The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 1

Mar 05, 2013 2:07 PM

Eamonn O Brien

Due to my recent realisation that Admiralty Law is key in understanding the basics, I'd like to start this thread to help comprehend Admiralty and how it equates to Man from the start...

If people would like to post their brief description of how they see it and we can go from there I suppose?

Maybe a good old diagram could be worked on once I have it properly figured out... :)

So, to the beaches!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 783
Printed copy of this post
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 783 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Read Comments 94

James Baal

Interesting....Admiralty A court exercising jurisdiction over maritime causes, both civil and criminal, and marine affairs, COMMERCE and NAVIGATION, controversies arising out of acts done upon or relating to the sea, and over questions of prize. Also, the system of jurisprudence relating to and growing out of the jurisdiction and practice of the admiralty courts. In English law. The executive department of state which presides over the naval forces of the kingdom. The normal head is the lord high admiral, but in practice the functions of the great office are discharged by several commissioners, of whom one is the chief, and is called the “First Lord.” He is assisted by other lords and by various secretaries. Also the court of the admiral. The building where the lords of the admiralty transact business. In American law. A tribunal exercising jurisdiction over all maritime contracts, torts, injuries, or offenses. 2 Pars. Mar. Law, 008; New England Marine Ins. Co. v. Dunham, 11 Wall. 1, 23, 20 L. Ed. 90; De Lovio v. Boit, 2 Call. 398, Fed. Cas. No. 3,77(5; The Belfast v. Boon. 7 Wall. 024, 19 L. Ed. 200; Ex parte Eastou, 95 U. S. 08, 72, 24 L. Ed. 373.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 783
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 783 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Baal

Scott Duncan: OK one last time. You cannot act in trust, because you are not WORTHY of the task. You are not CAPABLE, because you have a program that your entire identity is attached to, and as a result, you value the wrong things. This is a profound statement and something tells me it has much to do with your question related to MAN and ADMIRALTY, forget about the club rules here for a minute and let this sink in.... Than help me figure out what it really means!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 784
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 784 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Baal

I think this statement actually describes the borders if you will of Admiralty, Commerce and Trust.. ..its in a perfect sense "Aristotle at its best" keeping everything nice and tidy. I may be of topic here slightly But everything that moves these days is a vessel and statements like these are designed to help you navigate and clear the fog.. .

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 784
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 784 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

Ok, sorry, I didn't mean to post the thread and disappear for a day or 2...

So how I see it is...

Man is born...

By registering the birth the state view us, in admiralty, as a vessel on the seas of commerce...

They then give us a birth certificate...

The birth certificate is a "Bill of Lading" showing our receipt of the Government's "cargo" i.e. The PERSON.

So when we decide to use the Birth Cert, to engage with Government departments, they see that as a new vessel being docked in their harbor and we provide them with our "manifest".

They then see that the "cargo" we are carrying (The PERSON) is in fact their cargo that we received and are now in possession of (In control of to use and give value to should we wish)

So if we wish to use their cargo on the land while docked, they have certain terms & conditions (statutes) because they swore they would protect the natives of the land...I'd imagine that's what DC meant when he said "they're taxing US to protect us", or something to that effect...

So we have every legal right to use their cargo but obviously there are T&C's...

I'd imagine this is why receiving welfare is not a good thing to do... Once one receives welfare they are acting as usufructuary to the Government's property - The PERSON

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 784
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 784 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

Oh I know that man, I'm just gettin' into the Admiralty side of things now... Wrapping my head around it will hopefully make everything else more understandable...

I'd imagine a PPS/SIN could be referred to as a stock code... Once you use it it relates back to the Government's "cargo" on the "vessel"...

"Oh you're wanting to bring our cargo inland I see... We'll have to issue a license for that Captain"... etc... :p

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 785
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 785 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Baal

YOU are a YOU... ME is a ME......If you have to Operate through the PPS Number just do it...but understand its not YOU its GOVERNMENT PROPERTY held in TRUST for you....YOUR BODY is THE VESSEL, Your NAME is the FACT "CERTIFIED" that this vessels exist.........YOUR "PERSON" is the Security Vault for what YOU are transporting!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 785
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 785 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Baal

YUP.....What I have gathered so far in this group is that you have to always consider the three big ones here ADMIRALTY, TRUST and COMMERCE...know who you are within these three Jurisdictions and don't let CURRENCY pull into the shit ;-)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 786
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 786 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

Just don't use it Mo Chara... As DC says, you may possess a license that authorises you to "drive" (transport their cargo = the PERSON) but they have to prove you were using it at any time...

