Shawn FolkesShawn Ofthefamily Folkes
Naw, not at all, it's just that sometimes examples get TOO much focus and the original point lost from side tracking when the example becomes "preaching” about sonethibg else...so yes its useful in the sense that it discusses things like flawed logic and blind faith, but, in my opinion, turned a bit into a sub topic about that ONE example. Maybe if it used a few ...politics, education, nutrition, etc. It woukd hsve had more appesl to me and an attack on flawed reaskning, and not so much religion perr se.
Had it dwelled on “government" and not “religion” (which it could have) I probably would have thought it more relevant I guess, but still would question it as being a eloquent and well presented rant, but a rant nonetheless. Variety of examples always wins the day, and exemplifies the real main thought, wich often gets lost when the example is in itself a huge topic of potential discussion.
Nice how we can hold different povs and avoid ad hominen comments, isnt it? Lol
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 658
