Feb 15, 2013 6:36 AM

Holy SHIT dude! You're really going to do it.

It's me. I like to think big.

I was going to ask for more but I knew you'd offer it up...

You wanna fuck me now, don'tcha? :P

And I knew that was coming...

Jesus Christ. They used to put up a fight 20 years ago! I swear nothing changes with you.

The question still stands.

Is this could happen only when you are in the defendant position ??

You aren't part of the club, pierre. They ALWAYS view you as a DEFENDANT... THEY'RE ATTACKING YOU.

DEFEND...DEFENDant

Get it?

I just got up for a piss Scott Ill go back to sleep in 5 minutes no worries....

WHY do i need this information again?

Got it

Beverly May Braaksma, the question remains unanswered :P

seems to me there is some kind of presumption...

Gee can you vague that up a little?

You should go by "shit disturber" :D

OMG he's already locked on. You poor girl. :(

Where's that "Fiona Munro"? I happen to know his targeting system is buggy when there are multiple targets in range of his influence! Evade while you still can!

I'm more focused than I was in my 20's. Your data is old.

lol... I'm not twenty either... nite

You have to become that to secure your right in Court :)

Fuk...is this a star wars scene or something ???

I'd like to call bullshit please. You are male, after all. You get only one thought process. Women get up to 9 at once. You can't track two, and maintain focus.

You don't have the brain parts.

Google "cooperative multitasking", and just give up. It's me.

Fuck.

Fiona Munro my Lust! YES! And the PROPER (We must be "proper") response is:

BY WHAT AUTHORITY DO YOU DECLARE WAR ON MY PERSON!

Not the Courts rights....., not the prosecution rights ...your rights ! ;)

YAY! Let's fuck to celebrate!

If she goes for it, I'm just going to shoot myself in the head with a nail gun.

;)p

You been cheating on me....... with Beverly...Scott...... :(

Just settin' up a threesome. Good wholesome fun (For me). No "Cheating".

JESUS Christ. Where's my nail gun?

LOL!

I have no nail guns either

Lemme guess...midnight dump?

Et voila...

I'm in top form tonight. :D

Frightening to behold. This thread is gold.

You want details ??

This thread is gold, FOR NOW.

It appears Pierre Daoust is about to take a dump on it...

No no I never do that kind of stuff

Kate Butler, if I make another few thousand of these "GOLD threads, can you crochet me a scarf with them? :D

;)... "Ow Ah dunnae kinn.....If Ah coods dae somethin' loch 'at !

Women just do everything for you, don't they?

You need YARN to crochet, but I can Tat with thread! :p

NOW WE'RE TALKIN!

Och aye alrecht but it has tae be anither cheil !

OMG, who's THIS? Either you are a "damsel in distress" or you have a 12 metre lethal range. Which is it?

Ok please now...!!!!!!

Do I need to smoke a joint to follow here ????

Little from column A, and a little from column B. ;)

She, her VERY significant Other, and I are warming up for the next step in the KANSAS CITY SHUFFLE. ;)

Fuck. I HATE that dance. :(

Kate Butler, just trust him. The KANSAS CITY SHUFFLE is a scary "dance", but you have the best teacher on the planet. ;)

Thanks for the ringing endorsement. Get your Nail Gun ready ;)

Fiona! RUN!

Pfft, that one's hooked and hangin' off the side of the boat. :P

Ill get my shotgun out if this continu....

Those translators suck, don't they ;)

It's even weirder in English! :D

You dont even wanna know..

Fiona are you still here?

They translate as good as I play bowling

She is sleeping now

And on that note, I think I'll head back to bed

Rigth beside me..:)

Me too...!!!!..HAHAHA!!

...and as usual, I'm the last man standing. :P

THE GOOD GUYS DON'T HIDE, PEOPLE! REMEMBER THAT!

You say thats- "the proper response"..whats that the proper response TOO? As you say- "There's a catch; you MUST wait for them to offer it."...What is it that the court/judge has to say first, for you to come back with that line you used?

Agree 100%...

They "declare 'YOU'" belligerent. Look for the WORD "belligerent". When they USE it, they are accepting your Sovereignty.

How will they respond to "By what authority do you make war on my person"?

That's not a rhetorical question, everyone!

So you go into court, with the intent of acting like a bit-of-a-dick, baiting them almost, until they 'declare you a belligerent,' which springs the trap back on themself, in which at that time you say- "By what authority do you make war on my person"?...hmmmmmmm, interesting

..thinking

*Jeopardy Music*

LMAO

You totally played that in your head! ADMIT IT! :P

The Judge gets up, bows, and leaves the court...?

FUCK, no. I'll INVADE.

*Jeopardy Music (extended mix)*

They respond with what person is that?.. you answer- Grantor, sole-living-Beneficiary and Lawful Holder In Due Course?

Who's they? That doesn't really answer the question posed to the court, Doctor Lexus :P

they = court/judge

http://youtu.be/qkPGlVqqEP0

WOW! That's like every answer people give to your questions. :(

"Why come you don't have a tattoo" is probably the last words I'll here before some idiot shoots me.

"By what authority do you make war on my person?" is the equivalent to telling a cop who pulls you over in your car - "Not for hire," then the cop supposedly walks off.....thats your way of telling them your unscanable?

...well unless you WISH to be surety! :P

So what - you walk into court, give them THE NAME, they think they got you, then you just ask them.."Does the court consider me to be a belligerent defendant?"..and then hit them with your line?

The court/judge will then ask you- "Are you here as the man, or as the person?"

No. You only need to show that the NAME has "APPEARED". Then you ask questions. LOTS of questions! (NOTE:Canada Grade "A" Shit Disturbing can be had here) and just wait. You'll know when the time comes. They will engage you 3 times, to meet the burden of evidence.

Then they disengage. DO NOT ACCEPT ANYTHING FROM THE COURT PAST THIS POINT AS IT IS TREATY FROM THAT POINT ON.

TREATY??

..does this have something to do with the Liber Code?

You DID look up belligerent, didn't you?

What OTHER law exists between nations?

*Jeopardy Music -Extended Dance Mix*

*walks over to my Blacks Magic*

The reason I know as much as I do, is because my head isn't filled with shit I ASSUME I know. :P

As I said, NONE of you knows what "belligerent" means. :P

belligerent = country, belligerency = nation

And what laws exist between nations?

admiralty/maritime?

*facepalm*

..is that synonym for slap?

Natives don't care about Canada breaking Maritime law, I assure you :P

Admiralty, then..

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-oAfd6t1wQJ0/UHRWSKeum8I/AAAAAAAAHRY/VhbHnfZCazA/s1600/picard-facepalm.jpg

LOL

The Law of Nations?

Derek Moran, you really aren't that dumb. I'll dumb it down.

What does the T in NATO stand for?

THE ONLY LAWS BETWEEN NATIONS ARE TREATIES!

Treaty

Thank you, Derek. That was painful. Are you covering for Pierre?

LMAO

..yes, but im not deliberately trying to do it

I don't believe you.

"By what authority do you make war on my person?"... then the court will come back as you alluded to earlier, with.......?

