The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 1

Jun 15, 2013 6:49 PM

Derek Moran

Stuart Stone: Are you speaking purely physically, or jurisdictionally here Scott? The reason I ask is because I'm at the stage where the theory/principles are starting to gel & I'm trying to get my head around the practicalities of what is required:

As I understand it so far...

1. I am a soul, I have a vessel

2. Another entity has named my vessel and passed me a bill of lading to transport

3. I haven't yet claimed/liened that cargo, taking it out of commerce & claiming it as my own private property...but I need to.

3a. I am then no longer a junior seaman but am now the Captain of that/my vessel & have authority over that vessel (it is my understanding that, as I don't have a fleet of vessels, I cannot claim the rank of Admiral).

4. I then place this cargo/vessel in trust, of which I am beneficiary and place the trust inside a corporate shell, a corporation that I'm the sole shareholder & Director of...through which I can add value to the trust?!?

5. To be able to avoid the tender for law that using any currency directly/indirectly linked to the USD involves under the jurisdiction of the UCC, I need to become a currency exchange & I think you alluded that bitcoin qualifies as a currency that can be used as a sovereign's national currency, through which I need to add my own value.

6. In any dealings with courts, I need to be able to establish my sovereign status & my role as captain of my vessel, by making requests (nobility), asking questions & rejecting any and all subordinate titles such as 'Mr', appoint the justice as Administrator, make it absolutely clear that I am not surety & be recognised as belligerent/sovereign.

There are probably a number of elements that I'm missing, but my understanding that my trust is in/on a land based jurisdiction, while my vessel remains free to trade on the seas of commerce, a sea based/Admiralty jurisdiction?!?

When you talk about liquidating the assets of the trust (which I understand then dissolves the trust), are you then moving out of a land based jurisdiction, wholly & solely into an Admiralty based jurisdiction, which then grants you rights as a pirate salvage expert?

Feel free to like/critique/shove errant logic back in my ass, or provide whatever feedback you deem appropriate

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 632
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 632 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.