The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 1

Mar 14, 2013 2:27 PM

Scott Duncan

Get ready for your "Homeland" to be "Secured"!

Fresh from "The Harper Government"!

Cross-border policing provokes sovereignty worries - Canada - CBC News

cbc.ca

When the Conservative government passed its controversial omnibus budget bill last month, it included new powers for certain U.S. law enforcement agents that critics say could have ramifications for Canadian sovereignty.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 627
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 627 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 50

Dean Kory

I found out about an un endorsed warrant for "DEAN RUSSEL KORY" so i went to the police station to inquire,as i'm the Administrator for that name,.i brought with me all my law information and a digital voice recorder cuz i knew i would need to be prepared,When i was arrested(only identifying as "Dean" I was held over night till i was brought in front of a court clerk "acting as a JP"for a bail hearing where i adamantly stated my true capacity and wished to be provided a fare and impartial hearing with the ability to make full answer in defense by accessing my court materials and the right to record these proceedings with my recording device...they had a logisticall nightmare on there hands! I was then brought before the court 6 days in a row,before a different "JP" each time while they tried to figure out how to handle this!I was finally released!

Steve LemieuxSteeve Contributing Beneficiary

As far as my "Homeland" being "Secured", fuck man, let's start a poll on how long until Canada is officially declared USA territory. Don't laugh, it's coming.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 628
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 628 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

August le BlancBobis Youruncle

The Harper Government..... Sounds like.... A breech of trust. A name change from one defacto government to another. Were silence is thought to be assent. Where did I put that numbers for Her Majesties representatives.... Problem being are they part of the gang bang we as original people are receiving?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 629
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 629 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Pete Daoust

yep...common sense prevail..I agree...what about starting another group called THE TENDER FOR OUTLAW....that would be easier to get and way more comprhensive...??...Scott, tell us how to do it wrong...and what to do and how to get FUKED big time in court....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 629
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 629 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: There is only one signature on newly issued "Birth certificates" and the new plastic bills only have BANK OF CANADA trustees signing (Nobody from the government, like a treasurer).

This is not "your money" anymore and will help facilitate the "North American Union" that's coming.

THE U.S. has no value and nobody is buying their debt anymore. They will solve this by absorbing Canada and Mexico, and bleeding out resources.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 629 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 629 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: This is part of something MUCH bigger.

I'm liquidating all the trust assets and getting the fuck out of dodge.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 630 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 630 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: "Out of dodge" = Location's designation is "ZETA Aquilae".

You need boats to get there. It's not something that is public. Even people who lived with and studied under me do not know its location.

ZETA AQUILAE is the name of a server, as far as people like Andrew Langevin, and the like, know.

It will also take a LONG time to get there, and I don't want to be underway when war breaks out. I want to be settled in and lounging by the time THAT happens.

We all did out best. We tried for 25 years to warn ALL of you, and for what?

All I got out of it was:

A dead child.

Guns stuck in my face and removal from/of my home, and "what are you gonna do about it" as remedy.

Failed students, who now declare "it was all them" and I was just "incidental".

...and all sorts of nasty descriptions regarding my character.

So I'm liquidating and leaving. I shall sit back, surround myself with those who have EARNED my TRUST, and we will all watch the spectacular ass-kicking you've all got coming.

That's all that's left.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 630
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 630 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: ...me too.

I VASTLY over-estimated my fellow man.

...so now i trade my "walk-on part in a war", for a "lead role in a cage".

(That's from some obscure artists who were also trying to tell you something )

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 631
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 631 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Stuart Stone: 'All I got out of it was:

A dead child.

Guns stuck in my face and removal from/of my home, and "what are you gonna do about it" as remedy.

Failed students, who now declare "it was all them" and I was just "incidental".'

Sorry to hear of the price you have paid for your knowledge & the assistance/help you have provided Scott Duncan, but your efforts aren't wasted here...you have given a helluva lot that I can't yet express effectively as my brain is currently exploding & my old paradigms are crumbling...but, you're making a difference that is greater than you are probably aware of...speaking for myself, and probably others on here, we're waking up.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 631
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 631 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: NOT being part of the problem is harder than you think.

