Mar 06, 2013 3:24 AM

FULL DISCLOSURE IS A LEGAL FICTION. ASK FOR "WHOLE DISCLOSURE. "

This was already sent as such to the Courts and to the firm representing the banks.

They are themselves fictions no?

Scott, if the lawyers are petitioning the court to sell his house can a NOTICE stop this?

They have the buyers all lined up, etc.

Stay the proceeding"s ....

It wasn't Capri Mortgage by any chance ?

Capri? As in the local bank? No. HSBC.

Lien the AG's office with the court file as the account.

And lien your own property.

This is just tossing it out there. "last minute" is not something I do. Every time, either the client lies, or the data I get about the case is inaccurate. I can't work with "last minute"

Well Rick looks like your in luck being it that bank ! I watched some videos in retards to HSBC, I will see if I can find them here is one from the US. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/19/business/hsbc-will-pay-249-million-to-settle-foreclosure-review-case.html?_r=0

AND GO IN PERSON!

Yah, he's on his way right now. I told him to give the notice to the court clerk before anything. He only faxed it today :/

I tried that Beverly the Clerk did not put my documents in the file :(

No, but he emailed it to the bank's lawyer and is going in person as well.

to give 'em a heads up

Dis-embarking the canoe. Thanks for the info thus far everyone. A 3-1/2 hour drive to go...

http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/CreditRiver/1968-12-09judgmentanddecree.pdf

The defendant is awarded costs of $75... wow

RICK- this video will explain what the bank has done to you and what to do to STOP IT!:

At minute 10:00, this guy Redress starts breaking-down the scam of a Foreclosure-sale: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WS37CtPmtus

This was the reason I made a Tenant's agreement with the Queen.back in 2010.........From: David Butterfield Date: May112009 6:20:19

Subject: Re: SUPREME COURT RULED: CANADIANS HAVE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS

To all: I've been advising people of the denial of any "right to one's own property" for many, many years. As you can read for yourself in the attached "Request for Remedial Action", composition of which I completed, three days before the date of the ruling shown below. This is a denial of everyone's 3rd Natural Right to "one's own property" was given us by our Creator, it has nothing to do with any of "man's laws", corporate or otherwise. This is also exactly why I have been telling people that there is no avenue of domestic resolve available to end this violation of our Natural Rights and must be taken before an International Human Rights Tribunal. Attempting any other means to resolve this issue and restore this Natural Human Right will surely fail, especially in light of the unlawful ruling below. Mind you, after duly serving "Notice of Challenge of Jurisdiction and Lawful Authority" to both, no evidence has ever been presented by either the Attorney General of Canada or British Columbia that "Canada" is comprised of any geographic areas commonly called "provinces" (small "p") having names such as "British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan...etc". It has though been confirmed to me in writing by Legal Counsel for Justice Canada, that no statutory instrument exists to confirm that Canada is comprised of "provinces" with names as mentioned above. You cannot read something into a "law" that is not in fact written there, in other words, you cannot just assume or presume that we are actually in a country called "Canada". David Butterfield Educator and Defender of Natural and Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ----- Original Message ----- From: FMNP To: F P Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 5:32 PM Subject: Fwd: SUPREME COURT RULED: CANADIANS HAVE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Norris Barnes <vancouverpropertyrights@shaw.ca> Date: Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:16 PM Subject: SUPREME COURT RULED: CANADIANS HAVE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS

unknown.jpg “NEWS RELEASE

July 29, 2003 For Immediate Release

SUPREME COURT RULED: CANADIANS HAVE NO PROPERTY RIGHTS

“Anything you own can be expropriated without due process and without compensation say the Supremes.”

Yorkton — Today, Garry Breitkreuz, Official Opposition Critic for Firearms and Property Rights, denounced a Supreme Court decision saying that the government has the power to take anyone’s property without due process and without compensation simply by passing an “unambiguous” law. “We have just lost one of our most important freedoms necessary for the existence of a truly free and democratic society. The right to life and the right to property go hand-in-hand — you canât have one without the other. When Parliament resumes sitting in September, Canadian Alliance will be introducing a motion calling for property rights to be entrenched in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” promised Breitkreuz.

What got Breitkreuz so riled was the Supreme Court’s July 17th judgment in the class-action suit Authorson v. Canada in which the Supremes ruled in favour of the federal government and against mentally disabled war veterans (see supporting documentation). The government amended the Veteran Affairs Act to avoid paying hundreds of millions in interest on pension benefits the government had held in trust for about 30,000 veterans. The Supreme Court ruled: “Parliament has the right to expropriate property, even without compensation, if it has made its intention clear and, in s. 5.1(4), Parliament's expropriative intent is clear and unambiguous.”

