the LEGAL SOCIETY, a Promissory Note is deposited and the 'monetary value' of the LEGAL PERSON increases. This has NO affect on the Living man, other than when acting as agent for the LEGAL PERSON, the Living man may draw against the assets of the account for the discharge of debts established by the LEGAL PERSON.

Any other use constitutes FRAUD.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 427
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 427 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Constructive trust. Unlike an express trust, a constructive trust is not created by an agreement between a settlor and the trustee. A constructive trust is imposed by the law as an "equitable remedy." This generally occurs due to some wrongdoing, where the wrongdoer has acquired legal title to some property and cannot in good conscience be allowed to benefit from it. A constructive trust is, essentially, a legal fiction. For example, a court of equity recognizing a plaintiff's request for the equitable remedy of a constructive trust may decide that a constructive trust has been created and simply order the person holding the assets to deliver them to the person who rightfully should have them. The constructive trustee is not necessarily the person who is guilty of the wrongdoing, and in practice it is often a bank or similar organization. The distinction may be finer than the preceding exposition in that there are also said to be two forms of constructive trust, the institutional constructive trust and the remedial constructive trust. The latter is an "equitable remedy" imposed by law being truly remedial; the former arising due to some defect in the transfer of property.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 427
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 427 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

So what we want to do is set up a private trust that holds the decedent as property and a testamentary trust (will) on behalf of the decedent to direct the appointed trustee for this estate within the bankruptcy.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 428
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 428 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Neil RowePaul Rowe

Bev. If you know trust law, you know they are private contracts, that are subordinate to government if you license or register them. You've read the One People's Public Trust UCC documents havnt you?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 428
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 428 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Neil RowePaul Rowe

I filed an OPPT notice for my brother contracting with the Judge in his private capacity if he acts in any way on behalf of the bancrupt corperation. The case has froze. They dont know what to do.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 428
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 428 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Neil Rowe

theyve preestablished all the public records, affidavit of facts, tight, for any one to use

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 428 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 428 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Neil RowePaul Rowe

they set up a trust, that includes everyone on the planet. Theyve attached all the evidence that private government parading as public government is completely illigitamate, that all the judges are private contractors with no immunity.,

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 429
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 429 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

So there is a trust, set up by some international sweedish lawyers, whom I have NO IDEA who they are, doing something HONEST for "ME" ?.....and I am in it, regardless of what I could THINK about it ? :/

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 430
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 430 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Neil RowePaul Rowe

Seems pretty useful. Certainly has this Judge scratching his head. Unrebuted Affidavits stand as truth in commerce

Government Charters Cancelled: (Refer: DECLARATION OF FACTS: UCC Doc # 2012127914 Nov 28 2012) —...That any and all CHARTERS, inclusive of The United States Federal Government, UNITED STATES, “STATE of ...", Inclusive of any and all abbreviations, idem sonans, or other legal, financial or managerial forms, any and all international equivalents, inclusive of any and all OFFICES, inclusive of any and all OFFICERS, PUBLIC SERVANTS, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, TREATIES, CONSTITUTIONS, MEMBERSHIP, ACTS, and any and all other contracts and agreements made thereunder and thereby, are now, void, worthless, or otherwise cancelled, unrebutted; ...” Bank Charters Cancelled: (Refer: TRUE BILL: WA DC UCC Doc# 2012114776 Oct 24 2012) “Declared and ordered irrevocably cancelled; any and all charters for Bank of International Settlements (BIS) members thereto and thereof including all beneficiaries, including all certain states of body owning, operating, aiding and abetting private money systems, issuing, collection, legal enforcement systems, operating SLAVERY SYSTEMS — commandeering lawful value by unlawful representation...” Said DECLARATION OF FACTS, identified herein, restated here, remains unrebutted and stands as Absolute Truth in law, commerce and BE'ing, registered in public record, universal law ordinance, for all of the world to rely upon. See https://gov.propertyinfo.com/DC-Washington/ or www.peoplestrust1776.org.