Who is coming back? There has to be a PERSON behind a war declaration. Who declared it?

Is there some Treaty between us and the courts that you only know about?...your theory implies theres a Treaty between us and the court in place not to make war against each other

WHO ARE YOU TALKING TO? The declarer of the war? Who is that?

No treaty if you don't accept. Ask the Moors! :P

"By what authority do you make war on my person?'...then you asked awhile back in the thread- "What do you think the courts response will be to that?"..im still hung-up on that point

You are clearly caught up in all my awesomeness. RE-READ this thread. ;)

Yes.. this clearly deserves at least a lap-dance for you at The Brass Rail once i got this straight in my head

Dude, this thread ALONE is a high-end call-girl, MINIMUM! >:P

Im unemployed right now- so that high-end-call-girl better accept a Consumer Note-Purchase..

http://youtu.be/K_JIg9NB47M

LOL..yeah, thanks for that

It's a gift.

"They will engage you 3 times, to meet the burden of evidence." - so you have to ask them three times, "By what authority do you make war on my person?".....?

They'll make you. If you mean it, you won't let them move forward without an answer to the question.

That was a gift.. i got to see Dr. Demento again

*drumroll*

..and that answer is?

YOU ARE FREE TO GO!

"Where can i get some Marijuana cookies?".....actually, i have an answer to that question :0

LMFAO..are you kidding me??...this system has got some fucked-up sense of weird-distorted fair-play

There is NO PERSON behind the declaration.

It goes from "LEGAL DECLARATION OF WAR" to "Derek Moran is a poopie-head" written on a bathroom stall, in terms of legal authority.

But a person is a corporation?..ultimately thats who is taking you to court isnt it?...so in that sense, there IS a person behind the declaration

THE COURT IS NOT A PERSON.

A HOCKEY RINK IS NOT A PERSON

So Bill Thornton is wrong then when he says always go into court as the Plaintiff.....it doesnt matter if you are the defendant?

The bathroom stall with "Derek Moran is a poopie-head" written on it, is NOT A PERSON

I LOVE being the defendant. For 20 years I was PRO SE. If you know the rules you have ALL the power.

The system is corrupt now. They are unworthy of TRUST. When it was functional, I ALWAYS won. PRO SE!

bathroom stall = the court, and Derek Moran as opposed to DEREK MORAN is a poopie-head(id prefer- "likes black girls"), Derek Moran = no longer viewed as DEREK MORAN

Do you do this for money, even though you're not part of the B.A.R.?

NEVER!

I WILL NOT PRACTICE LAW

Why WOULD you practice law.....does anyone pay money to go see the Blue Jays PRACTICE?

You ever been in a situation where you start to wonder yourself in court- "Whens this judge gonna ask me if im a belligerent defendant?"

For the same reason you pay a doctor. :P

Casey Hill will spar for hours. The guy's a machine.

What happens if you're TOO belligerent and they cite you for contempt-of-court?

You still don't get it.

How can you be TOO "engaged in war with another nation". It's like pregnancy; You either ARE or you AREN'T.

Contempt of court? Civil or criminal?

Well if he warns you "Ill cite you for contempt"..can you ask- "Do you consider me to be a belligerent defendant?"

I dont know the difference..

You can ask if you can fuck his daughter if you wish. I don't own you :P

QUESTIONS negate the possibility of presumed UNDERSTANDING.

"By what authority do you declare war on my person?".....is this something you can ask say the City of Toronto lawyer hasslin' my dad over some by-law bullshit?

So theres really no fear then in going into court and CONTRACTING with them by giving them THE NAME, cuz you can get out of it later?

You ARE contracting them. WAR DEVOLVES CONTRACT.

Contempt of court? Civil or criminal?

WHOA.. when they ask for THE NAME, i give it to them, its the complete opposite of what everybody is thinking, in that, im not contracting with THEM..they are contracting with ME??

Yes. Learn what a TENDER is. :P

theres a guy named Pete from privatis.me who was saying on his show that there s a way to get the courts to see you as the man and not the person..now i see what he was talkin' about

YOU are OFFERING your NAME in RESPONSE (respondent) to the TENDER of LEGAL SERVICES they OFFER.

Like this dickhead-security-guard from the other night wanting my name- "Umm, are you asking me for the name of the man, or, the name of the person?"..that fucked-him-up, he didnt know what i was talking about

Contempt of court. You keep mentioning it, and I asked Civil or criminal?

yeah, i dont know the difference/significance of that

Am I being "threatened" with CIVIL contempt? Am I being "threatened" with CRIMINAL contempt?

..rhetorical questions?

You're kinda like The Joker i realized- "Im just ahead of the CURVE.."

"dont know the difference/significance of that" - *facepalm*

I could have saved a lot of preparation by saying "No Derek, you poopie-head, I'm not afraid of the made up thing you are asking about". :P

I read the poopie-head thing on a bathroom stall somewhere...

Seemed legit.

You were mistaken, it read- "Scott Duncan had a 19 year head-start on me"

Pfft... you kids and yer fancy lawyer-speak :P

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnOLhXmhkyA

I can relate...

LOL..The Joker, or Batman?

Which do you think? ;)

BANE

So is there an actual Treaty behind all this?

Just like NATO

Bane had issues. The Joker was just ahead of the curve. ;)

YES- thats right! I just read a Maxim last night that says- 'During times of war the law ceases!!'

Well DUUUUUUUH!

Well fuck, how many of us crazy freeman are gonna quote back to you that Maxim off the top of their head!? ;)

So in-between asking them all the shit-disturbing questions they will ask you 2 more times if you are a belligerent-defendant?

Until 3 hours ago, you THOUGHT you knew what "belligerent" means. You were wrong.

NOW ask WHY you thought what you did about the word previously. SOMEONE PUT THAT THERE ON PURPOSE.

3 hours ago belligerent = argumentative to me

Derek, let me give you $50.00 worth of free advice; STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM A COURTROOM. You THINK wrong.

WHY is the court asking YOU questions? Are you a SERVANT on the PUBLIC record? ;)

I've spent more than my fair share of years in command, and I'm PRETTY SURE I didn't put up with questions from lower ranking officers.

I heard you the other day with the ROOT/SUDO, telling the court that you are the Grantor, sole-living-Beneficiary and Lawful Holder In Due Course, effectively only leaving one-seat left for them to be the Surety as i understood it?

Answer questions with questions..thats what i did with that security-guard and it made him really pissed he couldnt get joinder with me

If you wish to go that route. What is your goal?

This is alot to absorb in a few hours..but i appreciate the walk-through

I once fucked a law degree into an Osgoode student. 6 memorable weeks. I re-defined "cramming", and she coasted the next 4 years. She aced all of it.

Whacky fun :D

Too bad for Fiona shes in BC i guess.. dunno where Beverly is at ;)

You don't get how easy you have it :P THIS is NOTHING

How easy i have it.. how so?

Oh.. cuz im single, yeah, i get that part

Thats what i like about all-inclusive-vacations.. girlfriend one-week.. freedom the other 51 :) :)

Kate Butler's Statistically Significant Other (She spends all her time with him) is pretty hard-core. I can move at a decent speed with him, but he's like a Lithium Battery; Full power and then without warning...done.

