Dwaine CarrilloSeiko Seven
How can he claim you are a "citizen"? If you do not rebut, you must agree ;) He says "YOU ARE A CITIZEN", and you should have said "that's a strong presumption, can you prove your claim?"
You should have said "Since presumptions seem to be the flavor of the day in here, I'm also going to presume you are a public servant, which makes you a public trustee, therefor, I, as the sole beneficiary of this estate you are attempting to hold a shareholders meeting against, would like to see the letter have, with my handwriting and signature, that gives you or anyone else in this courtroom permission to hold this meeting.
"Surely you wouldn't have a shareholders meeting without my written-authorized consent, would you?"
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 246