They offer cheaper insurance as a sweetener to get you to identify through it then... Oh such malarky!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 786
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 786 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

On a scale of 1-10 Scott? 10 being closest... :p

Man is born...

By registering the birth the state view us, in admiralty, as a vessel on the seas of commerce...

They then give us a birth certificate...

The birth certificate is a "Bill of Lading" showing our receipt of the Government's "cargo" i.e. The PERSON.

So when we decide to use the Birth Cert, to engage with Government departments, they see that as a new vessel being docked in their harbor and we provide them with our "manifest".

They then see that the "cargo" we are carrying (The PERSON) is in fact their cargo that we received and are now in possession of (In control of to use and give value to should we wish)

So if we wish to use their cargo on the land while docked, they have certain terms & conditions (statutes) because they swore they would protect the natives of the land...I'd imagine that's what DC meant when he said "they're taxing US to protect us", or something to that effect...

So we have every legal right to use their cargo but obviously there are T&C's...

I'd imagine this is why receiving welfare is not a good thing to do... Once one receives welfare they are acting as usufructuary to the Government's property - The PERSON

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 787
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 787 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

I eventually got a photocopy of the book that was filled out in the hospital... I have since been informed by Scott Duncan that it's not much use anyway... If we are the legal owners of the BC then we are considered to be the Captain of the Vessel or the vessel itself..., I'd imagine...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 788
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 788 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

Well THE GOVERNMENT OF IRELAND itself is registered with a foreign corporation... Dun & Bradstreet... Who are they registered to I wonder... I'd imagine it all leads back to the Crown...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 788
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 788 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

" "If people would like to post their brief description of how they see it and we can go from there I suppose? " "

k,...I only care about Their rules after they have harmed me so that I may go after them for damages. Until then They are the ones that must prove their claim or it is of no force or effect.

Adam Thomas, yess, Use it or lose it!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 788
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 788 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Blake Gardner

For me it's simply offer and acceptance, contracts being the law and chief concern of the public in regard to enforcement. In the private is were these contracts generally originate unless of course your unaware, then they will be made for you. So then it's a matter of your standing in relation to any issue on the basis of contract. And contract may be more than what we perceive it to really be...

James Baal

Oh my God.. ...yes contract is the fourth pillar.. .Contract dictates Law you can have a "out of body experience" by studying a little bit CONTRACT, now we really got to be good navigators and swimmers because we left the beach .... Its the beating heart in the centre.. .

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 788
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 788 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Scott Duncan

Eamonn O Brien, That's pretty much it in a nutshell. You aren't a PERSON, you HAVE a person. Just decide what you want to do with it.

I trust the SHAREHOLDERS of ROGUESUPPORT INC., so I let the compant LIEN THE SHIT out of my name. :D

Good guys, those rogue support folk! Smart too! ;)

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 789
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 789 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

Good to know I'm on the right thought process...

In relation to registering property to the NAME... How does that equate to Admiralty... Wouldn't that change the birth certificate?

Is attaching property the same as adding property?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 789
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 789 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Chad Brodgesell

mmmm. I have to say here, this is what screws me up. 1) Dean says (has said in previous videos from long ago) that you can be the ADMINISTRATOR of the name (PERSON) But, if you did not create then you can not ADMINISTRATE

2)He also said blah blah "REGISTRATION" does not transfer property. But (from my thinking) why would you 'Register' something of yours with some one else. Just makes it more confusing. Also I'm having a bad week so that doesn't help

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 789
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 789 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

Registration creates a title... You own the physical property but once registered a title is created by government which they own the legal title to, and you retain the equitable title...

equitable title. (17c) A title that indicates a beneficial interest in property and that gives the holder the right to acquire formal legal title

legal title. (l7c) A title that evidences apparent ownership but does not necessarily signify full and complete title or a beneficial interest

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 789
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 789 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

Rebutt it with your BC... Your BC is evidence that you are legally entitled to give the PERSON value and benefit from it...