It takes about 4 hours to wear him down, and he knows more than everyone here combined. He has the HUGE advantage of a common frame of reference. I can get concepts across QUICKLY.

...and NO questions that reveal the asking party is clueless! It's LUXURY these days.

Think of it as "drill camp". I need to train him up, for an upcoming initiative.

That would be Daniel Wentz?

LMAO, oh god no!

Roguesupport Nx?

He'll never be on Facebook. He'd rather put out a campfire with his face, than use facebook!

lol..awright

What about Dean? You guys seem like your buddies with that pic..does he espouse with your knowledge too?

No.

LOL- and'ta think, "Hey Scott..why dont you come take that Litigation course at George Brown, too?" LMFAO

Dean is Dean. He is awake. He is aware. He has seen the enemy.

We act as a lifeboat when needed. He is free.

So how long ago did you gain control of your birth-certificate-Bond?

1982

DAMMMMMMMMMMMM

I know a friend of a friend who did it, but wouldnt talk about it..even to her close friend

UK CANADA ACT was coming. I wasn't going to be cattle.

They were once a lawyer or Justice?

*drumming fingers*

No. This girl was an 'Indigo-child,' just a higher-sense-of-intuition her friend told me. Took the government to court to get it

Poor girl.

She did tell her that you have to take them to court, always to court, as they will deny deny deny to the very end

I sent registered-mail to Registrar General couple weeks ago just asking them on the WHEREABOUTS of my original Long-Form-Statement-of-Live-Birth-Record, just to see what they'd say...

they sent me a form to get a COPY..as usual

Well I didn't have no fancy internets. I had to go to a LAW LIBRARY.

I then subscribed to law articles. They just talked about it openly.

"The UK CANADA ACT will ACT as a CHARTER for the new shiny CANADA we're gonna slip in....and get this...the "citizens" will now think they are "Free"! BWAHAHAHAHA"

...I paraphrase, of course, but you get the idea.

THE "CHARTER": How to milk this cash cow, and many other articles in this month's issue!

Are you saying they would also talk about the bc-Bond openly , too??

The CRF actually.

Well its a fucking joke to begin with, cuz Queen Victoria repealed the enacting clause of the BNA in 1893!

While that may be true, you may have missed THE TWO FUCKING WORLD WARS that happened since. :P

Yes, thats right- Dean encouraged me to read the CRF and get back to him with a new-set-of-eyes on what i thought..i got up to section 80. and got sidetracked, i forgot about that

If it's BEFORE 1933, it doesn't count.

Im guessing they hide the bc-Bond stuff at the very bottom of the Financial Administration Act like the 'goodies' in every other Act

Unless specifically cited in an act or statute, of course!

The CHARTER mentions the MAGNA CARTA, so THAT counts, I guess...

I think the code-name they were using for the Bonds were 'Construction-and-Labour Bonds' as i recall..

WhatEVER, that shit is MINE!

Will i have to take them to an Admiralty Court, or a Court of Equity for it?

Who's challenging the claim?

You mean Claim-of-Right claim?

Dude if these stump you, you aren't ENTITLED to claim it.

WHY ARE YOU GOING TO ANY COURT FOR YOUR NAME? WHO'S CHALLENGING YOU?

Well they consider me to be 'Lost-at-Sea' via the Cestui Que Vie..imagine i have to rebut that presumption

Well id love to waltz into DTCC in NY and tell them to give me my fucking Bond..but i dont think itd be that easy

...because some dead french scribes with too much time on their hands scribbled? Really?

Dude, it's NOT YOURS!

YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO SHIT!

"WhatEVER, that shit is MINE!".. wise-man once said

I lien the NAME because I GAVE IT VALUE. I want the value, not the government. Now it's trust property.

What exactly did you expect "them" to give you, when you demand they "give you the bond"?

What IS this shit you've pulled out of your ass?

A lien puts you first in line when it comes to monetization.

Oh fuck, thats right. Thats what Mary Croft talked about. Putting a PPSA lien on the Bond.

You become your own creditor. YOU get all the value.

BUT IT BELONGS TO THEM! What are you going to do after? Walk into the BANK OF CANADA with a $20 bill screaming "give me the fucking bond"! :P

Before they changed it, were you able to look-up your Bond on Fidelity?

http://PPSA.ca is the BEST service ever!

i thought about doing a search on my name to see if there were any liens against it already, by chance..

No. I'm "out of the system". I need to RESPOND to be recognised. The government just ignores me like Jewish chicks ignore black chicks.

...even though I'd be a pretty lousy black chick. ;)

Remember that last case-law i came up with?..... Lien Search (individual, vehicle, or business)

INDIVIDUAL

That's all the government/courts can see.

So you placed a lien on the Bond.. does PPSA act like a bank to get the value for it out of it?

No. If I have VALUE, I ALREADY HAVE it. I don't need to "get value" out of a claim. It's just a claim.

If my name has VALUE I GET THE BENEFIT. Before I claimed it, THE GOVERNMENT DID.

So is Robert Menard right..these things worth a Billion dollars?

I dunno, how much do YOU think you are worth?

I'm Only $145 Million, and I know more than you, dude. Billions seems a bit arrogant. :P

My friend has a list of what countries correspond to the CUSIP-number letter.. mine is a Q.. Q apparently equals Australia.. so some fucker from down-under bought me

No more than you "bought" the 20 dollar bill in your pocket.

Yeah you never did finish that thread cuz of Pierre.. bc, cheque, $20 bill.. two signatures.. one on the left side, one on the right

If you didn't SIGN IT, then YOU DON'T OWN IT.

2 signatures and a TRUSTEE

you dont own it, until you claim it.. you dont claim it, until you lien it

Was that so hard to grasp? :P

..they didnt teach me this stuff at the University of Windsor ;)

You STILL don't own it. You are JUST THE BENEFICIARY of the VALUE. Just like the bearer of a $20 bill is the BENEFICIARY of the VALUE.

Now wait a second, we're just talkin' the bc-Bond.. theres still whats in our CRA-accounts, and SIN-accounts TOO

You don't OWN the $20 bill. You are the LAWFUL HOLDER IN DUE COURSE of the $20 bill.

You don't own them either. :P

They get the value, not you.

CRA will be annoyed though.

Just sayin'.

Its our name on those accounts though.. so we're the Lawful Holder In Due Course to the value in them too?

Hmm... i sent CRA a letter to please provide me with full-disclosure for a full-accounting of the Trust-account(SIN-number).. along with what kind of a Trust it is.. whos the Beneficiary.. and whos the Trustee

they got back to me.. they said to send them a copy of my Certificate of Appointment of Estate Trustee with a Will

They will act all confused and give you NO answer. They get the coop students to write the replies...which is why it's an "Acting" manager.

...it's always "acting manager" when they reply.

this guy was an Access to Information guy

Was that an ORDER they gave you?

no, they posed it in the form of a question?

