You know what- on second thought, someone brought-up a good point..not only do i think the SIN# doesnt have to be on the BILL-payment-remittance, like someone said, i think it would be construed as a tacit-agreement that you're a Government-employee by doing that...maybe Scott can verify that one way or the other
Printed copy · Anthology Volume 9, page 1029Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 9, page 1029 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export.