The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 2

Apr 06, 2013 2:48 AM

Cheryl Watson

I was very naive about the level of corruption in Canada. My eyes started to open when I got involved with child welfare, NS. My last discovery has just about made me want to quit learning, but I need to learn in balance, not just about the corruption but how to effectively fight it. I was flabergasted when I discovered that Child welfare agency was able to get privacy protected criminal records from the RCMP all for the asking. Usually, you have to be border patrol, or interpol to get access or other law enforcement agencies, Privacy Act section 8....unless you are given provincial authority through an ACT to carry out an investigation (civil) child protection. Not sure if these are the types of questions you all can address, but my brain is hurting so good night, shout out to dean clifford...really appreciate you tube videos.....BUT I CAN'T GET HOW PROVINCIAL LAWS ARE ONLY FOR GOV. EMPLOYEES....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 670
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 670 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 50

Cheryl Watson

thanks, these are all things I want to learn, for myself, I need to know what makes this true, I believe it is true but kids believe santa clause is true,,and you can't tell them any different , they have a very basic foundation for their childish belief, yet you know they are wrong,??? When people start telling me I am crazy I am going to be able to know why I am right and how to prove it. show me where/how do I learn all the foundational stuff...EX: you can tell a judge that i am not under your authority, so what, he is still going to do what he wants to do.....I told a bunch of social workers the other day, that they were public servants and they work for me, but let me try and enforce that "opinion"

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 671
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 671 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

wow...YOU are in the RIGHT place....especially if YOU decide to read ALL the threads in here.....at one point, you may start TRUSTING instead of BELIEVING, and when OTHERS start thinking you are CRAZY, thats a good sign....but by BALANCING the information with the processing of it.....they will listen to you anyway, good luck and HAVE FUN....and be ready to get twisted and shook once in a while if you get stupid :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 671
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 671 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Will Lawful ManLawful Man

As to the mentioned Unincorporated Nation of Canada, my research reveals otherwise. Canada is a corporation registered with the Securities Exchange Commission. The address of Canada is 1746 Massachusetts Avenue north west, Washington , District of Columbia. The registration number is 333-156346 and its central index key is 0023000098. The registration statement I found was made under schedule B of The Securities Act of 1933.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 672
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 672 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

NATION is PEOPLE, humans with a collective ideology ("Christian Nation", "Nation of Islam", etc), whereas a COUNTRY is just an incorporated/surveyed region.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 672 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 672 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Scott Duncan

IT'S ALL Accounting. ALL of it.

Remember what I've said so far and it gets easier. You've been taught since childhood to THINK WRONG, so these obvious things become hidden to you.

NONE of this is hidden!

Fun Fact: Of all my students, only Mathematicians and Computer Scientists are easy to teach. The average is 3 years for everyone else. A computer Scientist can be taught in LESS than 90 days.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 673
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 673 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

capitis deminutio applies in your imagination. John Scott Duncan, JOHN SCOTT DUNCAN nad John Scott DUNCAN...are the same person. It's the NAME (which was GIVEN to you) which you HOLD (not own) that matters.

It's all ACCOUNTING. Stop listening to those fucking freemen.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 673
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 673 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Will Lawful ManLawful Man

Capitis deminutio is an entry in Black's Law, in the minds of some self proclaimed freemen and in my last question. It is not in My imagination, it is a product of someone else's imagination. I have read of it and I question if a similar abstraction applies in relation to 'nation' and 'Nation'. I do not pretend to understand the style used in the legal profession.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 673 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 673 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

David Johansen

oddly enough Scott, that is what has gotten many of us here in the first place (all caps typeset). if it wern't for the likes (works) of Robert Menard, Dean Clifford, Ben Lowrey, and a host of others, pointing out parts of the many pieces of this puzzle, many of us still wouldnt be able to understand what's going on.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 674 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 674 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

David Johansen

all accounting, so then how do i get them to pay me for returning the title to my truck (bailment), or paying me their $.50/mi for the 80 thousand delivery miles ive acrued (plus expenses & costs)...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 674
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 674 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Shawn FolkesShawn Ofthefamily Folkes

So Scott...what's the best way to change my name "legally"... Although I inherieted my Anglo Saxon surname by blood (moms side wore kilts so Alex II is known to me as we'll lol)... I don't LOOK to Anglo...so im thinking if a new name to represent my dominant ethnicity...I'm thinking... "Rafiki Moufasa Simba of the family Folkes..."