Are you sure he wasn't the ACTING "access to information guy"?

i responded with- "Dont i have to deal with this Cestui Que Vie stuff first that presumes im Lost-at-Sea.....?" that was a month ago

NOBILITY COMMANDS WITH QUESTIONS ADMIRALS COMMAND WITH REQUESTS GENERALS COMMAND WITH ORDERS

..ill have to check

Yes, that will make you sound like a crackpot.

I have an email from the Attorney General of Ontarios office that discusses the existence of the Cestui Que Vie, though.. think they said its called the Absentees Act here or something

Why do you care what these strangers have done? Do you need their PERMISSION to claim it? WHY ARE YOU TALKING TO THEM?

Are you WINDOW SHOPPING for SERVICES?

Perhaps you can mail the ministry of natural resources and ask if you are wildlife too! Good use of your time. I can really see it's paid off.

...SERIOUSLY?

Good point.. so whens your seminar on how to properly fill-out the PPSA lien-registration?

LMFAO

http://www.ppsa.ca

End of seminar. :P

Order my SUPER DELUXE DVD if you have any trouble. Please inform your wife/daughter/mother that you intend to buy this dvd ahead of time.

I know how you expect payment - that was a very diplomatic way of putting it.. awright

I cant wait to see how I will handle all this in court...it will be an EVENT....tickets are on sale....

300 msgs (on my phone) later...

you can still do a UCC financing statement in CANADA

Why do you care about UCC? Seriously. You're talkin' out of your ass.

Paul Martin Cares about UCC. He has reason to.

If you don't own VESSEL and you are NOT in international waters, you have NO use for UCC!

Im still thinking about Certificate of Authority on the LBR and/or BC....it is stuck in my brain

PRICELESS!... Data with TEETH!

Pierre, read it over and over again

the jurisdiction and foreign parts matter

Where's "Vin the radio guy"? I want to see if his contributions can match mine :P

You just wanna fight

You REMEMBER WHERE IT CAME FROM you ungrateful fucks. :P

Yes Beverly May Braaksma, I do. Stress relief.

...and "Vin" has an intellectual "glass jaw", so he's low-hanging fruit. I won't actually have to engage my brain, so it will just be gratuitous abuse.

I already forgot about Vin the radio guy...who he is ??????

Pierre Daoust, when you READ something...what exactly happens to the information you absorb?

YOU COMMENTED ON THE ARTICLE.

Seriously. There's "Language Barier" and then there's "Dumb". One only disguises the other for so long :P

Some stuff I dont want to focus on, I just press delete....it stays somewhere in the registery, but I can not keep it in files....

I suffer from deficit de l'attention....in english should be attention defecit....

I cant write and listen at the same time, i cant think and talk at the same, I cant cook and shit at the same time....I have a bug somewhere in the OS....

Vin the radio guy = interruption = deleted = registery = no time for that shit....

Dont forget Scott Duncan , Im 47, 5 children, 1 wife, 1 dog, 7 precious back up friends, a business to run, and QRA have declared war on my person.....so fuck off Vin the Radio guy....

and since a few months....I get midnight dumps...I hate that shit, midnigth dumps...never had this before....

This was a marathon thread, wasn't it? :D

this one ended badly... :O

*sigh* Yes, but we mustn't leave Pierre Daoust behind.

To understand, Pierre, you must picture yourself in a car with a stick-shift, and 5th-gear overdrive, going 150 km/h. You are about to shift into fifth gear, but accidentally select "Reverse" and the engine goes flying out of the hood.

....that's what you do a thread. :P

Wanna leave me behind Scott now ???...

Engines flying out of hoods.....so you are having fun with me here..????...

Pierre, we are determined to get this stuff through to you... :D

I appreciate you determination.....good luck !!!!

Luck has nothing to do with it. No interested party left behind :)

Pierre feels good....he even have a small emotion that he will remit to proper party....wife....:)

LEGAL definition for the word SLAVERY: A civil relationship in which one person has absolute power over the life, fortune, and liberty of another

Translate this in english and it says that here in Quebec, we are slaves...TOUT EST PRIVILÈGE CONCÉDÉ PAR L’ÉTAT -- VOTRE VOITURE, VOTRE MAISON, VOTRE PROFESSION, BREF VOTRE VIE; ET CE QUE L’ÉTAT DONNE, IL PEUT LE REPRENDRE SI VOUS N’ÊTES PAS UN CONTRIBUABLE DOCILE” déclaration faite et reconnue devant une commission de l’assemblée Nationale du Québec par M. Pierre-André Paré, sous-ministre du Ministère du Revenu du Québec. (Le Devoir, 6 avril 1996, p.1)

Everything is privillege conceed by the state, your car, your house, your profession and your LIFE, and what the state gives, the state can take it back at anytime if you are not a docile taxpayer....declared in the assemblé national by sous-minister Pierre-André Par” on April 6th 1996....

"except as a punishment for crime" - so they make every Act a "crime".

Beverly May Braaksma! You've been here and you didn't speak up?

Oh wait...masturbating to my profile pic. Got it...

Nevermind...

That was earlier... nothing's been really said... it ended badly and left a disturbing vision... back up there

..its not a party without Beverly

I think I have the answer....if I can contribute ??

You stopped masturbating because of something typed HERE?

Your priorities are skewed, woman!

but if one of you laugh at me ....I get mad

No promises:P What have you determined?

When Im alone in my house and I have a chat with my dog....

which happen RARELY

164. Fair hearing

(4) Without limiting the generality of subsection (3), that subsection does not preserve the validity of the proceeding if the failure to comply with the agreement results in PREJUDICE to the DEFENDANT'S RIGHT to a FAIR HEARING.

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90p33_e.htm#BK207

"NOBILITY COMMANDS WITH QUESTIONS ADMIRALS COMMAND WITH REQUESTS GENERALS COMMAND WITH ORDERS"

ok, so do I want a ham & cheeze on rye or pumpernickel, and does that come with a pickle, and put feet on it...

Beligerant in blacks II http://blacks.worldfreemansociety.org/2/B/b0125.jpg

ok, now what I have to ask because I want to know, WHO in their right mind (typical diseased deceived slave) would even consider fathoming that the court (supposedly IMPARTIAL?) would be asking a party defending themself against an accusation, wether or not they were at war against the (who) the state?

you actually ARE a beligerant to the state inorder to be a federal citizen. that's my point regarding the birth certificate, they didnt ask me, or tell me, and it is impossible to be educated by them and think they would explain to you that... o.k. little johnny, you have to make a choice, but with the trick we want to play on you there is free candy and gum...

wouldnt that be the equivelant of the federal raping the state? only the state is willing? because somehow the federal holds somthing over the state unless it chooses to accept what the federal is doing to the people, without them being smart enough to know they are having the wool pulled over their eyes, in broad daylight noless???

What isBELLIGERENT?

In international law. A term used to designate either of two nations which are actually in a state of war with each other, as well as their allies actively cooperating; as distinguished from a nation which takes no part in the war and maintains a strict indifference as between the contending parties, called a “neutral.“Read more: What is BELLIGERENT? definition of BELLIGERENT (Black's Law Dictionary)

Scott, can you finish explaining the difference between contempt to court in civil vs. criminal matters? You asked the question a few times, <<Contempt of court. You keep mentioning it, and I asked Civil or criminal?>>. Thank you.

