Feb 21, 2013 10:40 PM

Accepting a fee or being paid back in return for acting as a surety is against the law...is that apply in every scenario of sureties..???

i don't believe that is law

who's law? only if you agreed to the terms in the first place

Why..???

IF you were to declare surety for some one i certainly wouldn't accept those terms. Paid how?

Surety talk? OK!

TODAY'S WORD IS...

ESTREAT!

that would be u in dean's case?

but their laws do not apply

Becoming a surety for someone accused of a crime is a lovely way to voluntarily enter into bonded servitude. You consent to the jurisdiction, yourself, having committed no crime, and agree to provide valuable assets, guarantees and unpaid babysitting for the new “ward of the court”.

While it may be tempting to get mom out of jail, after she allegedly robbed the jewelery store and all, you are guaranteeing the “accused” complies with all conditions imposed by the court (to secure their temporary liberty), and accepting full financial responsibility for any action, or inaction, deemed as a default of those undertakings. It's a little like that advertisement for “bits and bites”. You never know what the conditions are going to be when you consent to the process.

If things don't go well, be prepared to say farewell to some, or all, of your assets.

DOUBLE YOUR IQ OR NO MONEY BACK!

...sorry I can't "like" that more than once :D

While we're at it:

Estreat (French estrait, Latin extracta) means, originally, a true copy or duplicate of some original writing or record; since the 1900s used only with reference to the enforcement of a forfeited recognizance.

At one time it was the practice to extract and certify into the exchequer copies of entries in court rolls which contained provision or orders in favor of the treasury, hence the estreating of a recognizance was the taking out from among the other records of the court in which it was filed and sending it to the exchequer to be enforced, or sending it to the sheriff to he levied by him, and then returned by the clerk of the peace to the lords of the treasury.

NOUNS DON"T HAVE GENDER! MY PENCIL DOES NOT FUCK MY RULER!

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=180_1244652735

Create a Bond for surety it works every time !

The Dictionary of Canadian Law 3rd-edition, RECOGNIZANCE: n. 1. a person's own promise to appear. 2. "The recognizance contemplated by s.22[of the Coroner's Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. C-38] is in the nature of a performance BOND; an acknowledgment from the person from whom it is taken that he is indebted to the Crown in the amount fixed therein, provided always, that if he fulfills the condition of the undertaking and appears as required the debt ceases..." McMillan v. Bassett(19830 [1984] 3. "...a BOND of record testifying the recognizor to owe a certain sum of money to some other..." R. v. Sandhu (1984)

"Create a Bond for surety it works every time"..... CREATING-A-BOND, thats an area that goes right over my head!

http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/5986695/court-dorothy-1

Scott Duncan: Surety talk? OK!

TODAY'S WORD IS...

ESTREAT!

I can SEE what you are doing, Derek! :D

as I am NOT surety in this matter, please forgive me for giving YOU that impression.

ahh, i see the deception. you are trained to think that some deity will forgive you, and that you have to ask this alleged GOD party rather than who you REALITY need to ask it of... ahh, very clever indeed...

court-dorothy is nolonger available on that site nor through the internet wayback archive.

Acting as ADMINISTRATOR is a serious matter too :P