Mar 20, 2013 2:49 PM

<<[44] The truth is that the system needs conflict, it demands controversy- it relishes and celebrates the belligerent litigant — as the poster character for supporting propaganda aligned at warning others, that such “anti-law”, “anti-establishment” and “anti-government” behavior will not be tolerated. Those that actively pursue the courts, sometimes with personal vendettas unfortunately created terrible injury against the law and the rest of society by enabling the system to re-set itself and parody genuine concerns as “extremists” and more recently as “paper terrorists”.>>

<<[59] It is how we behave, above all, that determines the success or failure to represent the law. The arrogant, the aggressive the vengeful litigant injures the law as much as the corrupt official. The weak, the frightened, the ignorant litigant injures the law and their own character by doubting themselves and failing to work on their competence and knowledge.

[60] Despite the labels of pirates and privateers- forgive those who act in such a manner. Rise above the hatred, the cruelty. Be a beacon of honesty, respect and honor so that such character shines like a blinding light against judicial corruption. Never forget that your are immortal and how we live (and die) in one life can affect many lifetimes of lessons.>>

Yes...an interesting article by frank, and max pulled out what I believe is the pinnacle of errors in those quotes - namely, the fuel of the contemporary system is..."controversy"...it's truly a wild ride this life, so much experience to be had if so desired:-)

Scary stuff......very scary..!!!

I like that a lot, I scrolled quickly and will digest and ask questions to clarify when I have more time. Thank You Scott :D

read it and followed links to one heaven.org. Have studied this site off and on for a while. Now am studying the Sovereign Law. The learning NEVER ends. I KNOW I AM A TRUST and must act honourably.

Arrr.... Avast ye mateys...hard to port.....

I choked on my coffee whilst consuming [9]. :D

http://archive.org/details/commentarieson02blac

http://archive.org/details/reportssiredwar02cokegoog

Vast wealth of history and knowledge over there with Frank. Compentency with Honor.

Like here!

quite interesting

Cara Small Atherton.....you are a TRUST ???????

body(beneficiary), mind(trustee

oops soul(administrator)

Lol....

This is funny....lol..lol

you like that do you? laughing at me?

i'm used to it

Lol...no I dont laugh at you but at what you are :D

i am happy to amuse some one in this f'd up place

Cara Small Atherton, the way I get all this...you are not a TRUST, you are a BENEFICIARY of someting (NAME) kept in a TRUST....

not a trust, you are a stock certificate (bill of lading for cargo) registered & insured property, to the state stored on fidelity.com and a corporation as created by the social security (insurance co.) which is a claim against the surety from the ins co.

thats why scott says create a trust heald by a corporation (person) and claim by a lien ownership & control of the birth certificate. in the case of a warrant issued, the party has to claim the birth certificate as his property to control. as if it were stolen, the lien is proof it's your property that they have to return to the rightful owner. and i believe this leaves them with no evidence.

Pretty much, yes.

you are looking only on the surface....but yes i get thet

What surface..??...ANYTHING deeper I should know ??