The Supreme Court ruling also stated: “Lastly, while substantive rights may stem from due process, the Bill of Rights does not protect against the expropriation of property by the passage of unambiguous legislation.” Breitkreuz asked, “So if the property rights guarantees in the Canadian Bill of Rights don’t protect an individual’s fundamental property rights, what good are they? They even ruled that the Bill of Rights “does not impose on Parliament the duty to provide a hearing before the enactment of legislation.” Once again, we have a court ruling — this one by the highest court in the land - that demonstrates an urgent need for my Private Members’ Bill C-313 (see supporting documentation) calling for amendments to strengthen the property rights protection in the Canadian Bill of Rights. If my bill were law, at least the Liberals would have to get a two-thirds majority in the House to pass any law that runs roughshod over our property rights,” explained Breitkreuz. “This first step in property rights protection in federal law is required while we are trying to convince seven provinces with 50% of the population to approve our proposed constitutional amendment to entrench property rights in the Charter.”

“This Supreme Court ruling means that the Liberals can simply ram a law through Parliament giving themselves the right and the power to confiscate each and every bit of Canadian-owned property falling under federal law without paying a dime in compensation to the legal owners,” warned Breitkreuz. “This Supreme Court ruling should raise concerns for all Canadians over their ability to enjoy their own property including the fruits of their labour. What more evidence do you need that Liberals are undoing everything our ancestors fought for, for hundreds of years?"

“This wasn’t just another bad ruling by the Supreme Court. A free and democratic society needs to have the best protection of property rights or else all is at risk. We must entrench property rights in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as the Canadian Alliance has repeatedly called for.”

-30-

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT Authorson v. Canada (Attorney General) - July 17, 2003 Neutral citation: 2003 SCC 39 - File No.: 29207 ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO http://www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/2003/2003scc39.html BREITKREUZ BILL C-313 - An Act to amend An Act for the Recognition and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and to amend the Constitution Act, 1867: http://www.parl.gc.ca/common/bills_individual.asp?Language=E&Parl=37&Ses=2&Bill=C-313&BillType=public

A guy named Derek Hill on here told a story on one of Dean's shows, where his friend sent to the Municipality or whoever a Notice of Fee Simple Absolute, and it eventually stuck. I am looking forward to reading that case-law though! ;)

Thats what they did to my property... Fee Simple Absolute..maybe I can do that back to them Derek.... :)

Court of Equity?.. Writ of Mandamus getting Judge to ORDER your house returned, i dunno?

I learned about Notice of Application tonight in-class, regarding Injunctions and such..past that point i think with you, tho

Writ of Mandamus demaning due-process?

..having sex with Scott?

Sorry all. I'm currently making my way through a blizzard to reach Kelowna. Almost there now, 1 hour to go. (hopefully...). I truly appreciate all the input and hope my day in Court has a favourable result! I will check in once again from my destination. Cheers! :)

LOL.... Derek sorry I was reading more documents to see if I can find something for Rick......tomorrow is now lol...... Rick you can also talk to the Court Clerk and ask about a.. Stay of proceedings. and give your reasoning ..I hope you get through that snow safe ..must be on the Coquihalla :)

No, he's on the other road to Kelowna...

the windy one

I think the notice will speak for itself... he does not need to grovel

They will stay it, he does not consent...

Hope Princeton

yup

its that other backroad to Kelowna from Van...

neways

I did the same did not Consent !

its about who he is (foremost) and get that point across, then surety... then no consent

And he is going into the Court they see that also as Consent to be governed

Well, that's his own fight, he waited until today to get a handle on it

if your cat get's hit by a car do you just wait around a handful of weeks to see if "kitty" gets better?

you receive notice from a liar and just wait to see if it gets better? a handful of weeks?

Well he might just get lucky depending on the Judge ! he can Stay it until he gets things more in order but he may have more I am hoping !

This NOTICE will stop it. for now...

He is coming back on when he arrives !

Maybe it might !

The Banks Lawyer's have got the biggest bond in there who is going to have the say ?

Yes... I think he'll be okay... I drummed up the notice, but he knows what is going on...

I like what Scott say's about the lien ;)

It will, he cannot "cave" though...

Good for you well cheer's to that

Will he have support with him ?

Yah, he won't have time since he ALWAYS leaves problems until the last moment...

Rick Land must stop doing that!!!

LOL like me !

no support, he'll be fine

he's going to read this when he gets there and I say he WILL BE FINE

Well if that dont work he can *Stay* the proceedings !

Yes for sure and if you lent a hand that's awesome ! go get them Rick !!!

I told him what to do... based on my understanding from all things I've learned, with Scott as verification... I don't see Rick being the administrator in this matter, just let them follow their own rules... as that's what they do...

They will most likely have this in Chamber ..out of the Public eye

:D Scott is like a distiller... run it by him and its clean!

Did he go to the previous Court cases ?

