The Tender For Law

Mar 14, 2013

Maximus Legis

Mar 14, 2013

AT LEAST THREAD. Okay I’ll apologise in advance for any clumsiness in the way I handled the situation I’m about to share, as I was using the only information I could find at the time. Sometimes you have to learn by doing and take a leap of faith, in oneself of course. Some times it works out; some times you graze your knee. Either way you learn. In Scotland we rece... Continue Reading — Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1077 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 51

Maximus Legis

Mar 14, 2013 9:26 PM

Maximus Legis Okay, so the threats continued regularly for eight months but my modest balance in the bank remains untouched, my furniture stayed put etc. Why weren't the Sheriffs Officers & Messengers Arms following through? I have to admit adrenaline pumped into my system every time there was a knock at the door, horrible but more fight than flight. Then one morning I was about to get in the shower and there was a knock at the door. I checked through the upstairs window and saw two people at the door, one male one female. I went down and opened the door. Before I was able to ask who they were and what they wanted the guy said are you THE NAME? I replied in a slightly raised voice ‘Who are you?’ He repeated his question ignoring mine. I said ‘It’s good manners to introduce oneself when you initiate contact with someone. Now NEVER MIND WHO I AM, I REPEAT WHO ARE YOU!? He said they were Sheriffs Officers and had a ‘Charge For Payment from the local Sheriff Court for £1120 for THE NAME’ I told him I didn’t want it and to get off the property. He threw a piece of paper into my lobby and left uttering the words ‘14days’ . What a twat he could have had the wrong address as my mail often goes to the same house number on the next street and delivery drivers often try to drop stuff off here too meant for the next street. I picked up his litter and decided to read it. What a fucking joke, a five year old kid could have made a better forgery of a court document!... to be continued called Scott + Co . I'm off to chill for the night and will continue posting tomorrow. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1078 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Scott Duncan

Mar 14, 2013 9:41 PM

Scott Duncan If the IRISH REPUBLIC returns, I will be there so fast, the wake behind me, will expose the floor of the North Atlantic. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1079 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 14, 2013 9:43 PM

Maximus Legis "A Republic, if you can keep it" — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1079 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 15, 2013 11:37 AM

Maximus Legis CHARGE FOR PAYMENT OF MONEY In HIGHLAND COUNCIL, COUNCIL BUILDINGS, GLENURQUHART ROAD, INVERNESS APPLICANT against MR THE NAME, ADRESS TO: MR THE NAME, ADDRESS On the dates and at the Sheriff Courts (s) specified in the schedule overleaf Summary Warrants for recovery of Council Tax under Section 97 and schedule 8 paragraph 2 (3) (a) of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 were granted against you. I CHARLES McCAFFRAY Sheriff Officer, 29 INNES STREET, INVERNESS, IV1 1NP By virtue of the Summary Warrants, In Her Majesty’s name and authority and in name and authority of the said Sheriff, charge you to pay the total sum due as set out below (together with any further interest) within 14 days after the date of this charge to: SCOTT & CO 29 INNES STREET INVERNESS IV1 1 NP If you do not pay this sum within 14 days you are liable to have further action You are also liable to be sequestrated (declared bankrupt) This Charge is served on you today by me by: delivering it to you personally leaving it for you *depositing it for you and is witnessed fuckwit signature 29 INNES STREET, INVERNESS, IV1 1NP Dated this 15th day of August 2012 fuckwit signature Witness fuckwit signature Sheriff Officer THE SUM NOW DUE BY YOU IS blah… blah… blah…. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1079 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 15, 2013 11:42 AM

Maximus Legis I left it for a week and wrote to the court and asked them to send me a list of any outstanding judgements for the name so that I may settle them, three days later I got a reply letter. Any guesses as to how many judgements were outstanding? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1080 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Scott Duncan

Mar 15, 2013 12:31 PM

Scott Duncan NONE? OUTSTANDING! — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1080 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 15, 2013 12:46 PM

Maximus Legis Correct, None! — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1080 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Scott Duncan

Mar 15, 2013 12:47 PM

Scott Duncan OUTSTANDING! (Oh I slay me ) — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1080 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 15, 2013 12:47 PM

Maximus Legis That piece of paper (CHARGE FOR PAYMENT) had no more seen the inside of a Court than the paper I wiped my ass with this morning. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1080 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 15, 2013 1:02 PM

