All the STATE has is a picture by email of an allegued affidavit with her allegued facts, pictures she sent by email on a later date of some brusses, and the police "report". That would ALL BE NON-ADMISSIBLE evidence in court, even according to the rules of evidence, if contested. Besides, an attorney CANNOT PRESENT EVIDENCE INTO THE CASE. Either he is a witness, or an attorney, but he can't be both. So, WHO would be presenting the evidence for this case?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 85Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 85 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.