Scott Duncan: Calling bullshit on any "law" means it's contested. If there is no signature, then it is a STATEMENT or a NOTICE, begging the question "by what authority".
Scott- you bring up a good point > "Calling bullshit on any "law" means it's contested. If there is no signature, then it is a STATEMENT or a NOTICE, begging the question "by what authority".
..now what about in the case of where there IS a SIGNATURE, but, 'the law' has still been MISAPPLIED/applied inappropriately and/or improperly, how does that change things with 'calling bullshit' THEN?
Scott Duncan: The signature is the surety (Authority) behind the bullshit. If you do not ACCEPT that authority, the onus is on the SURETY backing the bullshit in question, to demonstrate "higher" authority.
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 945Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 945 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.