Maximus Legis So of I strolled down to the local cop shop with the piece of paper and a section of the Fraud Act 2006, a Notice of Withdrawl of Implied Right of Access which had previously been served on these assholes. I showed them to a young uniformed cop and mentioned Misconduct in Public Office too. bear the court Insignia, the name of the Sheriff who made the determination in law along with his ink signature (not facsimile signature) and perhaps the document to be sealed. He agreed and said "Oh Dear! What do you want me to do?" I told him I wanted the Bailiff charged with Fraud and Misconduct in Public Office. Misconduct in Public Office went straight over his head. As far as Fraud was concerned he said it was attempted fraud, I pointed out that just because he never got money from me doesn't mean it was attempted Fraud. The fact he produced and signed that piece of paper was Fraud in itself. He wasn't keen on taking an official stance on it and as I was unsure of a few things I asked him to go down to the assholes office and tell him to stay the fuck off my property and do not contact me in any way shape or form again or I'd take it all the way next time......to be continued. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1080 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 15, 2013 1:12 PM

Maximus Legis Malfeasance I think as it wasn't a mistake it was malicious. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1081 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Michael WebbWeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers

Mar 16, 2013 5:13 PM

WeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers RE: -->> "He wasn't keen on taking an official stance on it and as I was unsure of a few things I asked him to go down to the assholes office and tell him to stay the fuck off my property and do not contact me in any way shape or form again or I'd take it all the way next time" Would ANY of these AGENTS have extended the same COURTESY to you?! ... just sayin'. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1081 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Michael WebbWeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers

Mar 16, 2013 5:29 PM

WeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers I remember someone once said "rip a government hacks life apart, it's fun!" I carried this statement around between my ears for a couple of weeks, thinking this is NOT at all what I equate to be FUN. And now, with hindsight being what it is, I have seen the FUN reveal itself to me, through the reversal of roles being played out before my eyes. Before I initiated my FACT establishing, I wanted to talk about some very serious issue's, but NONE of these "government hacks" were the least bit interested in WHAT I wanted to discuss. NOW these same "government hacks" won't shut up AND I'm completely NOT interested. THE DISCUSSION WILL GO WHERE I TAKE IT -->> FUN TIMES! — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1081 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 16, 2013 5:33 PM

Maximus Legis I wasn't extending a courtesy. I knew they'd come for more wielding a Claymore, I'm here to learn how to use a scalpel. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1081 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Michael WebbWeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers

Mar 16, 2013 5:52 PM

WeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers "EVERYONE OBEYS THE LAW!" — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1082 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 16, 2013 6:03 PM

Maximus Legis I have never deliberately or negligently harmed another living entity in my life. I detest bullies and have punished many physically for attempting to bully me physically. I will not stand for bullying. I learned to use my "empty hand" many years ago. Now it's the time of the Pen — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1082 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Michael WebbWeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers

Mar 17, 2013 7:32 PM

WeLove JessicaDawn AndOthers Scalpel hey... well, I'm no surgeon, but I did have this thermo-nuclear device dropped in my lap, buried beneath mountains of publicly funded paperwork, it's covered with shit and it's REALLY stinky and sticky. It has left it's stink on NUMEROUS alleged professionals, ALL of whom have made the erroneous choice to either ignore it or make concerted constructive efforts to conceal it's exsitence. Unfortunately for ALL of them, I knew of it's exsistence very shortly after it's creation and have since presented FACTS that frame the part (of the Criminal Code of Canada) with capitalized emphasis. The attitudes of ALL involved parties have changed quite dramatically. The device is counting down to detonation as I type and to be completely honest -->> I WISH IT TO INCINERATE ALL THAT HAVE IT'S STINK ON THEIR HANDS! Fun times! Mischief 430. (1) Every one commits mischief who wilfully (a) destroys or damages property; (b) renders property dangerous, useless, inoperative or ineffective; (c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property; or (d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use, enjoyment or operation of property. Mischief in relation to data (a) DESTROYS OR ALTERS DATA; (b) RENDERS DATA MEANINGLESS, USELESS OR INEFFECTIVE; (c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use of data; or (d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with any person in the lawful use of data or denies access to data to any person who is entitled to access thereto. Punishment (2) EVERY ONE WHO COMMITS MISCHIEF THAT CAUSES ACTUAL DANGER TO LIFE IS GUILTY OF AN INDICTABLE OFFENCE AND LIABLE TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1082 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 17, 2013 7:39 PM

Maximus Legis I use the scalpel analogy to illustrate how I hope to refine my knowledge to a point whereby I may remove their genitalia before they even realise what's happened, then after the the realisation hits, the pain begins.You know what it's like when you cut yourself on something very sharp and there's no blood at first, then whoosh it starts to flow then the pain kicks in. I don't know how long it will take to get my skills to the point where I can use that 'scalpel' but I will and I won't hesitate to cut . — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1083 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 20, 2013 11:56 AM