No... gawd.. fuck no

ignored everything...

*annoyed

Ya it all sounds good its getting it to work in the Court Room :)

Well that might help him :)

um, yahno

The Judge could agree he needs more time

but he didn't realize as much as he's realized here as of now...

he's still stuck in a headful of what "you were told" stuff

LOL thats what might just save his ass :)

He was not ignoring he was unaware :)

I don't understand... is valuable

I see the worst part about all of this is to STOP being afraid of THE DREADED GOVT...

Some Judges realize we are not Lawyers he may tell him to consult one and give him time !

and that's the thing to overcome...

Ya who is afraid ! its getting them to work under there Oaths and practicing what they preach !

NO! Liars are the regret, giving them your rights and whom are they obliged to?

From my (slight) experience, they will do their job...

It is their job, Fiona, so they are just administrating and getting paid... it is YOUR JOB, to clarify

and they are not personable

er, humanitable?

The Court's its all about the money ! Bench ...Bank..

law is about commerce now... nothing else

And Contracts

Its about the money I can assure you !

yep... hence the other thread I started

that is why it is affecting us more and more and we're starting to realize how important this is... as Scott puts it "will save your life"

Thats right because its the Bankster that run the world !

Did you see my post above Canadians ... have no property rights

meh... with what? Do they have any money to lend?

We have a right to a roof over our head

Yes but no right to own it ;)

no, I don't need to own anything, but I have a right to eat, live, travel, have a roof over our head, and if some government is going to take a loan out on my "being born" here, "to accommodate me" then shall that be done?

I totally agree :)

Is that NOT what has gone on? Am I wrong?

Show me the evidence... I really want to see that...

But then they still come kick your door in and fling you out on the street :(

I will wait for that experience.... I have yet to be flung...

when did this happen to you?

Its not nice :(

Last year

Now I am still working on how to get it returned to me

but you didn't know how to handle it?

Where do you live?

Thats right... like what Scott would say how do you go back to the rapist to get remedy !

Where DID you live?

Okanagan ;) the only desert in Canada ;)

And are you there now?

Yes

I am Scottish from Scotland

no that's not the desert... c'mon... we still have dinosaur bones in AB

Yah Rick place is in Kelowna...

everyone their had HUGE hardship

Yes thats 3 hours from here

just move back in

Ass hole Judges up there !

They rented it out ...they gave me the opp to buy it back ;(

Who's name is on the title?

wow...

I have a few thing's up my sleeve . Derek has been great he give me lots of idea's

what name is still title?

It was me Fee simple 23 day's after the Court case they removed my name and put the frauds on it

yours or not yours? er THE NAME

oh...

And you should by law have 52 days to appeal

appeal?

I put in a Notice after the Bailiffs kicked me out my Notice was ignored .

They had my case in chambers no signed documents from a Judge

BY WHAT AUTHORITY?

Exactly

what did your notice state?

Only the registrar signed

was there clarification of capacity?

It was rather large .. I also had a Bond in honor placed in my file along with the BC .

I did not Consent no Contract...but stayed in honor

what did your notice state? who is the authority

Here. Looks like I have some catching up to do... ;)

I was the Authorized agent for the all cap name

You made it safe ;)

I dunno, I run a store where people can order furniture. I always allow for 2-4 weeks, since the 4 week part is fairly usual. So, between my creating sales (liability) I have to run around, with my AUTHORITY as being the buyer... and constantly chase orders around... "has this been shipped" "where is this order standing as of today?"

just sayin... its only business...

"they" are as useless as you are

Fiona Munro, Conditional acceptance & GUILTY are HONORable. Not guilty & no plea or silence are DISHONORABLE.

Fiona, keep pushin...

outty

AMEND THE ORDERS YOURSELF....

Yes Adam thats right !

But not for foreclosure I stayed in honor to pay the debt. I am the creditor and I was not Silent I did not consent or Contract with the Lawyers

Its easy to read these Laws and to know the difference between wrong and right... Common Law is not being upheld in the Court room"s ..They are not real Judges .. they don't sign the documents anymore because they don't want to be held liable..There is no such thing as Innocent till proven guilty ! there is no such thing as an ...Order for Possession ...but they still do it !

Rick.... check out Order of Possession down below ! that might come in handy for tomorrow :) ....Stay strong and the very best to you !!!!!