How's the best way to do it?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 674
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 674 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

You DON"T. Make a CORPORATION, and let THAT be the LEGAL entity. You are whoever your familiars know you as. WHY would you worry about the LEGAL name? IT'S NOT YOURS. Changing it "legally" makes SURETY a fact in law. You formed INTENT to change it, and therefore UNDERSTAND the LEGAL obligation.

Seriously. Why are you concerned about a LEGAL name at all?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 674 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 674 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Will Lawful Man

Shawn, I have done research into the Roman foundations of legislation and in doing so I have found reference to the term 'family' originally meaning a household of slaves. That being so, it is unfortunate that many people call themselves Xxxx of the family Yyyy.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 675 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 675 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Shawn FolkesShawn Ofthefamily Folkes

Ok... It must be noted that MY definition of "family" differs from your interpretation. Mine is founded on the premise of Consanguinity, not surname designation or allocation due to servitude... So no "family" is not a "household of slaves"...irrespective of whether that household has servants or not.

"Extended from the human "family unit" by affinity and consanguinity are concepts of family that are physical and metaphorical, or that grow increasingly inclusive extending to community, village, city, region, nationhood, global village and humanism." So IF my "ofthefamily" is to "extend" past my bloodline, it would be, in MY CASE...to the guild I have "sworn oath to" (in a sense), as I am becoming a tradesman in a specific field, which included apprenticeships... Liken to the old days where "The practice of sending children away to act as servants was even more common in towns than in the countryside. The inhabitants of towns largely made their livelihood as merchants or artisans, and this activity was strictly controlled by guilds. The members of these guilds would in turn employ young people — primarily boys — as apprentices, to learn the craft and later take a position as guild members themselves. These apprentices made up part of the household — or "family" — as much as the children of the master..."so, if anything....I would be a member of THAT family. As for a "legal name"...yes I guess I could incorporate my name myself...I'm only worried about my PRESENT "legal" fiction i.e. identity so that if I am surety to that name...I can ditch that name. And not do it "legally" because you know.... I'm dumb and ignorant and didn't think it's necessary to inform "them " of any "name change" since I am unaware if any "legal" obligations I have as a free person...so I can't really be "responsible" for much, esp the name they used to know me by. I don't "know SHAWN FOLKES" per se, and since I am a tradesman I intend to do business under a different name than the fiction that was designated to me...under the guild of my trade, to whom I pay my dues to.

When I dump that attachment...do I return the government documents issued to me? And if so...which ones and where...or can I just chop them? Cuz you know...it comes down to this: I can handle my finances just fine on Nubian, and I don't need the government to manage my money for me.... I don't need THEIR accountants.

I don't wanna shift off this topic but I have more questions...like concerning operating motor vehicles...esp if Im an independent tradesman that's driving while.pursuing my livelihood...

Oh yeah! I have my ORIGINAL photostatic copy of my BIRTH REGISTRATION...the microfiche! I was gonna laminate it but haven't. How powerful is this document?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 675
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 675 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Shawn FolkesShawn Ofthefamily Folkes

So.. What should a woman do then? Deliver their child with a midwife and do everything...including all education...at home? And register certify or insure them with no govnt agency or authority?

Kinda...start your own "harem"? Clan? Community? Or what they would call a cult it extremist group

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 676
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 676 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

Well...it took me a while to get it but Government don't DEAL with humans and/or children and/or woman and/or man.....they DEAL with ACCOUNTS...thats all.....and I PRESUME that most of these public servants don't even get it themselves....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 677
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 677 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

HAREM: a social group of female animals, as elephant seals, accompanied by a reproductive male who denies other males access to the group O.o a family of wives or concubines, female relatives, and servants, 1781; the occupants of a harem collectively. Examples: harem of dear friendships, 1855; a literary harem [“library”], 1872 1. the part of a Muslim palace or house reserved for the residence of women. 2. the women in a Muslim household, including the mothers, sisters, wives, concubines, daughters, entertainers, and servants :D

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 677
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 677 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

David Johansen

as soon as they copy my fingerprints by force and find that in their database, they will throw me down the well and claim they lost the property and dont know where it is... "oh, you dont understand, well then we dont know either, let us know when you do understand, understand?", they will lock the door and seeing as Habeius Corpus has allready been suspended and martial law sinse 1934 hasnt been repealed, ...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 677
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 677 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top