There is none. It's an invented "crime".

Contempt? Is that civil or criminal? <==That can't be legally answered.

Get it?

Yes, now I do, thank you. That is why you say to reply to such aberration: <<Am I being "threatened" with CIVIL contempt? Am I being "threatened" with CRIMINAL contempt?>> It's a threat, not LAW.

Hi scott, sorry this might be late. But ive been busy.

im trying to grasp the meaning of belligerent and tis connection with sovereignty.

my understanding of belligerent is a hostile act or intention towards another group/nation. Would they be accepting you as someone who is hostile or trying to get you to accept being hostile?

When i look it up it makes alot of references to waging war. I somewhat understand why you always say or ask if they are waging war against you, but i dont fully understand the connection between them agreeing you as sovereign.

They "may" refer to you as a nation or an entity, but as sovereign?

Someone be so kind to help me figure this out?

Only a Sovereign can legally wage war.

Wage War. Look at those words...WAGE?

a sovereign state or anything that is of sovereign?

so if they call you "escort him out of here this man is belligerent, etc blah blah"

they are indirectly admitting that you are sovereign and by stating that you are belligerent means that you are acting on your own authority?

Does this bring into light as to why they always bring a controversy??

No.

Once again you fumble around in your ass to pull out answers, never once focusing on what I say/write.

Nothing you wrote had ANYTHING to do with what I just wrote.

I'll answer in a more direct way henceforth.

The answer to any question you have is, henceforth; "Because you're an idiot".

That should save me some time.

scott i apologize if im not using the right words, but im just simply here trying to grasp things the best i can.

you say that only a sovereign can legally wage war.

how does that make you sonvereign, are they trying to say that you are waging war against them for not following their bs?

BELLIGERENT belligerent,n. A country involved in a war or other armed international conflict.

yes i get those, but how are YOU engaging in war. are they trying to say that you are waging war against them? If so, does that mean they accept the fact that your sovereign as only sovereigns wage war?

If you are sovereign, there's nobody else with STANDING there.

Controversies are for fictions...

sibling rivalry is beligerence not formally recognized outside the castle and typically isnt feudally over property not otherwise held by the father.

in the court, if they ask you if your beligerant then obviously they do not yet know, asking the court if it is waging war cant be answered by the court as it is not capable of such act AND confirms to them that you are of the capacity to WAGE WAR.

yes but most often controversies are what gets you ended up in court, such as i uno....arrests?

ahhhhhhh......its slowly coming together...now the trick is....how do we get them to say you are belligerent...:)

Send in a notarized copy of your BC... there, you've got your guy...

You actually don't want to go to court anyways...

hmmm.....yea i get that who wants to go to court. but sometimes they issue warrants and your taken in by force, which you can just state for the record that they kidnapped you. but you get where im going right?

sometimes being dragged into court by force is unavoidable

Meh, I dunno who Derek Hill is exactly? WHO ARE YOU?

for what purpose would you use that. I know about the notice of mistake path.

Use registered mail?

Wage War.

WAGE...

YOU... FUCKING...

IDIOTS!

stop being employees of the crown

k thats nice and dandy,. but my example was about getting arrested before doing anything.

Scott, its a bit unclear what your trying to get me/us to see by wage war.

My best guess is that in order to wage war you must have your own currency and that comes with its own nation. Therefor with that in mind you are capable of waging war. And thus since a nation can only wage war if sovereign, that indorectly states you are in fact sovereign?

There are NO homonyms in Law. There are no SYNONYMS in Law.

WAGE is an ACCOUNTING term. SURETY IS WHO'S ACCOUNTABLE. AVOID SURETY.

END OF STORY.

wouldnt it be more appropriate to say dont be employees of the government?

Scott, you said you don't want to go there, last resort. We're simply trying to move his thinking away from that.

OH, YOUR EXAMPLE DEREK? I have your answer... because you are a fucking idiot.

See? These answers practically write themselves.

It is ALL about surety. Nothing else.

yes but this topic was about the meaning of belligerent and catching onto when courtst extend an offer to be recognized as sovereign.

I get that you need to avoid as surety at all costs.

When a WAR is WAGED, the TRUSTEES are NOT accountable. Soldiers=Trustees. They can kill enemy trustees under licence from their government.

...and they get paid for it and all their needs provided for. WAGES. The SURETY of the war pays for everything.

"WAGE is an ACCOUNTING term." yes, cant it also... oh, to 'wage war' is to hold another ACCOUNTABLE? that sounds backwards. perhaps it has somthing to do with a ... BANKRUPTCY! (or three)

Black's Law 1st-edition, WAGE: To give security for the performance of a thing. [In this case, to give security for the performance of a WAR]

I think Scott may be 'burying the lead' as they say in this explanation..there are a couple Maxims-of-Law that say the same thing: "Laws fall SILENT amid arms." Which would explain, why the U.S. is always rushing-off to war, while Ron Paul reminds everyone that they never got the Congress to DECLARE war.....

Hey...I missed this....If you REALLY want to know what's a BELLIGERENT, wage war on me and/or my person, I'll show you...I'm the BELLIGERENT specialist in here....

he who has the gold makes the rules.....No doubt youve discovered loyalty is no longer the currency of the realm, as your father believed.. Im afraid currency is the currency of the realm."...Currency. A medium of exchange of value to define by reference to the geographical location of the authorities responsible for it. by not being the surety for the matter you are the belligerent and when you lein or make the "claim" then you would not have to term "sovereign" it would be known as you are not the surety and have authority over it

I wish to enter my vault.........

if all the court has before it is a charge with a name which you have liened than the court is in debt to you making you the sovereign because you own the currency before it

you're on fire Clint ????

how are you Pierre I enjoy your notice ;)

Derek Moran, I have found it very interesting, as you say, that congress didn't declare war against [insert just about any country name here]...but the chief executive/president, 'W', HAS declared war on terror/drugs/poverty, at least in the media...In my thinking, this then becomes a sneaky legalese play on words that theoretically allows/justifies the US forces to pursue the terror, drugs etc all over the globe, without the need to legally declare a war against a country, nation, group or people because they have declared war against a concept.

Thanks Charles Moreland

Can belligerent be used as an adjective too in a statute court as an offering from the judge to seize your lawful right to go to war and free yourself. What I mean is the prosecutor has to now prove that you are liable for/to statutes and not that you have to obey them?

So, if I have this correct, when the court asks if you are a belligerent defendant, you simply say yes?

no....you need to wait until they ask 3 times.....and then you say outloud: BY WHAT AUTHORITY YOU DECLARE WAR ON MY PERSON...?????....and then you take your stuff and leave...and if someone say something, you tell them: go ask Scott for more details... :D

the way I get this Philip Laforet, is at one point, the justice or judge or call it whatever you like, aknowledge the fact that the crown WAGE WAR on your person, and simply ask you if you want to bend over and get fuked or if you want to stand and fight....but verify this either by reading EVERYTHING in here, or ask Scott Duncan....

because sometimes I have the tendency of not getting it :D

http://belligerentact.org/

Excuse my ignorance, but, would that not imply that the court was in fact the holder and grantor of that right ? I thought your sovereign rights were over and above the jurisdiction of any entity such as the courts ?