Accordingly, Respondent is advised that they now act in the capacity of an individual entity, without a corporate safety net and with full personal liability for EVERY ACTION THEY TAKE under common law protected and preserved by public policy UCC 1-103, and Universal law, the governing law laid out in the OPPT UCC filings. (Refer: WA DC UCC Ref Doc # 2012113593)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 430
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 430 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Paul Rowe; If you mention OPPT EVER again here, I will ban you.

I have explained my position about One People's Public Fraud. It is not endorsed here. It is not tolerated here, and I am not debating the point. LAST WARNING.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 431
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 431 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Sacks of shit spreading fraud don't even get the tingling schitck.

This sack of shit is even threatening violence.

I NEVER threaten violence... I just commit it :P

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 431 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 431 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Scott Duncan

Here's the thing: I KNOW a lot of you are thinking the same thing as the OPPT Fraud I just banned.

Soon this group will vanish and something larger will replace it... The Banned will never see it.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 432
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 432 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Anyone want to editorialize about ME, the only one out here TELLING THE FUCKING TRUTH?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 432 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 432 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout swallowed this comment: only its date was printed.

Chris Evan

I have seen Paul around, and I could never figure it out WHO he was. He IS a perpetrator of THE FRAUD. That just became clear through what he said. He never mentioned OPPT anywhere else before. Lots of God, ls of bible....now it makes sense

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 433
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 433 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Come on cowards! I don't hide anything, why should you? Are you just the cowardly little lying bitches I say you are? SPEAK UP, cowards.

Tell Heather Jarraf that I will endorse her fraud if she agrees to make a video with me...shoving my cock down her throat while a rolled-up copy of OPPT is jammed up her ass with a robotic arm. Proceeds will go to the OPPT. :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 433
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 433 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Not me, I have come to appreciate your forth right, straight shooting, no bullshit approach. It is saving lives. it matters. In a sea of shit, your are not. Admiral

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 433
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 433 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Looks like this thread has already been derailed.....soooooo........Ever wonder what happens on the other side of banning? So, does the site just disappear from the screen? Can you see your old posts or comments? What is on the other side? ;-) Kinda like death I would suppose

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 434
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 434 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

mostly not, bull shit... thread... except for the last bit, and even that was good... bull shit not for protecting the integrity of the purpose and intent of this forum... not bull shit to me.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 435
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 435 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chris Evan

Scott, I have one Notice here with no seal and no signature on a City letterhead, do I ask for a signed bill? Also, I have one with a seal and no signature, only instruction, what do I do with this one? Both of these are acceptance of a Notice I sent, and refusal of the terms....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 436
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 436 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

To answer your question Beverly Girl-Brain Braaksma that is exactly it... your corporation is the holder, keeper of the trust as per the creator and grantor's wishes. which is you...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 440
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 440 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Chris Schulte so what it is still private, without your authorization, and for educational purposes. Sometimes you just gotta say What the Fuck and go for it... it will help people here

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 440
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 440 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Some notes from Scott Duncan....

1: Establish a trust

2: Establish a corporation - In the Charter, assign the role of the corporation to HOLD the trust, and establish the "Law" guidelines (You get to make your own up) as regards keeping the trust.

3: Get ANY accountant to manage the books of the corporation. You direct the corporation as FIRST DIRECTOR, and establish roles (President/CEO Vice President, etc) which is how the UNITED STATES was formed.

Side Note: EVER NOTICE that when the US "Liberates" a country, they NEVER install their form of government? It's always a PARLIAMENT they install. Figure out why that is, and things will be clearer. USE THE U.S. AS A MODEL FOR YOUR CORPORATION.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 440
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 440 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

The reality is that privacy is a thing of the past Chris Schulte, at least for me, with nsa and all the other agencies monitoring EVERYTHING... If it is on your computer and you are not a good computer guy/gal... your information is easily accessible thru the internets...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 440
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 440 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top