Hey, I just figured out how to make this work. I'll just fill in for BOTH sides...
Do you know what hearsay evidence is?
...duh, *prattling on with content-free bullshit.*
Is that a yes or no?
...*more content-free bullshit*.
After 100 or so posts we establish that HEARSAY evidence is third-party testimony and is not admissible.
Next I ask "what is a legal fiction", and then the readers would have to wade through/endure more of your content-free bullshit...
Leading to...
"OBJECTION! By what authority does this LEGAL FICTION admit HEARSAY EVIDENCE to this court? Was this LEGAL FICTION present during the events described, or is this LEGAL FICTION offering the court THIRD HAND TESTIMONY?
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 162Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 162 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.