BELIEF (Making a virtue out of self-imposed ignorance) is what the MAJORITY lives off of. The MAJORITY is ALWAYS wrong.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 632
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 632 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Stuart Stone: Are you speaking purely physically, or jurisdictionally here Scott? The reason I ask is because I'm at the stage where the theory/principles are starting to gel & I'm trying to get my head around the practicalities of what is required:

As I understand it so far...

1. I am a soul, I have a vessel

2. Another entity has named my vessel and passed me a bill of lading to transport

3. I haven't yet claimed/liened that cargo, taking it out of commerce & claiming it as my own private property...but I need to.

3a. I am then no longer a junior seaman but am now the Captain of that/my vessel & have authority over that vessel (it is my understanding that, as I don't have a fleet of vessels, I cannot claim the rank of Admiral).

4. I then place this cargo/vessel in trust, of which I am beneficiary and place the trust inside a corporate shell, a corporation that I'm the sole shareholder & Director of...through which I can add value to the trust?!?

5. To be able to avoid the tender for law that using any currency directly/indirectly linked to the USD involves under the jurisdiction of the UCC, I need to become a currency exchange & I think you alluded that bitcoin qualifies as a currency that can be used as a sovereign's national currency, through which I need to add my own value.

6. In any dealings with courts, I need to be able to establish my sovereign status & my role as captain of my vessel, by making requests (nobility), asking questions & rejecting any and all subordinate titles such as 'Mr', appoint the justice as Administrator, make it absolutely clear that I am not surety & be recognised as belligerent/sovereign.

There are probably a number of elements that I'm missing, but my understanding that my trust is in/on a land based jurisdiction, while my vessel remains free to trade on the seas of commerce, a sea based/Admiralty jurisdiction?!?

When you talk about liquidating the assets of the trust (which I understand then dissolves the trust), are you then moving out of a land based jurisdiction, wholly & solely into an Admiralty based jurisdiction, which then grants you rights as a pirate salvage expert?

Feel free to like/critique/shove errant logic back in my ass, or provide whatever feedback you deem appropriate

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 632
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 632 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: I'm sorry Stuart, but what you are experiencing is just a pale echo of something EVERY SINGLE ONE of my failed students, and cast-out trustees have experienced.

You are revelling in the "shock of change" internally. It will pass. There will come a day where even you will say, "Oh, yes, Scott Duncan. I remember that guy. I used to read his stuff", and that will be the end of it.

...you just don't know it yet. It is outside your current mindset.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 633
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 633 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: Even Andrew Langevin SWORE he would TRUST my instruction, and see why I was right later.

When called to in the REAL world, he chose "belief" instead. This means he would do it again, when it's needed in a CRITICAL situation. Such mindsets are "pruned from the tree" lest that branch kill the whole tree, for "belief".

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 633
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 633 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Andrew Langevin: I do trust what you say. I also have contractual obligations I am liable for therefore I can not drop everything at the drop of a hat if that is what's expected then I wasn't clear on the matter.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 633 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 633 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: You love the matrix (belief) too much.

Don't beat yourself up though. The majority is like that.

Chad Brodgesell, if you trust a systems engineer about a computer, because of their KNOWLEDGE and EXPERIENCE, and they tell you that something you "BELIEVE" about a computer is wrong...you don't stand by "belief" when the Systems Engineer says you need to get the computer working! Expecially if it's NEEDED to run the point defence system of the loction the "believer" is at.

That is just ONE example.

Clinging to "belief" that contradicts reality, EVEN IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE REALITY, is toxic. There is no hostile intent. Belief is EVIL. I will never abide it. EVER.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 634
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 634 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan: There is no EVIDENCE to support such a belief, in YOUR scenario.

You cannot say that with me. There IS evidence that NOT ONLY do I know more through knowledge and experience, HISTORY HAS SHOWN that what I say is true.

Your example, Chad, is an example of the very "faith" I am fighting. They aren't the same.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 634
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 634 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Derek Moran

Scott Duncan PIERRE: Let me give away the end of the story you are following:

QUEBEC IS A FREE STATE with LOOSE TREATIES with "CANADA".

That's it. There is nothing else. Anyone saying otherwise is lying. Figure out why they are lying and you'll see who they work for.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 2, page 635
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 2, page 635 (printed 14 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top