Rick .. I will post it here ;) No Order of Possession now ! Writ of Possession (RTB-14) is no longer in use When applying for a Writ of Possession,the Supreme Court requires applicants to use the Supreme Court “Residential Tenancy Act - Writ of Possession Package” (http://courts.gov.bc.ca/supreme_court/self-represented_litigants/info_packages. aspx) which includes an Affidavit of Service. File the following documents at the Supreme Court civil registry: Certified Copy of the Order of Possession (the original you receive from the Residential Tenancy Branch is a certified copy) Requisition - Form 17 Affidavit of Service Writ of Possession — Form 52. See also: Fact Sheet RTB-103: Landlord: Enforcing an Order of Possession (http://www.rto.gov.bc.ca/documents/RTB-103.pdf)

From previous readings elsewhere: What parties to the contract risked anything? (only you, because the bank have not provided any valuable consideration to the transaction)...If the bank claim they have risked anything/funds, demand that they show the origin of the funds via Generally Accepted Accounting Principles of double entry bookkeeping which will show who the grantor was (ie: you in a different status)...Ask for a stay in proceedings to allow them time to come forward with this information. I hope that's useful & this post wasn't too late.

Well the bank's liar called Rick first thing this morning... she "doesn't understand" what this notice is about... :D

good sign....when they dont understand, you are on the rigth track...

Yay! Pierre's back!

This NOTICE has been sent after my friend's COMPANY BANK ACCOUNT has been seized for a 85k income tax issue .....and the bank finally paid the 85k to the goverment...:D

POSTE RECOMMANDÉ [xxxxxxxxxxxxx & xxxxxxxxxxxx]

« AU NOM DE NOTRE SOUVERAINE BRITANNIQUE »

AVIS DE 9xxx-8xxx QUEBEC INC AUX TIERS SAISIS DE CETTE DEMANDE

Article 1 du Code civil et de la Charte des Droits privés et Libertés de la personne juridique s’applique sous l’autorité du jugement et des notes sténographiques assermentées du dossier de la Cour de l’état du Québec numéro # 200-22-028373-041 détermine l’identité réelle et véritables des parties. & Articles 888, 1440, 1455, 2504, 2655, 2941 et 2942 du Code civil de l’état du Québec. & <Présomption / Apparence de droit à L.Q. 1992, c. 57 Loi sur l’application de la réforme du Code Civil de l’état du Québec définition : DE JURE> & Loi d’Interprétation de l’état du Québec L.Q. c. I-16 art. 42 & DROIT DE JOUISSANCE CONTRE LE DROIT DE PROPRIÉTÉ art. 405 C.c.B.C. de 1866 à 1980 et L.Q. c. C-64 art. 911 & ABSENCE DE LOI FISCALE QUÉBÉCOISES formulaires RC251 et T1118 de l’Agence du Revenu du Canada conformément article 1, L.Q. c. I-3 ``Loi de l’Impét sur le Revenu Qc. & Identité de l’instrument scriptural du débiteur : Art. 27 (2) L.R.C. c. B-4 et Cour suprême du Canada Banque du Canada c. Banque de Montréal, [1978] 1 R.C.S. 1148 & ARTICLE 460 L.R.C. C. c-46 monnaie sans valeur refuge / sans provision & ÉTAT DU QUÉBEC L.R.Q. 2000 c. E-20.2 opposé à L.R.C. 2000 c. 26 & Avis d’intention selon l’article 95 du Code de procédure civile de l’état du Québec ou article 34 du Code de procédure pénale de l’état du Québec. & L.R.Q. c. A-2.1, 1982 confirme l’assimilation du pouvoir exécutif et du pouvoir législatif de l’état du Québec au Premier ministre, au Cabinet des Ministres et aux 385,000 fonctionnaires de l’état du Québec. & L.R.Q. c. A-23.1 & art. 71 et 92 (1) de l’Acte de l’Amérique du Nord Britannique de 1867

TIERS SAISIS DE CETTE DEMANDE / DÉBITEURS : BANK NAME Address ÉTAT DU QUÉBEC J7E 5xx & AGENCE DU REVENU DE L’ÉTAT DU QUÉBEC Name 4. Place-Laval, bureau 500 Secteur L453P2 Laval, état du Québec, H7N 5Y3

CRÉANCIER MINISTRE DES FINANCES DE L’ÉTAT DU QUÉBEC.

DOSSIER numéro : # 25xxxxxx Numéro de référence : 7xxxxxxxx

ATTENDU ET NOUS CONVENONS QUE la source de toute existence contractuelle est l’identité par l’acte de baptême signé ou ratifié par les parents, ensuite par l’invention juridique de la personne « persona » à partir de l’enregistrement de la déclaration de naissance vivante et le Certificat de baptême et de naissance signée par le curé ou un prêtre, par le Certificat de naissance du Directeur de l’état civil de l’état du Québec ainsi que par l’Acte de Naissance du Directeur de l’état civil signé par le Directeur de l’état civil autres que les parents responsabilise les signataires qui n’ont pas reçu le consentement formel des parents pour inventer des enregistrements de propriété intellectuelle à partir de l’identité du baptisé.