Maximus Legis After more time passed another fucking CHARGE OF PAYMENT OF MONEY for a different amount signed and witnessed by two other fuckwit Bailiffs came through my letterbox by hand deliver. Two days later a duplicate came in the post and I’m thinking they must have realised they were trespassing when they hand delivered the original having been previously denied access (maybe I give them to much credence there) I chuckled to myself as this is just more rope for them to hang themselves with and decided to contact the court again to confirm the Fraud further. One cannot have too much ammunition in a war. The letter I got back this time was curious. Bearing in mind, the last time I wrote to the court asking for any outstanding judgements against THE NAME they said categorically there was none, this letter said “I refer to your letter of 16th August 2012 regarding the above and have to advise you that the court does not maintain a record of outstanding judgements. This information could be obtained by contacting the Pursuers(s) in any case that has been raised against you. I trust the above will be of some help to you. Signed Administrative Officer. I called the court, read out the letter to the guy in the Clerks office and explained that I was confused by the content. I asked, If a Sheriff had made a legal determination against THE NAME would it not be recorded, the Court being a Court of Record. He agreed and I could feel his embarrassment over the phone. I pointed out that a person keeps harassing me for money claiming that the court issued paperwork saying I have to pay. I explained I would comply if that was the case, but other than this person waiving what appears to be fake papers in my face none seems to exist. I hung up and then thought why the fuck was the answer different to the last letter, collusion? The Administrator must be lying! To remind you there are now two Fraudulent CHARGES FOR PAYMENT OF MONEY attempting scare me into to pay within 14 days OR ELSE ! So, off down to see the cops again.. to be continued. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1083 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Derek Moran

Mar 22, 2013 8:12 PM

Derek Moran Same thing goin' on here in Toronto, Max. The city charged my dad with a by-law violation..i told them a by-law is a rule of a corporation for its own internal governance and seeing he doesnt work for the City/Corporation that it might be committing fraud. They keep sending to the house a Property Tax Account Statement thats gone from $106 to $182, and have now joined it with his property-taxes. Meaning he has to pay the by-law-fee first, before he can deal with Property Taxes. ABUSE OF PUBLIC OFFICE is a TORT, btw. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1084 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Derek Moran

Mar 22, 2013 8:17 PM

Derek Moran When you threaten someone with punishment for money/payment without a valid claim, is that not blackmail? Blackmail is Extortion. Extortion is Fraud. The problem is Max, as i keep telling my dad- "Unfortunately..they HAVENT damaged you yet." — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1084 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 22, 2013 8:21 PM

Maximus Legis They have harmed me by intention infliction of emotional distress. They have harmed me. They are also harrassing me. I have more to tell on this but finding time is difficult. I will post more shortly — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1084 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Mar 22, 2013 8:34 PM

be acting as parties to fraud, should they choose to get involved. INTENT TO INFLICT MENTAL SUFFERING is a TORT, also. Along with FIDUCIARY BREACH-OF-TRUST. You should maybe send them a NOTICE appointing them as your Fiduciary-Trustees with a duty-of-care to do whatever is in your best interests, if they werent sure of that before. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1084 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Maximus Legis

Mar 22, 2013 8:40 PM

Maximus Legis Whilst this was going on the launched a further attack/unsubstantiated demand. Like I said I will disclose all when time permits I just hope I am doing this right particularly with the last attack. I am learning by doing as my post heading suggests — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1085 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Derek Moran

Mar 22, 2013 8:41 PM

Derek Moran Here is a 'Denial-Access' Notice from another guy i know on here that may be of some help to you, tell me what you think: https://word.office.live.com/wv/WordView.aspx... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1085 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 22, 2013 8:43 PM

Maximus Legis Am typing on my phone so will read later. They have been served with similar and will be trespassing if they return. I have not seen them in quite a while:-) — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1085 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Mar 22, 2013 10:29 PM

Maximus Legis http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Quv1HUgpf-E TORTS - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Professor Stephen Gard teaching Torts, intentional infliction of emotional distress, for Supreme Bar Review — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1085 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Quv1HUgpf-E

Pete Daoust

Jan 06, 2014 8:30 PM

Pete Daoust .....Buck-o......ha never mind that !!! — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1085 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Derek Moran

Jan 06, 2014 9:01 PM

Derek Moran Interesting point, Pierre.....would you consider this "Buck-o-Five" that Adam Thomas pushes Scott to be CLUBHOUSE RULES stuff, too? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1085 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jan 06, 2014 9:15 PM

Pete Daoust I do NOT comprehend Buck-o-Five fully Derek, — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1085 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Jan 06, 2014 9:23 PM

That being said, when he HAS said that, my first thought has always been- "I didnt know Scott was EXPECTED to teach us about the Buck-o-Five" — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1085 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Jan 06, 2014 9:25 PM

