The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

Apr 07, 2013 8:14 PM

Cheryl Watson

ok, Brenda has some questions about your guys take on this, but I don't remember what they are. she can ask later. I made this document, wasn't sure I wanted to admit that publicly, but oh well, and This is NS point of view, but I think it still applies well everywhere in canada. this document is how I make sense of how cas can get away with so much obvious contradictions in law and jurisdictions....they are giving parents a penal sentence of sorts, but they do not have to use federal standards of proof to impose these restrictions of parental rights...they claim legal investigative powers that have no true legal standing.....The federal gov. allows provincial agencies that claim legal investigative powers to request individuals criminal records and the RCMP give them the records. well, if cas has legal investigative powers, why cant they lay charges? they have civil investigative powers and that is administrative law. the SPCA can't investigate or even take your dog unless it is a duly appointed special constable under the police act. so what gives. To me, the scam child protection is running has been to treat parents authority to protect their children from harm as if it were a gov. duty and that can be regulated. the cfsa proclaimed it in the preamble, we the gov. declare that parents and guardians have a responsibility to protect their childs rights. and if they don't we will step in with all authority we have given ourselves...???I am just rambling now. http://nslegislature.ca/legc/statutes/childfam.htm

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 852
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 852 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 19

Pete Daoust

maybe we don't HAVE children.....maybe we are the LAWFUL holder in due course of these children...:D until they reach the age where they can be THE lawful holder in due course of their persons....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 853
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 853 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Maybe I should post this here as well.... Well...it took me a while to get it but Government don't DEAL with humans and/or children and/or woman and/or man.....they DEAL with ACCOUNTS...thats all.....and I PRESUME that most of these public servants don't even get it themselves....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 853
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 853 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

That means we are ALL accounts for Government....nothing more and nothing less....HUMANS are NOT in their computers....only ACCOUNTS are in....They CREATED this account for US (BC) because they could NOT do with HUMANS what they can do with ACCOUNTS....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 853
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 853 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

When you FACE a public servant with this shit, he/she will probably deny all of this....too crazy for them to face this truth....but some will investigate.....I hope anyway !! ...lol..

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 853 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 853 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Cheryl Watson

Scott Duncan PROVINCE = ADMINISTRATIVE ZONE EMPLOYEE = PUBLIC SERVANT what I leaned about Child protection laws is that it is a cover story. Gov. assumes you are their servant because you registered your childs birth with them, whatever the whole trust thing is, accounts...never made aware of this FACT as it was cleverly concealed in plain sight but just wrapped in assorted legal jargon that should not have been used together just so you could probably never get all the wrapping off, at least until it is too late. . The big break for me to understand how the deception was put together and held together was the example of NS barristers Society. because they are classified as a profession, they need to be regulated. they have laws that apply to lawyers . and they have regulations that tell them how to do that job. they have to be registered. and the NS gov. is the boss with quasi-judical powers to investigate you in the performance of your job, and may apply any discipline, like the loss of a job/legal responsibility, they want to if their employees mess up.....To me that is what the CFSact really is, Regulatory legislation to the "parent as authority profession" otherwise how could one provincial legislation with limited authority cover so many jurisdictions and purposes. administration can legislate civil matters. civil matters are rights. when a citizen feels they have had their rights violated, they can file a law suit for equitable compensation. if a childs rights are violated, they cannot file a civil action cause they are a child. the parent would have to initiate. if the parent was the violater the court can appoint a guardian ad Litem, which is some one who litigates for a child or incompetent person. the gov. needs custody of the child to control the accounts. and in my mind, I don't care what legislation says, they have no legal right to just take custody/ possession of the child. way, way back when, looking out for the childs best interests, was only the childs property rights, not the child is the property, bleeding hearts have been slipping this crap in little by little for years. but gov, needs custody to have control, so because all parents or guardians registered a childs birth with the gov. that means you are now part of that administrative body and subject to its authority. Because only a childs parent has authority over a child, the job/responsibility to raise the child to be a productive citizen in society is a great responsibility the Gov. can decide that it needs to have a title. The Parent Guardian Authority...so you are a gov. employee with the professional responsibility of raising citizens/ managing accounts to be profitable and if you are messing up the Gov has every right to step in and take your place. Have I lost my mind. I think I may have....so much work for my little brain to be able to see the truth (there I go again with the conspiracies) HOW THE HELL DO I GET OUT OF THAT RACKET? how do I help parents get their kids back. while the government only sees accounts, their real live human child is sitting in a group home somewhere getting the shit beat out of him on a weekly basis. Gov. has no liability or responsibility to the person, I see that now, only to the account that was created by the registration of the childs birth. lol does this qualify as stupid ?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 854
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 854 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Cheryl Watson

i beat these buggers and got my child back by using their rules, or I should say by threatening to exposing their corruptness and incompetence. and they will try to beat you right into the ground. I want to learn how to beat them with the truth, so much still to learn. still need to get my accounts settled with the gov. they took advantage of me for financial gain and were not planning on giving me any of the proceeds....and in fact tied to shut me up. they owe me and I know there is away to collect.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 855
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 855 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

So, if you THINK they owe you $$....they have to get it from someone's ACCOUNT to give it to you, or they have to NOT pay you....I suggest (verify this with Scott) to find out WHICH account you think they should get the $$ they owe you before start ANYTHING.....good luck !!!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 855
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 855 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Cheryl Watson

darn you and your common sense....well, if I have to let that go I will let it go...but not just yet. what about the equitable compensation? SCOTT? and i have paid my dues and spent two years researching. so i do not apologize if people think I am looking for short cut answers, my perspective is that a real live human child, many more than one, is sitting in a group home somewhere getting the shit beat out of him. that child doesn't care how i get the info to help him/her. I expect the gov. to be evasive and keep their knowledge hard to aquire. I will look into correcting the record, thank you.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 855
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 855 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Cheryl Watson

compensation that may have equal value of a money amount ......and if the government has to get it from your account, I'm alright with that. There's some honesty for ya. do you have any money at all? who did you get it from. honest to gosh, I have leaned that the gov. owes me for the pleasure they have had screwing me, but don't bother trying to collect payment cause there is no such thing as money. so lets not even worry about how/ process, what forms to use, you could use, lets say, if they had a secret ACCOUNT somewhere you didn't know about.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 855
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 855 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Secret Account ????....I don't think it is secret....I think there is a bunch of IGNORANT humans that have NO IDEA who they REALLY are....me included....not so much today but not to long ago I was in the bunch.. :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 1, page 856
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 1, page 856 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top