ATTENDU ET NOUS CONVENONS QUE le formulaire NAS-2120-(01-12) de demande de remplacement d’une carte d’immatriculation d’assurance sociale corrige la fraude ou la corruption d’identité de la propriété intellectuelle de l’état sur l’identité du baptisé.

ATTENDU ET NOUS CONVENONS QUE la vraie monnaie n’est pas la réserve de monnaie numéraire canadienne ayant cours légal de la Banque du Canada. La vraie monnaie est la monnaie scripturale sans provision des membres de l’Association Canadienne des Paiements.

ATTENDU ET NOUS CONVENONS QUE l’entité juridique de facto des débiteurs n’est pas à démontrer aux actes de facto régissant la fiscalité dans les contribution comme dans les perception et les recouvrement, par leur devoir et obligation de gestionnaire et d’administrateur de # 2xxxxxxxx d’être redevable de n’importe quel montant déterminé entre eux et exigible envers # xxxxxxxxRI en vertu d’une apparence de droit sur perception ou recouvrement fiscal en référence au dossier numéro # xxxxxxxx en rapport aux articles de facto ou de jury et en rapport aux jugements énoncés dans cet avis.

ATTENDU ET NOUS CONVENONS QUE l’article 42 de la loi L.Q. c. I-16 stipule pour application que nulle loi n'a d'effet sur les droits de l'état, à moins qu'ils n'y soient expressément compris.

ATTENDU ET NOUS CONVENONS QUE la définition de l’expression loi stipulée à l’article 1 de l’acte du Québec chapitre I-3 stipule : loi comprend une loi autre que le parlement du Québec.

ATTENDU ET NOUS CONVENONS QUE le formulaire demande formelle de paiement numéro RC251 et T1118 identifie les provinces et territoires au Canada sauf le Québec.

ATTENDU ET NOUS CONVENONS QUE le serment des juges et des avocats de droit privé sans constitution dans l’état du Québec sont des juges et des avocats (es) membres du Barreau de l’état du Québec dans leur pouvoir discrétionnaire hors la loi et hors constitution d’appliquer les articles 24 (2) et 33 de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés dans l’intérêt des banques membres de l’Association Canadienne des Paiements en fonction de l’article 460 du Code criminel canadien, en fonction de l’article 27 (2) de la loi L.R.C. c. B-4 et en fonction de la décision de la Cour suprême du Canada [1978] 1 R.C.S. 1148.

ATTENDU ET NOUS CONVENONS QUE la Commission Charbonneau, la Commission Gomery, la Commission Bastarache ont été constitués par un mandant formulant le mandat constitué en maître MANDAT du juge concerné d’exercer ses fonctions de juge par son seul maître « LE MANDAT » ou bien corporel / physique / matériel comme tous les sujets concernés dans un palais de justice interdisant l’existence de l’être humain de facto dans l’état sans droit parce que sans constitution du Québec.

9xxx-8xxx QUEBEC INC en vertu de ce qui précède et de ce qui suit cette demande; nous, représentants autorisés sans droit de propriété, sans droit de gestion et sans droit d’administration de 9xxx-8xxx QUÉBEC Inc et Company Name et Company Name nos maîtres, exigeons aux tiers saisi de cette demande sans condition dans l’exercice criminel des tiers saisis par fraude et extorsion fiscale des contributions imposées, des perceptions et des recouvrements fiscaux exécutés par nous les tiers saisis que soit versé au Ministre des Finances de l’état du Québec sans limiter la somme fixée par eux-mêmes au montant de 83,437.16$ en précisant ou en instrument numéraire ou en instrument scriptural.

La démarche de remboursement a été enclenchée par son débiteur gestionnaire et administrateur du compte de dépôt # 8xx-3xxxx- 1xxxxx en présence des représentants autorisés. Occ. Cour du Québec # 200-22-028373-041. Les montants en recouvrement devront correspondre au relevé annuel de participation du Régime Enregistré d’épargne Retraite des représentants en rapport aux recettes fiscales de 9xxx-8xxx QUÉBEC Inc, Company Name / Company Name.

Veuillez faire parvenir sans délai au Ministre des Finances de l’état du Québec le versement exigé proposé dans le présent avis.

à VOS RISQUES, vous tiers saisi de la demande, avez (10) dix jours de la réception par courrier électronique pour acquitter la somme exigée.

VOUS AVEZ LE DEVOIR ET L’OBLIGATION D’ÉTUDIER LES ARTICLES DE LOI ET JUGEMENTS PRÉCITÉS, l’ignorance n’excuse pas la perpétration de l’infraction.

Le 05 octobre 2012.

Par MAÎTRE 9xxx-8xxx QUÉBEC INC.

holy :/

They said my notice meant nothing to them. They approved sale to the next highest offer.

