Apr 01, 2013 5:34 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_3amGePf0U

good job! my second attempt failed, also. keep trying

THIS IS NOT ME....!

no. its me!! lol

Oh right... You're in the right place to improve anyway... :p

Why does your profile say you're a female Leigh?

haha i was having a blonde moment . its not you nor me. but i did think it was you. great info thou. i am female. ;) my name is woman

Hmmm, plaice or haddock, I'm not quite sure...

cod

What did you mean your second attempt failed?

the judge had me at 'you'. what a waste of 40 mins. i fell into her juristiction.

I think she got you at "I wish to REPRESENT myself." How can you RE-present yourself? I listened up to minute 7, but good job just trying to explain yourself and not going off-the-handle like most Freemen do. But Eamonn is right..you've come to the right group.

Apparently it's not Leigh in the vid Derek... She had a "blonde" moment... She sounded quite confused in the comments to be honest...

I think a- "Im here by special appearance only sui juris" woulda helped...

Ah the chap in the video wasn't very clued in I don't think. Not that I'd be any better but he didn't seem to understand his relationship with the PERSON... The JP even asked him "Is it your birth cert?"... Testing him there in my opinion...

"No. It is not MY birth certificate, but...i am the Lawful-Holder-In-Due-Course and sole-living-Beneficiary of it"..... think Scott said the Birth Certificate is PROOF of the security-of-the-person..and that the PERSON, is the legal-name to the SECURITY. Where the Government tries to trip us up, is when they re-define for themselves the definition of CORPORATION to become a PERSON, in order to create joinder with us through the obfuscation with the meaning of the words. The LAW, is all about INTENT. And their INTENT, is to DECEIVE us...their masters, btw ;)

Birth cert is evidence of the security of the PERSON yup... Ah I left a couple comments for the guy in the vid based on Scott's posts etc...

Article 3. (UDHR)

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and SECURITY OF PERSON

164. Fair hearing

(4) Without limiting the generality of subsection (3), that subsection does not preserve the validity of the proceeding if the failure to comply with the agreement results in PREJUDICE to the DEFENDANT'S RIGHT to a FAIR HEARING.

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90p33_e.htm#BK207