The Tender For Law

English Only

ENGLISH is the international language of law and commerce. Knowing FRENCH is useful for understanding LEGAL ENGLISH, but FRENCH is not the international language of law and commerce, so we will ignore French speakers who speak to us in the language of a conquered people.

Non.

I understand that you are a proud Québécois, but the people here have nothing but contempt for you because of decades of transfer payments and NONE OF YOU understanding what Quebec sovereignty means. None of you know who Russell Rogers Smith is, and you're too proud and arrogant to teach. Just go away and be Retardier somewhere else.

Volume 1

Apr 30, 2013 12:25 PM

Stuart Stone

My take Philip Laforet, is that, by not granting jurisdiction, by disassociating yourself from being the name (notice of mistake) & other means outlined through your 'point of order' & reserving all rights, you have effectively/deliberately/inadvertently demonstrated your sovereignty...

The court will (after repeated challenges/threats/ignoring you etc) recognise this & refer to you as being (a)'belligerent':

not the common everyday adjective 'hostile & ignorant',

but the noun meaning:

'A nation or person engaged in war or conflict, as recognized by international law'....(this is an online dictionary definition because I don't have Black's at hand, but Black's is very specific about the adjective & its relevance in law).

You then ask 'By what authority do you wage war against my person?'

When you look up 'war' and 'wage war', again there are specific references to a requirement for a head of state (I think- talking from memory here) to declare war (written signed order) before anyone has any authority to wage an attack against your person...ie: the court, the judge/justice, the plaintiff etc do not have any authority because war has not been formally declared against your nation/person.

Rules of evidence (apparently, because I haven't verified this for Australia/UK where I spend most of my time), require that this merry-go-round goes round 3 times & as long as you continue to demonstrate that you are not surety & you maintain your sovereignty & don't grant jurisdiction, the court finally accepts that they are the administrators/trustees to the account/name, and you, the sovereign man are invited to go & have a nice day (or words to that effect ;-)

But as always, read the threads numerous times, define any and ALL terms you are unclear on, see if I get a kicking for talking out my ass, or if it's liked/confirmed by the brainstrust, and just as your brain starts to fry, it will become clearer...and then clarify grey areas with the oracle :-) (brainstrust & oracle being terms for Scott Duncan )

Printed copy · Anthology Volume 6, page 208 · cut by a page break
Printed copy of this comment
Printed copy from The Tender For Law Anthology, Volume 6, page 208 (printed 13 June 2014). Added by this site; not part of the Facebook export. A page break in the printout cut off the beginning of this comment, with its name.