I know Beverly May Braaksma its in french and it would take me 67 hours to translate this :)

RICK- its important for you to realize what the bank has done to you, which is effectively gotten you to slit-your-own-throat. Watch the video above i provided for you, until it sinks in on the switcheroo the bank has pulled on you in terms of the reversal-of-roles/positions they have pulled-over on you without your knowledge i.e. MATERIAL NON-DISCLOSURE, FIDUCIARY BREACH-OF-TRUST

I have to admit i became a little overwhelmed with the judges non acknowledgment of my notice and lost focus. I'm not sure what's left for me to do at this point... :/

RICK- question for the Trustee that has been appointed to sell your house: "Who appointed you as the Trustee ordering you to sell my house?...and can i see that in-writing?"

I will look further into everything after i return home.

They will be mailing me the new documentation soon i imagine.

Put A lien on the house Rick. like what Scott said

Is the title still in your name ?

Maybe Scott's 'NOTICE OF MISTAKE' he recently posted could be modified to suit your purpose if you were late in responding to something...

You can put a quite lien on the house too go to Kamloops and do that !!

Between CAS stealing kids and banks stealing houses, id love for Scott to do a thread walking us through how to properly place/register a LIEN on something, on PPSA.ca

Yes me too !! Scott did not get his house back though ;(

They must have Foreclosed on Rick prior to this Court case

If he put a lien on they can not sell

And ask for a *Stay* fill out the form there ...

Derek they ignore.. Notice of Mistake.. I was telling that to Beverly last night . I also put in a Notice they don't care ...you have to do something to lien it now ..go after the Equity..

Ignoring your Notices works in your favour. After 3 ignored Notices, you make a Notice of Application, in a Court of Equity, to get the Judge to make an ORDER, and then ENFORCE the Order, of one of the 5 Common Law Prerogative-Writs: Habeas Corpus, Quo Warranto, Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition.

I did not realize that would work at the Court House Derek, You are talking about " acquiescence " ?

I have a Tenants agreement with the Queen since 2010.Obtained through acquiescence ! 3 months later I did receive a letter from the Queen. Telling me she is a constitutional Sovereign, Her Majesty acts through her personal Representative, the Governor-General and had forwarded my documents to the same so she may be aware of my approach to the Queen and consider the points I had raised, Which is of course my tenants agreement... I gave her Majesty $20 in consideration ! which her Majesty has taken, . Now since the Lawyer fraudulently foreclosed on me I think I should write the Governor-General

"You are talking about " acquiescence " ?"..... the government would do the same thing to you if you never responded to any of their 3 Notices, right?......why cant you?

..i would've sent The Queen a- "I own my home Fee Simple Absolute-agreement," myself

Yes that was in the agreement that I owned it Fee Simple.you cant own anything out right ! we can only be Tenant"s as we do not hold the Deeds !

Here a nice NOTICE system.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNPJMk2fgJU&list=SPFBFCDCC3DBB96BC4

RICK- listen starting at minute 11:00 of this video, pretty much are the answers to the questions you're looking for: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJwHu0dytbg

Being a Government/public-servant-agency, they are SUPPOSED to provide you with INSTRUCTIONS on what to do, fiduciaries CANNOT hide information from you.....in theory

That was awesome Derek !

Another good point Derek :) they hid that information from me too thank you for bring that up !! man your good :)

I swear this shit practically writes itself! :D

Get ready for good sex Derek Moran..!!!!!! 8-|

And unlike Scott- i only expect foreplay as payment...dont need anyone gettin' pregnant ;)

10 minute procedure prevents a lifetime of headache.

:3

o.0

Only 10 min Scott ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RlBUEHQ7bY

That's all it takes. You don't even have to go to the hospital. :P

I shagged her! I Shagged her rotten!

lol

I hate chewing on these thing"s Derek =D

Exclusive sneak-preview for the upcoming 'The Scott Duncan Story,' only here on The Tender For Law!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTJj4wbmAhk&NR=1&feature=endscreen

I used to love "Bond Girl" names!

Cunt Galore was my fave... I think that was the name...

if you put a lien your property or your name...if there are other liens on it, do you automatically become the number one lienee?

or just the lienee for the value left on it..???

what do you need to lien the NAME...???...do you have to show something..??...like BC or LBR..???

A Winston Shrout quote re liens goes something like: 'First in time is first in right', which I think quotes a maxim of equity.

Id think if somebody put a Lien against you without a valid-claim, that they would be in deep doo-doo potentially and have created a liabilty for themselves...

If you have a mortgage, do banks not automatically place on a lien on the property?

Yes.

but if the mortgage is 60k and the house value is 240k......I can lien the 180k ????

so if they lien it when you get the mortgage, is there any benefit to you putting a lien on it too?