All rights has been reserved way before that.....go read the thread..!!!!

I don't excuse your ignorancy because I don't think you are ignorant.....lazy maybe, but not ignorant....:D

Misinformed maybe but never lazy :)

well....I am :D

Only Robots aren't lazy....

Fortunatly this is not the United States! I am still somewhat unclear as to when or what to say when the courts asks if you are a bellegerent defendant.

I just told you :/

Ha

Philip Laforet, have you red this ole thread ????

Not yet.

Lazyness ??? :D

Not sure by what you mean by thread? No too computer literate! Do you mean the site you posted or all the above comments?

Me neither I'm not sure of what I mean by thread....this is the 427th post made in this thread, have you red the 426 others ????

or should I say the 426 preceeding.... :D

I have, however my eyes glazed over some. Will try again. Thanks!

My take Philip Laforet, is that, by not granting jurisdiction, by disassociating yourself from being the name (notice of mistake) & other means outlined through your 'point of order' & reserving all rights, you have effectively/deliberately/inadvertently demonstrated your sovereignty...

The court will (after repeated challenges/threats/ignoring you etc) recognise this & refer to you as being (a)'belligerent':

not the common everyday adjective 'hostile & ignorant',

but the noun meaning:

'A nation or person engaged in war or conflict, as recognized by international law'....(this is an online dictionary definition because I don't have Black's at hand, but Black's is very specific about the adjective & its relevance in law).

You then ask 'By what authority do you wage war against my person?'

When you look up 'war' and 'wage war', again there are specific references to a requirement for a head of state (I think- talking from memory here) to declare war (written signed order) before anyone has any authority to wage an attack against your person...ie: the court, the judge/justice, the plaintiff etc do not have any authority because war has not been formally declared against your nation/person.

Rules of evidence (apparently, because I haven't verified this for Australia/UK where I spend most of my time), require that this merry-go-round goes round 3 times & as long as you continue to demonstrate that you are not surety & you maintain your sovereignty & don't grant jurisdiction, the court finally accepts that they are the administrators/trustees to the account/name, and you, the sovereign man are invited to go & have a nice day (or words to that effect ;-)

But as always, read the threads numerous times, define any and ALL terms you are unclear on, see if I get a kicking for talking out my ass, or if it's liked/confirmed by the brainstrust, and just as your brain starts to fry, it will become clearer...and then clarify grey areas with the oracle :-) (brainstrust & oracle being terms for Scott Duncan )

Wow thanks so much Stuart! I am in the middle of a court case now and I did use the notice of mistake and the point of order. I was removed fromthe courtroom once. I was in "custody" and wanted to get out, so I didn't push it too hard. They had sent an out of town J.P. and crown plus an expert bail cop. I still won, but had to sign recog. Now that I am out, I am more determined to get things straighten out and declare my status. Actually can't wait. Thanks again for clearing this up for me. With so many comments and some off topic it is difficult sometimes to get to the bottom of things! All the best!

Blacks Law 5th Edition: Belligerent

In international law, as an adjective, it means engaged in lawful war. As a noun, it designates either of two nations which are actually in a state of war with each other, as well as their allies actively co-operating, as distinguished from a nation which takes no part in the war and maintains a strict indifference as between the contending parties,called a "neutraL" As a personality trait, refers to one who is overly assertive, hostile or combative.

Black's Law 7th Edition: belligerent, n. A country involved in a war or other hostile action. - belligerent, adj. Cf. NEUTRAL.

I see the term "BELLIGERENT DEFENDANT" as a ploy to cause an emotional response which was programmed in that most comprehend it to mean "stupid" The courts, cops, agents of government will use these tricks to gain jurisdictional authority. this thous CONjoins the "PERSON" with the "man" My suggestion is this. look up words you think you know don't just assume you know for sure. Common English tends to mislead us in our endeavor when we seek freedom. YOU can either allow this to continue or break free.

Would you please shovel up your suggestions in your fucking ass ! :D ( oppsss, I'm I being uncivilize here :/ )

Please forgive me :(

pete does the above comment apply too you?

I won't do this again 8-|

To you, not too you

no read again i ment what i said too means also

John, belligerent has a very specific legal definition, which when used, is the court's acknowledgement of your sovereign status :-)

does it apply to you also

@stuart yes I comprehend that

My comment was as to why the courts use it not what it meant in court

OK, and WHY the court will use it ?

Pete stop thinking the world revolves around you.

Maybe to take advantage of our arrogance in assuming we understand something in English & then guessing it means the same thing in legalese?!?...especially if we accept that ignorance of the law is no excuse.

correct

Or just maybe to offer you the right to claim sovereignty IN THEIR JURISDICTION, WITH FULL SOVEREIGN STATUS ?

Or maybe it IS a genuine offer/acknowledgement from the court & we are too ignorant to recognise it...until now.

no they are declaring war plan and simple

I don't see how the word makes a difference and "sovereign" is for elected or chosen rulers are any of you those?

John Frisbey, FUCK YOU :D

Absolutely Pete Pierre Joseph Feather Puppy ;-) ...It depends on our perception on their intent...Are they malicious bastards who mean us harm, or are they genuinely making an offer that we don't fully comprehend the meaning of?

By what authority do they declare war on the person?

I am the sovereign they have acknowledge it by make such a statment

my person Stuart Stone, not THE person :)

Pete YOU must like men because you keep trying to get me to sleep with you.

My reference was to 'the' person solely because of John's comment re a declaration of war...I want to know by what authority the court has declared such a war...ie: Who authorised it? I think the head of state is the only party who can legally declare war, so if there is no formal declaration of war, by what authority is the justice declaring war against a belligerent/sovereign? ;-)

John Frisbey, you're the one that got fucked in the ass for 15 years idiot... :D

So pete does my doing time, make you think that I also like men. you the one that keep's offering to "FUCK YOU"

Learn what fuck you means

I'll leave you two to your love in...I'll know it's over when Feather puppy goes outside for his cigarette.

Well he will have too take care of him self because I am not into men.

But like ever other thread he FUCK'S THE PUPPY.

John Frisbey, we ALL have a duty in here, each of us, and MINE is to drive people INSANE. Until Scott Duncan assign me something else.

Relax John, it's all tongue in cheek...Pete feather puppy does it all with a smile & good intent because he's shaking up paradigms...paradigms that will result in us getting harmed if we continue to 'believe' in them :-)

I like to think of experiences in here preparing us for the 'real world' experiences

ET VOILA !!!!!!!!!!!!

I dont let pete to upset me. Only a child would.

LIAR :D

You can't lie in here John Frisbey, I did it once and I've been kicked out for 62 fucking suffering hours, watch out on this....