Although, "He who accepts the benefit accepts the burden"...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 790
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 790 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

In the instance of a car, by registering you aren't automatically assuming role of trustee... You aren't benefiting from the PERSON. You are benefiting from your equitable title to the property...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 790
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 790 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

I don't think so. An actual receipt/bill of sale is proof of purchase...

The registration card/document with the PERSON on it is evidence of your equitable title I think...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 790 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 790 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the end of this comment.

Chad Brodgesell

now the question would be "WHY" register it to begin with if you have the bill of sale to begin with?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 791 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 791 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.

Eamonn O Brien

Obviously for legal matters relating to the car, if it's stolen or damaged etc, you have to use the PERSON to bring anything before the court... So registering it can work for that...

By using the person for an instance like that you aren't asking for a benefit from "THEM" only remedy from whoever damages you...

Again, nothing I'm saying is 100% correct. Scott may verify...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 791
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 791 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Cara Small

You have equitable title. They have legal title. This would be a trust of sort. You are beneficiary, they administrator. Must have them to fill trustee position. It would be there duty because you pay for the service. Does that sound right? I also understand as sole beneficiary you can not be sole trustee. Of course this doesn't rule out you acting as A trustee.

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 791
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 791 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Baal

SOME GUY: SIR..is that YOUR SIGNATURE on this DOCUMENT? ME: SIGNATURE equals SURETY, LIABILITY is that correct? SOME GUY: Uhmm ???...yes SIR. ME: Ah..OK The PERSON you are looking for has its address at blah blah blah blah.......I am lawful holder sole Beneficiary of this PERSON. SOME GUY: AEHH??? SIR this address you gave me there is THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL PROTECTION... ME: Thats correct have a nice day....

I have a written confession that MY PERSON is PROPERTY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL PROTECTION at this ADRESS..I also have been invited to come and visit IT!

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 791
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 791 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Baal

Since I have a Copy and this COPY has a LOGO LOGO=SURETY, well I can't be in two places at once can I?.....I made this conversation up but something like this will take place when TV license Inspector knocks on the door...... I don't think he will show up though....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 792
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 792 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Baal

Yup Ireland ......what I mean is what I mean.. ... Go on Monday to your DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL PROTECTION and ask for the original APP form for your PPS NUMBER. They wont give it to you.. .So write a letter under the freedom of information act you want the form back.. ...it will take time but you get a letter back confirming what I just said ...Stating that this FORM IS PROPERTY OF THE DPSP AND FOR SECURITY REASONS CANNOT BE RETURNED. ..but they invite you to go and visit it.. ...its in a vault.....hour are allowed to hold a copy request for one

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 792
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 792 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

This is a reply from the Dept. when I asked about it...

Dear Mr O Brien

Thank you for your email you would have automatically been allocated a pps number once you were born in Ireland, you would not have completed an application form therefore nothing would be on file

Should you have any queries please don't hesitate to contact me

Regards Majella O Shea Client Identity Services Dept of Social Protection Shannon Lodge Carrick on Shannon Co Leitrim

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 793
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 793 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

I think I asked about whether or not I submitted a signed form requesting a PPS number...

They said no, they're allocated therefore there is no form on file... It's up to us then if we want to use it...

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 794
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 794 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

I must go in and ask them yeh... It would do no harm I suppose...

The DFSP must create the PERSON. Once registered with the GRO they must alert the DFSP and they then create the entity... They then issue the card and we then use it for whatever....

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 794
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 794 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

James Baal

Ok step by step.. GRO to DPSP TO DFSP. ..WHAT IS THE GRO SENDING TO THE DPSP? LBR??? WHAT IS THE DPSP SENDING TO THE DFSP? ?? NO IDEA.. ..WHAT IS DFSP SENDING TO YOU? ? TRUSTEES ACCOUNT. .

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 795
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 795 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.

Eamonn O Brien

No I doubt it. You only asked for a legal entity to engage with state departments... It's up to you to contract through the entity as you wish...

As DC says, you may have a driving license but were you using it at the time?

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 4, page 795
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 4, page 795 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.
Back to top