But I'm watching Derek's video here and this seems to be solid stuff.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJwHu0dytbg

Pierre, I was required to have a corporate identity, Then you need to lien the maxima name. The corporation then has first right to all the debtors (the name),present and after personal property. Then find someone you trust and give them your BC in Trust. Making your the beneficiary.

Ok, I'm thinking... they said they would sell Rick's house in 10 days. Can we put a lien on it now? How do you fill this out?

http://www.ppsa.ca/ppsacaV3//registration/index.jsp

Do a lien search first on the individual. Then fll out the form.

I don't fully understand liens, but if the bank automatically puts a lien on the house when you get a mortgage, and if it is true what Stuart shared "first in time first in right", I'm not clear how a lien would help other then as Pierre said, the value of the home above the cost of the mortgage would be available to the home owner?

One credit card has a lien on the house to the tune of $9000

that form does not designate property, only serial number for a car

I should lien my house

First in line, first in right is who gets any money if the house sold

That's why you do the lien search if it's already has a lien, plan b...... Which would be?

no, they are selling it for less than he still owes, then they are gonna go back to him for the remainder, likely

Fucker's

Beverly, I has tech difficulties on my end with ppsa link..... I went in person to the registry. Took -5 min

oh, you might need to login...

.....phat thumbs.. Excuse me.

They absolutely would not recognize his notice (but he should have done something a long time ago...) they FORCED HIM TO STATE HIS NAME “again

I did.... It's my last name.... Would not except space in spelling.

Noooo.... PUSSY GALORE. OR MIGHT HAVE BEEN GLORIOUS PUSSY. MY FAVE BOND GIRL WAS PUSSY GOOD HEAD FINGER BANG FANNY. :)

wow...

You have to put a Quite Lien on the house...Credit Cards are not legal ..

HOW... ANYONE... GO! only got 9 days...

I would put some documents up here if I new how LOL ;)

you can attach stuff in a message... message me!

Rick should also phone the Lawyer and ask for her Bond number ..

would that be on her affidavit?

I have that

No its her Insurance Number for her to work for the Bar

She is Bonded

I am going to get some documents for you ;)

I nearly shat myself from laughing so hard....Scott's fault....... ive always loved the Bond girl names..

she's a paralegal

http://robcourtofrecord.wordpress.com/2013/01/31/video-praecipe-act-of-the-king/ here is the right one

The Petitioner was granted conduct of sale of the subject lands by order pronounced Sept 19, 2012

This shit is hard to not think about all the time...

Next time they demand my name it'll be "Bev Braaksma “NON FICTION"

"Next time they demand my name"..... it should be- "WHO ARE YOU??"

Basically you just don't want to go in there at all... you don't belong

get your shit handled beforehand... Rick Land :P

Here is something interesting:

http://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/rules/02_Rules07.pdf

What is REPLEVIN? A personal action ex delicto brought to recover possession of goods unlawfully taken, (generally, but not only, applicable to the taking of goods distrained for rent,) the validity of which taking it is the mode of contesting, if the party from whom tbe goods were taken wishes to have them back in specie, whereas, if he prefer to have damages instead, the validity may be contested by action of trespass or unlawful distress. The word means a redelivery to the owner of the pledge or thing taken in distress. Wharton. And see Sinnott v. Feiock, 165 N. Y. 444, 59 N. E. 265, 53 L. R. A. 565, 80 Am. St. Rep. 736; Healey v. Humphrey, 81 Fed. 990, 27 C. C. A. 39; Mc- Junkin v. Mathers, 158 Pa. 137, 27 Atl. 873; Tracy v. Warren, 104 Mass. 377; Lazard v. Wheeler, 22 Cal. 142: Maclary v. Turner, 9 Houst. (Del.) 281. 32 Atl. 325; Johnson v. Boehme. 66 Kan. 72, 71 Pac. 243, 97 Am. St Rep. 357.

i am buried in:

http://freedom-school.com/bonds/a4v.pdf

that is brutal

What is brutal?

that pdf file...

the link

slaps you in the head...

50 pages

Your link or mine?

mine, verifies much of what Scott says, and vice versa

Pierre, re above " I had to establish a corporate identity" correction: corporate entity.

fuck this shit keeps me up late all the time...

Check out the last section of mine it is about seizing real estate. Yes, me too, uplate...... So much to learn. :)

The a4v is about same length as the one I posted, pdf above......

shit... that means another two hrs and painful day tomorrow :D

aaaack

Outty for this night... if only our fictions could learn whilst we sleep and inject what they've been up all night doing into our brains... which... based on results... FICTIONS ARE NOT VERY HANDY are they? *grumble

Depends on the application...

Yes, up to thus point in life, not so much. Good night :-)

I just don't know if there is any chance of stopping this for Rick, since its gone this far... Verification from Scott plz... I read some of the stuff you posted on Praecipe, but do not know if this is applicable anymore

I don't know. I do know it's not over till it's over. They want you to despair.