And the ONLY reason why Scott Duncan brought me back, is because NO ONE could do this SPECIFIC duty of driving people INSANE better than me. :D

Click LIKE if you agree on this gang :D

I don't fear Scott. I do comprehend that Scott will challenge my old way's of thinking but that is the very reason I am here to do. When I am full of bullshit he tells me and I then reconsider my position and correct it

It's a no bullshit environment...Scott Duncan sees to that...it can be challenging, frustrating & enlightening...but expect to be handed an emotional kicking once in a while because only then will we learn to remain calm & stand our ground effectively when confronted in the 'real' world with people who genuinely mean to do us harm...

Fuck we are so deep this afternoon :/

According to Police, I have done time for Fraud, Assault, Burglary and Murder... Except Tara and everyone I know personally KNOW that's not true. One record from 12 division, says I'm doing time RIGHT NOW.

Its all fraud. If you ever find yourself "jailed" again... KILL YOUR KIDNAPPERS.

I'll say it again, in case you are confused. KILL YOUR KIDNAPPERS.

And now it's getting deeper :/

No mercy no quarter

Afternoon? It's after midnight here...night all.

then a "double tap" to make sure they are dead

pete look up criminal. I have been decleared by the state as insane

Yes, and it's MY fault :D

18;33hrs here roger that

Thats funny pete

Well, you said that I think that the world revolves around me. So it has to be MY fault ?...NO ???

*facepalm* :)

Hey, John Frisbey, do you have an idea on how much of a big brain I have to have to fullfil my duty ? Driving people INSANE is not an easy job my friend. :D

look up the word friend in blacks pete you may want to excuse that comment

WHY ? :D

Scott, I don't get that part ? One record from 12 division, says I'm doing time RIGHT NOW

Everything is contract ?

Not true, I would SUGGEST to stop lying :D

EVERYTHING is: every single thing; every particular of an aggregate or total; all

Such as our conversation is a un-writing contract to converse.

You look like a un-writing contract :D

no that would be an opinion of your's

See I chose to not make contract

If I was to agree then contract made.

ok...I'm out for three cigarettes now....good luck ! :D

something that might help you to grasp the concept is to stop reffering to yourself as SOVEREIGN until you ARE a nation as declared by THEM by asking if your beligerant.

something tells me that wont fly

The day Pierre became a BELLIGERENT- thread...

I was way before that, I just had no clue ! :D

Pete Daoust: Im still thinking about Certificate of Authority on the LBR and/or BC....it is stuck in my brain

Holy fuck Pete, i know it was a year ago- but do you remember maybe what can kind of thread this came up in? :/

I ask- cuz Lee DID submit a notarized copy of her BC into the court today, she mentioned that she noticed a 'wary' look from the guy who took it once he realized what it was....hmmmmmm

:D.... I remember Beverly Berta Braakschmack wrote that, but I don't recall which thread :)

huh?

I always include it as an exhibit in an affidavit. They can't refuse it then. :D

I just re-read this thread.

Everyone named Derek needs a good swift kick in the face.

The court will never recognise you as "a man".

IT'S ALL ACCOUNTING AND SURETY!

I've since learned that the subjects discussed herein are WAY BEYOND YOUR CURRENT UNDERSTANDING.

Remember, this thread was made before I had fully grasped the sheer magnitude of your collective stupidity.

however... collective stupidity is simply duplicitives of the same stupidity, and should be circumventable. either that or i am just rambling on stupididly... and if that may be the case, please forgive me.

duh, I can has a board of directors

This was one of the first threads. .. Ouf.. As Pierre would say...

There was only like 10-20 people in the group back then. I have changed profiles twice since then. The ebb and flow of the threads were different back then.

What's a ebb ?

Figure of speech.. http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/ebb+and+flow

"Figure of Speech" = I have no fucking clue what I'm saying, so I'll use a "Figure of Speech" to make some smart-sounding white-noise.

The dialouge.

:-D ....what dialouge ?

The posts in a thread that form a conversation and dialogue among the readers in the thread.

HEY LOOK! 2 years later, and you are all STILL stupid! :D

:D

I was far more patient in 2014.

Questions as dumb as Derek Moran's will get you banned/blocked these days! :D

Holy CLUELESS FUCKS, BATMAN! That was a painful read.

Wow! I can say now, I am still stupid, but I SO get this thread nowadays. It's in my fucking bones now!

Ho! How did Philip LaForeret not end up in the Gail Marie and Sewer bin? He's another liar

"Holy CLULESS FUCKS, BATMAN! That was a painful read."

Yes. Wow. Yes. :/

Should I re-read it ? :(

Yes, re-read Scott Duncan only, obviously. Trust me, but verify!

PS: I like you better now! :D

HAHAHA!!! :D

I could no longer handle reading his comments and had to finally block him to make reading flow smoother. He thinks he is part of the clubhouse AND he thinks they are going to let him in and show him fairness and justice because he can quote their rules. Painful, and it makes my head hurt just seeing his name. What couldn't that man get?

But what about what Scott had to share? Did you "get it"? :/ Fuck anyone else. Scott gave fucking gold here, as always.

Yes, Anibal. I see the gold. I am studying and using the dictionary to reprogram the old OS. It takes me a bit as this old brain has a lot deep files of bullshit programming. Sometimes it hurts so bad that I have to get away and THINK about what I have just read and then come back and read it again with new eyes that replaces the bullshit "in the library of my ass" as you all call it. Painful, very painful, but it also means that you can teach an old dog new tricks. Persistence and repetition.

So, you see the gold? Like, which part?

I don't miss Derek. :D

They didn't called me BELLIGERENT last friday. They've threatened me to expulse me from the court. I think the judge knew that I know :D

They never called belligerent either

For an hour and a half, they were waiting for see to say ONE wrong word. And that would have be it. I would have been arrested....

This part was the most difficult, staying sure to not use a wrong statement or word.

At one point, near the end, I said: IT IS BOVIOUS TO ME THAT I AM GETTING "FUCKED" IN HERE.

I used the word FUCKED (Fourré in French)

NO ONE OBJECTED..... :/

That was TRUE, I was getting FUCKED in there.....that is the TRUTH.

But Scott Duncan warned me many times..... :)

#ItsOKtoKillThem

Now you know why. Killing "justice officials" harms a society in NO WAY. NONE.

Now you know why.

Well belligerence is for the sovereign. But my understanding is that you are there in the capacity of AGENT, as administrator. So I do not know if an agent can be considered belligerent.

I was there as Pierre, the man who possesses a juridical personality.

LIEN YOUR NAME!

A notice of mistake was filed, with an affidavit and the bc.

There's still another case to take care of, Scott...

But with what happened las friday, I have, indeed, ALL the good reasons to LIEN my name.

Because OBVIOUSLY, they will LIE and LIE and LIE and LIE.... :/

Reading again. Anibal, and I see that ME has to start seeing everything as visa versa and ME has to start being the fucking KING. YES, I said, KING, because who the fuck wants to be the QUEEN! In court you are the ONLY one with STANDING. Me DEPOSITS the YOU and then they OFFER ME the VISA VERSA of what I have been PROGRAMMED to believe (ALL BELIEF IS EVIL)! We hang ourselves for lack of knowledge of the WORDS that we have been programmed with because there are no SYNONYMS.

