Official video archive of presentation by Professor Robert Miller at the Indigenous Peoples Forum on the Doctrine of Discovery March 23, 2012 at the Arizona ...
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 701Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 701 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.Filter by poster
Read Comments 10
Scott Duncan
THIS is why I hold BELIEVERS in GOD in such contempt.
...oh that's right, those are the EVIL believers...you aren't one of THOSE! YOUR imaginary friend is DIFFERENT!
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 702 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Pete Daoust
Thanks for sharing....it gets me to think, which is not a bad thing....
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 702 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Pete Daoust
Except for those who say that whats bouncing inside my skull is complete white noise :P
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 702 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Pete Daoust
this one gets more in dept....as far as my understanding :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qO6JoqcrgQ
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 702 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Pete Daoust
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_v._M'Intosh
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 702 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Maximilian Poe
"DIMINISHED SOVEREIGNS" and "Assumed Trust Responsibility"!
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 702 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
David Jones-Cook
http://www.citeman.com/7908-manifest-destiny-and-the-monroe-doctrine.html
Manifest Destiny and the Monroe Doctrine
by Sree Rama Rao on December 3, 2009
Manifest Destiny and Monroe Doctrine were accepted as the basis for US foreign policy during much of the 19th and 20th centuries. Manifest Destiny, in its broadest interpretation, meant that Americans were a chosen people ordained by God to create a model society. More specifically, it referred to the territorial expansion of the United States from the Atlantic to the Pacific. The idea of manifest Destiny was used to justify US annexation of Texas, Oregon, New Mexico, and California and later, US involvement in Cuba, Alaska, Hawaii and the Philippines
The Monroe Doctrine a cornerstone of early US foreign policy was enunciated by President James Monroe in a public statement proclaiming three basic dicta: no further European colonization in the New World, abstention of the United States from European political affairs, and non-intervention of European governments in the governments of the Western Hemisphere.
In 1881, its principles were evoked in discussing the development of a canal across the Isthmus of Panama. Theodore Roosevelt applied the Monroe doctrine with an extension that became known as the Roosevelt Corollary. The corollary stated that not only would the United States prohibit non-American intervention in Latin American affairs but it would also police there and guarantee that Latin American nations met their international obligation. The corollary sanctioning American intervention was applied in 1905 when Roosevelt forced the Dominican Republic to accept the appointment of an American economic adviser who quickly became the financial director of the small state. It was also used in the acquisition of the Panama Canal Zone from Colombia in 1903 and the formation of a provisional government in Cuba in 1906.
more at http://www.citeman.com/7908-manifest-destiny-and-the-monroe-doctrine.html#ixzz2RvdfNuAq
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 702 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 703Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 703 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
David Johansen
those evil bastards!
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 703Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 703 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Sirwade Firsbey · Who-are You Frisbey
@ David don't you mean us evil bastards since we consented to it it is us that also must take some of the blame?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 703Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 703 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Filter by poster
Read Comments 10
Scott Duncan
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702
Pete Daoust
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702
Pete Daoust
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702
Pete Daoust
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702
Pete Daoust
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702
Maximilian Poe
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702
David Jones-Cook
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 702
David Jones-Cook
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 703
David Johansen
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 703
Sirwade Firsbey · Who-are You Frisbey
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 703