Scott is the learned one.

http://www.duhaime.org/LegalResources/RealEstateTenancy.aspx

Rick, the courts will not hear you at this point, you are in dishonour and as far as I know, there is no turning back. The house is gone; I would learn and move on. Let me elaborate” Rick likes house, makes offer on house. Rick enters contract with bank which allows him to close on the purchase contract and move into house. Rick has fun in house. Many women are fucked and much beers and weed is consumed. Rick has a lot of fun in said house. Rick has a little too much fun and forgets his contractual obligation with the bank to make his mortgage payment. The bank sends a friendly letter reminding Rick to make his payment. Rick ignores the letter. The bank sends 2 or 3 more letters. Rick ignores the letters. The bank sends NOTICE and warns Rick they are going to foreclose and COLLECT the COLLATERAL if he does not make good on his PROMISE to pay. Rick ignores the NOTICE, ignores the court appearance; dishonours himself. Bank goes to court UNCHALLENGED, get judgement in their favour. Rick breached a contract; the COLLATERAL must be COLLECTED. Rick does ignores that he is NO LONGER OWNER of the house Bank lists the property on the MLS with a realtor with the CROWN as SELLER Rick ignores that the house he thinks he still owns is for sale. Another realtor brings a buyer along who likes Rick’s house and writes an offer SUBJECT to financing. Rick ignores that his house is PENDING under a NEW and VALID CONTRACT Several days go by and the new BUYER removes his conditions. The home is no longer PENDING SALE. All that is required at this point is for the judge to say “done deal!” Ricks pulls his head out of the sand and says “hey! You canât do that, that’s my house!” Court does not hear Rick because he is not even part of the equation anymore. He breached a contract, agreed to the JURISDICTION by not showing up. In the courts eyes, he is insane. He agreed for the COLLATERAL to be claimed and is now saying he owns the house. Rick is lucky they didn’t send him away for a psychological assessment. This is what happened. You can give all the notices you want, the judge will not REVERSE the initial judgement awarded to the bank. Should you have shown up at the first court session, you might have had a chance, although highly unlikely. The judges are there to PROTECT the SYSTEM (scam). Don’t expect to penetrate the wall of bullshit they put up. The wall is thick and high. Bend over, smile and try not to scream too loud when they stick it in”

Hey Rick- where exactly are you from again?..i have a friend-of-a-friend going through the same thing in Calgary, maybe you guys can work together on this.

"Hey Derek,

I have a question for u,I have a friend out in Calgary who is having some issue with his house , he loss is case to summary judgement , he did an appeal, so he is actually waiting for the appeal , the realtor came to take pictures to put the house on the market, can any thing be done to for him at this time. "

My house was in Kelowna.

Fiona Munro No Order of Possession now ! Writ of Possession (RTB-14) is no longer in use When applying for a Writ of Possession,the Supreme Court requires applicants to use the Supreme Court “Residential Tenancy Act - Writ of Possession Package” (http://courts.gov.bc.ca/supreme_court/self-represented_litigants/info_packages. aspx) which includes an Affidavit of Service. File the following documents at the Supreme Court civil registry: Certified Copy of the Order of Possession (the original you receive from the Residential Tenancy Branch is a certified copy) Requisition - Form 17 Affidavit of Service Writ of Possession — Form 52. See also: Fact Sheet RTB-103: Landlord: Enforcing an Order of Possession (http://www.rto.gov.bc.ca/documents/RTB-103.pdf)

Fiona Munro: I had been given an order Writ of Possession via mail not signed by a Judge ! and had Bailiffs kick in my door refuse to show me a signed document from a Judge, and now I see there is NO ORDER OF POSSESSION... ?

(Scott clicked 'Like' on this): Derek Moran: When i brought up to my paralegal-instructor this past week who is a lawyer about Prerogative Writs, he admitted to me that he had forgotten about those cuz itd been awhile since he had ever done one, but he did admit that "you are talking about common law Writs." He thought i was asking him about Civil writs which were/are the ones you are talking about i believe Fiona- WRIT OF POSSESSION. I could tell he was quite surprised that i even knew about Prerogative writs at all and further surprised as i listed off all 5 of them as he could only remember two. I think you need to declare to the court that you are not there IN PERSONAM, but, that you are there IN REM. IN PERSONAM = agree to the jurisdiction.. IN REM = you are there to protect/defend a right 'against the world,' which would entail that Maxim that no one shall be dragged from their house, an inviolable right which is even entrenched in the Constituition of IRELAND - me lucky charms!

Scott Duncan: Lien the AG's office with the court file as the account.

And lien your own property.

This is just tossing it out there. "last minute" is not something I do. Every time, either the client lies, or the data I get about the case is inaccurate. I can't work with "last minute"