I have 100% TRUST in Rogue Support and/or Aquilae TRUST, just saying :D

No jokes :P

Oh, and Tara Duncan too :D

One that is hostile or aggressive, especially one that is engaged in war.

A belligerent is someone who won't bend over when being agressed......

He won't START the fight, but when someone jump on him, he will stand up and face the music...... ;) Natasha Tutino

yep copy pasted far far ;) I have understood INTENT and how important it is throughout allllll of this. The more I see, the more I can't help but see a masterpiece of linguistic art lololol

I have been called the "William Shakespeare" of trash talk! :D

...or is that not where you were going with that? :/

580 something comments....and that's where the gold always is. Great way to deprogram laziness. EXACTLY where I was going

the 'arts degree' gains more and more meaning lolololool

Their "art" is lying.

Yes.

Love reading the random changes in definitions.

I have the same "Arts degree" as they do. They can't lie to me.

You passed 2 bars, yes?

No. I passed NO bar.

When called to the Bar, I responded "why"?

:D

please go on

It was beyond their comprehension that someone would study law, and NOT become a lawyer.

As I said before; NOBODY drops out of law school because it's "hard". It isn't. It's memory and recitation. The whole myth about "Law degrees are so hard to get", is a myth PAID FOR by the Law Society.

Ever notice that EVERY lawyer you meet is stupid? HOW? How can they be stupid? Don't you have to be "smart" to get a law degree?

NO!

In fact it's SO easy I studied computer science and medicine too!

You paid for it, too! :D

Of all the things that I have paid for; I would say today that THAT ONE ended up being an investment :)

René Lévesque did the same, he never answered the call :D

annnd *slow clap*

WHY do you think René Lévesque didn't answered that CALL? :D

WHY René Lévesque didn't want to become a LAWYER? :D

Hey Pete I put my Rene Tshirt to the test; a man of about 65 noticed pointed at me with surprise (I guess because I'm 'young' to be wearing rene on my shirt) and said 'That man. He was the best.' boom. proof of concept. lead right into pirate party. was just missing a pin to give and and to take a selfie and post lolol we have this little idea about 'spreading the word' to those not using any social media online.

This man wanted to SERVE us, and he knew that if he would have answered that call, it wouldn't be possible to SERVE, after.... :P

Because he understood what the fuck him joining the law society implied and understood it WAS WRONG.

As I was typing hahaha

It being wrong meant, as you said, he could no longer SERVE.

Cause there is this thing about right and wrong and how it can make you feel and well....any normal fucking human being should UNDERSTAND that lawyers are evil.

I miss Jacques Parizeau :((

Lol :D

The Bronfman family too :D

"Its was beings the Niggers and Jews is why we can't separates" <---OFFICIAL Frenglish translation! :D

COME BACK JACQUES!

"Its was beings the Niggers and Jews is why we can't separates" <---OFFICIAL Frenglish translation! :D FFS pete *shaking my mo-fucking head laughing my ass off* bwahahaha

René Lévesque was NOT as fun as Jacques! He just wasn't!

Pete can you tell me: have any 'separatists' brought up the financial reasons why it is advantageous to split? Like the numbers in the fucking face type of info? I was too young and studying too much right now to start going through videos of those years. lolol

SURETY and ACCOUNTING :D

René Lévesque was NOT as fun as Jacques! He just wasn't!: please elaborate: I come from the generation of 'liberals' that were brainwashed by media convincing us he was garbage and I just didn't give a fuck cause 'prgramming' lol

Pete Daoust is starting to think right and value the right thigs.

This ALSO means he's starting to grasp some of what was STOLEN from him.

...and YOU.

It hurts already. And I am NOWHERE near Pete's level.

Yes. You aren't qualified to have an opinion on the matter. :P

...ask Pete. He can confirm this :D

Fact. I'm already hurt by the stupid shit programming which shows what they purposely kept from us in terms of knowledge. I can't imagine the anger many of you feel, the hate.

And I'm not qualified to have an opinion on the matter. lolol true story

I would ask Pete but he has 'You aren't qualified to be asking." all over his fucking bio. bwahha :P

I could kill a lawyer's family in front of him/her and feel NOTHING, except the tiny consolation that I have made the world a tiny bit better.

YOU might think "Their family is innocent". No. No they aren't. They are PETS that fed off of YOUR LABOUR.

They think it's their RIGHT.

The Law Society CLAIMS TO OWN YOU. NEVER FORGET THAT!

THE LAW SOCIETY CLAIMS OWNERSHIP OF ALL "INDIVIDUALS".

Remember: ONLY LEGAL DEFINITIONS APPLY!

Scott Duncan "You totally played that in your head! ADMIT IT! :P" I did. lol

I really hate that I wasted so much time with Derek Moran.

These days, ALL of Derek's questions are answered with "NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS, DEREK"!

And NO SURETY.

YOU might think "Their family is innocent". No. No they aren't. They are PETS that fed off of YOUR LABOUR." - YES. Climbing that hurdle step by step. That's a tough one for me as a woman. But the more I dig deeper into this, the less 'empathetic' I feel.

'pathetic'

#ScottisAlwaysRight

#ScottIsAlwaysRight

Seriously, at least make a EFFORT to get it right!

These days you have to PAY to be called to the Bar. I'm directly responsible for that. :D

Otherwise, it's ALL ACCOUNTING!

This guy, Paul Leblond, he was there friday. He called me about 5 times since friday, he is SHOCKED......he came here at my place after the hearing, I showed him the WHOLE case....

I showed him EVERYTHING I have done with City of Terrebonne......He is just fucking shook to the core....

He was there, and really focused on what happened friday, he just can't believe it..... :D

That guy is fighting the system for 5 years now. I taught him SURETY and ACCOUNTING two months ago. He doesn't sleep since :D

It's SO hard to say this without sounding condescending, so I apologize in advance!

I'm proud of you. You are BETTER than your peers, and you make a REAL difference. Time will surely show this to be true.

While you observe Mr. Leblond's reactions, you already know you are on the RIGHT side.

You can't be on the RIGHT side, unless you think right, and value the right things (or implicitly trust someone who does). It's a burden, but it's worth it. You are now more than you were. The possibilities are ENDLESS.

They grow up so fast.

Indeed.

Why just a few years ago we were trying to determine what the fuck he was saying....never mind, that hasn't changed :D

Indeed.

HAHAHAHAHA!!!! :D

Hahahaha!

...this post is from 2013! I was debating how to abuse my new powers way back then.

I was learning French :P

How's that coming along? I can't tell :P

SURETY AND ACCOUNTING. Why is it that NOWHERE ELSE ON THE WHOLE FUCKING INTERNET says this?

Think about it.

You KNOW it's TRUE, so why am I the ONLY MAN out of the BILLIONS on the Internet, who says it?

"Secret maritime lien"

Secret between who?

Look it up

Pete Daoust: "I was learning French :P" Scott Duncan: "How's that coming along? I can't tell :P"

This is still making me laugh :D