The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 1

Mar 14, 2013 10:29 PM

Steve LemieuxSteeve Contributing Beneficiary

If I may, Pierre, I think you've made the same mistake I did, which is to engage the court process as a plaintiff, who has all the burden of proof on his shoulders. Knowing what I now know, thanks to Scott, I'm contemplating reversing my position by placing liens on the corporation as well as the owner of said corporation - for the money that is owned to me. I suppose that might "motivate" them to file a claim against me (to remove the liens) which I could latter motion (?) the court to "join" the two claims together as they are tied hand in hand in every aspect. Would that not "force" the other party to the suit into some type of action?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 734
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 734 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.