Bobis Youruncle Buck o five is a process used by the real high ups to devalue the assets they seize.The value is depreciated Like what the Archdiocese of Edmonton does… it values all real setae at one dollar on the books and insures it for replacement value. It is an administrative process that is not taught here. That should speak volumes… no value. It may work, but it is a perilous ride… Companies still try to seize shit. Trust law is the highest form of law… That is the point. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1086 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Scott Duncan

Jan 06, 2014 9:27 PM

Scott Duncan Well, primarily THIS GROUP IS NOT ABOUT THAT! It's about the JOINDER that THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER and RULES OF ACCOUNTING provide. It always HAS been. It's purpose is to TEACH YOU WHAT MONEY IS, because NONE OF YOU KNOW. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1086 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Derek Moran

Jan 06, 2014 9:30 PM

Derek Moran But just so i and everyone else knows conclusively, Scott.....do you consider the "Buck-o-Five" to be CLUBHOUSE RULES? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1086 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jan 06, 2014 9:30 PM

Pete Daoust — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1086 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Jan 06, 2014 9:31 PM

Bobis Youruncle We stand corrected once again… Our point was it is not taught here. We Have learned many things. Joinder and this note is legal tender and all those lessons have been very important. If it is bullshit that was not our intention. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1086 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Jan 06, 2014 9:34 PM

Bobis Youruncle Yes, We have come to understand that… NO WHERE ELSE. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1087 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jan 06, 2014 9:34 PM

Pete Daoust That's why I started the admin group... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1087 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jan 06, 2014 9:34 PM

Pete Daoust Relief TTFL from some Stain Shit — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1087 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Scott Duncan

Jan 06, 2014 9:50 PM

Scott Duncan I clean up the shit stains here. You just leave them lying around. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1087 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Derek Moran

Jan 06, 2014 9:52 PM

Derek Moran Bobis- the difference here being, is that you have never been a completely-fucking-dick-asshole-attacking people-for-not-swallowing-what-Adam was pushing, just like like that fuckin' prick has with his "Buck-o-Five" PROPAGANDA-CAMPAIGN he has unrelentingly waged that somehow if YOU dont use it like he does then somehow you are AGAINST HIM, like anybody cares what he thinks anyways Sincerely (actually no, not really), One-Trick-Nazi-Ponies — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1087 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jan 06, 2014 9:59 PM

Pete Daoust Tissues Derek ? — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1087 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Derek Moran

Jan 06, 2014 10:02 PM

Derek Moran Mackximus and Chris- cuz you know we all spoke about this at length when you guys finally got to the hotel-room after using a GO-Train as a weapon and we were all wondering the same thing - so.....to review: Derek Moran: But just so i and everyone else knows conclusively, Scott.....do you consider the "Buck-o-Five" to be CLUBHOUSE RULES? ANSWER: Scott, clicked, LIKE. *Matt Damon-to-Adam Thomas*: "...do you like apples?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xcY0-dscn0 — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1087 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xcY0-dscn0

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Jan 06, 2014 10:02 PM

Bobis Youruncle I am sorry it is not my intent to confuse and or detract. I do not want to create any extra hassles at all. I am doing my best to contribute. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1088 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Maximus Legis

Jan 06, 2014 10:04 PM

Maximus Legis It's my intention some time in the not TOO distant future to shake the hand of The Admiral Scott Duncan and then kick the arse out of some really outstanding Single Malt from one of many fine distilleries I have on my doorstep if he'd allow it. A small Thank You for his kind act of passing on knowledge to me. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1088 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Beverly Berta Braakschmack

Jan 06, 2014 10:22 PM

Beverly Berta Braakschmack Any administration of the PERSON/ACCOUNT would be clubhouse rules... — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1088 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jan 06, 2014 11:16 PM

Pete Daoust Ho...I should hit the books then — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1088 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Jan 06, 2014 11:18 PM

Bobis Youruncle Just depends which clubhouse holds title. We like the one we created. That BOB UNCLE LTD. administrates PRIVATELY. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1088 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

Jan 06, 2014 11:19 PM

Bobis Youruncle HELLLOOOOSSSS — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1088 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jan 06, 2014 11:26 PM

Pete Daoust The first thing I do, when I decide to administrate a debt, I am ASKING them what's my options...... THEY NEVER ANSWER......never.... I am literally asking them to supply me with THEIR CLUB HOUSE RULES, so I can administrate correctly.... If they do NOT answer, I guess I can CREATE some club house rules ?? Not my fault if I have watched money as debt, and read some stuff on facebook and decided that I am not interested anymore on BUYING public debts — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1088 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.

Pete Daoust

Jan 06, 2014 11:29 PM

Pete Daoust Administration, Definition: Taking care of stuff. — Recovered from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 1089 (printed 13 June 2014). Not in the Facebook export; added by this site.